Preview

Yellowtone National Park Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
461 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Yellowtone National Park Case Study
In recent years, we have seen the ecosystem flourish due to a successful reintroduction of wolves into Yellowstone National Park. We have seen a steady decrease in elk population, which in turn helped create a successful trophic cascade. Looking at graphs we can see that the wolf reintroduction has done its job, and we see a more than 50% decrease in population of elk. But what could happen if the wolf population doubled. We could see a total extermination of elk from Yellowstone and a decrease in visitors to Yellowstone, but in turn we could see in increase in the population of wolves, water animals, birds, and bears. Think for a minute that the wolf population doubled in size. Looking at graphs, we see that with the current population of wolves in Yellowstone, we have seen that the population of Elk have a decrease of more than 50%. If the wolf population were to double, I can only infer …show more content…

Because there would be no elk at Yellowstone, we would see a decrease in visitors, especially hunters who enjoy hunting elk. We would also see a loss of money in the businesses that surround Yellowstone. Less visitors to Yellowstone mean less businesses for local restaurants and hotels. Less money for them means less tax money, which then means less money circulating back into Yellowstone in the end.
Lastly, there is a positive impact on Yellowstone from a doubling of the wolf population. We would see a huge increase of water animals, birds, bears, and etcetera. Without the elk, bees and other birds would have more flowers for pollination and food. Without any elks to erode the river banks, the water animals would flourish and would inherit clean homes and we might see them increase in number. Without the elk, the bears would have more berries so that they could build up fat so they can hibernate.
In the recent past, Yellowstone has experienced less deep snow. This has


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of many reasons the B.C wolf cull should continue is because the caribou population is intensely decreasing and wolves are the cause. The wolf population is not endangered and do not have predators which will affect the food chain negatively. In this case, shortening the wolf species would not impact their population greatly. For instance, in B.C 15 of 31 caribou herds are threatened (Government of B.C, no date) and the number will quickly increase if nothing is done to the wolves. If no action is taken place in order to save the caribou, it will be too late and canadas _______animal will soon be extinct. This important because having a steady, controlled cull saves both species from over exploitation and endangerment.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Landscape of Fear In “Scared to Death” by Ed Yong, he discusses how the addition of one predator can cause a cascade effect on the remaining prey in the ecosystem. The grey wolf was originally eradicated in the Yellowstone Park in order to increase quality of life for the elk. The elk was the natural prey of the wolf, and faced dwindling populations due to its presence. Following the elimination of the removal of the wolves, the elk population flourished, reaching numbers as high as 19,000. This eventually turned out to not be 100% good news for the park, as the elk greatly diminished the park’s trees.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ● Ranchers and loggers are concerned with the effect that the grizzly bears will have on…

    • 661 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A huge amount of rock falls from one of the cracks, or steep slopes in the national park could make it hard for many animals to get to resources, or hunting grounds. Animals could be affected by a rockfall more so that humans because of this. If animals only know one way to get food or water, and they get cut off from that because of an event such as a rockfall, the population of animals in the area could die off. Whereas humans have plenty of other resources we can gather from to get our food and…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many people felt that the reintroduction of elk was a good start to reviving their species in the area, farmers on the other hand weren’t to enthusiastic about it. Elk are a big animal and proved to be very destructive to agricultural areas. Aggression lessened in 1923…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Making Providence Canyon a national park is unacceptable for the following reasons, it could put the parks wildlife in harms way, because the people that visit may throw trash down, and the animals may consume it or become tangled in it,both of these tragedies could cause serious injuries to the more larger species of animals, deer, elk, moose, and bear are some examples of the large animals that are not so lucky. This tragedy does not just happen to large animals it happens to small animals as well…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the threats is to the wolves food supply. Another threat is the building of roads and pipelines may clear parts of their natural habitat, displacing and destroying its prey.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The park has many species of wildlife, but in recent years park researchers have noticed a significant change in behavior of the park animals, as a result of people feeding the animals. That is bad because if wild deers, bears, or even elk come up to people expecting food and they don’t have any then they can get hurt really bad. They could even die because the animals want food.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The kaibab essay

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For these solutions it is possible to make both parties happy. By making a federal law against killing wolves, moving the wolves away from livestock somewhere farther but close to kaibab, and hiring hunters to kill kaibab so they don't require wolves to do it. These are all the solutions possible that the park could use to help these to…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is it possible the wolves made a change in the environment when they were almost completely wiped-out? Did reintroducing them back into existence turn the fate of the ecosystem around? Sure it is possible it happened that way. And while we are at it why don’t we bring back the Mammoths they were here before us, or better yet their closest cousin the elephant and let’s see what kind of change that makes to the ecosystem. It is my opinion that wolvers are ready to be placed on the fair game list to control their increase in…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In addition to eliminating weak members of elk herds, hence strengthening the heard as a whole, wolves keep herds on the move and maintain the balance of the herd in reform to the fragile wilderness. In moving the herd frequently, wolves preserve groves of aspens and other smooth-barked trees, improving the stability of the ground and preventing damaging erosion, especially near river and stream banks essential for the survival of fish, beavers, and even aquatic-oriented birds. An imbalance in the wolf population has repercussions on the entire ecosystem, ranging from the more easily seen populations of elk to the more blurred effects on fish and expanding even further to animals who depend on fish, ultimately affecting even markets in our economy. This “trophic cascade,” named by biologists and ecologists, have a wide array of repercussions which can occasionally be irreversible. Entire populations can easily be wiped clear from existence, giving way to a devastating mudslide of devastation and a whole new era of demanding complications. In a field study, Ecologist William Ripple and his Oregon State University colleague Robert Beschta reported that “within three years after wolves were reintroduced to Yellowstone National Park elk populations fell, pockets of trees and shrubs began rebounding. Beavers returned, coyote numbers dropped and habitat flourished for fish and birds.” And yet, people…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Actually, those species are vital in the Yellowstone environment. For instance, Gray wolves were reintroduced after being extinct in Yellowstone in the 1900s as farmers complained about the damage Gray wolves did to their livestock. After removal of wolves, Yellowstone elk began to overpopulate due to a lack of their natural enemies, causing vegetation to vanish there, affecting animals like rabbits, mice, and much more, which depend on that vegetation. Decreased number of those herbivore endangered carnivore, such as coyotes and foxes, as well. Just a removal of wolves by humans has brought the ecosystem out of balance. However, the bright side is that, since reintroduction of Gray wolves in 1995, the ecosystem in Yellowstone National Park is showing some recovery, telling us that it may not be too late and humans may be able to correct what they have done against the Mother Nature. The history of Yellowstone National Park tells us that we humans can easily destroy the ecosystem but a recovery effort is possible and worth to…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sanctifying The Wolf

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Is the Wolf a Real American Hero?, Middleton writes that wolves didn't fix Yellowstone, and the trophic cascade believed to have been caused by wolves is false. Studies conducted in the 1990's showed that aspens and willows were regrowing, but follow-up studies showed that despite the 60 percent elk reduction, trees hadn't regrown. A Colorado State University study, focused on willows, determined that too much damage had been done for wolves to undo. Without wolves, elk increased, elk reduced willows, without willows, beavers declined, without beavers, rivers deepened and the water tables dropped below the root level of willows. Focusing on wolves as the savior of Yellowstone detracts from other…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wild Wolf Research Paper

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Over the years the wolf population has increased gradually.“Before Europeans came to North America it was estimated that hundreds of thousands of wolves roamed the land.” (Return of the Wolf Population).…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clarkson argument

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    impact on the food chain and we are looking at an overpopulation of buffalo, deer and even more!…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays