Preview

Williams Construction Co. V. Oshrc

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
987 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Williams Construction Co. V. Oshrc
Assignment #4 – R. Williams Construction Co. v. OSHRC
Sarah Barnard
February 26, 2012
Business Employment Law - HRM 510
Dr. Zelphia A. Brown, SPHR, Instructor

Assignment # 4- R. Williams Construction Co. v. OSHRC 1. What were the legal issues in this case? This case is based around the laws and regulations of OSHA. OSHA is an Occupational Safety and Health Act that has been put into place to ensure the safety of employees while on the job. These regulations are put into place to help reduce the number of on the job injuries and death. In this case, Williams Construction was put under investigation after a trench collapse, which resulted in the death of one employee and a serious injury in another. After the investigation Williams was charged with four OSHA violations that all resulted in expensive fines. The issues that arose from the investigation included; the failure to instruct employees and managers on how to recognize and avoid hazardous work conditions, the failure to ensure that employees did not have to travel more than twenty five feet to a safe zone, the failure to have a “competent person” that was specifically trained in trench safety and the final violation was the failure to make sure that the walls of the evocation were either sloped or supported. It is the belief of OSHA that if these regulations were followed that this tragic accident could have been avoided. The legal issue here is whether or not the courts and the construction company itself should up hold the violations of specific OSHA standards. 2. Explain what the employer did or failed to do that violated the OSH Act. The first violation that was brought against Williams was the failure to provide instructions to employees and their managers about how to recognize and avoid un safe working conditions. This violation is basically stating that the company did not provide enough training to their employees to ensure that the job cite was safe. This standard set in by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    R. Williams Construction Company v. OSHRC is a case regarding the rules and regulations of OSHA verse the practices of a construction company. OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Act) is a government regulated organization that was created to ensure the safety of employees while on the job. The regulations of OSHA have been put in place to eliminate and/or reduce the number of on the job injuries and deaths. Therefore, legal issue of this case is whether or not the courts should hold the construction company responsible for specific violations of OSHA standard regulations. Yet, in the case of Williams Construction the company was put under investigation by OSHA after a trench collapsed at a construction site, which resulted in the death of one employee Jose Aguiniga and the serious injury of another employee by the name of Adam Palomar. Once OSHA completed their investigation, they charged Williams Construction Company with four violations that carried hefty fines. The violations found from the investigation included:…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In July of 2000 Curtis Williams was indicted by a grand jury in Williamson County, Texas for aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury. While under indictment, Williams traveled to Louisiana from Texas on a Greyhound bus. The bus Williams was traveling on was scheduled to make a stop at the Shreveport Greyhound Bus terminal on September 12,…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sutton v. Tomco Machining

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Facts of the Case: In this appeal, DeWayne Sutton, an employee of Tomco Machining, Inc. claimed that he injured his back on the job while disassembling a chop saw. Sutton alleged that he was fired within one hour of reporting the workplace injury to Tomco’s president, Jim Tomasiak. No reason was specified in the termination; however he was told the firing was not due to his work ethic or job performance or because he had broken any work rule or company policy.…

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Construction Law Cases

    • 1239 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The issue in this case is between the plaintiff, Leon Slavin, and the defendant, Joan W. Borinstein. Slavin is suing Borinstein over a dispute that erupted over payments on a construction project that were not received; on a project Slavin was building for Borinstein. Borinstein and her people agreed to pay Slavin 10 percent of the cost on a house they wanted to build in Los Angles. They would make the payments in installments. Slavin began to not receive payment for the appellant; then Borinstein’s lawyer tried to modify the contract mid project, therefore trying to reduce the amount owed to Slavin. The two disagreed, initially, however eventually thought they had come to terms on a modification. Soon after Slavin began to not receive payments for the second time, therefore he halted construction. At the time he halted construction the balance reached around $300,000. The rules that were applied are Civil Code section 1697, Civil Code section 1580, Civil Code section 1581, and last Civil Code section 1584. Each rule played its own part in the case and determining the conclusion. Code 1697 states that oral contracts may be modified; this played a role by allowing the respondent to claim that his oral contract was altered. Code 1580 talks about consent and how it needs to be mutual among all parties. This contributed to the case because the court came to the conclusion that the oral modification was not valid because it was not mutual. Code 1581 is relevant to how consent is to be given and communicated among all the parties. Lastly code 1584 states if a party acts on a proposal or states they accept a proposal then the proposal is accepted. This code was important because even though the counter modification wasn’t considered accepted, the initial modification was still effective because after the offer, Slavin continued the project. This allowed for the court to come to a…

    • 1239 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    This law requires that employers provide employees with a safe and functional work environment. In order to stay compliant with this federal law, Bradley would need to be sure that all the equipment that is needed to operate his limousine business is in working order to help keep the employees safe. I would also recommend that Bradley take advantage of the resources that OSHA offers to small businesses. These resources include free education to the employer and employees, training, and compliance assistance specialists. The consequence of non-compliance of this law is a fine. The amount of the fine would depend on the degree of violation and would be assessed by an OSHA representative. Bradley would need to consider all aspects of OSHA laws before employing anyone at his limousine business (Occupational Safety and Health Administration ,…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Co. was the first class-action sexual harassment lawsuit in the US. It was originally filed for Lois Jenson and other female works at EVTAC mine in Eveleth, Minnesota. In this case, it was noted that Mrs. Jenson began working in March 1975 along with some other women, and they were continuously harassed from male employees via abusive language, threats, and stalking. Originally, Jenson made a formal complaint to the Minnesota Department of Human Rights in 1984, however, because of this, she had to withstand even more harassment. As after news that she reported it caught on, another worker or workers had popped her car tires. As a result of the continued harassment, and reports to the human rights committee, the MDHR…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. Refer students to the Weekly Fatality/Catastrophe Report and explain its purpose. (Emphasize that this represents one week of worker fatalities reported to OSHA.) Show where the current report is located on the website, if available.…

    • 4649 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    While I agree that the hardworking citizens of this country go to work with the intentions of coming home. I do not agree that OSHA should increase their regulations, In fact, I question their origins of authority, and most importantly who they report to. OSHA, “has long been at the center of ideological battles over the power and reach of the federal government (Well, 2003). When an OSHA inspector comes in and cites a company for infringing on one of the many policies they have where does that money go, who does it benefit, and most importantly who regulates the enforcers of the OSHA sector. For all the good that has come from OSHA in compliance in the construction and healthcare industry I have to question their effectiveness…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Toxicology

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Bailey, M.A., Conn, E.J., Davis, F.D., Doran, W.K., Duggin, K.A., Flood, J.B.,(…)Siepman, K.B. (2008) Occupational Safety and Health Law Handbook. Lanham MD: Rowan and Littlefield publishing group.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gives EEOC authority to sue in federal courts when it finds reasonable cause to believe that there has been employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. This is a federal and state law.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bibliography: Bennett-Alexander D., Hartman L., (6th Ed.) (2009). Employment Law for Business. Columbus, OH: Irwin McGraw-Hill…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Employment Law

    • 2830 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The concept of harassment did not figure in the original anti-discrimination legislation, American legal theories were influential to the formation of harassment laws in Britain. The American Equal Opportunities commission identified sexual harassment as being unwelcome sexual advances that rejection of which would hinder the recipient’s employment and conduct that created a hostile or intimidating working environment. In British law the idea of harassment was became realised as a form of direct sex or race discrimination on the account that it amounted to treating a person less favourably on the grounds of sex or race (see Porcelli v Strathclyde Regional Council (1984); De Souza v AA (1986)).…

    • 2830 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Critical Incident Evaluation

    • 2254 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Forgacs, as the employer of Phillips, werecharged for breaching the Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983, Section 15(1). Investigation into the incident showed failures on Forgacs behalf to givethe necessary information, training and instruction and provide the adequate equipment to perform the task that contributed to the incident (NSWIRC 2000). Short-falls in the OHS management system, particularly in the areas of commitment and policy, and planning, can be identified as being the root cause behind the active failures and latent conditions that led to Phillips death. There are many actions Forgacs can take to reduce the likelihood of an incident like this reoccurring, such as implementing appropriate training and…

    • 2254 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Employment Law Assignment

    • 3728 Words
    • 15 Pages

    A tribunal Judgement report on constructive and unfair dismissal, detriment as a result of whistle blowing/ protective disclosure, injury to feelings etc.…

    • 3728 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unfair Dismissal

    • 4562 Words
    • 19 Pages

    t is important to distinguish unfair dismissal from the common law remedy for wrongful dismissal. The latter is a civil law remedy essentially based upon breach of the contract of employment. From the point of view of the employee, there are significant deficiencies in this civil law relief as a remedy. Because an employer is generally entitled under the terms of the contract to dismiss upon giving the appropriate period of notice as stipulated by the contract, damages will often be limited to the loss of earnings during that period. The civil law does not provide for a remedy by way of reinstatement. There is no remedy based upon breach of contract for failure to follow appropriate grievance and disciplinary procedures prior to dismissal. However, it will be argued below that the development of the concept of unfair dismissal and the range of remedies available in respect of it has perhaps empowered the employee to too great an extent with the ironic result that he may ultimately be less well served as a result of a consequent reluctance on the part of prospective employers to expose themselves to the consequences of employing an individual who will in due course be in a position to pursue such a powerful array of relief against them.…

    • 4562 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays