Preview

Why Japan Should Not Use Nuclear Energy?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1000 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Japan Should Not Use Nuclear Energy?
Do you remember the huge nuclear accident that happened in Japan 6 years ago in 2011? This disaster is said to be the world’s second worst after the 1986 Chernobyl tragedy, brought about the closure of all of Japan’s 44 working reactors, responsible for producing nearly a third of the national energy output (Documentary Director to RT). This incident killed over 1300 people in Japan, and some people are still suffering from diseases, such as radiation-caused cancer. Also, Naoto Kan, a former Japanese prime minister recently told the Daily Telegraph that the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant will continue to pose a threat to the ecology and humans around it. I believe Japan should not continue using nuclear energy because when accidents happen, …show more content…
According to the Reconstruction Agency, the number of the Great East Japan Earthquake related death was about 3523 in 2016, and the number of people who died from the nuclear accident was about 1368 in 2016(Tokyo Shimbun). This means that 40% of the Earthquake’s death come from the nuclear accident. Also, according to the Hoki net, the death rate of cardiovascular system diseases of Fukushima became 1.45 times of the national average after the nuclear accident. It is said that the polluted radiation from the accident is the reason to this increase. Since nuclear energy can harm humans in many ways, they should be banned in …show more content…
According to the World Nuclear Industry Status Report, The cost of the Fukushima's nuclear accident's damage was about 13 trillion yen, and according to Mainichi Shimbun, the disposal cost is about 12.5 trillion yen. This means the government will soon start spending an enormous amount of money, which can lead to disorders in Japan and even in other countries. Also, according to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, The expense that costs for compensation or the decommissioning of the first Tokyo Electric Fukushima nuclear plant accident rises to more than a total of 20 trillion yen and this was approximately 2 times of the conventional government assumption. This means that the government is not ready enough to revive the economy and the areas that were damaged by the accident. Since accidents can financially harm people, I believe we should not continue using nuclear
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    BTEC P4 Unit 7 'Increased costs.' Give 3 examples including cause and impact.
    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    BTEC P4 Unit 7 'Increased costs.' Give 3 examples including cause and impact.

    This nuclear disaster was a series of equipment failures – nuclear meltdowns – releases of radioactive materials at the ‘Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant’.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of Eugene Robinson's No Fail-Safe Option
    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summary Of Eugene Robinson's No Fail-Safe Option

    Eugene Robinson, author of “No Fail-Safe Option”, writes during the recent destruction of the Fukushima power plant, cautioning the use of nuclear power, and touching on the Chernobyl incident. He claims that the idea of nuclear energy, in spite of its benefits, is not worth the destruction and damage it could potentially cause.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    SCI 207 Week 4 Assignment Nuclear Power
    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    SCI 207 Week 4 Assignment Nuclear Power

    1. Due by Day 7 . Nuclear Power . All energy sources have drawbacks. Even the clean hydropower option has negative ramifications. Weigh those against the possible consequences of developing nuclear power, a controversial alternative to fossil fuels. Discuss the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster as well as the 20th century Chernobyl nuclear meltdown in drawing conclusions about risk versus reward of nuclear energy use. The paper must be two to three pages in length and formatted according to APA style. You must use at least one ...…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    No Fail-Safe Option By Eugene Robinson
    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages

    No Fail-Safe Option By Eugene Robinson

    In Eugene Robinson’s article, “No Fail-Safe Option,” he addresses that nuclear power is beginning to look like a “bargain with the devil” (Robinson 226). Robinson, a journalist for The Washington Post, aims his article at the Chernobyl disaster and the unlikeliness of the Fukushima crisis ending with the same result. Even though Japanese engineers struggle to keep the catastrophe from escalating even higher, Robinson says we cannot ignore the fact that nuclear fission is “inherently and uniquely toxic technology” (226). He points out that the “most powerful earthquake in Japan’s recorded history” began a declining chain of events, starting with system…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tucker Nuclear Summary
    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tucker Nuclear Summary

    In order to remain at the forefront of technological innovation and industrial prowess, the United States must become cognizant that the use of nuclear energy is by far the most efficient policy regarding the creation of power despite the possible risks. This is the belief of William Tucker, the author of the New York Times published article, “Why I Still Support Nuclear Power, Even after Fukushima”.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Energy
    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Energy

    Many people around the world ask themselves what are the disadvantages of adopting an alternative solution to solve the consumption of global nuclear energy? Based on what we have experienced through events with major disasters and the aftermath of many casualties, it has summed up to result in having failures outgrowing expectations. Therefore, global nuclear power usage is to be opposed due to the fact that it comes with high financial costs, nuclear waste management complications, and the fact that thousands in populations are mass numbers of casualties.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Was Chernobyl the Most Detrimental Nuclear Disaster in Nuclear History?
    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Was Chernobyl the Most Detrimental Nuclear Disaster in Nuclear History?

    Over centuries humans have always continued to try and find new ways of converting one form of energy into one which humans can manipulate for their own use. One of the most recent forms of converting energy, which is gaining in popularity is nuclear energy. With 14 percent of the world using it today it is a viable alternative to burning fossil fuels. To give you a basic idea on how the process of converting energy works according to the Canadian Nuclear Association is as basic as, “splitting the uranium atom to generate the heat that is used to produce steam for the production of electricity”(www.cna.ca). However things do not always run so smoothly, and the leakage of the nuclear material could have devastating consequences to both the land and its inhabitants. One of the bigger well know events of this nature, came from the power plant Chernobyl. To put simply it is a plant that exploded releasing nuclear waste into the atmosphere. Although this is detrimental to the environment the significance behind this event is because of this accident, we have now learned from our mistakes and are taking more precautions so that history is not repeated. I will prove that history will not be repeated through some background knowledge of the plant, what happened during the meltdown and how it effected the land and inhabitants, and finally what insight we have gained from this event and its significance to history.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Bill Mckiibben Waste
    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bill Mckiibben Waste

    With all the money, we spend on the nuclear industry they nor the government have come up with a plan to get rid of the waste that does not involve dumping it in the ocean or the desert. McKibben states, “Congress is being lobbied really, really hard to fork over billions of dollars to the nuclear industry” (333). One thing about nuclear energy that can never be forgotten is the fact it can be turned into a weapon. The destruction nuclear weapons can cause is and always will be horrifying. During World War 2 a nuclear bomb was dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima. The bomb destroyed most of their island, killed most of their population, and left the country filled with radiation. Nuclear weapons can cause radiation sickness, different forms of cancer, and malformations to children ("What's the Damage?"). Even factories that use nuclear energy are harmful they destroy soil used for farming and water sources. Nuclear energy contains elements such as uranium, strontium, benzene and many others ("What's the Damage?"). These are the materials that keep nuclear energy radioactive even after it is disposed of, plus it can cause birth…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear Energy Pros And Cons
    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nuclear Energy Pros And Cons

    Nuclear power does not put out green house gasses, nuclear power does not pollute our water, and unlike some people believe nuclear power does not release toxic gasses into the air. Some people believe that it produces toxic gases into the air because they see the white clouds that come out of the top of the power plant cooling towers, but in fact those white clouds are actually just the water vapor that has been used to cool the systems, it is not toxic and therefore does not pollute the air. Nuclear energy uses either plutonium or uranium, depending on the type of the reactor. Nuclear reactors produce less waste than any other type of energy source. One pound of plutonium can produce the same amount of energy as 50,000 barrels of oil. The number of deaths caused by coal powered plants is about 24,000 a year. There were only 56 direct deaths caused by the Chernobyl reactor meltdown. Fukushima had no direct deaths, and the only other reported deaths were of the 3 men who were testing a portable reactor in Arco, Idaho. Arco was also the very first city in the world to be powered by nuclear…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Comparison of Nuclear Energy and Coal Energy
    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Comparison of Nuclear Energy and Coal Energy

    The initial construction cost of nuclear power plants is large. On top of this, when the power plants first have been built, people are left with the cost to enrich and process the nuclear fuel which also costs a lot of money. How much? Apply concrete details from your research (and cite it). Just think of how nuclear is wasteful too conversational 8 not only that but the people who work there at the plant. Nuclear energy is very costly. Generation electricity in nuclear reactors is cheaper than electricity generating from oil, gas, coal and not to talk of the renewable energy source 1 cite. Even though coal pollutes big time doesn’t mean it’s not double negative bad. Coal produces carbon dioxide which we 9 human produce as well. By using coal, it provides just what we need without paying overtime on building one of nuclear buildings which cost way more than a Coal factory.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Nuclear Power in the United States
    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Nuclear Power in the United States

    As the severity of the global warming threat attains universal recognition, the United States must look for ways to decrease its reliance on fossil fuels for electricity production. The combustion of fossil fuels such as oil and coal to generate electricity produces carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases that lead to a variety of environmental problems. Nuclear power, on the other hand, is a comparatively clean source of energy. Though still widely employed, concerns over security of stored waste and a public distrust of reactor safety—fueled by the incidents at Three Mile Island in 1979 and Chernobyl in 1986, and the paranoia behind the sensational but popular film The China Syndrome—have led to calls for the decommissioning of older plants in current operation. However, it makes little sense, economically and in terms of energy capacity, to decommission plants currently in operation. Conversely, the environmental superiority of renewable sources of energy, the problem of storage of nuclear-waste, nuclear energy’s risks and dangers, and the high expense of nuclear power due to high construction costs and enormous funding for incremental research make the construction of new nuclear power plants an impractical means of decreasing the United States’ reliance on fossil fuels for electricity.…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Is It Time to Revive Nuclear Power? Essay Example
    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Is It Time to Revive Nuclear Power? Essay Example

    2. In “Small Recactors Make a Bid to Revive Nuclear Power”, the Obama Administration and the Energy Department are working on making America the leader in advanced nuclear technology and manufacturing (Biello 2012). They are considering switching the large reactors, which are currently the predominant technology, to small reactors, which will save money. These reactors would contain enough power to power more than 200,000 U.S. homes for a year (Biello 2012). This strategy will cause less nuclear waste and will increase safety issues as well. In another article, “Time to revive, not kill, the nuclear age”, it is stated that a world without nuclear power would be less secure. Neither fossil fuels nor renewable resources will be able to replace the 14 percent of global electricity generated by nuclear reactors (Financial Times 2011). This article sides with MacFarlane by saying the Chernobyl accident was bad, but since then things…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Examples Of Kingdon's Multiple-Streams Framework
    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Examples Of Kingdon's Multiple-Streams Framework

    Where an earthquake measuring 9 on the Richter scale caused severe damage to the nuclear powerplant. This was coupled with a large tsunami which led to a meltdown of 3 of the reactors at the Nuclear Power plant. The disaster spurned the public on in some European nations to demand an end of the use of Nuclear Power as an energy source, which led to national administrations amending their plans for the sector on a temporary basis. And the high-profile nature of the disaster encouraged the European union to take strong action on the issue of nuclear safety since before this piece of legislation the European Union made little attempt in the past on regulating safety standards in this sector. The stress test report organised by the European Nuclear Safety Regulatory Group (ENSREG) showed the situation which the Nuclear energy sector found itself in the months and years after the melt down at the Fukishima Nuclear Power station. What’s interesting here is that the issue of nuclear power rarely made it onto the agenda of the European Authorities, it was a competency which was largely at the behest of the national administrations. In developing this policy…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Is Nuclear Power Worth The Cost?
    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page

    Is Nuclear Power Worth The Cost?

    Furthermore, nuclear power is too expensive. For instance “Many supporters and critics say nuclear power biggest impediment is economic.”(8,8) Even people who agree with nuclear power agree that the cost is too high the amount of workers and materials that will be needed and how long the process is too much money for the economy. Like this quote states “But in reality is wasting yet more time and money pursuing the nuclear nightmare would be, too expensive, too risky.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Controversy: The Role Of Nuclear Energy In The World
    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Controversy: The Role Of Nuclear Energy In The World

    By building nuclear reactors which contains the nuclei, the large of energy released from it creates steam which drives machines to generate electric power. Nuclear energy is capable of producing energy equivalent to 3 million pounds of coal from 1 pound of uranium. however, after the nuclear plant disasters that happened in Chernobyl in Ukraine and Fukushima in Japan led people to a controversy on nuclear energy and questions such as whether nuclear energy and reactors can solve the world’s energy issues or does it pose to much of a risk and should be taken out as a choice of energy. After looking through the issue more, I have came up with the question: To what extent do the benefits of nuclear energy outweigh the possible risks it has on the environment? After doing research, my position in this controversy is pro nuclear. I believe that the benefits of nuclear energy are higher than the threats and after looking at statistics, it had shown that other sources of energy causes the same or more damage to our environment with less good…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics