Preview

Why These Four Justices Rejected Marriage Equality Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
373 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why These Four Justices Rejected Marriage Equality Summary
The article entitled “Why These Four Justices Rejected Marriage Equality”, by Sunnivie Brydum talks about why the four members of the Supreme Court (Justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Chief Justice John Roberts.

One of the reason is that the dignity does not come from the government, but religious freedom is now at risk. “The Court’s decision today is at odds not only with the Constitution, but with the principles upon which our Nation was built.” This means that the decision of the majority may affect the religious liberty. This also means that the Constitution contains or does not have dignity.

Another reason is that this dangerous decision will silence the people who believe in so-called traditional language.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: Groups of the same sex couples sued their relevant state agencies in Ohio, Kentucky, Michigan, and Tennessee to challenge the constitutionality of those states bans on the same sex marriage or refusal to recognize legal same sex marriages that occurred in jurisdiction that provide for such marriages. James Obergefell (plaintiffs) in each case argued that the states statutes violated Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the fourteenth Amendment, and one group of plaintiffs also brought claims under the Civil Rights act. In all the cases, the trial court found in favor of the plaintiffs. The U.S Courts of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reverse and held that the states bans on same sex marriage and refusal to recognize marriages performed in other states did not violated the couples fourteenth amendment rights to equal protection and due process.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “Why These Four Justices Rejected Marriage Equality,” the author, Sunnivie Brydum, presents the different views of the justices who disagreed with the newly approved same-sex marriage bill. Recently the United States of America legalized same-sex marriage, and although five of the nine justices voted in favor of it, there were still four justices who expressed their dissent about the new law. The reasons these four justices voted against the law varied, but all four justices had made the same decision of voting against the law. Chief Justice John Roberts claims that the decision should have been made by the majority, not only the Court. The constitution says that justices are only supposed to state what the laws are in a country,…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stutzman Case Summary

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “This case is about crushing dissent. In a free America, people with differing beliefs must have room to coexist,” ADF’s senior counsel Kristen Waggoner said in a statement. “It’s wrong for the state to force any citizen to support a particular view about marriage or anything else against their will. Freedom of speech and religion aren’t subject to the whim of a majority; they are constitutional guarantees.”…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Four Justices disagreed, creating four contradicting opinion. Many of the supreme court justices disagreed with the majority stated that same-sex couples had the right to wed. All justices concurred that the Constitution itself does not say anything in regards to marriage. This implies marriage is not a counted right. Indeed, Justice Alito particularly stated, "The Constitution says nothing in regards to same-sex marriage." Because the privilege for same-sex couples to wed is not an identified right, the only way for it to be protected in our constitution is for it to be inferred. The justices stated that…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obergefell Case Summary

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The core issue in the Obergefell case is whether the right to marry whomever is a “fundamental right” of American citizens. While our biases and preconceived notions of liberty and social rights…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Subjectivity for Lct1 Wgu

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Maureen Dowd’s opinion column entitled “Happily Never After?” she expresses doubt in the Supreme Courts ability to rule in a way that she feels is fair to the Gay and Lesbian community. In her view the Supreme Court Justices are out of touch with society and they will fail to provide equality for gay couples who are only seeking equal respect in the law; to be treated just like other Americans and have the legal right to marry in their “pursuit of happiness.”…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This case is a landmark in the identification of the rights of homosexuals and homosexual couples. The rights of homosexuals have always been denied and restricted on many accounts, but in recent times have already made the steps to reject DOMA. Since DOMA sates that marriage is an agreement between a man and a women, it gives no innate right to homosexual unions in federal law. By looking at history we can easily define marriage, its evolution in the eyes of state and federal law and prove that…

    • 1068 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though many know of the court case, not all people know the history of it. The part that many know is that the people were gay, lesbian, and so on, and most people also know that they were fighting for the right to marry. What too many people do not know is that even though court Justices were against it, the majority did not care since it did not affect them. Justice Scalia said the following in his statement, “The substance of today’s decree is not of immense personal importance to me.” Since in many states, previous to the law passing, barely anyone who was same-sex could marry their spouse.Though this privilege was granted to opposite-sex spouses, along with insured plans, medical plans, and many other privileges. When the law was passed, same-sex couples would have the same privileges. “Insured plans in every state will require to offer coverage to same-sex spouses to the extent such plans cover opposite-sex…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his essay "Against Gay Marriage," William Bennett, a great spokesman for conservatives and former Secretary of education under President Reagan, maintains his conservative stance that allowing same-sex couples to marry would have a harmful and lasting effect on our society 's intrinsic values and, in his view, would stretch the "fragile" institution of marriage beyond recognition (409). Bennett, as the title indicates, presents a powerful argument "Against Gay Marriage." He argues that allowing gay marriage would change the meaning of marriage, the ideal of marriage as being an "honorable estate," and would have a large role in molding sexuality (409).…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prop 8

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The freedom to marry is a fundamental right, it's an expression of emotional support and public commitment. The plantiffs, the gay and lesbian communiuty, argue that they deserve the "fundamental" right to marry their partner. The state of California wants to keep sexual activity withing marriages and because of Prop 8, same sex couples are permitted to engage in any sexual activity. However, same sex couples are allowed to adopt children. Plantiffs want to have the state recognize their relationships. The Equal Protection Law of the fourtheenth ammendment states that "no state deny any person within its jurisdiction." Evidence at the trial shows that marriage in the US traditionally…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dynamic Court Viewpoints

    • 1936 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Though traditionally the courts of the United States have abided by the conditions of the constrained court, the court was being quite instrumental in the advancement of marriage for same sex couples. With the exception of the Supreme court case Bowers v. Hardwick in 1986, there had been a general trend of the courts to serve as important implementers of social change for same sex marriage. Yet, the courts have not been able to figuratively strike the mortal blow to issue. Of the accomplishments won by activists in the court, many had been rulings that simply overturned laws forbidding same sex marriage. In order for there to be true social change, the courts would need rule that not only are same sex marriages legal, they must be held to the same standard of equality as heterosexual marriages. Though activists continue to hope that one day full marriage equality can become a reality, it is important to understand the previous cases that been brought forth in the courts…

    • 1936 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitution and its amendments are supposed to protect our freedoms, not take them away and limit them for a certain demographic of people. My cousin, who is 28 and will be graduating from medical school this spring, has recently come out as gay. He has experienced depression and intolerance from his colleagues and professors. He has inspired me to become an advocate for allowing equal marital freedoms in all states, and to help bring this bigotry to justice. It is our duty as Americans to support the freedom of others. Our country was founded off the fundamental idea of freedom and equal opportunity; therefore it is a vital part of our nation’s…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After reviewing the case study of Nursing Malpractice in a Mental Health Setting. There are many different factors that had led to the unfortunate death of this child. I would begin with inaccurate documentation of this child severe airway disease, as being listed as mild reactive airway disease. Later, after developing symptoms of an increased cough and wheezing without the presents of a fever, the nursing staff dismissed it as his attempt to avoid group therapy. The next situation that is concerning is that he had requested to be taken to the emergency room for treatment and made a statement of “You’re going to kill me” and was told by the nurse “that he doesn’t need further treatment” and had referred to his outburst as attention seeking…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive Essay

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    At least 11% of women smoke during pregnancy. Many of these women smoke without knowing the significant negative effects smoking has on their babies before, during, and after the pregnancy. When a woman smokes during pregnancy, she exposes her baby to dangerous chemicals such as tar, carbon monoxide, nicotine, and other poisonous chemicals that travels through the bloodstream and goes directly to the baby. Nicotine restricts the oxygen through the blood vessels throughout the body, including those leading to the umbilical cord. There are more than 4,000 chemicals in cigarettes. Among these chemicals, there are life-threatening issues that can happen while smoking during a woman’s pregnancy and after the babies are born.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Poe’s family life was not one to be desired by others. He also had a strange personality, which caused him to write even stranger stories. One of these stories won him an award, and even further recognition. Although only one of his works received official recognition, his works will always stay in the minds of those who read them.…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays