Preview

Why Is The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Necessary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
816 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Necessary
On August 6, 1945, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki; a bomb that completely obliterated both cities. Many believe that the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were turning points of the war in Japan. Many people say that this bomb could have saved many lives as well as save the United States economy. However, I believe otherwise. Although at first glance, it may seem that the Atomic bomb was essential to ending the war in Japan, a deeper look into the topic reveals otherwise. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were completely unnecessary as the bombs took an innumerable amount of lives, Japan was already defeated in many aspects, according to a survey performed on Japanese generals and people, Japan would …show more content…
Although there is no exact number of the death toll of the atomic bombs, one estimate states that at Hiroshima, 90,000~120,000 people died and at Nagasaki, 60,000~80,000 people died. This means that all together, 150,000~200,000 people died. (Children of the Atomic Bomb) And to add on, America had already rained Tokyo with thousands of tons of bombs. Between March and June of 1945, America dropped around 10,200 tons of bombs on Tokyo; an action that resulted in 72 square miles of land being “burned out”, took over 100,000 lives and left a million homeless. (Weber) Even after seeing the damage the atomic bomb has done, some people still justify the bombs saying that the bombing was revenge for Pearl Harbor; however, these two attacks do not even compare. The Bombing of Pearl Harbor was an attack on a military base while the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were in highly populated areas. This means that at Pearl Harbor, mostly soldiers died and at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, mostly civilians died. If the Atomic Bombs were dropped on a military base, the bombs would be somewhat justified; however, these bombs were dropped in a highly populated area killing innocent …show more content…
The Japanese military was obliterated; the entire Navy and Air Force was completely destroyed. Japan itself was pretty much surrounded by the United States and the Soviet Union which would mean that supplies were cut off to Japan. Even Japanese citizens suffered from starvation as food had become so scarce. From what was left in Japan, the factories were barely able to create ammunition and weapons. (Institute of Historical Review) To sum it up, Japan basically had nothing left, and when Japan was at its lowest point, the United States dropped two bombs, one on Hiroshima and one on Nagasaki. This shows that the bombs were pointless as if the United States had waited just a little, then the Japanese would probably have surrendered as Japan would at one point run out of resources. Even without the bomb, research shows that Japan still would have surrendered, even if the bombs were not dropped.
Based on a detailed investigation of all the facts, and supported by the testimony of the surviving Japanese leaders involved, it is the Survey's opinion that certainly prior to 31 December 1945, and in all probability prior to 1 November 1945, Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped, even

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    World War II was a global war from 1939 to 1945. Japan surrendered on 15 August 1945, which brought the total victory of the Allies. Right before Japan’s surrender, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima and another one on Nagasaki. The atomic bombs caused great damage to Japan and killed estimated 129000 to 246000 people. However, the bombings helped to bring the war to an end. Whether President Truman should make the decision to drop the bombs is still a topic to debate. Due to the fact that it was the best decision Truman could make, the bombs ended the war, and reduced the loss at that time, President Truman was justified in his decision to drop the bombs on japan.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Atomic Bomb

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although there were attempts at peace, Japan showed no signs of agreement towards a peaceful and unconditional surrender. Japan’s reluctance to stop fighting could have left to months more of fighting and thousands of more deaths. The atomic bomb ensured an enormous display that could quickly end the war. As Cuhrchill proclaimed, “the end of the Japanese war no longer depended upon the pouring in of their armies for the final and perhaps protracted slaughter… this nightmare picture [has] vanished… in its place the vision of the end of the whole war in one or two violent shocks” (Doc E). Churchill summed up the gist of America’s reasoning for implementing the bombs. The United States did not have to depend on the slaughter of millions of people in bloody, messy fights, and , instead, “a speedy end to the Second World War” could be reached with one machine (Doc E). However, once the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the Japanese continued to resist. It wasn’t until a second bomb was dropped that Japan surrendered with a simple stipulation that their emperor remain in his position. This alone proves the military necessity of the bombs. Despite the attack on Hiroshima, Japanese still wished to continue their war. If not for the second bomb, who know how many lives would have been lost.…

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Analysis

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On the morning of August 6, 1945, the first atomic bomb was dropped on the city of Hiroshima. On August 9, 1945, the second atomic bomb was dropped on the city of Nagasaki. Thousands died instantaneously while many more died from radiation exposure from the bombs. The use of the atomic weapons was unnecessary due to the fact the Japan’s military was greatly weakened and ready to surrender, thousands of innocent lives were sacrificed simply for political power, and there could have been alternatives to cease the war.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 was made by a complex group of technological, political and military influences. History has it that the bombs were dropped in order to save American lives by avoiding the invasion of Japanese homelands, at least, that was what President Truman told the American public at the time. “For years, this simple view has been challenged by a seemingly more sophisticated academic perspective that the bombs were wrongfully used against innocent civilians, did not genuinely factor into the surrender of Japan, and would have better served the war effort as part of a diplomatic “carrot and stick” package.” (Beason 1). Some argue that the first bomb may have been required to achieve Japanese surrender, but the second one was a needless act of barbarism. According to Admiral William D. Leahy, the President’s Chief of Staff, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war over Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” (Beason 1). However, I have many facts to counteract all of these criticisms and to support President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6, 1945, citizens of Hiroshima were greeted with a brilliant flash of light, instantly vaporizing seventy-thousand Japanese citizens. This was the atomic bomb Little Boy. Only three days later, the atomic bomb Fat Man fell on Nagasaki, resulting in eighty-thousand deaths. In addition, hundreds of thousands would later perish at the hands of radiations sickness, which was not yet understood at the time. It was then and still is a point of contention between scholars, but, ultimately, President Truman made the right and just decision in bombing Japan.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After Japan bombed Pearl Harbour, President Truman (U.S) requested that Japan surrender, but they didn't. So President Truman responded by dropping 2 atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. So therefore, President Trumans' decision to drop the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was completely justified and rational. It was also the best possible option at the time because first of all Japan started it, also, war is such a hassle to deal with and we wanted to avoid that, and we couldn't just let Japan keep stalling when we asked them to surrender. Japan technically started it when they bombed Pearl Harbour.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians have investigated whether the dropping of the atom bomb was necessary and what effect the bombs had on ending the war in the pacific. The government of the United States of America were divided in opinions on how to use this weapon of mass destruction, and its impact on history. However now, the decision for dropping the atom bomb was an extremely complex and connected to a wide array of problems, and many of them simply went beyond the goal of the surrender of japan. Through analysing the many intertwined issues, I personally believe that the dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was justified, as it had saved more lives, not just for the allied forces, but also…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prejudice During Ww2

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    If Japan did not attack Pearl Harbor, the United States government would not have fired back. Due to the dropping of the bombs, approximately 65,000 people were killed while 50,000 were injured in severe condition. Everyone who was out during the dropping of the bombs, suffered serious burns on areas that were not covered by clothing. According to Japan, Japan would have surrendered before the atomic bomb, a bomb that derives its powers releasing nuclear energy causing damage through heat, blast, and radioactivity, were being dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Japanese soldiers felt as if they would not be victorious due to weaknesses they had in their military such as low confidence.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sameer

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The bombs dropped in Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6th, 1945 was completely necessary. For one, it efficiently ended the horrible World War II. Other reasons include that Japan needed to learn the error of their ways, it started the whole use of atomic weapons, and it ended other conflicts with Japan. A positive thing that happened is that it helped Japans economy. Those are just some of the many reasons why it was right to bomb Japan.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Europe, the war with Germany was over but Japan was still fighting. So the U.S could concreted on the war with Japan. The U.S had atomic bombs ready and a decision had to be made; should they sent ground forces to invade Japan or should they bomb Japan. So on August 1945 the U.S decided to drop atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and this created some controversy. Some people though it was a good idea to bomb Japan, while others say that 200,000 innocent people were killed. I believe that bombing the two cities was the right decision because it did save the lives of many U.S soldiers and it ended World War II.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    World War II was a war between governments, by dropping the bomb; they put the innocent people of Japan in danger too. The two cities were of limited military value. Civilians outnumbered troops in Hiroshima five or six to one. Japanese lives were sacrificed simply for power politics between the United States and the Soviet Union (as stated in Document B). By dropping the bomb the US was hurting the citizens (people not involved in the war) more than they were the government, the people they were really fighting against. Between the two cities, there was an estimated 105,066 dead, and 94,000 injured; that’s almost 200,000 causalities total (document A).…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the final year of World War Two, the Allies prepared for what was anticipated to be a very costly and devastating invasion of the Japanese mainland. This was preceded by a U.S. firebombing campaign that destroyed 67 Japanese cities and the Battle of Okinawa, wherein almost 100,000 civilians died. Having developed the world’s first nuclear weapons in the Manhattan Project, the US Government made the decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan. On August 6, 1945, the United States dropped the first atomic bomb ever used in combat on the town of Hiroshima. Three days later, the United States dropped a second atomic bomb on Nagasaki. Combined, the bombs killed almost 150,000 people immediately, and they are attributed to more than 170,000 more…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the aftermath over 60 cities were bombed by Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The bombs caused so much damage to the country that their society was will always be scarred by it. It was important for the U.S. to defend themselves but many of the people who died had no part in the war. The method the U.S. chose to use was morally wrong. In Hiroshima, one hundred forty thousand people died and in Nagasaki eighty thousand people died. Most of the people died after the bomb because of the radiation. The radiation would kill peoples white blood cells and if you have dead blood cells they can not fight off infection and then you will die. The radiation would also leave marks on your skin that would most likely never come off. The Japanese had a lot of damage done by the the atomic bombs and they did not deserve it. William Leahy thought the exact same thing “The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the successful bombing with conventional weapons”…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    August 14, 1945 Japan finally surrendered to the Allied forces. By this time, there were over one hundred thousand Japanese deaths due to either immediate obliteration, wounds, or radiation infection months after the bombing (“The Decision to Drop the Bomb.”). The final death count for the whole war was 35 million people, including soldiers, Jews, and Russians (Kagan).…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “if you assign my book don’t censor it’’ published in Kernersville, N.C on November 28, 1999, Mark Mathabane argues the high school that assign his novel ‘’Kaffir Boy’’ should not censor chunks of his book that contributes to the meaning of the novel. This novel is about Mathabanes childhood, living in Africa during the during the apartheid period. There is mature scene and language in this novel that parents would disagree with, but all with reason and purpose. He argues that those parts censored teach lessons, not to take everyday things like food or freedom for granted, to utilize education as a tool to make our society better, and to always to have the urge make the right choices in life. Mathabane uses all three logos, pathos and ethos to support his claim; he also uses his personal experiences to contribute to his argument to not censor parts in his novel that serve a great importance and lesson.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays