Taney was part of the Supreme Court. In the document, Taney said that the Charles River Bridge Company was not allowed to build a bridge over the Charles River since another bridge company has already planned to build a bridge there. He points out that the rights of the community are just as important as the rights of the private property. Because of that, the state could give charters to other bridge companies to build bridges over the Charles River. This caused competition to among companies in constructing transportation centers, and it reduced monopoly. The purpose of the document written by Taney was to sustain the rights of the community in opposition to monopolies in order to keep equality of economic
Taney was part of the Supreme Court. In the document, Taney said that the Charles River Bridge Company was not allowed to build a bridge over the Charles River since another bridge company has already planned to build a bridge there. He points out that the rights of the community are just as important as the rights of the private property. Because of that, the state could give charters to other bridge companies to build bridges over the Charles River. This caused competition to among companies in constructing transportation centers, and it reduced monopoly. The purpose of the document written by Taney was to sustain the rights of the community in opposition to monopolies in order to keep equality of economic