Preview

Why Does Grimes Destroy The Constitution

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
77 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Does Grimes Destroy The Constitution
The main point of excerpt 1, is that Senator James W. Grimes does not wish to destroy the Constitution because of Andrew Johnson. Grimes understands the urgency of impeachment from Congress, however, he does not deem it necessary to go against the Constitution to get rid of him. He believes that despite the obvious conflict between the branches, a Government cannot function without all branches working together. That means legislative, executive, and the judicial branch must
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Federalist Paper 10 And 51
    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Federalist Paper 10 And 51

    In response to the formidable factions fear, Madison explained in Federalist Paper 10 how the proposed government would be able to control the effects of any one faction or group. He stated that the larger the government, the better to control factions as it would be more difficult to deceive all the people, and there would be more factions in a larger government and nation, effectively weakening them. In addition to the faction fear, Madison addressed the public’s concern about the strength of the presented government by depicting the checks and balances that were to be implemented. Madison justified the need of a strong, central government by illustrating the practicality of checks and balances and a representative republic…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Dbq Analysis
    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page

    Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Dbq Analysis

    The Constitution guarded against tyranny through checks and balances. Checks and Balances is where the three branches work together to make sure no one branch has too much power. Each branch receives control over the other branches. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay wrote the federalist papers in 1787 and 1788. According to Doc. C, and Federalist paper number 51,” Constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices is in such a manner… check on the other.” James Madison, is explaining how the government got split into three branches. Next he explained that the three branches were framed/setup to check on each other…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter Summary: The Jacksonian Democracy
    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page

    Chapter Summary: The Jacksonian Democracy

    Ch.9: The Jacksonian democracy refers to the political philosophy of Andrew Jackson and his supporters. Jacksonian Democracy gave equal protection and equal benefits of all white Americans also known as the rise of the “common man”. Andrew Jackson won in the 1828 Presidential Election against John Quincy Adams. Jackson won the Presidential election and he used a system called the spoil system to replace the federal office holders with his own supporters. In 1832, Calhoun won the election to Senate and resigned as President Jackson’s Vice President. Also in that year, they passed a new lower tariff to appease the South. The Southerners were dissatisfied with the new Tariff and used Calhoun’s Nullification Act for defense. President Jackson and…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalist Paper 51: AP Government
    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Federalist Paper 51: AP Government

    James Madison begins his paper stating that he believes that each branch of the government should be independent from one another. If possible the branches would have as little agency with one another as possible. He believed that members from the different branches of the government should not be able to appoint each other or decide on other salaries. If these rules were followed the people would be in more control of the government by picking the best representative in each branch of the government. Madison and the Framers realized that every position couldn’t be elective because of political pressures and certain needed qualifications, such as in the judicial…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ap Us History Dbq Essay
    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Ap Us History Dbq Essay

    -He was writing to tell them that the Republic they had just fought for was in danger of collapsing in on itself. He wants there to be a strong centralized government, but not infringing on the rights of the people.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Tribe And Dorf
    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Tribe And Dorf

    In this essay, Tribe and Dorf describe our nation’s Constitution as a document that continues to dynamically work to achieve a balance between governmental power and individual liberty. Founding fathers like Madison and Jefferson also look to the constitution as a distinct outline, instead of a blueprint. The amendments and bills that comprise it tend to be very vague and open to interpretation of what some definitions actually mean. This leads to a lot of disputes throughout history of what the Constitution and its words stand for.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argument Analysis: 'The Federalist 41 And 45' By James Madison
    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argument Analysis: 'The Federalist 41 And 45' By James Madison

    One of the most important concerns of the argument presented by James Madison in The Federalist No. 41 & 45 is the possible misappropriation of power that the government has over the country. Madison stresses the importance of maintaining civil liberties and preventing the government from having too much power. The new government will be granted great influence over many aspects of life for the American citizen so there must be a system of checks and balances.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros and Cons of Article V of the United States Constitution
    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros and Cons of Article V of the United States Constitution

    One pro of this Article is the fact that the executive branch, or the President, does not have an official role in the amendment process. He cannot veto a proposed amendment. This limitation to power, an example of the system of ‘check and balances’ so central to the philosophy of the Constitution, prevents the President from engaging in self-serving ratification.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Timothy Sandefur's The Conscious Of The Constitution
    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Timothy Sandefur's The Conscious Of The Constitution

    He argues that a proper use of “substantive due process,” with an understanding of natural rights as expressed in the Declaration, will guarantee individual liberty, and while he may be right he countermands himself in a way in which he tries to stop the expansion of government and thus shrink it. His solution instead would expand certain aspects of power that the federal government…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of The Federalist 10
    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Summary Of The Federalist 10

    The Federalist is a series of papers written by three men in reference and support of the Constitution. The 10th paper, The Federalist 10, is specifically written by James Madison on the topic of factions throughout the states and throughout the government. He focuses specifically on the effects that factions have on the rest of society and our ways of living. Madison starts off The Federalist 10 by first addressing what his view off a faction is which is basically a group of people or citizens who join together because of a common interest or a common purpose against another group who has opposing interests and goals. Madison's view of factions in society are along the lines of being unstoppable.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How To Make The Executive Branch Strength Or Powerful
    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How To Make The Executive Branch Strength Or Powerful

    Determining the intentions of the founding fathers in their deliberations about whether to make the executive branch weak or strong is a murky task. Like nearly all questions about the true intentions of the founders, there was hardly any consensus, and the only consensus that was possible was a middle ground between a strong executive and a weak one. Gouverneur Morris explained the goal as “make him too weak: the Legislature will usurp his powers… make him too strong” and “[he] will usurp on the Legislature.” There was a delicate balance of creating an effective, independent Executive and having him be responsive to pressures from the people. To many, including Morris, the tyranny that needed to be protected against was not executive, but legislative. The Executive was supposed to act as a check on the legislature and be the “great…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is The Branch Of Government Making Liberty Possible In The United States?
    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Is The Branch Of Government Making Liberty Possible In The United States?

    Amar and Amar discuss how this federal succession statute could be unconstitutional due to the conflict of interest that resides within the branches of government that Madison discussed in Federalist 51. If the Speaker of the House was to become president, than there would be a shift in the power dynamic of the Branches. Essentially, the legislative branch of the government would have the ability to choose the president, successfully having more power in both the executive and legislative branches, which may create tyranny and bias within that branch. Amar and Amar distinguish this when discussing the implications of the Incompatibility Clause in that no sitting Senator or Representative could hold Executive or Judicial Office. If someone from another branch of government were to take power of the executive branch, then the rejected British-style of the government would be implemented.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Decision in Philadelphia review
    • 1964 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Decision in Philadelphia review

    America is a young country in 1787. They have just won the war for their independence and are now under the new rule of the Articles of Confederation. This government is put in place to ensure that no one leader will have too much power. The newly formed nation still has the undesirable taste of monarchy in their mouth and are hesitant to enact some sort of executive power. The Articles rely on the committee’s to take care of that missing executive branch. Committee’s prove as weak during the period after the war as they did during war itself. The legislature and committee’s lack to enact major neccesties of a government proved it was time for a change. The authors make sure to point out the flaws of the articles of confederation.…

    • 1964 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Dangers Of Federalist 10, By James Madison
    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Dangers Of Federalist 10, By James Madison

    Factions’ right to hold opinions, no matter how controversial, should not be infringed upon, but majorities should not be given unregulated power over the polls. A “well constructed” Union is the mode of controlling the faction, it would allow for the wisdom of officials to discern the best path for their country. Overall, Madison makes solid arguments on the benefits of a representative, constitutional republic and displays an understanding of the inherit cruelty of human…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Executive Power Debate Analysis
    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Executive Power Debate Analysis

    Proponents of the empowered executive position argued that weak executives at the state level were the reasons the Articles of Confederacy were not working. The power to approve and veto was essential in preventing the siphoning of power from one branch of government to be concentrated in another. This executive oversight branch of government served as a safeguard protect the others. Or as Alexander Hamilton stated, “the necessity of furnishing each with a constitutional arms for its own defence, has been inferred and proved”(113). Hamilton further argued this safeguard was a key to keeping governmental powers from being blended and concentrated in the same hands. Hamilton claimed it protected the people from the enaction of improper laws and provided a “salutary check upon the legislative body calculated to guard the community against the effects of faction, precipitancy, or of any impulse unfriendly to the public good”(113).The anti-Federalists however, argued quite the opposite. They contended that the wisdom and virtue of one man should not supersede the wisdom of the legislative branch. They further argued the executive should not be allowed any amount of control over the legislature and that through the presidential veto power they would exert to much influence over…

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics