Preview

Removal of Indian Tribes in 1700

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1405 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Removal of Indian Tribes in 1700
No, I do not agree that Georgia and the United States were justified in forcing the Indian tribes to leave their homeland and move to the Oklahoma territory. I believe the Tribes were taken advantage of and abused by the states whenever possible.
In 1971 the Cherokee tribe was in the process of making treaties with United States. The state of Georgia recognized the Cherokee tribe as a nation allowing them to make their own laws and follow their native customs. In the late 1700’s their land started to be invaded by the white man. The Cherokee Indians began to move to Arkansas. (Historical Context) I believe the Indians were taken advantage of and had no option but to move when their land was taken away from them. Georgia and the United States had no regard for the treaties that were put in place. The treaties changed depending on who was in office at the time, the Indians had no choice but to move and give up their land. United States v. Georgia, Chief Justice John Marshall, stated “the Cherokee nation was a domestic independent nation, and therefore Georgia state law applied to them.” When Georgia continued to press the tribe for their land the “Treaty Party” began to make treaties with the federal government to give up their land. The majority of the tribe disagreed with the New Echota treaty where their land was sold for $5 million dollars and the tribe had to move beyond the Mississippi River. Due to corrupt government and the demands of President Andrew Jackson and President Martin Van Buren in 1838, the Indians were “rounded up” and forced off their land and moved to other states.
On May 28, 1830 the Indian tribes had another setback by the Untied States government, where there rights were stripped away even further. President Andrew Jackson signed into law “The Removal Act.” This new law gave the President of the United States the authority “to cause so much of any territory belonging to the United States, west of the Mississippi River, not including in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Yes, I would argue that the Cherokee’s should have fought to maintain control of their land. President Adams lost a competition with Georgia which resulted in the action of removing the Cherokee Indian resident. This operation took place in order to benefit from the supplementary terrain for cotton planters. This Indian tribe was one of the first to relocate. The Native American tribe in addition to others had the right to remain in their territory due to the right granted by the treaty in 1825. Although Adams tried to resist the notion of the Indian Removal, he was not able to find a way to stop William McIntosh from continuing with his unjust plan. Cherokee Indians who resided in Georgia constructed a stable and cosmopolitan culture, their…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Removal Act Dbq

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Andrew Jackson, the man representing the federal government as the President of the United States, actively pursued the Removal Act despite his previous opinion of Natives being so savage it were better to have them driven to extinction. (Wallace, 54) Later, he ruled that all Natives had been conquered and it was the U.S.’ responsibility to “save” these people by moving them away from their ancestral lands and West of the Mississippi. (Wallace,…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Indian Removal act of 1830 was in short; an act made law by Andrew Jackson relocating many Native American tribes west of the Mississippi river to unsettled lands. This would open up safer territory for those looking to colonize further west than the original thirteen colonies. Here are four men’s messages regarding the act that gives further insight into it all.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unfortunately, despite how precisely Indians followed white men’s laws and requirements, the Indian Removal would have eventually transpired. The Five Civilized Tribes shed their Indian traditions and culture to take on the Americans way of life. Indians not only adopted principles in government and agriculture, but also religiously. Despite all of this, whites still wanted to kick Indians out of their lands in order to bring profit to themselves. Even the national government could not terminate the Indian Removal. Through both the United States Constitution and Worcester v. Georgia, the national government declared that states could not operate the removal of Indians. All of this, illustrates the inhumanity and lack of compassion whites had…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the late 1780’s the US began urging the Cherokees to stop hunting and their traditional ways of life and to instead learn about how to live, farm, and worship like Christian Americans. Despite everything the white people in Georgia and other southern states that abutted the Cherokee Nation refused to accept the Cherokee people as social equals and urged their political representatives to take the Cherokees land. The purchase of the Louisiana Territory from France in 1803 gave Thomas Jefferson the chance to relocate the eastern tribes beyond the Mississippi River.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because of this system, the Cherokee were included as one of the so-called Five Civilized Tribes. The other four tribes were the Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and the Seminoles. In 1832 the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Georgia legislation was unconstitutional; federal authorities, following Jackson's policy of Native American removal, ignored the decision. About five hundred leading Cherokee agreed in 1835 to cede the tribal territory in exchange for $5,700,000 and land in Indian Territory (now Oklahoma). Their action was repudiated by more than nine-tenths of the tribe, and several members of the group were later assassinated.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Indian Removal Policy

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There were several moral aspects of moving the Indians that were brought up during this time. The Secretary of War, William H. Crawford, said, “Intrusions upon the lands of the friendly Indian tribes, is not only a violation of the laws, but in direct opposition to the policy of government towards its savage neighbors…” while he was talking to some military commanders (Document G). He was trying to get the point across that it was morally wrong to remove the Indians from the lands that they have lived on for so long, especially since they had not done anything to justify the actions that the American Government were attempting to take against them. There was a collection of photographs from the Georgia Historical Society that contained a picture of the Vann House, built by James Vann who was a Cherokee leader of mixed blood. His estate was beautiful and very well built. It showed the intelligence of the Indians and that they were not all primitive like some would believe (Document L).…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early 1800s, White settlements were expanding westward. This threatened the Cherokee land which was located in the Southeastern part of the United States. This left the Cherokee with a big decision to make for their entire tribe. Would they relocate West ,or stay for the White settlements to invade where they call home. After all, the Cherokee had owned the land for over 10,000 years. It was not the United States’ land to take. This is why many of the Cherokee Nation felt the need to stay. Others wanted to move because they felt that if they did not, then the United States territory would override the Cherokee customs and they would have to follow United States laws. Clearly the best chance of survival for the Cherokee was to stay in…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government didn't give them options; basically gave them land Oklahoma and told them to move there. The Cherokee refused to leave which is exactly what I would have done. The Cherokees wanted to continue on with the traditions of their ancestors. They wanted to live on the land of their ancestors,…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cherokee Tribe Case Study

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Cherokee had an agreement on a land cessation in 1819, and it concluded that the Cherokees would cede no more land. Georgia tired to revoke their civil rights so the Cherokee’s had to bring in the United States Supreme Court for protection. “In 1832, when the court ruled in favor of Cherokee sovereignty in Worcester V. Georgia, the state refused to respond to the court’s decision. Furthermore, Georgia went ahead with a land lottery, enacted into law in 1830, that provided for the distribution of Cherokee territory to Georgia citizens…no one seemed to have the power and the will to help the Cherokee.”1 The Georgians were winning leaving little hope for Cherokee…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was a policy established through congress, that allowed the federal government to move the Native Americans out of their lands further west. When white Georgians discovered gold in western Georgia, they requested that the Cherokee Natives be removed so a gold mine could be established. In the Cherokee v. Georgia case, the Cherokee were found, by the Supreme Court, to have their own sovereignty and that the U.S state could not interfere with their land without permission. However, president Jackson disregarded the Supreme Courts decision and revoked the the Cherokee's rights to their land and began their removal. The Nation was forced to travel one thousand miles, leaving Georgia for Oklahoma on a grueling walk…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This point of view makes sense because the Indians did waged war on us since 1775 and killed more than 300 men, women, and children. According to the article “Move the Cherokee to Indian Territory” by Jack Andrews, it says, “We should also remember that these Indians have waged war on American since 1775…” Also it says, “In one incident during war 1812, the Creek Indians massacred more 300 men, women, and children when they captured Fort Mims in Alabama.” However, in their defense we did killed so of their own, try to kick them off their land, and a few chiefs signed the Treaty of New Etocha. Therefore the Indians should stay on their own land, and free to live there as long as they want.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cherokee should be able to stay because the government said that the land belonged to them and their fathers before them. From the letter it said,“These governments perfectly understood our right to the land and our right of self-government.” and “Our fathers gave it to us as their children.” The Cherokee did not want to give up their land because they had owned the land for generations and the government knew this. The land belonged to them first and they have the right to stay there and not be forced to leave.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But unfortunately, President Andrew Jackson ignored this ruling. He sent federal troops to remove the Cherokee. With the harsh winter conditions in 1838 the troops succeeded in removing the Cherokee form Georgia, and forced them to march to Oklahoma.…

    • 569 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cherokee Removal

    • 1870 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Georgia’s campaign for Indian removal begins in the early 19th century. The state of Georgia and the federal government made an agreement that made Georgia surrender its colonial land claims in the present day Alabama-Mississippi border region. Part of the deal insured that the United States government would acquire all the lands held by Indians within the new boundaries of the state as “rapidly as it could be done peaceably and on reasonable terms.” The federal government recognized Indian tribes as sovereign nations and couldn’t simply force tribal leaders to sell their land that they have been on for hundreds of years, if not for a thousand years. The government conducted relations with the Native Americans through treaties, states generally had less control in the matter of Indian relations. Although other southern states had Indians living within their boundaries, Georgia and its people took a radical and aggressive approach in the expulsion of the Cherokee people on their own terms.…

    • 1870 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays