Preview

why gay marriage should be legal

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
719 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
why gay marriage should be legal
Why Gay Marriage should be legalized
Why is it okay for a criminal to get married but two completely innocent people of the same gender can’t? According to the Supreme Court case Loving v. Virginia, marriage is a basic human right and same-sex marriages should be treated equally. Just because you believe same sex marriage goes against your religion is not a fair argument because everyone has different beliefs. You ask why it should be legalized but I ask why should someone be able to chose who marries who? We were a country founded on freedom and now basic rights are being taken away from American citizens.
Throughout the years many high profile killers have been married while behind bars such as;
Richard Ramirez, The Menendez Brothers, and Kenneth Bianchi. The most recent to possibly be married behind bars is Charles Manson. So let me ask you this why do convicted criminals have more privileges than gays. The government says same-sex marriage is unconstitutional but letting a

man that orchestrated 7 brutal murders get married is constitutional? I don’t believe thats right in any religion, government, or even in general.

In the Supreme Court case Loving v. Virginia a black women named Mildred
Loving and a white man named Richard Loving were sent to prison for interracial marriage back in 1967. When the supreme court made a unanimous decision to overturn the previous law made by the case Pace v. Alabama (1883). Loving v. Virginia states that:

“Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival.... To deny this fundamental freedom on so unsupportable a basis as the racial classifications embodied in these statutes, classifications so directly subversive of the principle of equality at the heart of the Fourteenth Amendment, is surely to deprive all the State's citizens of liberty without due process of law. The Fourteenth
Amendment requires that the freedom of choice to marry not be restricted by invidious racial

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Defendant’s “rational basis”: Man - woman marriage definition is constitutional & best for society because:…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obergefell Case Summary

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The core issue in the Obergefell case is whether the right to marry whomever is a “fundamental right” of American citizens. While our biases and preconceived notions of liberty and social rights…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Plaintiffs in Loving v. Virginia were Richard and Mildred Loving, who were represented by the ACLU in the Supreme Court. The Plaintiff argued the prohibition of interracial marriage was unconstitutional and anti-miscegenation laws violated the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Fourteenth Amendment explains, “No State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of the law.” As declared by the Constitution and Maynard v. Hill case, marriage is a civil right for citizens of the United States and the decision of whether one decides to marry a colored person or not cannot be infringed by any state. Denying anyone their given right to marry without due process of the…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pa250 Unit 1

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the basic rights we hold sacred in this country is the freedom to marry whomever we choose. While that seems like a given in the US, because we don’t have the strict class hierarchy of Europe, or the arranged unions found in certain Eastern and African cultures that define who marries whom. We have had, and still do for that matter, rigid restrictions on marriage, when they seem counter-intuitive to social mores. When social feelings begin to shift towards a more progressive outlook, challenges to the status quo are bound to occur, especially when the emotionally charged aspect of marriage is involved. Two perfect examples are the cases of Loving v. Virginia 388 US 1, 87 S Ct1817(1967), and Goodridge v. Department of Public Health 440 Mass 309, 798 NE 2d 941(Mass.2003).…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In school especially, as well as throughout our daily lives, we learn in America to live by the idea of freedom and equality for all. We do not allow race, class, or creed to determine a person's stature in the community. It may seem as if this is the standard of society, but these ideas of equality have been fought over since the beginning of written history, and even in America today, prejudice still exists. To address these and similar problems, the founding fathers of this nation created a Constitution which included laws that dealt with individual freedoms. However great the founding fathers envisioned the United States Constitution, it did not form a perfect union and justice for all. America would have to amend, or add to, the Constitution in order to serve its constituents better. The most powerful constitutional act towards equality would come with the fourteenth amendment. This amendment permanently changed constitutional law by empowering the Federal government's jurisdiction to include local and state governments which would be required to abide by new standards of civil rights and privileges.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Loving Vs Virginia Essay

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In June of 1958, Mildred Jeter and Richard Loving married in the District of Columbia. They were residents of Virginia but due to Virginia’s laws they weren’t able to marry within their state. The state of Virginia prevented marriages based on racial classification. After the couple married they returned to their home state in Caroline County where they were then charged for violating Virginia’s ban on interracial marriages. The Loving’s went to court and was sentenced to a year in jail. However, the judge suspended the trial for twenty-five years on the condition that the Loving’s wouldn’t return to Virginia for those twenty-five years.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Loving V. Virginia

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to the Equal Protection Clause govern by The Fourteenth Amendment; no one will be deprived of life, liberty or prosperity. Legislature and Judges were suppose to uphold the Constitution of the United States, but did not. Even after going through protocol by appealing to the highest court of appeals, the Loving family sentence remained due to the state of Virginia’s objective concerning interracial marriages.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 5 Final Paper

    • 2010 Words
    • 9 Pages

    References: Commentary: Marriage is a basic right to both heterosexuals and homosexuals (2003). . Washington, D.C., United States, Washington, D.C.: Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/189797853?accountid=32521…

    • 2010 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people see marriage as the culmination of the love for another human being, as finding the person to spend the rest of your life with. So, as Kathy Belge states, “if two people love each other, shouldn’t they be allowed the same rights, privileges and responsibilities, no matter their genders?” We have to take into account that most people who can’t get married with their partner have no benefits whatsoever over their partner’s assets, so if they’re together it’s solely for love. Then why is it so hard to just let them be happy by consummating their union under the law?…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marriage is known to be a foundation between a man and a women and if two of the same sex are unified, individuals view that as wrong. Relationships of the same sex are often referred to being immoral and a social experiment. Some religions feared that if gay marriage became legal that the churches would be forced to marry gay couples at their will. After researching this specific topic, I truly believe that it is safe to say that the pros outweigh the cons in this discuss in my own belief. As well as in my opinion, I feel that as long as there is peace, love will be found. If we the people chose to abide by the Constitution than that is what needs to happen. People will forever have their own opinions but if others are happy it should not matter if it does not affect you or your life. Gay marriage was legalized and though individuals think that is wrong on the Constitutions part, they need to realize that we are America the free and even if the same genders are allowed to marry, we are still free as a…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Those are marriages are strictly between a man and a woman and marriage is a privilege, not a right. In bible it is often quotes that marriage is a union between a man and a woman. So in the case of Baker v. Nelson, the Supreme Court of Minnesota found that “the institution of marriage as a union of man and woman, uniquely involving the procreation and rearing of children within an family is as old as the book of Genesis” (Gay Marriage - ProCon.org). So two couple of the same sex getting married is contradictory to that belief. Many Christian believers believe that it is morally wrong to allow same-sex marriage. These can be attributed to religious texts. Oppose group of marriage equality believe that marriage is a privilege and not a right. The classes that are protect under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 include “(1) a history of longstanding, widespread discrimination, (2) economic disadvantage, and (3) immutable characteristics… ‘Sexual Orientation’ does not meet any of the three objective criteria shared by the historically protected civil rights categories” (Gay Mariage – ProCon.org). Same-sex marriage contradicts nature. Two people of the same sex will never be able to marry because it is biologically…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why should we legalize gay marriage? Or, in other words, why isn't gay marriage legalized already? Same-sex marriage is just about as humane as opposite-sex marriage. One in ten people are gay. Seems perfectly normal to me. Is it normal to you? And anyway, why don't people like two gays marrying?…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Against the Broken Family

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Another reason people should get married instead of living together is to create a family and protect the rights…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    support love

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Marriage is about love and it should not be about gender. Two people that happen to be of the same sex should be able to come together in marriage because everybody deserves a chance we the people of the United States have rights that are protected by our constitution. As stated in the article The US Supreme Court will Likely Rule in Favor Of Gay Marriage” “no state should deprive anybody of life or liberty or deny equal protection laws”. Nobody should be discriminated or be considered inferior because of whom they choose to marry. Our society is going to reject something that is different or does not fit our norms. We are taught that different is not acceptable but it should not be that way. Same sex marriage should be looked at as something good because there are a lot of positive outcomes. Instead people should be more understanding; it does not personally affect them. We should support our differences because it’s so cliché but the world would be boring if we were all the same.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Same Sex Marriage

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Floyd questions, “why is the government involved in marriage?”. Think about it, the government doesn’t recognize anybody’s love for their best friend according to Floyd. But, after Illinois got sued by a small group of people for discriminating on the basis of one’s sexual orientation and ability to get married by law in the state of Illinois, per Floyd Judge Hall had to redefine the meaning of marriage in the Illinois marriage law.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics