Preview

Why The Oslo Peace Accords What Went Wrong

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
901 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why The Oslo Peace Accords What Went Wrong
Another reason, the Oslo Peace Accord did not work was simply due to being the first time both Israel and Palestine coming to a deal towards peace. If the accords were held today as discussed later, there is a possibility of the accords working. For being in the early stages of trying to find common ground between both sides, the Oslo Peace Accords did their best. The reason the accords went wrong is there was not enough information or knowledge to go off to see what needed to be changed and do the change in a logical way. For both Israel and Palestine, the accords were a first of many talks to come but at the time the failure was inevitable. What went wrong was the early process of the talks and how neither side could come up with solutions to benefit both sides. Especially in a time where Palestine had so little, no government, no true leaders, or an actual place to call home. For Israel, it seemed they had to power, the leverage was on their side and they said what goes. Basically, the failure came …show more content…
The simple answer to make the accords better is to address what went wrong such as the Palestine wanting to be recognized and so forth. Yet, to make the Oslo Peace Accords better, the area needed to be addressed is the mediators. The mediators in this case were the United States and there backing to such a deal (Freeman, 248). The United States backing the Oslo Accords could have been made better if they oversaw what both sides were talking about. Instead of simply backing the Oslo Accords, the United States should have been a part of the discussion. If the United States were involved in the dealings and text of the accords, perhaps the accords could have moved forward. The United States along with the other countries, wanted a peace agreement between both countries. By having a better mediator for the discussions, both Israel and Palestine could have gotten what they

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    2003 Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One particular effect the division of Palestine had on the Palestinians was that they were not allowed to enter Israel, whereas the Jews are able to freely travel between the region. This creates a huge inequality between the Jews and Palestinians which is definitely a problem because the ability for the Jews to have more freedom will anger the Palestinians and stir further conflict. Secondly, the failure of the 1947 United Nations plan for partition in the Israeli-Palestinian region also had a detrimental effect on people. In Document 6 it states that one of the events that occurred in 1948 was a war that broke out. This affected the people who lived in the region because war would lead to several casualties and reparations that would cause an economic deficit. Furthermore, another major effect the division of the Israeli-Palestinian region had on people in the region were two intifadas. The intifadas were Arab uprisings against the Israeli government and military which was supported by the Palestinian Liberation Organization. This is significant because the intifadas were extremely violent and led to several hundreds of deaths and affected the perspectives of the people who lived in the region. The division of Palestine was one of the major divisions that occurred after World War II and it has made a considerable imprint on the…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 3and4

    • 268 Words
    • 1 Page

    Israelis and Palestinians conflict will continue indefinitely until they forgive each other in order to move forward in peace. The primary approach to solving the conflict today is a "two-state solution" that would establish Palestine as an independent state in Gaza and most of the West Bank, leaving the rest of the land to Israel. Though the two-state plan is clear in theory, the two sides are still deeply divided over how to make it work in practice. The alternative to a two-state solution is a "one-state solution," wherein all of the land becomes either one big Israel or one big Palestine. Most observers think this would cause more problems than it would solve, but this outcome is becoming more likely over time for political and demographic reasons.…

    • 268 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was the closest to a peace agreement the Israelis and Palestinians ever reached. There was significant opposition to the Peace Process, but support was higher: 80% of Palestinians said that they supported a two-state solution. (Ravnitz) However, after he was assassinated, his successors were unable to reach a deal, possibly because Arafat, the leader of the Palestinian Liberation Organization, trusted Rabin more (Bowen), leading to a slowdown in peace talks, so by now, support for peace talks and a two-state solution are down dramatically. About half of Palestinians support a two-state solution, down from 80%. Only about 35% of Israeli Arabs (distinct from Palestinians) think that a two-state solution will works (Ravnitz).…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After reading Mr. Ross's book, you earn that Barak was truly intnent for peace, and President Clinton was accommodating to him by bringing all pressure on Arafat to accept or reject a reasonable counter proposal. Since Arafat could not make peace with the Israelis, all this energy was in nothing. Although Mr. Ross does not necessarily reject the theory that Arafat was behind the eruption of the 2000 violence, he did absolutely nothing to prevent it. When Arafat felt the pressure, he vented the only way possible, with more of that same…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine living in a warzone, where every day could be your last day, and your country is in the war with itself. Where words of peace were only spoken, not carried out. Israel was one of those countries; it was 1993 when a break to the seemingly endless war began. The Oslo Accords, a result of both Israel and Palestine desire to move beyond the reputation of the intifadah, gave Palestine independence from Israel and brought the country into a financial golden age (“Israel”).…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paris Peace Accords

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Agreement on Ending the War and Restoring Peace in Vietnam arranged a settlement which ended direct military involvement by the United States and resulted in a temporary ceasefire, the end of the Vietnam War occurring two years later. The agreement was reached at the end of the Paris Peace...…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On June 28th 1919, the “Big Three”, Georges Clemenceau, Woodrow Wilson, and David Lloyd George, on behalf of Great Britain, the United States, and France, had formulated a peace treaty called Versailles Treaty to end the four-year-long First Word War, establishing the famous “Versailles System”. The purpose of the system is to build a peaceful world dominated by the victor countries, such as Great Britain, the United States and France. Therefore, the treaty harshly punished the losing countries, like Germany, Austria, and Hungary, making them decline in power. Every country participated in the Paris Conference with its own goals, and all countries, especially the three biggest victor countries, want to maximize their own interest. In this case, conflict was inevitable. Unfortunately, the treaty failed to make a perfect negotiation to solve problems, such as the placements new borders between countries, the amount of reparations the losing powers had to pay, and therefore, the treaty finally could only build a kind of illusive peaceful system, which was instability, and directly led to the Second World War. Why the Versailles treaty failed to bring peace and stability after the First World War? It’s no denying a fact that only when the most of delegation countries feel satisfied about an international treaty, or there are some powerful dominant country both have the willing and ability to sustain the treaty, the treaty can really take effect in a long term. However, in my opinion, all countries involved in the system, included the losing powers, the colonial countries, and even the victor powers, felt disappointed about the Versailles Treaty more or less, and unfortunately, at that time, the world system was an unstable one. The leading countries neither had the willing to protect the system in long term, nor had the ability to maintain it. Consequently, the collapse of the Versailles System was only a…

    • 2063 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Then after World War II and the Holocaust, there was a great push to do more to stop the genocidal efforts of Adolf Hitler to wipe out the Jewish people. There was this tragedy of the Jewish people, but many suggest that the way to deal with this was not to create a tragedy for the Palestinian people. Richard Falk goes on to say, “The UN decided to partition the former mandate that the British no longer wanted to administer and they gave, at the time, 55% of the historic territory to the insipient Jewish nation and 45% to the Palestinian nation. This seemed unfair and unacceptable at the time to the Palestinians and Arabs.”(“Global”) Yet again, it was another decision made by the European world that did not bother to consult the people who would be affected by the decision. The Palestinian and Arab people occupying the land were outraged. According to Office of the Historian, “The Palestinian Arabs refused to recognize this arrangement, which they…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Treaty of Versailles should have made the victors either to conciliate the enemy or destroy them. The Treaty of Versailles did neither. It did not pacify Germany, still less permanently weaken her, appearances notwithstanding, but left here scourged, humiliated and resentful.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Paris Peace Accords and the Vietnam War were some of the most important events to have taken place in world history. This paper will present an attempt to break the Paris Peace Accords down into its constituent parts. This will be done by analysing its setting, the negotiation process, as well as its successes and failures.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When you contextualize the issue, it’s evident that the Palestinians do have some validity to their grievances. One issue at hand is that the land Israel now occupies was once considered Palestine. The two civilizations used to coexist. It wasn’t until the mass influx of Jewish people following World War II when the battles over the region truly began. Following WWII, the Jewish Israeli settlers were given part of Palestine as a result of the persecutions to the people. It was done so by the United Nations on May 14th, 1948 in the following declaration. “By virtue of our national and intrinsic right and the strength of the resolution of the United Nations General Assembly, we hereby declare the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine, which shall be known as the State of Israel” (Siegel). It was a reasonable solution--a two-state territory.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The deputy general also informed members of the United that’s the reason behind why a two state solution has been failure is because he believes that both leaders o the Israel’s and Palestinians are not willing to be brave enough to take the vital steps needed for a successful peace process. Basically a two solution has not been successful because parties are not willing to have a two state solution. Therefore a huge part of the peace talks will have to focus on not only the conditions of a two state solution within Palestine but the…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Could the 'Big Three' have done any better, or was the Treaty of Versailles the best that could have been achieved under the circumstances?…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It was unfortunate that the covenant of the League of Nations was made a part parcel of the peace settlement. It would have been better if it had kept separate. There were many states which consider the Treaty Of Versailles as a treaty of revenge, and were not prepared to ratify the same. By not retifying the treaty , they refused to be the members of the League.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays