Preview

Why Is Nicholas Brov II Called The Last Tsar Of Russia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1173 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Nicholas Brov II Called The Last Tsar Of Russia
“A people without the knowledge of their past history, origin and culture is like a tree without roots.” -Marcus Garvey History has an uncanny way of of showing the world a country’s greatest victories or more commonly their worst mistakes. The House of Romanov is not at all exempt from this and especially not Nicholas Romanov II, the last Tsar of Russia. Nicholas the Second made many mistakes but also had plenty of successes during his reign. His family life was brought heavily into light during his reign aswell due to their involvement in the political aspects of the country.
Russia has been apart of a multitude of battles and even wars. Nicholas had many of them during his time as the Tsar as well. There was the Russo-Japanese War, Bloody
…show more content…
Russia lost this battle and the result of that Japan got the Port Arthur. A treaty between the two countries was also signed. Soon after the Russo-Japanese war Russia had something else to worry about. On January 5, 1905, there was a peaceful protest going on in St. Petersburg. It was a group of workers with a man named, Father George Gapon who was leading the protest that were going to try and appeal to Nicholas to get better working conditions and higher pay to be able to actually survive in the country. However they never got to because troops opened fire on the group killing over one thousand people. This gave the protest the name of Bloody Sunday. Many people in the country agreed with what the workers were trying to do and started uprisings because of what had happened. Many of the uprising however ended in the same fashion as the first. In Russia there was the belief that the Tsar was ordained by God, Nicholas believed in this heavily, having said that because of all the peasant uprising he realized that he would have to appeal to his people to get on their good side again. Nicholas’s way of doing this was …show more content…
At the end of Nicholas II’s reign the people of his country took matters into their own hands. Nicholas didn’t take care of his country in the way that he needed to be, Russia’s people were dying left and right and he sat back for a while then put the people through a war. Russia’s people were done trying to believe in a person who didn’t try to help them and wanted all the pain and death to end so they revolted. There were riots that lead the royal family to try and run how ever the people found out about it. Due to the overthrow Nicholas was forced to abdicate the thrown on March 15, 1917, and a new government was produced. Nicholas and the rest of the royals were forced to stay in a house in the Ural Mountains, where they were held for a few weeks. On the night of July 16, 1918, the royal Romanov line was exectuted by order from Vladimir Lennin. The execution of the Romanov’s brought on a new age for Russia under new rules and regulations by new rulers and leaders who brought their own ideas to the country and made it what it is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Under Nicholas, the people suffered from his draconian policies, inciting a series of revolts. The Czar’s significance comes from his role in starting the Russian Revolution, which ended a backwards Russian Empire and created the Soviet Union, a state that influenced the world today. A person today can learn from the Czar’s mistakes and use them in daily life; for example, one can learn to listen to the problems of others before making a major…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The extent to which Rasputin’s influence led to the removal and eventual execution of the Romanov Family in the year of 1917, one year after Grigori Rasputin’s assassination.…

    • 3594 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexei, who puzzled the people - they didn’t know about his condition - and was seen as spoiled and unloveable by politicians, was reasonably killed. He followed his father’s way of life, one that the people of Russia greatly disliked. It also made sense that Alexandra, the tsarina, was killed, as the people mistrusted her and Rasputin. Wherever Alexandra went, Rasputin went too. On the other hand, Nicholas’s brother, Grand Duke Michael, was asked to take the throne. (He later on refused) Eventually though, as history tells, most of the Romanov family was led to their deaths. OTMA, on the other hand, were possibly murdered due to the fact that their parentage led people to believe the children would turn out like Nicholas II and Alexandra. Nicholas was actually an uneducated man. “He had few intellectual pretensions” and instead preferred to leave the politics and papers to others. His parents did not bother educating him well either; Nicholas was tutored by average and undesirable people. The upbringing of the tsar helped Nicholas rule the way he did, and look at other people the way he did. The tsar was not very smart, so he sent away all ministers that he thought were more intelligent than him due to superiority belief. The people might have thought that OTMA and Alexei would turn out the same way - as Alexei showed he…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    His people’s faith in him was waning. In that year, Russia had suffered a number of defeats in navy battles. “Alexandra had turned Nicholas’s mind against the popular commander in chief, his father’s cousin the grand duke Nicholas, and on September 5, 1915, the emperor dismissed him, assuming supreme command himself.” (Britannica) Duma was the name of a house of representatives that Nicholas created. Nicholas and Alexandra intended that both their older daughters should make their official debuts in 1914 when Olga was 19 and Tatiana was 17. Around this time Rasputin was murdered and his death did not even dispel NIcholas’s illusions: he disregarded the warning, as he did those by highly placed personages, and members of his own family. His isolation was…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nicholas went into the lines to lead his armies but the problems increased and many soldiers deserted. Nicholas’s departure for the front meant that his wife had to rule Russia and Rasputin appointing new members to the cabinet and clergy. Those soldiers were instrumental in the February Revolution in 1917 which ended the Romanov Dynasty. On March 8th, 1917 riots broke out throughout Russia, and seven days later Nicholas abdicated the throne in favor of his brother Michael, who declined the crown. The royal family was imprisoned and then transported Yekaterinburg in Ural Mountains.…

    • 1975 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1904 the Tsar Nicholas II 's Minister of the Interior, Plehve, recommended to him that Russia expanded its Empire in the Far East and in doing so create "a small victorious war to stop the revolutionary tide". The resulting Russo-Japanese war was a failure for the Russians, as the Japanese seized Port Arthur and destroyed most of the Russian fleet. The war ended in 1905 with Russia defeated by Japan. Although the resulting peace treaty (the Treaty of Portsmouth) was relatively easy on the Russians, the defeat was humiliating as Japan was only a second-rate power and should have been easily defeated by Russia, one of the five great powers of the time. The war itself caused significant economic strife in Russia, creating food shortages and mass unemployment. This, added to the public opinion that the war with Japan had been completely unnecessary, created unrest among the Russian population, and many of those who were upset blamed the Tsar.…

    • 844 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlike his father, a man of confidence and strength, Nicholas has always seemed weak willed, often doubting himself. However, he reportedly said his rule was sanctioned by God, and that he regards “Russia as one big estate, with the tsar as its owner.” It seems odd that a man who described himself as, “without will and without character,” would declare himself appointed by God as supreme ruler.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 1905 revolution, highlighted the evident threat towards the Tsarist regime, though only started due to poor working conditions, the violent suppressing of the Russian people on ‘Bloody Sunday’ brought forth a wave of protest that argued for better leadership and civil rights for the people, and yet it wasn’t until 1906 that there became a decline in power in the Romanov rule, and so how did the Tsarist regime last until then, and what was the main reason? Immediately after the revolution there was a lack of official responses from Nicholas II, as he failed to listen to the problems of the Russian people and situations that were happening within his own country, and it was only after some serious persuasion from his ministers that he finally understood the…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nicholas Romanov

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Nicholas Romanov was an indecisive man who was easily influenced by others. Although it was not his character that was the decisive factor in bringing on the revolution. He may have been a leader at the wrong time, but if he had related better to the Russian peopale for the time he was in power his leadership may have been more effective.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II chose to uphold the values of the Romanov rulers that held complete power before him. His determination to maintain his autocracy whilst lacking the ideas and abilities to do so resulted in growing public resentment and discontent. Naïve and incompetent, Tsar Nicholas II remained ignorant the peasant population’s problems, focussing his attention on retaining the medieval system of society that was in place when the Romanov family first gained power. This way, he ensured that the equality gap between the rich and poor stayed the same.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II Weakness

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The February Revolution was succeeded by the October Revolution of the same calendar year, which placed the Bolshevik’s in control. Tsar Nicholas II never wanted to be the ruler of 1/6 of the earth. He never had a desire for power and he never believed that his family, or Russia, would lose the monarchy. It was this nativity, which resulted in the collapse of the Russian monarchy and spending the last months of his life under house arrest as a political prisoner with an armed guard watching his every move far away from his home country.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The last Tsar of Russia, Nicholas II, ruled from November 1, 1894 until March 15, 1917. He was also known as Nicholas the Bloody. Nicholas made many unpopular decisions. For instance, on a day known…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He and his dynasty reigned over a gigantic kingdom, extending from central Europe to the Pacific Ocean and from the Arctic to the edges of Afghanistan. Nevertheless, the Russian Empire was divided by various clashes in perspective. Just five years after the festivities, Nicholas and his family would be deceased, executed by the Bolsheviks. The downfall of the Tsarian rule was not a surprise by any means; throughout the timeline mentioned above, many uprisings, especially the Decembrist revolution, were on going as a result of continuous repression on reform and revolutionary groups. For example, the revolution in 1905, when revolts and uprisings had forced the Tsar to grant civil rights and a parliament to the Russian people also played a part in further weakening the empire’s rule, not to mention the country 's political and economic problems that were caused by the war (WW1). Various factors, including the militarization of production and catastrophes in food resources, meant drastic threats and disaster on the home…

    • 2592 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first part of the revolution, known as the February Revolution, sprouted in February of 1917, when violent protests erupted in Petrograd, known as present day St. Petersburg. Russian citizens had lost their faith in Nicholas’s leadership, and the involvement in the First World War showed how unmatched imperial Russian was against Germany. “On March 12th, the revolution triumphed when regiment after regiment of the Petrograd Garrison defected to the cause of the demonstrators. The soldiers subsequently formed committees that elected deputies to the Petrograd Soviet.” (history.com Staff) Soon afterwards, Nicholas was forced to step down from power, bringing the Romanov family reign to an end. The family was put under house arrest at the palace until they boarded a train headed for…

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘By the beginning of 1917, tsarism was rotting from within.’(1) Romanov’s had ruled Russia since 1613 but people were unhappy and the Tsarist regime was due to collapse for and it was inevitable that it would happen soon, it finally did under Tsar Nicholas II in 1917. There were many factors as to why the Tsarist regime collapsed some of the most important were Tsar’s personality, political opposition ,peasants and workers and The World War I.…

    • 2104 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays