Preview

Why Nations Fail Review

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1337 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Nations Fail Review
Ryan Rivera
Dr. Ruger MW 12:30
Why Nations Fail Review The issue of human welfare and its large international inequality has long been debated between economists, and is supported with several different theories. In their book Why Nations Fail, Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson provide their compelling theory as to why there is such a growing gap in wealth across the globe. The foundation of their theory is based on the types of political and economic institutions that have been implemented by colonial nations, starting from the discovery of the America’s by Spain and Portugal. Based on the established governments, these institutions may either spark incentive for prosperity, or strip any motivation for labor and economic productivity. Acemoglu and Robinson use solid examples in history in order to describe why there are differing institutions that exist today; however, they did not provide a sufficient remedy based on their theory, which is disappointing for such an intriguing issue.
In Why Nations Fail, the authors appropriately provide the statistic of purchasing power for the currencies of Afghanistan and Zimbabwe, which helps give a vivid idea of the amount of poverty these poorer countries must endure. The reason for this continuously widening gap between rich and poor countries is explained by the different economic and political institutions that were implemented in them, either providing prosperity or poverty. First, understanding what the author’s definition of a political institution is helps clarify some of the more in depth detail introduced later. Acemoglu and Robinson define it as such, “Political institutions determine who has power in society and to what ends that power can be used”(pg.80). They further explained that these political institutions influence economic institutions, allowing whoever has the power to create policies of exploitation or prosperity.
These political and economic institutions were given two distinct classifications

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Politics and social structures play a huge role in why some countries are poor and others aren't.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    There is no secret that some countries are more prosperous and developed than others. Why are some countries poor and there is nothing we can do about it? Is the answer culture, weather, economics, geography, bad policies, or simple bad luck? This is probably the most important question facing the world today, especially for the over three billion people that live in less than $2.50 a day. Economists, political philosophers and political figures have been trying to come up with a solution to fix this problem for hundred of years. The book “Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty” by economists Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson state that while economic institutions are vital to prosperity, it is man-made political institutions that determine if a country is prosperous or poor.1 This is concluded because any economic institution is implemented by the political class that work within the framework of a pre set legal tradition and political system, generally contained in a country’s Constitution and other society foundation documents such as the Declaration of Independence. Therefore, the framework that leads to prosperity (or lack of it) is as follows; the people enact a Constitution based on a core set of founding principles, that sets forth a society’s goals, the political class then implements economic institutions that in turn determine how prosperous a country is. But why do similar theoretical political institutions and legal traditions work so differently in practice? The answer lies in the philosophical foundations of societies.…

    • 2997 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The institutions inculcate that one’s worth can only be measured using material success. The economically deprived are perceived to have a lower value in the society and are a threat to the development, because the resources spent on them do not measure to their contribution towards the resource generation. Such ideologies have resulted into the increasing disparity between the rich and the economically deprived. The ideologies have also encouraged the existence of a government that continues to enrich the wealthy while oppressing the population with the greatest needs.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Technique

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    No one can argue that America is the country of the human rights and freedom and many people around the world dream to live in this great place. However, big problem is going to reshape the American society if nobody tried to solve it. The dilemma is simply that the rich got richer and the poor got poorer as a result of inequality of money distribution among rich and poor people.America had created a marvelous economic machine, but evidently it worked only for that at the top. Both Joseph E. Stieglitz and Timothy Noahintroduce a very critical issue which affects the American society in these days, is the widening gap between the rich and poor people. Stieglitz claims that the American economic system is failing for most of Americans and the inequality is increasing to the extent that one day will be unaffordable. The rising gap is created by the one top percent who are taking advantage of making a huge wealth. They are driven by their greed to accumulate big fortune upon poor’s shoulders. Stieglitz came up with some evidence to support his claim. One of these is the new statistics fromCensus Bureau’s statistics that shows that the one top percent gain 20 % of the total American income. Therefore, Noah says that this inequality income creates and retains the capitalism system which forms a serious threat upon middle and lower class (Noah The Great par 3).…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the most globalized era to date, the world faces many policy debates and questions. Many are fearful of globalization and are worried about the negative consequences it can produce. Brawley addresses these concerns in Chapter 3, “What People Fear-or Anticipate-about Globalization”. One issue people have about globalization is its ability to widen the gap of inequality between the rich and the poor, both domestically and across borders. Krugman uses the United States of America as a basis for the study of inequality in his chapter “Inequality and Redistribution.” On a global scale, Easterly explores foreign aid as a remedy for inequality in developing states in his chapter “The Legend of the Big Push.”…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ipa Cheat Sheet

    • 2135 Words
    • 9 Pages

    AIPA 2: UNDERSTANDING ACTORS, INTERESTS & POWER Institutions  Basic level – states exist to provide (1) defence and (2) social order  this requires the presence of a functioning economy.  State not only produces, consumes and redistributes; it’s also the main source and enforcer of “rules of games”.  “Rules of games” are institutions  institutional quality is related to economic performance.  Evidence: No country has gotten rich with bad institutions. Politics  Politics is the process of creating new institutions. Existing institutions create a constraint on this process.  Political processes can be analysed in terms of Actors involved in the processes, their interests and their relative power (AIP).  Actors: Political, Societal(land, labour, capital, business associations, unions, students, military), International (hegemon, institutions)  Interests: Assume, Deduce or Judge by stated intention and observed behaviour.  Power: voter base, past performance, military control, resource control, shared nationalism/ethnicity, moral authority, int’l support  Usually, the actor with greatest relative power wins. IPA 3: STATE STRUCTURES 1: ENDS, DECISION-MAKING & IMPLEMENTATION Ends = the ultimate end of economic policy, not necessarily what is said.  Self-enrichment - “rentier state” e.g. Zaire, Congo. Anything possible for highest bidder.  Economic Development - “developmental state” e.g. Japan, S. Korea. Risk-sharing and high intervention with bias to domestic firms.  Equal outcomes - “welfare state” e.g. Scandinavia, Netherlands. Minor state intervention, heavily regulated, little adjustments & intervention.  Equal opportunity - “regulatory state” e.g. US, Hong Kong. Minor state intervention, light regulations & adjustments Decision-Making…

    • 2135 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For this assignment students will review Confessions of an economic hit man. To develop an analysis of the relevance of this memoir to the study of the politics of development students must draw on and cite concepts and approaches covered in the required texts and in the lectures during the first eight weeks of the course. In this paper students will provide an introduction that briefly imparts their views on the book’s principal contributions to an introduction to international development studies. They will then proceed to present in an organized manner their perspectives on each of: (i) the strengths of the analyses presented in the book relative to other interpretations of development covered in POLS*2080; (ii) the weaknesses of the analyses relative to other perspectives on development covered in the course; (iii) the opportunities around the world that presently exist for this book to improve development outcomes; and (iv) the threats around the globe that could impede efforts to pursue the changes desired by the author. Students will then offer a brief conclusion. In the conclusion students will clearly present answers to the two (2) following questions: (a) do the strengths of the book outweigh its weaknesses or vice versa; and (b) do the opportunities for the author to realize his desired reforms presently outweigh the threats to his programme or vice versa? In the concluding section students should draw upon the evidence presented in the paper and on course material to support their answers to these questions. Finally, students should include a summary statement – one sentence maximum – at the end of their introduction that imparts the answers they give to the two questions in the conclusion. Term papers should be at least 2400 words and will be no longer than 2600 words, excluding the works cited, references or bibliography. Papers should be typed, double- spaced and edited for spelling and grammar. Students are encouraged to use sub-headings to organize…

    • 5828 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By understanding what went wrong in the Congo’s case, we can apply what and why to avoid forming more weak states. Samuels credits the difference between Botswana, a successful African state, to Zimbabwe, a disaster similar to the Congo, to “diamonds, civil war and political leadership” (Samuels 49). Through the corruption and exploitation of natural resources, the Congo’s profits were never returned back to the people. Unlike Botswana, the Congo’s post-independence government failed to use the natural resources, like diamond, to improve infrastructure and stabilize the interior of their nation. Through a poor legacy from the colonial government, the Congo was not equipped with enough educated people nor the self-sustaining intuitions to govern themselves. The lack of qualified political leadership contributed to their failures and perpetuation of a weak state. And finally, because the Congo started as a weak state internally, it opened opportunities for external violence to invade as well as civil war. The lack of enforced borders leads to violence destroying infrastructure and stealing valuable potential income. By understanding these factors, today’s new states can learn how to avoid these pitfalls and the international community can…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A crucial controversy of America today is the growing gap between the wealthy and the poor, and the discrepancy is caused by capitalism run wild and only the helping hand of the government can only fix the problem. A question that turns the tables is what if the growing wealth disparity in America is actually caused by the government? For years, the idea that inequality is economically neutral has been the prevailing view not just among traditionalists but also between most Americans outside the further reaches of a political audience. There could be ideological or moral reasons to object to a growing gap between the wealthy and the rest but for economic reasons, there are no such. Furthermore, there are many ways inequality places itself in America. In our society, a good amount of the population is forced to stand up and work for our country while hardly being redeemed for their time and effort, thus the problem of income inequality. An estimate of these people live from paycheck to another, barely coping with life itself, not because they cannot manage their money well, but the reason is that…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Does Inequality Matter

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The economic gap here in the United States is a great deal wider than in any other rich democratic nation. Why is there such a difference here in the United States? The most important reason for economic inequality in the U.S. and not other countries is due to the United State 's particular economic policies (Christopher Jencks, "Does Inequality Matter?" Daedalus Winter 2002).…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In current times we often observe that many members of our society receive less than other members regardless of whether they are no less deserving. In contrast, there are some who have ownership over assets and earn income that they may not be deserving of. The distributive balance is upset and wealth distribution today can thus be seen as a social injustice. This injustice that is becoming more noticeable as people start to become aware of the facts, as we can see through the start of the occupy wall street movements that, first started on wall street in America, have spread to other countries (one of which being Australia). As a consequence of how wealth is habitually distributed and the way in which governments are run, the wealthy continue to become wealthier while the poor in fact experience a reduction in their wealth, or at best maintain their low status. A number of different governmental and social structures exist in different countries respectively to ensure a just community, and people have many different views on what the best approach to distributing wealth is; however it seems that in all forms of idealisms that countries are run on a fair wealth distribution model is still yet to be truly attained.…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some are so Rich and some are so Poor, David Landes sets out to elucidate the causes of the divergent destinies of different economies. In doing so, he presents economic history as a profoundly Eurocentric anecdote. He posits that Europe's industrial revolution is the epicenter of modernity and the means of how some--largely western Europe and northwest Europe's settler ex-colonies--have grown rich. He also conceives, that relative poverty elsewhere is the result of failure on the part of political, religious, and mercantile elites elsewhere to ascend (being circumstances set heavily against them) and maintain or regain independence from and assimilate the technologies of the people from Europe--merchants, priests, and thugs with guns--who came in boats, rarely with friendly intent.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Inequality

    • 2256 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Inequality is the lack of equality, opportunity, treatment, or status. Inequality has been going on since World War II and began to rise in the mid 1970s. Many people in the world from the United States to the Caribbean have dealt with this problem. In this article it discusses the causes and consequences of inequality researches and examinations of sociologists and economists that go in depth of the social and political life of people mainly in the United States, as well as global. It provides an update of research on their consequences.…

    • 2256 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    the Wealth of Nations.”Edited by Edwin Cannan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976. Available online at: http://www.econlib.org/library/Smith/smWN.html, 14/3/2013…

    • 2673 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Countries fail, according to the authors, because they extractive institutions who live in a constant vicious circle and they do not have enough recurring resources to support their population status comfortable life [7] . Its economic institutions do not create the necessary incentives for people to save, invest and innovate. The extractive political institutions support these economic institutions to consolidate their power goals.…

    • 2059 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics