The simple answer to make the accords better is to address what went wrong such as the Palestine wanting to be recognized and so forth. Yet, to make the Oslo Peace Accords better, the area needed to be addressed is the mediators. The mediators in this case were the United States and there backing to such a deal (Freeman, 248). The United States backing the Oslo Accords could have been made better if they oversaw what both sides were talking about. Instead of simply backing the Oslo Accords, the United States should have been a part of the discussion. If the United States were involved in the dealings and text of the accords, perhaps the accords could have moved forward. The United States along with the other countries, wanted a peace agreement between both countries. By having a better mediator for the discussions, both Israel and Palestine could have gotten what they
The simple answer to make the accords better is to address what went wrong such as the Palestine wanting to be recognized and so forth. Yet, to make the Oslo Peace Accords better, the area needed to be addressed is the mediators. The mediators in this case were the United States and there backing to such a deal (Freeman, 248). The United States backing the Oslo Accords could have been made better if they oversaw what both sides were talking about. Instead of simply backing the Oslo Accords, the United States should have been a part of the discussion. If the United States were involved in the dealings and text of the accords, perhaps the accords could have moved forward. The United States along with the other countries, wanted a peace agreement between both countries. By having a better mediator for the discussions, both Israel and Palestine could have gotten what they