If the image of God is to act as moral support, a friend, and an object of love, is he also the answer to happiness. If religion is based on experiences of the individual, men themselves are already acting out upon it to find their own happiness. Therefore religion cannot be roofed under one “science of religion” for every man has their own view of what true happiness is. Perhaps real religion is our own faithfulness, how far our faith is willing and will go to ensure what we do know, and possibly reveal our future happiness. The divide in the science and living religion, is what will ensure happiness, following one’s own faith as contrary to
If the image of God is to act as moral support, a friend, and an object of love, is he also the answer to happiness. If religion is based on experiences of the individual, men themselves are already acting out upon it to find their own happiness. Therefore religion cannot be roofed under one “science of religion” for every man has their own view of what true happiness is. Perhaps real religion is our own faithfulness, how far our faith is willing and will go to ensure what we do know, and possibly reveal our future happiness. The divide in the science and living religion, is what will ensure happiness, following one’s own faith as contrary to