Preview

Why Is Indian Removal Wrong

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
215 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Indian Removal Wrong
The Chief of the Cherokee tribe, John Ross strongly opposed Indian removal, because it was not right to the Indians, and the way the Treaty of New Echota came to be was fake and wrong. In the letter that John Ross wrote to the U.S. congress following the Treaty of New Echota, he explains that the treaty was fake, because the Cherokee tribe leaders picked a group of Indians to make a treaty with the U.S. officials, but a treaty was not made. Therefore, a group of random Cherokee individuals not chosen by any Cherokee tribe leaders met up with United States citizens and made a treaty and the president signed off of it, even though he knew it was wrong. Ross also says that, Indian removal was not right, because the United States took away any

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The treaty was not ratified by a full tribe, being that only a small portion of the Cherokees attended the meeting at New Echota, where Schermerhorn arranged to present the treaty. The Cherokees felt cheated and “tried to block the treaty’s approval in Congress”(Takaki 76). They protested and petitioned against the treaty only to be suppressed by military forces.…

    • 2363 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Indian Removal Act went against the indian’s rights, and the indians did not want to move off their land. The Indians were forced off their land because of the Indian Removal Act. The Cherokee tried to go to court to fight the Indian Removal Act, explaining that the act was against their rights. The Cherokee did lose, and eventually were forced to follow the Indian Removal Act. The Native Americans that were moved also had rights to original land they lived on. For example, the Cherokee had a written constitution that explained that the Cherokee had full control of the land. That did…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1971 the Cherokee tribe was in the process of making treaties with United States. The state of Georgia recognized the Cherokee tribe as a nation allowing them to make their own laws and follow their native customs. In the late 1700’s their land started to be invaded by the white man. The Cherokee Indians began to move to Arkansas. (Historical Context) I believe the Indians were taken advantage of and had no option but to move when their land was taken away from them. Georgia and the United States had no regard for the treaties that were put in place. The treaties changed depending on who was in office at the time, the Indians had no choice but to move and give up their land. United States v. Georgia, Chief Justice John Marshall, stated “the Cherokee nation was a domestic independent nation, and therefore Georgia state law applied to them.” When Georgia continued to press the tribe for their land the “Treaty Party” began to make treaties with the federal government to give up their land. The majority of the tribe disagreed with the New Echota treaty where their land was sold for $5 million dollars and the tribe had to move beyond the Mississippi River. Due to corrupt government and the demands of President Andrew Jackson and President Martin Van Buren in 1838, the Indians were “rounded up” and forced off their land and moved to other states.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the government told the Indians to move, they said they would give them bigger land, money and support to move. “The Cherokee Nations cedes to the United States all the land claimed by said Nation east of the Mississippi River… 7,000,000 acres of land is guaranteed to the Cherokees west of the Mississippi” (source 5). The United States as well, “agreed that the land herein guaranteed to the Cherokees shall never, without their consent, be included within…any State or Territory” (source 5). As the Indians were getting ready to leave, the Americans took…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Following a discovery of gold in northern Georgia and a recommendation from President James Monroe, Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act of 1830. In the Supreme Court case Cherokee Nation vs Georgia in 1831 the court ruled in favor of Georgia, however in Worcester vs Georgia in 1832 the court ruled in favor of the Cherokees. Jackson ignored the rulings and instead enforced the removal. The U.S. government used the Treaty of Echota in 1835 as leverage to justify the indian removal. The treaty, signed by about 100 Cherokees, gave up all land east of the Mississippi in exchange for land, livestock, money and other goods in Indian…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Indian Removal

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There were some reasons why the Cherokees moved in the first place. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 justified because the Indians did things that are very uncalled for. They did things like, scalping men, women, and children alive. and They also burned them on stakes. Also the Cherokees agree to move because they signed a treaty that if they sign it they agreed to move. Plus when they move they get to receive five million dollars and they also get a lot of land. So the Cherokees agree to move and get land and five million dollars and the Americans don’t want to die.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Treaty of New Echota, was signed by a faction of prominent Cherokee leaders, but not by the elected tribal leadership. In theory, this removal was supposed to be voluntary, and many American Indians did remain in the East. In practice, however, the Jackson administration put great pressure on tribal leaders to sign removal treaties. This pressure created bitter divisions within American Indian nations, as different tribal leaders advocated different responses to the question of removal. During the Treaty of New Echota U.S. government officials ignored tribal leaders who resisted signing removal treaties and dealt only with those who favored removal. Though the Trail of Tears took place during Van Buren's presidency, through Jackson's numerous removal acts such as the treaty of New Echota he set up the framework for the Trail of Tears. Van Buren's administration only had to enforce the Treaty of New Echota, which resulted in the deaths of an estimated 4,000 Cherokees on the Trail of Tears. Jackson had carried out his plans to relocate the Indians west of the Mississippi, and then some. His land policies were very unfair to Indian tribes, because they were not written for the tribes' advantages, but rather for the taking of their…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Equality… for all or for some? In 1830, all of the Indians except for some of the Cherokee signed the Treaty of New Etocha. This treaty, was between a small group of Cherokee and the U.S. government where they agreed to leave. Most of the Cherokee refused to leave their land. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 should not be justified because the Americans and Indians have an abysmal, the americans gave the Indians bad land, and the Indians were there first.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meanwhile John Ross was now a young man. John sold goods to Cherokee and travelers like his father. Because of Ross’s interests in politics Ridge took Ross under his wing in Cherokee diplomacy. Strong leaders like the Ridges and Ross would help the Cherokee nation stand against the U.S. government. However, many other tribes begun to take offers of land in the west. Soon the Cherokee were completely surrounded by the United States. The Cherokee had only 10 million acres of…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Indian Removal Act

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The proposal was the “Indian Removal Act”. The president had power to negotiate removal of the Native Americans east of the Mississippi from their land. When Jackson made the proposal people were lead to believe the removal would be peaceful and voluntary which couldn’t be any further from the truth. The only peaceful removal was for the tribes that agreed the conditions that were put on the table. The tribes that met them with resistance were forced by President Andrew Jackson to leave their land. President Jackson looked down on the Native Americans he said they were “children who needed guidance”. Jackson convinced himself and the people around him that the removal would be beneficial to both…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After John Ross, the principal chief of the Cherokee, signed the Treaty of New Echota, the Cherokee were then uprooted from their homes and forced to relocate to less hospitable lands in “Indian Territory,” which is known as Oklahoma…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Andrew Jackson Dbq Essay

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages

    According to Sean Wilentz, the Indian Removal “has, in recent historical writing, become the great moral stain on the Jacksonian legacy, much as it was to Christian humanitarian reformers in 1829 and 1830 a policy, supposedly, that aimed at the ‘infantilization’ and ‘genocide’ of the Indians.”6 Many Americans were against this legislation because they believed that Americans were taking the rights of Indians and treating them as slaves. The removal came from the threat Native Americans gave. They wanted to be able to have their own constitution, separating them from the US. One of Jackson’s biggest fears was that “sovereign Indian nations would prove easy prey for manipulation by hostile foreign powers.”7 To Jackson, all Indians were inferiors to whites, and the Indian removal Act was an act that would give land to white settlers. He argued that the legislation would provide land for white citizens, improve security against foreign invaders and encourage the civilization of the Native Americans. Andrew Jackson even argued in one speech, this "will separate the Indians from immediate contact with settlements of whites; enable them to pursue happiness in their own way and under their own rude institutions; will retard the progress of decay, which is lessening their numbers, and perhaps cause them gradually, under the protection of the government and through the influences of good…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In eighteen thirty President Andrew Jackson along with the rest of the United States government designed the Indian Removal Act that would remove the indians from their lands. While this treaty did not force the indians to move off their land, it allowed the president to negotiate with the indians and make them relocate. In September of eighteen thirty the first Native American tribe to voluntarily sign the removal treaty was the Choctaws. Although the government kept there promise of relocating the indians to a different section of land, they often abused their right. When relocating, the government would choose lands that were not suitable for the indians needs like hunting, fishing and growing crops. The government knew what they were doing and they succeeded in their plan. When the indians could not grow their crops or hunt for their food…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Having people being treated poorly because of their skin color or their ethnicity today is not socially acceptable but back then, everyone did it. The Indian Removal act was an act created by President Jackson. He had these poor people forced from their property because of their ethnicity. The Indian Removal Act was not justified because the U.S. Government (President Jackson), lied to the Cherokee people about what they promised, President Jackson took away the Cherokee’s rights and the Cherokees had a lot of hardships while they walked the Trail of Tears. The Indian Removal Act was not fair for anyone and shouldn’t have been created in the first place. So many people lost their lives and their rights so it was not justified.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Native American Removal

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Native American removal is something that is considered a dark period in Untied States History. Many natives spilled their blood on their land that was taken from them by our American Government, many people then saw it as there right to expand westward (Manifest Destiny) if we didn’t take over the land, the United States would most definitely be different.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays