Preview

XACC/280 Financial Analysis: Pepsico

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1114 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
XACC/280 Financial Analysis: Pepsico
XACC/280 Final | Financial Analysis | Instructor: Zeno Gavales |

Gracie Sandoval
2/24/2013
|

To any company whether small or a large corporation, the financial analysis is very important in order for a successful business. This will determine if the company is healthy enough to invest or even to see where you are weak in the financial part of the business. It is the company’s responsibility to present accurate analysis of their financial reports. What I hope to present to you is information that you will help see the comparison of both companies within their financial standings. In this report I will present a vertical analysis and a horizontal analysis, and ratio analysis. I will also try to provide some strategies
…show more content…
Coca-cola total current assets were 39% and 34.83% in 2004 and 2005. Liquidity of PepsiCo decreased in 2005 and The Coca-cola increased in 2005. The assets of Coca-cola were 62% and 65.17% in 2004 and 2005. The current liabilities of PepsiCo were $6,753.00 and $9,406.00 in 2004 and 2005. The total assets were 24% and 29.65%. The total assets for Coca-cola were 35% and 33.43%. The liabilities of PepsiCo increased while the current debt of Coca-cola decreased. For both companies the total liabilities in 2005 were 55.08% and the total assets were 44.02%. The equity of PepsiCo was 48% of assets in 2004 and assets was 44.92% in 2005. In 2005 PepsiCo shareholder reduces the inventory. In 2005 the shares were 55.59% of assets for Coca-cola but in 2004 it showed shares there were only 51%. The shares for Coca-cola have been more than …show more content…
Revenue growth for Coca-cola is less than PepsiCo; the proceeds from the Coca-cola in 2005 and 2004 were $23104.00 and $21,742.00. In 2005 and 2004 turnover was lower than PepsiCo. Cost of goods sold by PepsiCo was $11,031.00 and $12,314.00 in 2004 and 2005. Cost of sales increased it was 111.63% compared to 2004. Cost of sales of Coca-cola was $7674.00 and $8195.00 and that was an increase in 2005 compared to 2004. PepsiCo earnings total operation was 112.61% compared to previous years. The total operating revenue for Coca-cola was 105.79% in comparison to other years. The net income for PepsiCo was $4,078.00 and $4,212.00 in 2005 and 2004. The net results for Coca-cola were $4,847.00 and $4,872.00 in 2005 and 2004. PepsiCo operating profit was $5,259.00 and $5,922.00 in 2004 and 2005. PepsiCo operating expenses were 111.85% and 11.85% in 2005 than 2004. Coca-cola operating expenses were 110.75% and 10.75% than 2004. In this comparison it looked that Coca-cola had the upper

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Cocacola Analysis

    • 1314 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An eyeball assessment of the changes in Coke’s financial statements between 1996 and 2010 show that mainly all accounts are up. The total assets are up from 1996 to 2010 with an increase from $16,161 to $72,921. Also current assets increased 3.6% from 1996 to 2010 with total non-current assets increasing 5%. Revenue nearly doubled from 1996 having only $18,546 to increasing in 2010 to $35,119. The total current liabilities increased over the years from $7,406 to $18,508. The total long term liabilities also show an increase from 1996 having $2,599 to $23,410 in 2010. Also the shareholders equity increased greatly over the years from $6,156 to a total of $31,003 in 2010.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Xacc280 Financial Analysis

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Coca-Cola company has been in business since its inventor began selling it in drug stores in 1886 (The Coca-Cola Company, 2009). Pepsi-Cola was invented a short time later in 1898, but at the time it was called “Brad’s drink.” It was later renamed Pepsi-Cola in 1902 (Butler, 2006). Since those early days when the sodas were invented, Coca-Cola and Pepsi have been in competition with each other for the domination of the world’s soda market. Over the course of more than a century, sales have continued to rise for both companies, and they both consistently earn a profit. Both companies have expanded into new product markets in more recent years. They have chosen to invest their earnings in new ventures like bottled water, snack foods, and iced tea, and they each strive to continue increasing their profits in many ways. In order to maintain this continued growth in the coming years, these companies are both in need of investors who will fund their efforts.…

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Xacc280 Week 9 Final

    • 2678 Words
    • 11 Pages

    In order for a company to be financially healthy, it is of most importance that the company must analyze, interpret, and review the business’s annual financial reports. The financial analyses of the annual reports provide insights and information regarding the performances of the business. In this paper, I will be disclosing financial evaluations and comparisons between Coca-Coca and PepsiCo Incorporation. The visualizations used in this paper were designed to provide the analyses performed utilizing three financial analyses methods: vertical analysis, horizontal analysis, and ratios analysis. There will also be recommendations made on how Coke and Pepsi could improve their financial status.…

    • 2678 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Xacc Checkpoint Wk 7

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    · Examine PepsiCo, Inc.’s Consolidated Balance Sheet on p. A6 in Appendix A of Financial Accounting, especially its Current Assets, Current Liabilities, and Total Assets for years 2005 and 2004.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Answer: On April 9, 2009, Coca-Cola Company reported cash and cash equivalent to be $6,816,000,000 and on December 26, 2009, PepsiCo reported cash and cash equivalent to be $3,943,000,000. Coca-Cola has made almost double the cash and cash equivalent than PepsiCo. Cash equivalent from both companies generally including their time deposits and other investments that are highly liquidated and have maturities of three months or less at the date of as cash equivalents from both companies. Coca-Cola Company typically fund a significant portion of their dividends, capital expenditures, contractual obligations, and share repurchases and acquisitions with cash generated from operating activities. They rely on external funding for additional cash requirements. The Company does not typically raise capital through the issuance of stock. Instead, the company use debt financing to lower overall cost of capital and increase their return on shareowners’ equity. Refer to the heading ‘‘Cash Flows from Financing Activities”. PepsiCo believed that their cash generating capability and financial condition, together with their revolving credit facilities and other available methods of debt financing, would be adequate to meet their operating, investing and financing needs. As of December 26, 2009, their operations in Venezuela comprised 7% of their cash and cash equivalents balance.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The financial situation of Coca-Cola can be commented by looking at the company’s annual reports. For the year ended December 2004, the company generated revenues of $21,962 million, an increase of 4.4% on the previous year (Coca-Cola, 2005). The distribution of this revenue under the five business units is: North America 30.1%; Africa 3.9%; Asia 24%; Eurasia 31.2% and Middle East 9.7% (Datamonitor, 2005). The company’s leading brands are Coca-Cola, Diet Coke, Sprite and Fanta.…

    • 2500 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pepsico Evaluation

    • 4707 Words
    • 19 Pages

    WACC is forecasted at 7.32 using CAPM. In the last 5 years, PepsiCo maintained sales growth rate above 7.5% annually. We expect the growth rate will gradually reduce from 9.8% in 2008 to 4.5% after 2013. Asset turnover will be constant at 2.319. Core sales profit margin will remain 11%. After adjustment of one-time items, we estimate the effective tax rate to be 30.52%. We excluded unusual operating income factors from our analysis, and expected the aggregated value will zero out in long term. Other core operation income will increase of 3.5%.…

    • 4707 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The common-size income statement shows that Coca-Cola’s cost of goods sold to revenues percentage rose very slightly from 39.14% in 2011 to 39.32% in 2013. At the same time, PepsiCo’s cost of goods sold to revenues percentage decreased from 47.51% in 2011 to 47.04% in 2013, bringing the 3-year-average to 47.44%. However, 47.44% is still much higher than Coca-Cola’s 3-year-average of 39.38%. With lower cost of goods sold to revenues ratio, Coca-Cola was able to obtain higher gross profit margin, which proves the advantages Coca-Cola have in pricing power over PepsiCo and other competitors. This makes sense because as stated in the overview, Coca-Cola is one of the most recognizable brand in the world and a leading producer, distributor, and marketer of soft drink concentrates, syrups, sparkling, and still beverages.…

    • 1674 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For the ratio of the current asset and the current liabilities of Coca-cola, it had been estimated that it has the ratio of 0.91 or 91 percent higher the total current liabilities than the current asset for the year 2007 vs. 2006. On the other hand, for the year, 2005 vs. 2006 it has the ratio of 0.94 or 94 percent higher the liabilities as compared to the current asset. The coca-cola company also has the earnings per share of 19 percent as compare to the $2.16 for the yea 2006 and to the $2.57 for the year 2007. This had been caused by the increased of the worldwide sales and the rise for its earnings in the year 2007 for the company. On the analysis of the price to earnings ratio, the company has the actual (2007) PE Ratio of 19.72 and for…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Weygandt, J. J., Kimmel, P. D., & Kieso, D. E. (2008). Financial accounting (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Coca-Cola Financial Analysis

    • 2269 Words
    • 10 Pages

    By the 21st century, Coca-Cola is proclaimed to be the world’s largest beverage company sold in more than 200 countries. The company owns and markets four out of the world’s top five beverage brands; Coca-Cola, Diet Coke, Fanta, and Sprite. Coca-Cola’s current business situation is obviously more expansive than the early years, with increased sales, maximized profit, and product expansion into new markets. According to Chief Executive Officer, Muhtar Kent, Coca-Cola’s net income rose six (6) percent to $2.45 billion, or 54 cents a share, from $2.31 billion, or 50 cents a share from a year earlier ( NY Times, 2013). Based on Coca-Cola’s quarterly profit, the company is right on track with their goal in doubling its 2010 revenue. The sales volume of noncarbonated drinks like juices, tea’s, fuze, and bottled water has had double digit percentage growth in comparison to Coke’s actual soda beverage.…

    • 2269 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Coca- Cola Overview

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Today Coca-Cola markets and connects with consumers using a portfolio of nearly 400 brands in over 200 different countries. Coca-Cola has five strategic business units: North America, Africa, Asia, Latin America, and Europe, Eurasia and the Middle East. The company adopted their strategies of success using the following strategic priorities: A. Accelerated carbonated soft-drink growth, led by Coca Cola B. selectively broaden the family of beverage brands to drive profitable growths C. grow system profitability and capability together with our bottling partners. D. Direct investments to highest –potential areas across markets. E. Drive efficiency and cost effectiveness everywhere. In 2003 Coca-Cola Company products comprised of about 10% of total worldwide sales of non-alcoholic beverage products. The company's' primary competitor in many countries is PepsiCo. Other significant competitors include Nestle S.A., Cadbury Schweppes plc, Groupe Danone, and Kraft Foods Inc., among others. The remaining portion will evaluate the performance and give an investment outlook of the Coca-Cola Co using market and ratio analysis.…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The attached report analyzes the financial position of Semirara Mining Corporation. Semirara Mining Corporation is a publicly-listed mining company and a subsidiary of the DMCI Holdings, Inc. The company is engage in the business of coal mining and coal production. As of now, Semirara Mining Corporation is the only large-scale coal producer in the Philippines and is engaged in surface open cut mining of thermal coal from its Panian mine on Semirara Island, in the Antique Province. The company is publicly traded on the Philippines Stock Exchange (PSE).…

    • 6904 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Valuing Coca Cola Stock

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to the case study Coca Cola international groups (Latin America, Middle East, Far East, Africa and Greater European Groups) are expected to continue a steady rate of growth in the year 1998. Therefore, the investment in this group will still be a positive of around 15% in the next three to five years, due to the rapid increase in new markets such as China India and the Middle East. Domestically Coca Cola is projected to stay at a high level of sales. A slight increase can be expected in the upcoming business periods due to Coke’s new Barq’s and PowerAde line.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    You (or your group) are required to conduct a comprehensive financial statement analysis of two companies. You may choose either to compare WalMart and Target or Coors and Boston Beer Co. You may work individually, or in groups of two members. The purpose of this project is to provide you an opportunity to apply the analytical techniques studied in Chapters 3, 9 and 11. In conducting this analysis, take the perspective of a common stock investor. You will be interested in all aspects of the firms’ performance. Comment on the important trends and achievements of each firm. Also explicitly compare the performance of the firms. Be sure to get to know the industry and the firms’ businesses. Look behind the numbers. That is, what economic factors explain the trends and differences that you observe?…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays