Preview

Why The Federalists Establish The First Party System?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
809 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why The Federalists Establish The First Party System?
2. The emergence of the Federalist and the Republicans established the First Party System in America. “[By] creating a new republic base on the rights of the individual, the North Americans introduced a new force into the world.” The nation’s first political party developed steadily in the 1790’s. Consequently, the new government faced fresh challenges for American politics. The Federalists split into two conflicting divisions. The causes of the split consisted of contrasting views over financial policies and foreign policies. Notably, the founding fathers Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson offered opposing visions for the future of the nation. Hamilton proposed a national government and an economy based off of manufacturing. Whereas, …show more content…
In fact, the Federalist Party was led by Alexander Hamilton and John Adams. They favored a strong central government and believed that the Constitution should be interpreted loosely. As treasury secretary, Hamilton devised 3 major reports to Congress as a way to enhance national authority and assist economic development. The lucid program presented the expansion on national mercantilism, it consisted of: public credit, a national bank, and manufactures. In fact, the report was welcomed by foreign and domestic creditors. For instance, the Federalist favored a cultivation of strong commercial ties with Great Britain as an economic accomplice. No to mention, the innovative financial policy was designed to overcome the fiscal problems that had afflicted the confederation. Markedly, in 1801 Samuel Blodget Jr. admitted that since the commencement of the funding system “the country prospered beyond all former example.” However, one of the complications that arose with the program was that it was anticipated for the elite of the country, the merchants and financiers of the …show more content…
The French Revolution instigated further inconsistencies between the two factions. Many American’s welcomed the French Revolution because it resolved feudalism and established a constitutional monarchy. However, as the French Republic rose and initiated the “Reign of Terror”, many Federalist condemned the new French government beliefs. While the Republicans proclaimed “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity!” In relation to the British, the relationship was extremely important regarding mercantilism, so the Federalists commenced to pro-Britain foreign policies. Whereas the Republicans argued that Jay’s treaty was too appeasing, yet the Senate still ratified it. Particularly, in the Election of 1796 when John Adams became president this weakened the Republicans even more. Adams upheld the Federalist pro-British foreign policy and supported Hamilton’s financial plans. As mentioned above, the Federalist attacks against the French Republic raised a great disturbance and protest among the people at home. The rivalry came to an enactment of coercive acts by the Federalists in order to limit the rights of the party system. To point out, the Republican Party consisted of headstrong Irishmen that attacked Adams’s policies. As a result, acts were enforced to target those specifically tied to the Republican Party. The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    AP U.S. History Goal 1: DQs

    • 2550 Words
    • 11 Pages

    - George Washington chose the talented Alexander Hamilton, who had served with him throughout the Revolutionary War, to take on the challenge of directing federal economic policy as the Secretary of Treasury. The first issue that Hamilton tackled as Washington's Secretary of Treasury concerned the problem of public credit. Governments at all levels had taken on so much debt during the Revolution. The commitment to pay them back was not taken very seriously. By the late 1780s, the value of such public securities had decreased to a small fraction of their face value. In other words, state IOU's — the money borrowed to finance the Revolution — was viewed as nearly worthless. Hamilton's vision for reshaping the American economy included a federal charter for a national financial institution. He proposed a Bank of the United States. Modeled along the lines of the Bank of England, a central bank would help make the new nation's economy dynamic through a more stable paper currency. The central bank faced significant opposition. Many feared it would fall under the influence of wealthy, urban northeasterners and speculators from overseas. In the end, with the support of George Washington, the bank was chartered with its first headquarters in Philadelphia. The third major area of Hamilton's economic plan aimed to make American manufacturers self-sufficient. The American economy had traditionally rested upon large-scale agricultural exports to pay for the import of British manufactured goods. Hamilton thought that this dependence on expensive foreign goods kept the American economy at a limited level, especially when compared to the rapid growth of early industrialization in Great Britain. Rather than accept this condition, Hamilton wanted the United States to adopt a mercantilist…

    • 2550 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    During Jefferson’s presidency, he implemented an embargo that required a strong central government to enforce.(Doc F) As a result of the embargo, manufacturing grew more rapidly under Jefferson than that of the federalist leader. With the band of trade, America became dependent on nation made products which helped grow the manufacturing industry drastically. By 1812, John Adams began to approve of the two Republican presidents’ restoration of the taxes and the Navy.(Doc G) Jefferson had restored taxes while he held office, while Madison worked on building back up the Navy. Even though the Founding Fathers were both finding a moderate ground, others were not adjusting. During both presidencies, the tariffs kept and enforced were disliked by some Republicans. Southern Democratic-Republican farmers rejected the protective tariff created by Madison because it lead to higher prices.(Doc H) These tariffs were set by Hamilton, and enhanced by Republican…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    American populace was partitioned to two groups. One group comprises of the federalists who were living in the north. Their advantage was in favor of the merchants, ship-owners, and the industrialist. They are currently known as the Democrat party. The North was experiencing a modern upset and Democratic Party was supportive of this change. The Second group comprises of the anti-federalists, who were living in the south and were in light of a legitimate concern for state and farmers right. They are presently known as the republican. History of the Americans demonstrates that the two political vested parties had/have their own particular thoughts. Those thoughts were planted to the most youthful era by the…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the years 1789 through 1800, Federalist went through many harsh conditions. There were many disputes between the Federalist Party, led by Hamilton, and the Republicans, led by Jefferson. The events that created the most trouble for the Federalists and were most significant in the development of the Federalist Party were creating a national bank, how to pay the national debt, and establishing the public credit. Overall, the Federalists faced more of an economic challenge than anything else.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The origins of the Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties can be traced back to the early 1790s. Initially, the Federalists, or broad constructionists, favored the growth of federal power and a strong central government. The Federalists promulgated a loose interpretation of the Constitution, which meant that they believed that the government could do anything by the implied powers of the Constitution or that congress had the right to interpret the Constitution based on connotation. On the contrary, the Democratic-Republicans favored the protection of states’ rights and the strict containment of federal power. The Democratic-Republicans were strict constructionists and they believed only in the enumerated powers of the Constitution. Up until 1800, these descriptions of the two political parties were very accurate. However during the period of 1801-1817, the Jefferson and Madison’s presidencies reveal that these characterizations were accurate only to a certain extent. These characterizations became inaccurate when Jefferson, Madison, and Monroe stepped up in power as president and were forced to compromise their political views for the benefit of the country in the face of war, economic pressure, and threats to the Union.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the tax. Resistance came to a climax in July 1794, when a U.S. marshal arrived in western…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our first president George Washington was a wise man and didn’t believe in political parties. He thought political parties would split apart the country and make government a competition instead of a place to serve the people. Although, inevitably the first political parties were made, the Federalists and Democratic-Republicans. The original political parties in America had very different views on many topics including their interpretation of the Constitution.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the young colonies of America broke away from their mother country and began to grow and develop into an effective democratic nation, many changes occurred. As the democracy began to grow, two main political parties developed, the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conflict that took place in the 1790’s between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists made a huge impact on American History. Alexander Hamilton led the Federalists and focused mainly on the city businesses as well as manufacturing interests of the seaports. On the other side, the Anti-Federalists whom were led by Thomas Jefferson represented the rural farmers and southern interests. With the Federalists favoring more federal involvement and the anti-federalists advocating states rights, this debate between the two concerned the central government versus that of the states.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalists’ envisioned a strong national government due to the fact that they thought humans were selfish. Alexander Hamilton, the leader of the Federalists, believed that a powerful, central government that use the rights protected in the Constitution would strengthen the state's. Moreover, Hamilton would rather have power in the capital than giving the states rights. “Real liberty is neither found in despotism or the extremes of democracy, but in moderate governments,” Hamilton remarked. In order to get the strong nation and government, he desired, Hamilton made a national bank to pay off taxes, print money, and to make loans. He also wanted to expand the economy to benefit business and trade.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through the development and drafting of the constitution, two political parties were born. One labeled as strict constructionists, the Jeffersonian Republicans, and the other labeled as broad constructionists, the Federalists. The Democratic-Republicans such as Thomas Jefferson, were first labeled as anti-federalists and believed the states should have the most power in the government and most vowed not to sign the constitution without the addition of a Bill of Rights. They believed that if a power was not specifically stated in the constitution, then it could not be acted upon. The Federalists such as Alexander Hamilton, believed that they could exercise whichever powers on the basis that, even if a power was not physically stated, it could be interpreted from the specified powers. During the presidencies of Washington and Adams these characterizations of the two parties remained evident, but during the presidencies of Republicans, such as Jefferson and Madison, the line between strict and broad constructionism became a little more unclear. After the election of 1800 both the Federalist and Democratic-Republican party began to back down on their views of constructionism when faced with the task of deciding what would benefit the nation most.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison (1801-1817), a dual political party government was starting to form. In the Constitution, which was made in 1787, it is portrayed Jeffersonian Republicans as strict constructionists and Federalists as broad ones. It is true that the Democratic-Republicans believed in the strict construction of the constitution and a weaker federal government, thinking that if there were high concentration of central government, it would lead to a loss of individual and state rights. Madison and Jefferson were two members of this political party, with Jefferson being known as the founder and leader of it. The Federalists, on the other hand, believed that a stronger central government was needed and the Articles of Confederation were too weak.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton Implied Powers

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Through the office of Secretary of the Treasury he was able to propose the idea of a national bank, the framework of which was based on the Bank of England. This government owned, and run, bank would help the American people recover…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "There is nothing I dread so much as a division of the Republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader and converting measures in opposition to each other. This...is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution."1 This view, expressed by John Adams, was not shared by all, namely Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. As the early American government began to form, so did the two major political parties. Alexander Hamilton was the founder of the Federalist Party, while Thomas Jefferson led the Anti-Federalists in response.2 Both men used their prominence in each party to their advantage to influence the public and their disputes created controversy and discordance between the parties and the American people. Hamilton and Jefferson had many disagreements throughout their careers and had radically different opinions on what their new country should be like.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hamilton and Jefferson represented different interests that would come to define the priorities of the nation's 1st political parties (Thomas 10). These two-party political systems were impacted by domestic and foreign affairs. Hamilton and Jefferson had different interests that would define the priorities of the nation's first political parties. The Federalists and Antifederalists division took place during the debates over ratification of the constitution (Sisung 2). The Federalists were more centralized, and they could keep their name as the Federalists because they were much more modest. They were known as those who only looked up to the government and followed all their rules. The Anti-Federalists were decentralized and had a variety of names, Democratic Republicans, Republican, but were mostly called Jeffersonian Republicans. They believed in freedom and opposed the Constitution and federal government which was the total opposite of what the Federalists believe in.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays