Preview

Why Is Mary Surratt Innocent

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
466 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Mary Surratt Innocent
Mary Surratt was a woman who was thought to be involved in Abraham Lincoln's assassination plot. Booth, the killer of Lincoln and her friend, asked her to deliver a package that ended up helping Booth get away from manhunters. For this reason added to lying to the police, having different reactions to news and having a son that was known to be a strong confederate, she was the first woman to be hanged. Although she wasn’t completely innocent, she did not deserve to be hanged for multiple reasons.

Mary Surratt’s court was not fair, not all information was presented in court. Stanton, the leader of the hunt for Lincoln’s killer and others involved, found a journal on John Wilkes Booth’s dead body. He didn’t show the information it contained at court which he later claimed was due to it not being important. He was so content on punishing all people involved in
…show more content…
The article says “Booth also left behind evidence seemingly exculpating mary in the assassination plot.” Furthermore, the journal didn’t mention Mary. The last reason Mary Surratt wasn’t guilty was the list of Booth’s helpers. That list didn’t have anything about Mary Surratt, yet it did contain information about all other helpers. The untrustworthy conspirators gave up information about all others but Mary Surratt. Could Mary Surratt still be guilty, the people used as evidence were conspirators.

The people that were evidence were not trustworthy. One of these conspirators, Booth, said “In the presence of almighty god, I swear Mrs. Surratt is innocent of the crime charged against her.” Both the article and the book agree Powell was freely giving all information correctly and without flaw. We can conclude that Powell was telling the truth at this time, Powell was trustworthy when he said this. Mary Surratt was, as Powell said “innocent of the crime charged against her.” Powell is not the only person to claim Mary Surratt was innocent

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The allegations were contradicted by other people within the trial. The jury saw that there was not enough evidence supporting that it was a clear print mistake, and that it instead was a act of malice.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was evidence that wasn’t collected such as blood that Mrs Chamberlain offered to give to the police. Evidence such as their tents and belongings were moved to a motel on the first night, which could’ve caused contamination allowing the evidence to have alterations. Their tents and belongings were also not searched. In addition, the family was then allowed to leave in their car the following morning without it being explored allowing contamination with another piece of evidence. Furthermore, evidence that was discovered later on in the case such as Azaria’s jumpsuit was moved then picked up and was not placed as it was found which tampered with the evidence. Although the collection of evidence throughout this case demonstrated faults, the Jury still concluded to Mrs Chamberlain as a guilty woman, which led to her…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mary Barnett Case Study

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The first witness for the case was a woman named Caroline Haspers who lived in the same apartment building as Mary. She recalled on January 30th that Mary looked distraught and that her daughter was not with her. She also provided information that was not relevant to the charges saying that, “I always thought Ms. Barnett was a disgrace—I mean, she didn’t have a husband.” Given that she did not…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mary Surratt was hanged on July 7, 1865 because she was said to have played a role in the assassination of the president. So, should she have been hanged? Many sources say that her role in the assassination plot means that her sentence was reasonable. Contrarily, some sources say that she was wrongly accused and was just helping John Wilkes Booth because he was a friend and customer. The charges against Mary Surratt are reasonable considering her role in Lincoln’s assassination.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters clearly did not have respect for the law. They both kept the evidence that Mrs. Wright killed her husband a secret. These two women put themselves in Mrs. Wright shoes. They understood why Mrs. Wright killed her husband. They both knew that if their husband had treated them the way Mr. Wright treated Mrs. Wright that they would have probably done the same thing. They also snuck Mrs. Wright things in prison that they were aware she was not suppose to have. “Mrs. Peters is governed by this dogma, until she remembers the silence in her own house after the death of one of her children. This memory produces a powerful bond between her and Minnie 's experience of isolation and loneliness, so powerful, indeed, that Mrs. Peters herself attempts to hide the box with the dead canary in it—fully aware that this action goes against everything society and her husband expect her to do, not only on legal grounds but also because, as a wife, Mrs. Peters is not supposed to act against her husband” (Brown 2011 ). These two women were not close to Mrs.Wright but illegally hid evidence in this case in her favor.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lizzie Borden Satire

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It took less than two hours for them to come to a final decision. Lizzie Borden was found “not guilty”. This isn’t surprising because at that time women were seen as “flowers”.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Massie Rape Case

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It was shown during the trial that the gang could not have been at the same place where Mrs. Massie the same time they were getting arrested. One witness had seen Mrs. Massie with a man, a stranger, the same time she said she was attacked by the gang. The trial ended in a mistrial because the jury could not come up with a verdict on way or another. This case brought public furor in Hawai’i and on the mainland. A chain of paper called the Hearst Papers publicized the case on the mainland in a sensational manner.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first case of this special court was the Trial of Bridget Bishops. She maintained her innocence throughout the trial. She was an older woman known for gossiping in Salem Village according to Smithsonian Magazine according to her clamming innocent she was found guilty and on June 10th, 1692 she became the first person to be hanged in these trials.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Elizabeth Proctor was proven innocent, but she is not what everyone thinks she is. Elizabeth is the catalyst of the trials because of her relationship with Abigail Williams and how Elizabeth treated her husband. John Proctor has fights in which Elizabeth starts that make her look bad. She also had acted very poorly to Abigail after her affair with John that kick started a lot of events that lead to the trials. “I know you clutched my back” (Miller 14).Elizabeth proctor is the catalyst of the Salem witch trials.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Undoubtedly these two trials have many similarities despite one of the trials being mainly a focal point for achievement in the literary world. An identical example between these trials are the historical culture in abundance with many of the families included in the trial, an example being the Ewells compare to be utterly consistent with the two young prosecutors in the way they live their life. Another of these many similarities includes the bizarre assumption by the jury that the accused were already virtually guilty before the trial had even begun due to the mainstream’s coarse view of African Americans and how African Americans are nothing better than a common house animal, punished at the dominant being’s will. This point is shown, beyond doubt, when one of the women prosecuting the Scottsboro Boys, Ruby Bates admits that neither herself nor her friend Victoria Price were every raped in anyway by any of the nine accused African Americans. Even after this incriminating confession, the series of trials continue .…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    What poses antagonism, are arguments over whether that decision was just, fair, or moral. In the mindful opinion of this writer, the legal conclusion was completely unethical. Abraham Lincoln delivered a series of oppositional speeches and declarations after the fact. Dyer’s article assigns a commentary which discusses how certain modern scholars try and paint Lincoln’s sentiment another way, against what he truly felt about the situation, and his true moral disgust. Dyer emphasizes that Lincoln had a huge respect for the law, and legal principles based upon natural law, truth, and fairness.9 Dyer states of Lincoln’s love of the law, prior to Dred Scott, as “A younger Lincoln had taught that respect for law – even bad law – was the central doctrine in American civil religion…In a his famous Lyceum Speech in 1838, Lincoln declared, ‘Let ever American, every lover of liberty,”10 never violate the country’s laws. But even then, prior to Dred Scott in that same speech, Lincoln distinguishes that some laws are so badly legislated and need immediate repeal. The national debate, after the dust of the Dred Scott decision had dispersed, centered upon “the territorial question of slavery.”11 Thus, proving judicial authority can falter, in terms of ethics and legal balance, the Dred Scott Decision remains a hot topic among historians and…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This leads us back to the analysis of whether or not to Hart’s confessions should be admissible, there are similar reasoning, but slightly varying answers amongst the Justices. It was agreed that the confession Hart made at the scene of the crime and to Mr. Big should be inadmissible. Yet, in regards to the confession made to the undercover officer, there were differing opinions. The two prominent ones being that after considering a prong by prong analysis of the confessions based on the probative verses prejudicial value that that confession should be determined at a new trial. Or that the confession should be dismissed based on the implied social and financial inducement. I completely agree with those who wanted to dismiss Hart’s confessions to Mr. Big and the confession he made at the scene of the crime. Based on the prejudicial influence…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boston Massacre

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Today is the last day of the trial. We have heard all of the witnesses and now we know that we must deliberate. I know that some of the "witnesses" are liars. Some make valid points and I know without a doubt in my mind that Captain Preston is an innocent man and that his men were provoked. As I listened to the witnesses, here is what I came to believe:…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an article by Matthew James Nance titled “A Mockery of Justice” he writes about an inmate’s tale of what happen to David Martin Long in the late 80’s. While David Long was still incarcerated there was a reporter that was interested in writing about his story her name was Laura Miller and in 1994 she came to the prison to interview him. She wrote about his injustice in which he wanted to be executed but because Texas law had an automatic appeal process his execution could not be carried out and therefore no matter how many times that he wanted to oppose this the state of Texas denied him his execution. He tells her about his trial and how short the deliberation was. He goes into great, detail in telling her of his wrong doing and how he knows…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Miranda Law

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages

    During the trial on June 19th, Carroll Cooley, the officer who questioned Miranda had admitted that he did not tell Miranda that he was allowed an attorney at the time, and that anything he said could be used against him in court. Alvin Moore believed the confession’s of Miranda were not voluntary and that the confessions should be dismissed. The judge disagreed, and found Miranda guilty on the robbery charges.…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays