Preview

Why People Break The Natural Law By St. Thomas Aquinas

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
443 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why People Break The Natural Law By St. Thomas Aquinas
St. Thomas Aquinas was a religious philosopher who is recognized for his ideology of the four main kinds of laws; Eternal, Natural, Human, and Divine. However, lets particularly focus on The Natural Law Theory for which Aquinas explains as; The Natural Law, which is composed of multiple mini laws (The Basic Goods) that apply to all living beings and can intuitively be understood by everyone. For instance, god designed all living things and wanted them live so he gave them survival instincts. He also wanted them to reproduce so he gave them sex drives. The ability to pass information down to off-springs. Some Basic Goods only apply to humans, as humans are the only beings on earth with the ability to comprehend certain exercises such as seeking …show more content…
For example, each individual finds their own life precious as they have a natural drive to live, and assumes that everyone’s lives are similar to their own, thus everyone’s lives are precious so killing others would be breaking the Natural Law and therefore wrong.

However, if god designed humans to pursue righteousness and gave humans the ability to recognize it, then why do people break the Natural Law all the time? If the Natural Law is theoretical so intuitively obvious to humans and all living things then why do people kill each other, why are there atheist, would things like suicide, and not having sex would be the ‘wrong’ thing to do as humans?

Another issue that all of Aquinas Laws have in common are that their premise is based on god. This itself is a major flaw as his Laws mean nothing to a nonbeliever. These Laws would only sound reasonable to people who believe in god. Also, Natural Law assumes that just because something is a certain way, therefore it ought to be that way. For instance, just because animals want to live, they must live; just because people enjoy sex, people must have sex/reproduce. This is a false assumption most people make as they are naturally inclined to cling to their lives and believe everything revolves around

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Aquinas developed the Natural law Theory, with which he proposed five ‘telos’ that he believed were our duty to follow. His 5 primary precepts- ‘Worship God Ordered society, Reproduction, Learning and Defend the innocent’ are deontological. However, whilst being deontological, Natural Law does have some flexibility with the more teleological, secondary precepts.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    EssayThief123

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    However it can be argued that even before Aquinas developed Natural Law; it was a pretty stable concept which could be followed. As previously mentioned that we don’t truly know what good is, following our reason, as Aristotle said, would become much easier. This is because what we perceive to be good is personal to the individual and…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aquinas' main argument is well known as 'Aquinas' third way'; the argument from contingency and necessity. The first of Aquinas' ways was 'from motion,' this follows the idea that all objects move and a change of quality is movement. Nothing can move itself, which then leads to the idea of a chain of movement but the chain cannot be infinate, therfor there must be an unmoved mover to begin the chain. This first mover is God. The second of Aquinas' ways was 'from efficiant causes,' this follows the idea that all things are caused by something else because they cant cause themselves or they would exist before themselves. However this would mean that there cant be an infinite chain of causes, meaning there must be a 1st cause that caused all causes, then this 1st cause is God. The third of Aquinas' ways is 'from contingency and…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Natural Law is a deontological theory of ethics. According to Thomas Aquinas it is absolutist and depends on the idea that God created everything with a purpose and supreme good is found when that purpose is fulfilled. For Aristotle, who heavily influenced Aquinas’ ideas, he believed that supreme good for humans is happiness. Thomas Aquinas agreed with Aristotle, but saw a human’s supreme purpose to be perfection.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Aquinas proposes a number of laws that exist in the world. He believes that God is responsible for eternal law. Aquinas points out that eternal law the way the universe is structured. He understands that a rational being must exist, who is responsible for the structure of the universe, and that rational being must be God. This category of law applies to all things in the universe ranging from rocks to human beings. All of these things have natural tendencies that…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the textbook, the definition of natural law is the expression of what a person knows in his or her own soul to be right or wrong. The Ten Commandments are a perfect way to apply natural law. A great Commandment to focus on when speaking of natural law is the 7th Commandment, “Thou shall not steal.” In the world that we live in today, I believe that this Commandment is often broken the most. About 75% of the people that rob or steal something feel an immediate guilt, whether they are stealing something very small or very large. The guilt that people feel in their conscience is not taught and is naturally inbred into your soul; This guilt is also called natural law. A good example of how natural law affects a person is the…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aquinas believed he had discovered, through his observation of nature, the correct path you had to take if you were to fulfil your purpose. To help others to follow this path he created 5 rules called the “5 Primary Principles” and if you followed them you where ensured a “good” life, this was called following the synderesis rule. The 1ST primary principle is to live, the 2nd primary principle is…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miss Sarah Nadwick

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Natural law is a rational theory, which doesn’t need you to believe in God to understand it. You could be a Darwinian atheist and believe in natural law derived by empirical observation, with the primary precept of survival - preservation of life. Furthermore, it is a clear-cut approach as it sets out an absolutist approach with a set of rules that everyone should follow if they aim to do what is good. The set of rules in natural law is the primary precepts. To further embellish these rules are the secondary precepts that help instruct and explain how to follow the primary precepts appropriately. This also means that it is easy to understand how to follow the rules so everyone in society is able to. For example, one of the primary precepts is Reproduction. If we did not have the secondary precept of what is acceptable and not in reproduction and how to look after your children then some immoral things could be seen as acceptable as they follow the primary precept.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Natural law, when associated with the will of God, can have penalties that are of another world. Meaning that because some view natural law as the will of God and may say that these laws aren’t man- made, but rather they are basically our moral principles to follow. This can blur the line between what the law is and what we should do to be morally right. This can make it difficult to enforce natural law because Gods will can be pretty vague and hard to govern, since not everyone lives by the same standards of what Gods will is. Also, the penalties are from another world, so that can be hard to govern and enforce.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While George W. Bush’s Address to the Nation and 9/11: The View From the Midwest are both about 9/11, The View From the Midwest is focused more on one experience rather than being more broad.…

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aquinas as a Neo-Platonist believes that existence is a good in itself, therefore, all things that improve existence are good. For humans our most important act of existence is the one that separates us from the animals around us, our ability to reason. As animals are not provisioned with morality, then our morality must be based on reason. Reason…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In a perfect world, laws would be unnecessary. We would all love our neighbor and regulate our behavior accordingly, but we don't live in that world. Martin Luther King, Jr. once said:…

    • 5163 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As defined by the Philosophical Dictionary, the Natural Law Theory is "In moral philosophy, a norm, custom, or set of beliefs shared by people living in different cultures or eras. Such a “law” is supposedly derived from Nature (via reason or some other natural human faculty) and is considered binding on all humans everywhere. Ancient Stoicism, for example, held that there are eternal laws that govern all human actions and that happiness depends on recognizing and living in harmony with these fundamental “laws of nature.” Similarly, Aquinas argued that God established a set of universal laws – ascertainable through reason alone (hence available to everyone, regardless of their religion) – that operate for the welfare and benefit of all creatures.”…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aquinas Vs Hobbes

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As a theologian, Aquinas believes the supreme good derives from the eternal God, rather than a worldview good. The Natural Law theory is central to his work because it connects Aristotle’s argument and harmonizes it with the Church teachings. Unlike Aristotle, Aquinas believed the city was a mean to reach the ultimate end, which is God’s will. In his broad conception of explaining laws human beings should obey, the most virtuous ones are derived from God, not from man. He articulates the principle of obedience and how each person is obligated to perform their duties to society. This also is a slight critic from Aristotle’s teaching. Aquinas stressed the significance of duties, rather than performing deeds. Even though both words are relative to preserving and protecting the city, the teaching of obligations solidity the expectations of moral…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The suppliers of raw materials to Heineken Company are mainly farmers. Therefore, the threat for power of supplier is high. The bottle supplier for Heineken is provided by Heye Glas Nederland which is fully supplied the green bottle for the worldwide distribution of Heineken beer.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays