Preview

Why Is It Worth Doing The Wrong Thing?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
581 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is It Worth Doing The Wrong Thing?
Every human has different morals and values which define what is good, bad, wrong, right, pretty, ugly, etc. The wrong or right thing might have varying meanings like any other adjectives. The wrong thing completely depends on how far someone is willing to go, but as long as that wrong thing remains reasonable based on common sense and laws, it would be worth doing it for the right reason. Although there are many gray and not acceptable situations, there are times when doing the wrong thing for the right reason is acceptable.
Many times, doing the wrong thing for the right reason is not acceptable because the wrong thing is a detrimental act which harms others in bad ways. For example, Traffic laws identify that going over speed limit is illegal, but what if someone is in an emergency situation in your car and no ambulance is available? It would not be right to go faster than the speed limit, but someone’s life tends to be significant. In this situation, the wrong act outweighs the right
…show more content…
An important example of this situation occurred in 2013 regarding the US national security. In 2013, Edward Snowden, a former US CIA employee and government contractor, committed a wrong and illegal act. He revealed details of classified United States National surveillance programs to the world. He surely did the wrong thing in eyes of many people and especially the government, but his work resulted in releasing significant information about how the US government accesses private information. Many people consider the result of his wrong work successful and helpful because they believe that Snowden shared crucial details with Americans to inform them about the government. On the other hand, many others believe that Snowden’s wrong act is not acceptable because secured documents of US were spread to other countries. This case remains a controversial topic of ethics and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 432

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Discuss the ethics of the program and Edward Snowden’s actions, applying one or more of the following theoretical frameworks: Kant’s categorical imperative, Mill’s utilitarianism or libertarianism, or Locke’s natural rights.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bradley Manlen

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bradley Manning, a member of the armed force in the United States, worked as an intelligence analyst in Iraq from 2009 to 2010. In 2010, he sent classified documents and videos about military decisions and actions in the Iraq War to a website, WikiLeaks and his intention was to reveal injustice and wrongdoings. Later on, he was accused of violating the American secrecy laws, providing aid to their national enemy and several relevant counts. At last, the US court’s military judge sentenced him to 35 years in prison for being guilty of violating the Espionage act, copying and distributing the high classified information. However, he was acquitted of the most serious charge of aiding the enemy.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the day you are born, learning and education are the most important skills for survival in today's society. The most valuable thing learned on your journey of life is the ability to distinguish "Right from Wrong", both technically and morally. Though easy at first with the minor day to day issues we deal with, it can become quite difficult when more pressing issues are placed in front of you. Many things influence a person's judgment. While one person believes that their view is the absolute truth, another sees that person as idiotic and uneducated. The important thing to remember when making a decision is to be open-minded, and push the outside influences away so that you can see both sides of the issue and make a decision for yourself. Is there really a moral right or wrong, or is it just a view point?…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism theories hold that the moral worth of actions or practices is determined by their consequences. An action or practice is right if it leads to the best possible balance of good consequences over bad consequences for all affected parties. (Arnold, pp 17)…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I chose to focus my analysis on Edward Snowden and his disclosure of classified domestic surveillance documents. When the leak first came out, I was upset at the thought of my privacy being violated by the NSA. However, the feeling dissipated when I considered the protection making that sacrifice affords. The NSA, like many organizations, are sometimes faced with ethical dilemmas. Occasionally, there is no right answer. Thus, the decision made, while not ideal, is the lesser of evils. In his TED talk interview, Snowden stated, “Your rights matter because you never know when you're going to need them” (TED, 13:20). While I admit his statement did trigger the reexamination of my stance, I arrived at the same position. Perhaps, I will look back…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The "right thing" is, by nature, something that is an opinionated concept. Many people could be doing something they see as correct while other people believe that thing could be awful. Take, for example, the holocaust in Germany. Adolf Hitler was in charge of Germany and made many statements supporting the mass genocide of jewish people. Looking back at it today, most people will see this as something horrible. Supporting the mass genocide of a group of people without any real reason seems completely ludicrous. However, in that era of Germany, many people supported the idea. They had the Hitler Jugend, also known as the Hitler Youth, who were training to become a Nazi and fight for what Hitler was supporting. "Heil Hitler" was a common greeting…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By the leaking of important documents from the National Security Agency, Edward Snowden has taken the spotlight onto him and has changed the views on what and what not should be kept a secret to the public. The following three articles from The Guardian, Washington Post and The New York Times shows a comparison of different views and points that people have based on this issue.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout its long history, America has been tormented by a stream of its own traitors. Among those traitors many people believe that Edward Snowden and Julius and Ethel Rosenberg have been some of them. They have both done different deeds that have effected and impacted America in many different ways. Edward Snowden exposed holes in the country’s national security that could have proved disastrous in the future and should be pardoned for his crimes in light of this.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Edward Snowden is a criminal, yet known as a hero. He knew the consequences if he released the private information to the public. He simply wanted to let America know what actions the government is doing today. He confirmed that the U.S. government, without having any proof of a warrant, collects phone call logs and keeps them in file. The second leak he announced was the N.S.A., who wants to track down foreign suspects, and or criminals, has the capacity to access emails from U.S. based Internet companies. Most people were in disbelief about this information because they thought they had their own freedom on the internet and taking phone calls. Others did not react to Snowden's information because they already suspected it. Either way, this issue is important to be aware about because it can let citizens know what the N.S.A is capable of doing.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Edward Snowden Argument

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Edward Snowden was a hot topic in the news in 2013 after he released classified information from the National Security Agency (NSA) to the media. This leak contained information about global surveillance performed by the United States, which involved monitoring email, tracking cell phones, and logging phone calls. Not only did this action force him into asylum overseas to avoid arrest, but it ultimately caused an uproar in the media and amongst the American public. The controversy surrounding Snowden involves the rights of the public vs. the surveillance programs performed by the U.S. While many condemn Snowden for betraying the national security of his country, many applaud him for exposing the…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In order knowing if you are doing something right or wrong depends on the person's virtue. You can't really say that everyone has the view in doing one thing is the correct way.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In recent discussions of Edward Snowden, a controversial issue has been whether or not he was wrong for leaking government information. On the one hand, some argue that he is an American hero. From this perspective, it is a good thing that he exposed the inappropriate surveillance tactics of the American government. On the other hand, however, others argue that he is a traitor. From this perspective, he betrayed his country by leaking information to other countries. In the words of President Barack Obama, “If any individual who objects to government policy can take it into their own hands to publicly disclose classified information, then we will not be able to keep our people safe, or conduct foreign policy” (Mason). In sum, then, the…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past century, the government has been a center of controversy and division. American citizens and non-American citizens, for years, have complained about many aspects of government ranging from hypocrisy to lies and false promises from politicians. This attitude was heightened because of an NSA employee named Edward Snowden, who afterwards fled to Russia for asylum from the U.S. government. Snowden revealed shocking secrets about operations orchestrated by the CIA and NSA. Most notably, their “snoopy” behavior. According to Snowden, government-based agencies constantly use programs and various devices to spy on people. The NSA has access to everyone’s phone records, emails, pictures, messages, and sensitive information. The leak caused…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    domestic terrorism

    • 1144 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is an unavoidable issue which continues inconclusive, whether Edward Snowden is a whistleblower, or a traitor. Those who support him call him a hero, a man protecting the people. Others view him as nothing but a traitor or defector. The people agree that his actions were unjust and are considered domestic terrorism on the United States. Snowden signed a contract under NSA, which he agreed to keep their secrets but he broke the contract by leaking information to the public. This was an enormous concern to political officials because that information leaked can be used by enemies of the United States.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Former C.I.A. employee Snowden leaked classified information about the National Security Agency’s programs. In other words, Snowden broke the law, and in doing so, he opened the eyes of the public to what some would perceive as an invasion of privacy. Those same people who perceived Snowden’s act of civil disobedience as an act of heroism would argue that this invasion of privacy is unjust according to the U.S. Constitution. In the event of Snowden’s civil disobedience, Snowden created distrust between Americans and the U.S. government by insinuating that the American government was unjustly infringing upon the rights of its citizens, and suggesting that there should be no circumstances in which this is legal or accepted by the American people. The reality is, however, that without organizations such as the N.S.A. there to monitor Americans from afar, the American nation would be open to millions of threats. In fact, those who view Snowden as a hero would likely view things differently if for example the safety of their nation was compromised by a secret terrorist organization within the United States which, without the efforts of the N.S.A.’s programs, had gone undetected. If this was the case, they would likely be arguing in favor of creating these programs rather than demolishing them. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that in the case of Edward Snowden’s act of civil disobedience, society was negatively impacted by…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays