Preview

Why Was Harry S. Truman Justified?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
157 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Was Harry S. Truman Justified?
As the first President, and world leader, faced with the decision of whether or not to use this technology in war, Harry S. Truman is quoted as saying, “‘I did not like the weapon. But I had no qualms if…millions of lives could be saved’” (Truman, 1973, p. 273). Despite Truman expressing peace with his decision, it is estimated that there were around 150,000 casualties in the attack on Hiroshima (O’ Malley, 2016, The Bomb section, para. 3). The question that arises from these two facts is this: what exactly were Truman’s possible courses of action, and why did he choose the one he did? Multiple sources attest to four possibilities that were on the table; these were 1.) occupy the Japanese mainland, 2.) use only conventional bombs on Japan;

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The first option would allow President Truman to end the war peacefully, and it would have also allowed the Japanese to withdraw from the war without shame to their leader and save the thousands of Japanese individuals by not making the United States have to make the choice of dropping the atomic bombs. This option would have let Truman show that “We as Americans have not sunk to the level of our enemies” “We should end the war now in a manner that reflects the value we place on the sanctity of human life and the dignity of the individual”. The author gives Truman a second option and this option approaches the war in the Pacific with a demonstration of the atomic bomb in efforts to force the Japanese to surrender without condition. This includes the uprising of the Manhattan Project which gave the United States the “weapon of almost inconceivable power” with the scare tactics of the demonstration this gives the Japanese leaders an idea of what would…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Truman Doctrine Dbq

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Truman Doctrine, the Marshall Plan, NATO, support for Chiang Kai-shek in China, and the American response to the North Korean invasion were all based on the foreign policy of containment in hopes that the United States could create a way to eliminate the threat of anymore Soviet expansion. The Truman Doctrine was a way for the United States to give aid to those who who were trying to stop the damage that the Soviets were causing. The Truman Doctrine was the main contributing factor to why the American people had support for Chiang Kai-shek in China. The Doctrine was also the reason why the United States supported the south after the North Korean invasion. The Marshall Plan had its role in the foreign policy of containment by suggesting…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    BREAKING NEWS- President Truman had been warned about invading Japan, and the terrific casualties they were capable off. However since they were afraid of attacking our soil, he ordered for a weapon large enough and powerful enough in hopes of bringing this all to an end. On August 6th, 1945 a five ton-bomb was dropped in the city of Hiroshima, Japan. The bombing killed 80,000 people; the city wasn’t left in great shape as well. Although the devastating outcome, we believe that this is the last of the feuding between them and us. (P.2, http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/atomic-bomb-dropped-on-hiroshima). The atomic bombs are scary, and threating to all nations. Sadly we believe this has both ended problems we have been facing, but also…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Truman’s decision of the atomic bombing has undeniably made a huge impact to world’s history events. Throughout decades, many individuals’ have encountered diverse explanations as to why it was necessary for the dropping of the atomic bomb. While others believe it was essential, some may think that it caused an enormous catastrophe, murdering millions of innocent civilians and produced a generation with an atrocious radiation poison. Years has passed by and it continues to be the utmost talked about event. The atomic bombing that took place in Japan can be argued that it was the greatest decision made by president Truman. There are majority of different schools of thought behind President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombing. Readings that have been encountered can conclude that President Truman’s decision was a great one. This event prevented future fatalities amongst the Japanese as well as the Americans, ended the world war II, and it was the only option handed to Truman.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6th, 1945, the United States dropped the first ever Atomic weapon on Hiroshima, Japan. 140,000 people lost their lives, most of which were civilians. President Truman was in charge of this major decision, and he made the correct choice. The alternative solutions were much too costly for the United States, both in expenses and American casualties. Another reason Truman’s decision is justified was due to the declination of the fair ultimatum recieved by Japan. Also it was important to the well being of the world to keep the Soviets out of Japan. Dropping the Atomic Bomb was the most reliable and definite way to end the war.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 was made by a complex group of technological, political and military influences. History has it that the bombs were dropped in order to save American lives by avoiding the invasion of Japanese homelands, at least, that was what President Truman told the American public at the time. “For years, this simple view has been challenged by a seemingly more sophisticated academic perspective that the bombs were wrongfully used against innocent civilians, did not genuinely factor into the surrender of Japan, and would have better served the war effort as part of a diplomatic “carrot and stick” package.” (Beason 1). Some argue that the first bomb may have been required to achieve Japanese surrender, but the second one was a needless act of barbarism. According to Admiral William D. Leahy, the President’s Chief of Staff, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war over Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” (Beason 1). However, I have many facts to counteract all of these criticisms and to support President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    If the war continued, an invasion would be needed and such an invasion “… would have cost an estimated million casualties,” (The Decision to Drop the Bomb). It was even believed by President Truman “… that the bombs saved Japanese lives as well,” (The Decision to Drop the Bomb). Even though the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths, the quick end to the war they brought saved more lives in the long run than those that were lost in the…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    military could see that. “On June 8 and imperial conference adopted The Fundamental Policy to be Followed Henceforth in the Conduct of the War”. This policy meant that the Japanese pledged to “prosecute the war to the bitter end, in order to uphold the national polity, protect the imperial land and accomplish the objectives for which we went to war” (Maddox). This policy, this pledge meant nothing other than what it said. Leaving President Truman in a tough situation. This policy meant that the Japanese were going to fight and die fighting. They were going to continue this war until they had gotten what they wanted to, until they had gotten what they had entered this war for. Japan's unwillingness to surrender was one of the reasons President Truman was forced to use the…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Truman relieved Douglas MacArthur of command of the U.S. forces in Korea. The dismissal of MacArthur set off a brief uproar among the American public, but Truman remained committed to keeping the conflict in Korea a “limited war.” Problems with the flamboyant and egotistical General had been brewing for months. In the beginning of the war in Korea the general had devised some brilliant strategies and military maneuvers the helped save South Korea from falling to the invading forces of North Korea. As U.S. and United Nations forces turned the tide of battle in Korea, MacArthur argued for a policy of pushing into North Korea to completely defeat the communist forces. Truman went along with this plan, but worried that the communist government of the People's Republic of China might take the invasion as a hostile act and intervene in the conflict. In October 1950, MacArthur met with Truman and assured him that the chances of a Chinese intervention were slim. Then, in November and December 1950, hundreds of thousands of Chinese troops crossed into North Korea and flung themselves against the American lines, driving the U.S. troops back into South Korea. MacArthur then asked for permission to bomb communist China and use Nationalist Chinese forces from Taiwan against the People's Republic of China. Truman flatly refused these requests and a very public argument…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When President Harry Truman made the decision to drop the first ever atomic bomb, did he saves lives or did he create a whole new Pandora's box that we would continue to struggle with today? After gathering facts and meeting with our Allies such as the Soviet Union, he believed that dropping the atomic bomb would make the Japanese surrender quickly saving lives in the long run. There were many factors that went into the decision that President Truman made. After the bloody battles of Iwo Jima and Okinawa, American soldiers and the American government realized that the Japanese would fight to the end. They did not believe they were "beaten" but they believed they were luring the American troops to their turf where they could fight a better battle in their rugged terrain.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, the benefit of this program brought not only America year into the future but the entire world with it. The research done to make these bombs possible allowed for multiple advancements in the fields of radiation and cancer. It was these effects that the Japanese's did not understand when examining those affected but the blast. The use of similar radiation is used to cure cancer. The advancements made by the dropping of the bombs would have never been examined due to the simple facts that is would not be considered "humane". The decision that President Truman made may not have been considered humane to most people. However, the decision was not his alone it determined by a committee of advisors who believed it best…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    President Truman was justified in using atomic weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August of 1945. As commander-in Chief of US Armed forces, President Truman was responsible for the men and women in harms way. Americans and Japanese were dying, suffering life-altering injuries and experiencing torture and deprivation in prison camps each day the war raged. Additionally, it is important to look at the cultural elements of Japan, , the possible invasion of Japan, and the American morale during this time, when addressing the justification of Truman's decision.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After considering the pros and cons of the use of nuclear weapons I believe that President Truman and the U.S were not justified in the use of the atomic bomb to force Japan’s surrender. First of all there were alternative options to resolve the war than resorting to drop a bomb. Instead of bombing Japan we could’ve cut a deal or create a treaty to end the war with little to no bloodshed or could’ve even waited for the Russians to attack to scare Japan into conditional surrender or at least less casualties if assisted by U.S army. Truman should have assessed…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To place us in President Truman’s shoes , America was getting tired of being at war but, “…the Japanese military was refusing to give up their fight.” (Par.2) Although whats done is done, the question still remains to this day, was Truman Justified in using this device? Seeing as how the United States reached out to the Japanese Government for a surrender and also included in the terms that if a surrender was not reached it would result in “total destruction”(Par.2) I believe that the United States was justified in their…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6th, 1945, President Truman addressed the American people, informing them that one of the most influential events in history had occurred, “Sixteen hours ago an American airplane dropped one bomb on Hiroshima,...That bomb had more power than 20,000 tons of TNT...which is the largest bomb ever yet used in the history of warfare”. By the summer of 1945, millions of soldiers and citizens of the world had died after years of fighting in the Second World War. Although Europe’s involvement in the war had come to an end, the War in the Pacific between the United States and Japan had not found its conclusion. The dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki have come to be among the most debatable events in history. While some argue that because the bombings ended World War II, more lives of both American and Japanese soldiers were saved then there were victims of the bombs; others argue that more measures could have been attempted in order to possibly preventing the need for the bombs. The argument that the dropping of the bombs have prevented possible future wars from occurring has been made. However, the lasting environmental and social effects of the bomb have left…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays