Preview

Woolf And Socrates: A Comparative Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1263 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Woolf And Socrates: A Comparative Analysis
Both Woolf and Socrates have been questioning society as a whole. Woolf questioned the ideals about how men and women where treated in society and how gender is just a social construct people made up. While Socrates questioned why society made something pious or impious and people followed it without understanding why. Why do Woolf and Socrates ask and tell us all these things? Its not as though they would be able to change the world, but just to be able to make people to think about the construct of society and it’s role. Why do I have to get a job, while my wife stays home with the kids? Why do I follow this god if he doesn’t make me happy? Why are these laws in place? These are just some of the many questions they would make you ask, …show more content…

Even here you are able to see that Euthyphro is following an ideal way of society that he is not able to put into words. He isn’t able to do this because he doesn’t even know why, what he is doing is good or bad. Conforming into society is why he does this, he was taught to think and act a certain way because of his class, gender and god. Euthyphro never asks questions like why do I have to believe in this type of god and no another. That was Euthyphro’s downfall, not asking questions about what he didn’t understand but just blindly following it because society told him he had too. Socrates understood society had a tremendous role in people’s lives. The role society plays is one of the things Woolf talks about on what a good righter should understand. She wants women to be able to have a creative writing style "The androgynous mind is resonant and porous," Woolf continues, "it transmits emotion without impediment; it is naturally creative, incandescent and undivided" (Woolf, 98). Woolf overtly states here in this quote that a creative mind is a marriage, or balance, of having the ability to have traits female emotionalism, with some male traits of productivity and style. She basically states that men don’t have to choose between genders but woman cannot. Women sometimes have to choose between their art of writing or society's expectations. A woman will only write as men only when they have the same freedom of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Luce’s speech, she uses ethos in order to demonstrate to her audience that the public view on journalism forces journalists to give up their honor in order to publish some exaggerated stories. Her audience is a group of journalists at the Women’s National Press Club in the 1960’s. Journalists around this time may believe that sacrificing their rectitude was morally acceptable due to the fact that this is what the public demanded from the American Press. However, Luce argues that the journalists should publish what they desire to considering that “no audience knows better than an audience of journalists that the pursuit of the truth, and the articulation of it, is the most delicate, hazardous, exacting, and inexact of tasks” (Luce). This…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the reading Euthyphro, it is an argument between Euthyphro (the priest) and Socrates (who is being indicted by another man). This reading is a dialogue between the two men arguing on the same topic, even though they each gave examples, they still can’t figure out the answer but going “around and around” with the original question. Since Euthyphro and Socrates gave a lot of examples during the argument, I was really confused when reading it. I couldn’t organize my thoughts on the reading. However with the example of Euthyphro persecuting his own father for “murdering” a drunk murder, I start to have an idea of what they are arguing about, in my opinion, it is a question with no right answer for. No matter which answer was given, the result…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since this view was seemingly radical, many people took this to mean that Socrates was actually one of the first feminists. However, Saxonhouse explains that by doing so, he is effectively “de-sexing” women. This is Socrates’…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ReEx3

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The purpose of the Harrison Act of 1914 was to stop physicians from using opiods to treat patients with opiod addictions.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doesn’t the same hold for all the other things? Don’t you call shapes and colours admirable on the account of either some pleasure or benefit or both?…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In most Greek mythology there is a general hostility towards the female sex, which relays that most poets and writers themselves were sexist. Throughout Hesiod’s Theogony and Works and Days, women are portrayed in a very subservient manner, placing them far below men and are almost despised. However, in more than one instance, manipulation, women’s true power, is shown. They are constantly described as beautiful temptresses, which could be thought of as the weakness of many men. When Theogony and Works and Days are looked at as a whole it is obvious that Hesiod’s opinion of women, most likely shared by the Greeks themselves, is that they are inferior and subordinate to men.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Virtue, rather than being a teachable piece of knowledge, seems to be an innate understanding. Every person in the world, save perhaps psychopaths and sociopaths, naturally has a strong moral compass. An example that proves this idea is the innocence of children. I have never witnessed a child perform an action with solely malicious intent. Children always have some outside motivation for any hateful actions they perform, so they never do it only to hurt someone. At this point you might think that, yes, children do not do anything with only malicious purposes, but the fact remains that they continue to perform such actions. This is true, but honestly, how have children learned to do such hateful things? No child would consider cursing at anyone if they were angry, but since they observe others performing these actions, the children begin to develop the idea in their minds that doing so must relieve their suffering. It seems, then, that humans learn harmful…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major themes that Socrates heavily focused on in his speech was the philosophical ideas of wisdom and a description of Socrates’ own wisdom as well. Older accusers had allegedly claimed that Socrates did not believe in gods, and instead would try to explain phenomenons through physical explanations instead, as well as the fact that Socrates would teach others how to make a weak argument triumph a stronger one by using clever rhetorics. In Socrates’ defense, he has stated that he does not have any kind of competence and expertise in any of these areas. This statement truly divides Socrates from sophists and even Presocratics, as teachers that each belong to these organizations assert that only through experience and examination they can gain…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Truth and Socrates

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages

    you able to show that your father was guilty of murder, or that all the…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What exacty is virtue and how does one describe it? In the dialog Meno, two men, Meno and Socrates, attempt to define virtue. The dialog begins with Meno asking Socrates if virtue can be taught. Personally, I do not imagine that virtue can be taught. Meno does not exactly know what virtue is but guesses that it is to possess power and to retain good things. Socrates argues that learning is impossible because a soul has already learned everything from passed lives and that learning is simply recollection from those past lives. The purpose of this paper is to discuss Meno’s paradox and to determine how Socrates resolves it.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soon, dozens of authors began to emulate them, triggering an “infatuation for Plato,” to the point that in 1445 an Academy is founded solely to the study of this philosopher. And it is in this fashion, this rediscovery, that all thinkers of the Renaissance will feast, and take a new look at the nature of women; which is quite logical when you consider the role of women in ancient society. Did not Aristotle doubt that women even had a soul? Did not Plato see the female as too base of a being (to be a partner of love, which is to say of engaging in the sexual act)? Furthermore, being a man during this period was not a necessarily a vice, but to place man over everything, and to revolve the entirety of humanistic thought around him, in essence, leads to a depreciation of the…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Vs Meno Analysis

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates states that the human soul is immortal and it is reborn again, but it’s never destroyed. Socrates also points out that the soul has learned everything that is to know. Therefore, when we “learn” about something, it is merely just a “recollecting” what our soul’s have learned in the past. This idea is essentially the basis of the argument between Socrates and Meno. Socrates tries to prove this to Meno by calling over one of Meno’s servant and confirms that the boy has no knowledge of mathematics. At first, the boy seemed to have no knowledge about Socrates problem. But, through step-by-step questions, the boy was able to provide a correct answer to Socrates problem. Therefore, Socrates states that, since he had no knowledge of geometry in his life, he must have already known it and he was able to…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    What seemed strange about Socrates is that he neither labored to earn a living, nor participated voluntarily in affairs of state. Rather, he embraced poverty and, although youths of the city kept company with him and imitated him, Socrates adamantly insisted he was not a teacher and refused all his life to take money for what he did. The strangeness of this behavior is mitigated by the image then current of teachers and students: teachers were viewed as pitchers pouring their contents into the empty cups that were the students. Because Socrates was no transmitter of information that others were passively to receive, he resists the comparison to teachers. Rather, he helped others recognize on their own what is real, true, and good (Plato, Meno, Theaetetus)…

    • 4852 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    From Ancient Greece to the 21st century, there is still a continuation of sexual division because of set norms and hierarchical standards. Even as time passes, conventional gender roles that Greek philosophers established are still visible in present day, such as when media portrayed Thomas Beatie as a dominant male figure even though he was having a child. Society needs to have strict division roles between the sexes because it’s the only way of having control over emerging generations. Men are portrayed as the dominant gender that are incapable of doing harm, while women only have a single role of being child bearers. However, there have been minor alterations to the gender norms, such as males beginning to play a significant role in their…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conversations between Socrates and Euthyphro can often times be difficult to follow and understand however, with careful reading and critical analyzing, much can be gained and inferred. This can be seen in the many great and intellectual conversations that were had in class last week. A combination of my own interpretations as well as those of my peers allowed for the whole class to gain a deeper understanding of this reading. As a brief overview, we were able to discuss the difference between knowledge and opinion, the use of irony within the conversation and how it affects the reading, and the relationship between piety and justice.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays