Preview

Why Were the Statesmen at the Congress of Vienna so Reluctant to Give Serious Consideration to the Establishment of an Independent and United Italy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
846 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Were the Statesmen at the Congress of Vienna so Reluctant to Give Serious Consideration to the Establishment of an Independent and United Italy
Why were the Statesmen at the congress of Vienna so reluctant to give serious consideration to the establishment of an independent and united Italy?

The Congress of Vienna was a peace conference after the Napoleonic Wars. During the Congress of Vienna the European powers, Britain, Austria, Russia and Prussia began to draw up a settlement that they hoped would ensure them a place in Europe.
This settlement, from 1814-1815 was dominated by a few leading statesmen from the major powers. Austria’s chancellor Prince Metternich had a major influence at the Vienna peace conference. Britain’s foreign minister, Lord Castlereagh, Russian Tsar Alexander I and Prussian King Frederick William III also played important roles at the congress. Additionally, the foreign minister of defeated France, Prince Talleyrand, was able to play a significant role at the peace conference. The main aim of the congress of Vienna was to return Europe to political stability and to prevent France from causing so much trouble again.
The person who had the most impact on the Congress of Vienna was the statesmen, who was a Austrian foreign minister, Prince Klemens Metternich. He knew that for the meeting to be a success, he would have to modify his conservative ideals for a new Europe. Wanting to secure the Austrian predominance, Metternich tried to form German and Italian confederations, both under Austrian rule. Along with Castlereagh, Metternich opposed to the elimination of France. Metternich also agreed that Russia must be kept form obtaining too much control. Another plan that Metternich wanted to achieve at the Congress of Vienna, was long-lasting order in Europe. But his biggest hope for the Congress of Vienna was to restore conservative governments in the new Europe.
The treaty mainly reflected the views of Metternich and the desires of Austria, which had even greater control over Italy affairs. The Austrian control and influence was dominating the unification of Italy and after

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In 1815, Italy had just emerged from Napoleonic rule and was completely divided into nine separate states; with different rulers and different cultures. By 1848, these states had progressed towards, albeit merely to a limited extent, some kind of national unity – national unity meaning the feeling of being united and together as one country. It could be argued that the lack of success in the reception of Giuseppe Mazzini’s ideas was the most substantial reason explaining this slow progress; though some would say that it was mostly down to factors such as the power and influence of Austria, poor communication within Italy, or its weak military. Through analysing the evidence, it would appear that the main reason for the slow progress of national unity within this time frame was poor communication.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For all the difficulty France had coursed, the Congress was remarkably delicate towards Frence, that primarily have to be compelled to keep its ancient, pre-Revolution boundaries. The congress conjointly stopped probably explosive problems from obtaining out of hand: the Republic of Poland issue may have junction rectifier to war or more hostility, however was handled with extreme care by cluster of terribly capable diplomats. Also, the steadiness the Congress created helped keep reactionary regimes in power and should have slowed social progress, and far of the years between 1815 and 1848 were animated by the interaction of liberal and conservative ideals. But in all, the Congress of national capital was a hit. It created enough powers of comparable strength and influence that name of them may go too way while not being powerless by coalition of the others.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    World War 1 Dbq

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife ( Austria-Hungry president ). That maybe the alliance,…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Austria had a massive empire in the early 19th century, Italy only being a small part. The 1815 Congress of Vienna had given Austria direct control over Lombardy and Venetia, and had also put an Austrian family in charge of ruling smaller duchies such as Parma and Modena. As such, Austria had dominating control over a lot of Italy. However, this was not the only reason why Italian revolutionaries failed. Other factors included the fact that there was no foreign support against Austria and other foreign rulers in Italy and the fact that there was a lack of cooperation between the various revolutionaries.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the French revolution and Napoleonic wars, the conservatives were inclined to restore monarchies. By restoring old boundaries, the balance of power was ensured. This was so that no one country will become a hegemon like what France did before. They also did not want another revolution to occur. The Congress of Vienna was set up to discuss issues of restoring old boundaries and mediate issues that may potentially bring disharmony or even war.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, one of the aims of the congress was to bring peace to Europe. This meant that power had to be evenly distributed, balanced in other words. As a result, it was agreed that the five European powers (Russia, Austria, Prussia, France and United Kingdom) had to have an even share in the influence they have and the land they possessed too. As the other powers feared the return of a strong France, the country was forced to return to its old borders (the 1790 borders). In this congress the first signs of collective security came into play. To further strengthen chances of peace in Europe, it was agreed that the countries were free to do whatever they wanted. However should this sort of independence turn encourage a particular power to threaten another power, then all other powers were allowed to take action against that particular power (refer to page 59 of History of Europe and the Middle East Course Companion).…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Klemens Von Metternich

    • 2465 Words
    • 10 Pages

    He studied philosophy at the University of Strasburg, and law and diplomacy at Mainz. A journey to England completed his education. Metternich began his public career in 1801 as Austrian ambassador to the Court of Dresden. Though he had for several years prepared himself for a diplomatic career, he was especially fortunate in being immediately appointed to so prominent a position. Only two years later he was made ambassador to Berlin. The emperor considered it very important to have a minister at Berlin who could gain the favour of the Court and the principal Prussian statesmen, and who knew how to combine "great powers of observation with a moderate and agreeable manner". Metternich had already proved that he possessed these qualities. Napoleon was then emperor with the new empire at the zenith of its power. The Emperor Francis needed his ablest ambassador at Napoleon's Court, and in May, 1806, he sent Metternich to Paris. Metternich found himself in the difficult position of representing Austria in the face of the overweening threats and ambitious plans of Napoleon at the height of his power. He did so with dignity and firmness, as his report of his important audience with Napoleon on 15 August, 1808, shows. The year 1809 is marked by the great war between Austria and France. The German States were called upon to join her, but only the Tyrol responded. On 13 May Vienna was besieged by the French, but eight days later Napoleon was defeated by the Archduke Charles at Aspern. Metternich, treated as a prisoner of state by Napoleon, was finally released in July in exchange for members of the French embassy. After the battle of Wagram Austria's position was hopeless. Its army was cut off from Hungary and compelled to retreat to Moravia and Bohemia. A great…

    • 2465 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Vienna Settlement (1814-1815) was made up of not one but three sets of negotiations. The First Treaty of Paris (May 1814), which was made just after the French Revolution, was convened to prevent Europe before French expansion. The Treaty forced Napoleon to abdication and he was send to/on the Elba. The Congress of Vienna – which was a conference between ambassadors of the most powerful countries in Europe – went on November 1814 to June 1815. It was until the Napoleon had run off from Elba and interrupted the Congress with his ‘100days’. The Congress indeed did not make any decisions not related to borders and new order in Europe except banishing slave trade in France. The main aim for Europe was prevent countries before France and preserving the peace. After Napoleon’s ‘100 Days’, when the battle of Waterloo was his great defeat, countries assembled once again on the Second Treaty of Paris (November 1815). Monarchs reduced France o its 1790 boundaries and ordered it to pay indemnity. As everything, the Vienna Settlement had it bad and good sides and this is what made a dispute between historians.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prince Metternich was the chancellor of Austria; he was the most influential man during the time of the German unification. Prince Metternich was the chancellor of Austria between 1807 and 1848, during his time as chancellor of Austria, he tried in many…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why was the influence of other European states important to the creation of a united Italy?…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Congress of Vienna

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Congress of Vienna prevented a recurrence of the Napoleonic nightmare by restoring the borders of Europe that had existed before the Napoleonic Wars, and establishing the principle of legitimacy in Europe. The Quadruple Alliance forced France to regress to its pre-War geographical boundaries and allowed the borders of countries surrounding France to strengthen their boundaries. The kingdom of the Netherlands was reestablished in the north of France, Piedmont was restored in the south, Prussia was given important territories in the west, and Austria gained full control of northern Italy. The principle of legitimacy in Europe allowed for royal families who had ruled before the French Revolution to take back their previous power. The reign of only legitimate monarchs in Europe was intended to crush any notion of the republican and democratic ideals that were conceived during the French Revolution.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Austria was one of the main powers in Europe for centuries, but that meant that it was involved in most of the European conflicts in the 18th, 19th, and 20th century. Also while many countries were becoming liberal, industrial, and very nationalistic The Austrian Habsburg Empire remained dynastic, absolutist, and agrarian. These problems were not solved until the fall of Austria after WWI. They agreed to the Compromise of 1867 because they wanted the support of the Hungarians because they had a strong economy, military, and politics. They also had just been defeated by Prussia making it impossible for them to be included in German affairs. It was a success because they soon had established Habsburg rule in Hungary and…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vienna Settlement

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Fourth History Test: How far did the Vienna Settlement contribute to maintaining the peace in Europe in the period 1815-1914? The Vienna Settlement refers to a series of agreements made by the European powers at the Congress of Vienna in 1815. As the peace terms with France had already been decided by the Treaty of Paris (signed earlier on May 30, 1814), the Congress of Vienna was mainly concerned with solving the problems brought about by the Napoleonic wars. To solve these problems, the four European powers reached certain agreements at the Congress of Vienna on June 9, 1815. These settlements, consisting of both territorial and political ones, were commonly known as the Vienna Settlement. There were many factors contributing to maintaining of the peace of Europe in the period 1815-1914. One of them was the Vienna Settlement. However, there were other factors as well, for example the Congress System. To decide the extent the Vienna Settlement contributing to keeping European peace during 1815-1914, we have to find out which one of the above factors could remove the threat to peace sustainably. The more successful, the larger the extent, and vice versa. Not the entire Vienna Settlement contributing to maintaining of the peace of Europe in the period 1815-1914. Only those settlements relating to building the arc of containment around France, and to building an effective balance of power in Europe helped to keep peace of the time. To begin, the European powers built an arc of buffer states on the eastern borders of France at the Congress of Vienna. First, they joined Belgium with the Netherlands to form a new Kingdom known as the Kingdom of the United Netherlands. Then, they gave Prussia the Rhineland --- the land adjacent to the eastern borders of France. Finally, they strengthened the southeastern border state of France, Piedmont, by giving her two French provinces of Savoy and Nice. In building stronger buffer states along France’s eastern borders, the powers…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many will say that Cavour was the architect of Italian unification, although he took part on the evolving process his intentions was not to unify Italy, at most the North. Cavour differs from Mazzini in many distinctive points, the first one being that Cavour had an excellent political experience and as a politician he was very competent. Therefore with these talents he was able to make intelligent decision for Italy, as he was prime minister of Piedmont. Even though Italy had the King Victor Emmanuel great power stood in the hands of Cavour and with that he made the nation develop drastically. He installed better railways and farming methods, also opened trade with other states, Cavour had a great vision of an Indepent Italy and without an enhanced industrially speaking Italy it probably wouldn’t have been able to unify itself. These were the steps towards the unification and towards getting rid of Austrian influence, as they had so much of it inside Italy and one of Cavour’s main goals was to get rid of the power Austria had over them.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon Exiled to Elba

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    * Return of Napoleon united the powers at Vienna, and agreed to raise and army under the Duke of Wellington…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics