Preview

Yong Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
653 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Yong Summary
Activity #24: Summarizing and Responding-Quickwrite
Summarize the Yong article in your own words, answering the following questions: What is the event or events related to animal rights that motivate Ed Yong to write this article? What questions does Yong raise about this issue? What positions do people take on these questions? (7-9 sent.)
The event related to animal rights that motivate Ed Yong to write this article is the Great Ape Project. The Great Ape Project was established in 1993 and requests a basic set of moral and legal rights for great apes. The questions that were raised by Yong about this issue are why can’t all nonhuman animals that feel pain have rights. Another question Yong has is what would be the credible reason not to
…show more content…
It is clear from the article that Hiasl’s fate depends on how we define “person.” Can Hiasl be declared a person with rights? Answer the following questions and be prepared to discuss your thoughts: (short answer below)
Hiasel can be declared a person with rights because he has a home, a life, and feelings. Hiasel goes through everything a person goes through he has to eat, drink, have company, have a home, and be shown
…show more content…
The qualities Hiasl has that would make us call him something else are, his ability to cause damage to more than just a person, he has the strength to destroy whatever gets in his way, and he is a wild animal.
3. Is Hiasl a person?
Hiasl could be considered a person but we have to remember that he is still a wild animal.
4. What should we do about Hiasl?
We should give Hiasl the respect we would give a person. Giving Hiasl respect would show him care but, we should still keep him in his own habitat in case anything goes wrong with his mindset of humans.
5. Does Hiasl’s pligt have potential as an appeal to pathos? Why?
Hiasl’s pligt has an appeal to pathos because he is struggling to be treated with more respect and being legally declared a person. There is research proving that animals feel pain and go through depression.
6. Does Yong use it for this purpose? Explain.
Yong uses the emotional appeal for this purpose by explaining the situation Hiasl is in with his living standards. Yong uses pathos in the article to make the reader feel sympathetic towards the argument or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Both Rifkin and Watson address the topic of animal treatment. Rifkin and Watson both use pathos and logos to support their claims however, they do so in contrasting ways. In my rhetorical analysis of the essay’s I will examine these strategies in both texts, make connections between the two works, and I will show how Rifkin’s essay clarifies Watson’s and was ultimately more effective. First I will talk about a very important term in Rhetoric, the logos appeal.…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this section of “Importance of Being Cute” by Hal Herzog illustrates how people think about other species on their mental capacity, feelings towards, and common kinship between animals and people. [Main concept of the article]. While Herzog recounts one of his kayaking experience of a man and his wife rafting down the river rapids of North Carolina with their cold and scared dog. [79]. Although the group in front him ended up in the river, the dog managed to climb onto the man while the animal is freezing.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals should have the right to decide if they want to collaborate in experiments. In Ed Young’s article, “Of Primates and Personhood”, he explains that, “the Great Ape Project demands a basic set of moral and legal rights for apes”. This quote informs us that apes should be more than just property. Some may argue that experimentation is beneficial to humans because it helps us decide what kinds of products are safe for human use. However, the experimentation on apes sometimes leads to their death.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rhetoric of the Op Ed Page

    • 4651 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Rifkin, Jeremy. “A Change of Heart About Animals.” Los Angeles Times 1 Sept. 2003: B15.…

    • 4651 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article, A Change of Heart about Animals, written by Jeremy Rifkin is about how animals are very similar to human beings. Some animals are capable of having emotions and the mental ability to complete tasks as humans can. Rifkin emphasizes how animals should have better treatment due to the lack of compassion and acknowledgment among animals. He uses distinctive types of rhetorical techniques to persuade his audience to agree and feel his pain for these creatures. For instance, Rifkin uses pathos in his writing to get emotional feedback from the reader; he makes the reader feel some sort of guilt or pity for the animals. He also uses examples that have a great deal of credibility; such as using animals that are almost as intelligent as humans and including studies from universities and educational references. Rifkin also makes sure to include companies that supports animal rights that one would never imagine supporting. Lastly, Rifkin uses another technique that would leave the reader questioning their own concerns relating to animal rights.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human Rights Act 1998 – is an Act that gives legal effect in the UK to certain fundamental rights and freedoms contained in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). These rights not only affect matters of life and death like freedom from torture and killing, but also affect your rights in everyday life: what you can say and do, your beliefs, your right to a fair trial and many other similar basic entitlements.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeremy Rikin Essay

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this article, “A Change of Heart about Animals,” Jeremy Rifkin argues that animals are the same as humans because they have emotions, cognitive abilities and are self-aware. Rifkin supports his argument by using the rhetorical tools of comparing and pathos. His purpose is to encourage people to take action in order to treat animals more humanely. His audience is people who read the LA Times and his tone is compassionate.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals deserve rights because just like humans, they feel excruciating pain, suffer and have feelings. One would argue that animals don’t experience emotions? But the answer is of course they do. It is emotions that allow animals to display various behavior patterns. According to the theory of utilitarianism, all sentient beings should be given consideration in the society and this includes both animals and humans. Also, animals cannot speak for themselves and for this reason they should be treated equally, protected and given the same respect as human beings. Peter singer’s approach also supports the argument on equal consideration in that animals deserve the same respect as human beings but just in a different view. In today’s society humans exploit animals for milk, meat, fur, scientific experimentation etc. and animals are constantly injured or killed. Their pain and sufferings should be taken into consideration, as this unjust treatment is morally unacceptable. Similarly speciesism is an…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Peter Singer Argument

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He states that non-human animals are farmed for food, experimented on, and we as humans fail to acknowledge the suffering that these animals go through, because we are too caught up in our own ‘selfish’ behavior. Overall, his main point is that from a moral standpoint, humans should reconsider our modern practices, and give all sentient non-human animals equal consideration. He suggests that we all adopt vegetarian diets, and only conduct experiments on non-human animals when it would do less harm than good. (205)…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    TDA 3.6 1.1

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Human Rights Act 1998 – Sets out the rights of all individuals and allows them to take action against authorities when their rights have been affected.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tom Regan Animal Rights

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Animals contain traits that humans acquire into their everyday lives, yet humans find different approaches to make these animals suffer on a day to day basis. Tom Regan, author of Animal Rights, Human Wrongs, describes various situations in which humans hunt animals for pleasure while Stephen Rose, author of Proud to be a Speciesist, illustrates why a speciesist like himself would use animals for research. Tom Regan’s describes his main point as to why humans would want to slaughter such precious animals to have them for resources. On the opposing side of the argument, Stephen Rose’s argument states that animal cruelty cannot be considered wrong because “Many human diseases and disorders are found in other mammals…” (Rose 553). Although Regan…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Human Rights Act 1998 became law in Briton in 2000 and its articles and protocols, give all people constitutional rights that were intended to prevent discrimination and unfair treatment, echoing and the idea of advocacy:…

    • 4063 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Human Rights Act 1998: Sets out rights of all individuals and allows them to take action against authorities when their rights have been affected.…

    • 2674 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I maintain what I said which I totally disagree. There are some people not comfortable with the idea and projects in order to protects animals. In the article “ Of primates and personhood” by Ed Yong talks about some projects about apes basically talks how “ Great Ape Project” was established in 1993 it demands a basic set of moral and legal rights for chimpanzees and apes,gorillas bonobos and orangutans.” Yong state in his article “ i do think we have special obligations to the great apes as our closest relatives, but if we give rights to apes, what would be the compelling reason not to give rights to monkeys ,dogs rats, and so on” imagine give rights to this animals when they are not similar to us do not have…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first premise of his argument was that all human and non-human animals possess equal inherent value because they are all individuals experiencing life. His second premise is that possessing inherent value demands that these individuals have rights that should not be violated by others. The final premise of his argument is that any individual with rights must be treated equally and with respect. In this paper, I objected to his third premise by arguing that we humans should not interact with animals at all because we are not able to distinguish their perception of equality and…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays