Preview

Why Is The Trolley Theory Wrong

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1517 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is The Trolley Theory Wrong
Getting to choose who lives and who dies? This is the reason I fell in love with the Trolley Theory during one of our lectures. The Trolley Theory is an ethical experiment commonly discussed and analyzed by philosophers. In the experiment, you must decide if having a single person die in an accident is better, or worse than having five people die in an accident. In this paper I will talk about the Trolley Theory as well as the “Fat Man” theory which is based off on the Trolley Theory. I will discuss the way of thinking around these theories, what made them so memorable for me during that class day, and how the topics are similar and different. First I will discuss The Trolley Theory. This topic puts you in the driver’s seat of a trolley …show more content…
In both cases, one person will die if you commit to the act, such as turning the trolley or pushing the fat man. If you choose to commit to the act you will save five people’s lives. The Trolley Theory puts you in the driver’s seat of the trolley and either way you are responsible for what happens because ultimately, you will have to decide whether to let five people die or turn the trolley and let one person die. The “Fat Man” Theory is different because you are physically pushing someone to their death. This theory lets you choose whether to save five people if you can muster the strength to push the fat man, or you can do nothing and five people will die while you continue your day. Both of these theories promote the same type of questions. Both are also set in very similar situations with few differences. In the Trolley Theory, you can turn the trolley and kill one repairman, or you can stay on your course, but either way you will be involved in the accident. In the “Fat Man” theory you can walk away like nothing ever happened, or you can push the fat man and save five rail worker’s lives and potentially be incarcerated. This is the main difference between these two

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Describe the concepts and propositions of the theory. Provide an example from the literature as to how the theory has been applied.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spel Case

    • 1464 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When presented with the crucial decision of life or death, people should do everything in their power to survive, no matter the cost. While on an excursion of spelunking, four friends find themselves trapped in a cave with limited amounts of food and water. In order to increase their chances of survival, one of the friends suggest drawing straws to see who will be killed and eaten for the benefit of the group. After killing the friend who was left with the shortest straw, the remaining spelunkers are rescued a couple weeks later and shared their story with their community. The friends are soon met with charges of homicide and disapproval from the public for their lack of moral awareness. This essay will argue that murder is justifiable when the reality of grim conditions exists. Consequences from such an action do not come to mind when decisions are based solely on emotions and not made with morals and ethical obligations set by society.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethics are not gained in one day. Ethics are built over time from experiences. From childhood to adulthood these learned behaviors add to traits that help shape an individual; they complete who one is and what one believes. Ethics guides individual’s understandings of the concepts of right and wrong. In everything one does, decision-making is involved. Work, school, home, and communications, ethical beliefs are challenged. Ethics guide one 's thought process for these challenges and help approach any situation long before it happens. Ethics are rules…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics has been used as a basis of human morals from Greek times to today’s hectic and fast paced society culture; it is based on a number of factors both of a personal and cultural aspect focusing on a people’s conception of right and wrong. Either way philosophers use logic, critical thinking, and reason to find the answers to a wide variety of non-empirical human questions to what is morally right and wrong. Below I have provided information on three ethical concepts of utilitarianism ethics, virtue ethics and deontological ethics.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Philippa Foot, Emerita Professor of Philosophy at the University of California at Los Angeles, has been studying and writing about the moral implications of killing someone versus letting someone die for many years. She also explains to us the difference between the negative and positive rights of a person and how negative rights and duties are more stringent than positive rights and duties. I shall be looking at this theory and explaining how it applies to certain cases. Before we can discuss these rights and how they apply to these situations, though, we must know what they truly mean.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Also mentioned will be a number of theories and concepts, here is a few brief definitions of those mentioned in this essay.…

    • 2018 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Radiolab

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Morality from WYNC. The first two experiments that deal with the train car are very interesting. The fact that most people would pull the lever to only kill one person versus killing five makes sense. The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. However, you would still be killing a person, but it doesn’t seem that you have much of a choice. The second experiment where you can push the large man to save five people seems a little different, but in reality it is essentially the same thing. You are killing one person to save the lives of 5 people. The reason it is more difficult for people to push the man is because you feel personally responsible for the large man’s death because you are physically pushing him off the car. When you pull the lever, it is a victimless act because you don’t have the physical act involved with pushing someone. Dr. Joshua Green’s brain scans are interesting but they are not that hard to understand. No one wants to kill someone directly, if they had to choose who to kill, they would want to not have a direct impact on the lives of others. People do not want to kill, because morality says we must not.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Theory and Points

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Describe the theory in your own words. What phenomenon of concern or problems are addressed by the theory (10 points)…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. Identify the stand that each contemporary theory takes on the three basic issues presented earlier in this chapter.…

    • 4793 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    order of operations

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After reviewing each of the above theories, choose one theory and theorist and answer the following questions in a paragraph essay format:…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    week 11

    • 273 Words
    • 1 Page

    The reasoning that has allowed me to come up with this decision is based upon my own personal values that I have which is if there is something that I can do some way shape or form that will allow me to make a difference I am willing to do it especially if it is for the greater good to be helpful to someone else. By me just sitting by and watching the trolley car and letting them all die would be something that I would physically be able to do because of the heart that I have. Though I am not a killer I would still weigh the options between the two and come up with one person dying is better the all 5.…

    • 273 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Social Responsibility

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this paper we will review the three classical theories of mortality and interpret what the meaning, as well as make connections to my own culture. The purpose of this paper is to review theoretical perspectives and assess how they impact ones culture.…

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethical Dilemma Paper

    • 1430 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the most difficult trials I face in my life are ethical and moral dilemmas. An ethical dilemma is more consistent with my everyday life than a moral dilemma. Ethical dilemma is defined as situations in which there is a choice to be made between two options, neither of which resolves the situation in an ethically acceptable fashion. Every day I am faced with decisions of right and wrong most of which are easily and correctly dealt with. Sometimes decisions need to be made that are not easy or clear, however they require thought and often prayer.…

    • 1430 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Good and Evil in High Noon

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For the purposes of this discussion, the concepts of good and evil are going to be analyzed through the use of two contrasting ethical theories, Utilitarianism and Deontology.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stakeholder, pleasure v. pain, numerical model of Utilitarianism - Utilitarian analysis as per required model (See required Utilitarian model below)…

    • 9503 Words
    • 39 Pages
    Powerful Essays