What we have seen in all of the books thus far, is a focus on public administration as something that first and foremost needs to be understood, and secondly, within that understanding, progress can be made. The focus of Khademian's book is understanding culture and combining this effort to bring about a merit-based type of management for administration that allows for performance measurement. As she states: "As the endless efforts to restructure government and individual programs suggest, attention to structure and process alone might not be enough to enhance the quality and effectiveness of public programs" (Khademian, page 15). What is needed then, besides the banal views of structure and job performance, is people-based thought, and recognition of culture. What is being questioned in Khademian's work, and elements of this idea were also found in Selznick, and in Cook, is the notion that the power in an organization is not always as clear as a leadership chart
What we have seen in all of the books thus far, is a focus on public administration as something that first and foremost needs to be understood, and secondly, within that understanding, progress can be made. The focus of Khademian's book is understanding culture and combining this effort to bring about a merit-based type of management for administration that allows for performance measurement. As she states: "As the endless efforts to restructure government and individual programs suggest, attention to structure and process alone might not be enough to enhance the quality and effectiveness of public programs" (Khademian, page 15). What is needed then, besides the banal views of structure and job performance, is people-based thought, and recognition of culture. What is being questioned in Khademian's work, and elements of this idea were also found in Selznick, and in Cook, is the notion that the power in an organization is not always as clear as a leadership chart