Preview

Why Do the Events of 1857-8 in India Matter?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1451 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Do the Events of 1857-8 in India Matter?
The events of 1857-8 are extremely significant and have changed India dramatically into the India we see today. We see the British taking over India from the East India Company after a ‘mutiny’ in 1857 and welcoming it into a colony in the British Empire. It was described as “the jewel in the crown” of the British Empire because of their rich sources such as silk that were deported from India to countries in Europe. This made Britain considerably richer and greedier as they increased their power by continuing to expand their empire. The British made many positive changes as well as negative changes in India during their rule such as introducing technology such as expanding railways for everyone to use, and education for some Indians. These are just a few changes that helped a trade-inspired outlook within India. Nevertheless, they also took advantage of the Indians by making money from their resources, charging them heavy taxes to use in Britain and sending many Indians to fight for Britain in the First World War. We see that many changes shaped the modern India today, but why do these changes matter to us?
We find out much about British rule in India from the outbreak of fighting of the mutiny before 1857 as it tells us about how the East India Company forced strict rules and intervened upon the Hindu society such as ignoring their religious beliefs, which was one of the key factors leading up to the Indian ‘mutiny’. We see that although some changes did benefit from the Indians, the general attitude was negative, since all Indians were heavily taxed as discriminated. The way Britain changed from a trader to a ruler reveals to us how greedy Britain were at the time and how powerful as they could gain control of such a big country like India. We also can see how the British abused their power as they treated the Indians unfairly, as, in an account written by Vishnubhat Godse, an Indian who was living in the city of Jhansi in 1857, described how they British took

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    India Dbq Analysis

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “First they Ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Mahatma Gandhi. Although the British taking rule over India had many positive economic and some social effects, The majority of all political, social, and economic effects had negative impacts on the people and land of India.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine living in India when the British took full control, and then being forced to change your day to day life. The british had an economic interest in India which started during the 1600’s. During the Industrial Revolution, India was considered a prized possession by the British because they supplied raw materials to the factories for production. Eventually, the British took full control of India, and made some major changes that significantly impacted India. Although the British had a negative economic impact on India, they had a positive impact on both the political and social aspects of India. The British were able to set a foundation for India, and create a justice system while containing violence, even though they had to take away some Indian rights to do so.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, British imperialism helped to revise the legal system in India. Several things needed to be changed therefore many reforms began to occur. The legal system changed to promote justice towards all Indians no matter their classes. They worked to put an end to the caste system and slavery once and for all. Much of the population was Hindu and followed the Hindu customs and traditions even those that were hurtful or not beneficial to society or the country of India. For example one of the Hindu customs referred to as “Sati” is a belief that a widow must join her husband in death therefore she is required to throw herself unto his funeral…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Therefore Britain did not care about Indians and their well-being, and instead only cared for their own profit and gain. In addition, Britain was able to control the Indian economy due to mercantilism. Mercantilism is the establishment of foreign trading monopolies. This can be seen in India where the British took raw materials from India, produced them in their own industries in Britain, and sold the finished products back to India (Textbook, pg. 358). Britain was able to control the economy because the imported goods were much cheaper than the ones made in local Indian industries.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One view presented by the sources is that Indians did not like the British rule. The theme of hostility is presented in Source 11, where Gandhi writes in 1920 that the British are “evilly manned”, using strong words such as “dishonest” and “unscrupulous”, suggesting strong feelings of hostility towards British rule, as Gandhi feels as though the British are almost cheating the Indian people “with no regard to the wishes of the Indian people”, meaning the British are doing what they want without consulting the people they are ruling over. This source shows that the hostility felt by Indians was in fact widespread because it is written by Gandhi, a man who represented and was supported by a variety of people from all classes. This theme of hostility towards British is corroborated in Source 10 where the British are described as “irresponsible” and, like in Source 11, the Indians feel their “rights of human beings are being denied”, showing that the Indians again felt that the British were doing as they pleased without Indian voices being heard. However, as the source is written by Motilal Nehru, leader of the INC, it is difficult to say from this source that hostility was in fact widespread – Nehru only represents the INC which has the high caste community as a significant majority, and as it is written in 1919, we cannot be sure if the hostility was long-lasting as it is the same year as the massacre itself.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The British East India company held India in its grasp until the Sepoy Rebellion in 1857 happened. Because of the rebellion England decided to take more control over the colony by having the actual government take root and complete control in 1857. With Britain having taken over India they turned it into a very efficient colony and maximizing its potential, while also putting controlling and racist laws to Indians and restricting them in most ways, by forcing them to farm non food crops, destroying whole industries and unneeded deaths from famines, to a massacre of peaceful protesters.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Once the British took over they paid them very poor and they had poor living conditions, compared to the British. The Indians were forced to be low ranked. As previously stated the Sepoys were forced to be gone overseas, which they really didn’t like. They forced the Hindus who were in a higher caste fight in remedial jobs and forced them to fight over seas , this really made them angry because in their religion it forced them to go down in the caste system. The British then did things that really offended the Muslim and Hindi people by using pig and cow fat for greasing the rifles. The Muslims and Hindu people thought of those things as sacred. Over all the British treated the Indians like…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sources 10, 11 and 12 suggest that the Amritsar Massacre, the incident in which British troops under the order of General Dyer fired at a crowd of Indian protesters on the 13th April 1919, did create widespread and long-lasting hostility among Indians towards the British. Creating the British government to be portrayed as repressive and irresponsible. However, the alternative view presented by the sources is that Indians were not hostile towards the British, but they were in fact appreciative of their help and did not feel that they were repressive.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people would say politically British rule helped India out but the statistics beg to differ. The British ultimately took advantage of the weakening of the Mughal Empire creating a government that benefitted them through East India Company. According Dr. Lalvani the British created the world’s largest democracy for India. However document 2 brings to our attention the reality of out of 960…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Glt-1 Analysis

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The British introduced education, language, religion, democracy and trade to India. It is evident that the direct British changes created positive growth for the country with regards to education and technological advances but it created socioeconomic changes to the culture according to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Society in India was heavily contrived by the British (i.e. the East India Trade Company) and through the rebellion; society became socially, politically and economically impoverished. Although there are many leading causes In the May of 1857, the sepoys of the East India Trade Company’s army began a mutiny against the East Indian Trade Company. Initially starting of as a small revolt in the small northwest town of Meerut, the mutiny eventually escalated into a nationwide rebellion against the EIC, especially in the northern regions of India, including the upper Gangetic Plain and central India. Within these regions, present-day Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, northern Madhya Pradesh, and the Delhi were the major zones where the rebellion took place. Throughout the rebellion, millions of soldiers and civilians were killed as a result of the many bloodbaths, which took place. The rebellion led to the partition of the East India Company. As soon as the rebellion came to a halt, the British Government took control over the British Raj and gave it in possession of the British Crown. There were many leading causes for the rebellion, which took place in India in 1857. These causes can be divided into three main categories: political, social and economic.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    British Imperialism was a large factor in the development of India both technologically and socially. The main reason that the British Imperialism has had such a large effect on the Indian way of life was because it lasted 190 years. Such a long direct and indirect rule impacted India's development immensely, with the occupation ranging from the oppressive company rule to the British monarchy. The imperialism of India had many negative effects on the nation. Indian culture was lost, people were repressed, and the social order was completely destroyed. However; there were also many good outcomes. This boost in resources allowed Britain colonies to contribute to fixing India as a whole and make their economy stronger. This also, eventually freed…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Despite being an individual loyal to the British crown, Gandhi’s harsh description of British legislation forces Lord Irwin to reconsider his stance on the salt tax in the face of large-scale civil disobedience. His ability to highlight British transgressions against the Indian people in a resentful yet formal manner through his use of charged language demonstrates Gandhi’s capability as both a lawyer and activist, one who would go on to inspire nonviolent social activism on a global scale. Gandhi further argues that if British trade India was “purified of greed” there would be “no difficulty recognizing” Indian independence. By suggesting a logical line of reasoning, Gandhi is able to gain the “moral high ground” while challenging Great Britain’s continued occupation of India in the process. Despite staunch opposition from Viceroy Irwin and the British crown, Gandhi's insinuation that British occupation and taxation stem from greed echoes the rationale employed by American patriots during the Revolutionary War, ironically foreshadowing India's independence from British rule in 1947.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ultimately, controlling India’s economy benefitted Britain financially and India both politically and economically. However, foreign influence resulted in Britain taking control over India’s government, creating unrest between the British and the Indians. Once Britain extended their authority into India, the British took total control over the Indian government. By occupying all high offices of power in the government, British executives made the laws and governed all political responsibilities in India, deciding what the mother country needed and what India would produce.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The British came to India in the 1600’s, originally to trade but eventually took over india in 1858. The British controlled India from 1858 to 1947. Britain was successful in ruling, they had an efficient government, army, police, justice system, and civil system, they constructed many infrastructures, plantations, sold lots of cloth, educated young wealthy Indians, and health and life expectancy improved. Although the British government was efficient and successful, it benefited the British not the Indians. The British had high taxes, the crops they had Indians grow ruined the land, and while they controlled India 58 million people died because of famines.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays