Preview

Analyzing Jeremy Rifkin's Article 'A Change Of Heart About Animals'

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
463 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analyzing Jeremy Rifkin's Article 'A Change Of Heart About Animals'
Justo Hernandez
Mr. Unger
English 4P
14 October 2014
Yes to an Animal Bill of Rights Did you know that more than 50% of the fur in the United States comes from China, where there are no penalties for abusing animals, which are raised in unbearably cramped and run-down cages on fur farms? Animals should have a Bill of Rights because they have emotions, feel pain, and are being forced into painful experiments. Animals should be able to play with each other because they have emotions. In Jeremy Rifkin’s article, “A Change of Heart about Animals”, he states that “studies on pigs show that they crave attention and are easily depressed if isolated”. This fact shows us that people don’t really care what animals go through. Some may argue that it
…show more content…
In Victoria Braithwaite’s article, “Hooked on a Myth”, she describes how, “fish have the same two types of nociceptors that we do”. This research tells us that fish are subjected to pain just like humans are. Some may argue that fish do not even have the cognitive abilities to actually feel agony or misery. However, we have evidence that fish do feel pain and that we should treat them accordingly. Animals should have the right to decide if they want to collaborate in experiments. In Ed Young’s article, “Of Primates and Personhood”, he explains that, “the Great Ape Project demands a basic set of moral and legal rights for apes”. This quote informs us that apes should be more than just property. Some may argue that experimentation is beneficial to humans because it helps us decide what kinds of products are safe for human use. However, the experimentation on apes sometimes leads to their death. Animals should have a Bill of Rights because they have sentiment, feel suffering, and are being forced into excruciating procedures. Animals should have the potential to stand up for themselves and make their own decisions because they are just as superior as human beings. People of El Monte, I encourage you to vote yes to an animal bill of rights because it will help prolong the lives of animals

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the article “Hooked on a Myth” Victoria Braithwaite argues that , there should be a “biological for drawing a line.” She states this because the way that fisherman currently catch fish is that as if fish feel no pain.Studies from Braithwaite and her colleagues looked in trout and found that fish do indeed feel pain.She proves her statement by finding two nociceptors A delta and C fibers found inside of them which are the same nerves that we have that cause us to feel pain when harmed, thus the scientific studies proving that fish feel pain i agree with Braithwaite.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I am writing to you regarding Mr. Jeremy Rifkin’s article.”A Change Of Heart About Animals” I personally didnt agree with much of what Rifkin said.To me he is a man who just talks and doesnt really go in to depth or think what hes trying to say through.He reccomended we give pigs toys so that they would be more happier and less agressive.Mr. Bob Stevens on the other hand had an amazing argument to what Mr.Rifkin was saying it was outstanding.Rifkin makes an argument saying that we should be more sympathetic on how we treat our animals.Logically there is million of kids in the world who do not have toys but have familes and can not afford them.So there is a dirty pig who is destin for slaughter that is given the oppurtunity to have toys,they…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A Trunk Full of Empathy Throughout the years the generation among us has become less selfless. We worry less about those around us and worry more about what we’re going to consume for dinner or how many likes a picture of yourself will get.. In Jeremy Rifkin’s article, (published by Los angeles Times) “A Change of Heart about Animals”, he describes that animals are more like us humans than we think and that our empathy needs to constantly become stronger towards animals. Rifkin gives us a plethora of rhetorical ways to persuade readers to feel more towards animals. One strategy Rifkin utilizes is to note how other countries, universities and groups have already begun to discuss the right to animals.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A Change of Heart about Animals” by Jeremy Rifkin. This article talks about how animals are so much like us. Jeremy Rifkin asserted in his September fifth letter announcing that creatures were equipped for each feeling an individual was, and requesting that all individuals augment a feeling of balance and compassion to living creatures equivalent to that they would give an alternate person. This is clearly preposterous and, in the event that you truly make a stride back and take a gander at the procedure behind the thought, unexpected.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After reading the article A Change of Heart about Animals by Jeremy Rifkin . I conclude that Rifkin is really interested in the way animals feel and the research that proves animals are just like humans . He is persuading us to think that animals are just like us by giving lots of examples of animals having emotions just like humans do. There is also lots of science that leads me to believe animals are just like us. Like the studies researchers have done on pigs, they need attention to stay happy because keeping them isolated or alone will make the pig feel depressed.I feel like animals should have their own rights because they are very intelligent and some, like Koko the gorilla, can communicate with humans. Betty and Abel the…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeremy Rifkin expresses his knowledge on how animals are compared to humans in his article “A change of heart about animals.” Rifkin argues that science has shown that the differences between animals and humans are less than we think. I agree that animals are very similar if not close to being on the same level as humans. Most people would assume that animals are very different from us; this could be due to the inabilities we think we have to communicate with animals.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research shows that fish respond to painful stimuli in a manner that is not just a simple reflex. In the article “Hooked on a Myth” by Victoria Braithwaite, biologists say “We shouldn’t be so quick to believe that fish don’t feel pain.” The Standing Committee of the European Convention for the Protection of Animals Kept for Farming Purposes explains, "The skin of the fish is the first line of defence against disease and provides protection from the environment. It contains sensory receptors for touch, pressure and pain." In his book Pleasurable Kingdom: Animals and the Nature of Feeling Good, animal behaviorist Jonathan Balcombe, explains how fish are falsely, yet "commonly denied feeling" perhaps because of "their relative lack of facial expression."…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Animals deserve to be treated with love and care just like any other species.” True. However, to what extent are we willing to be compared to animals? In the article “A Change of Heart About Animals” Jeremy Rifkin sells the idea that science proves everyday that we aren’t much different from any other animal therefore he believes that, just like humans, animals should have a bill of rights. I say this is too extreme and completely unnecessary.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the article “ A change of Heart about Animals” by Rifkin, he states “ They feel pain, suffer, and experiences stress, affection, excitement and even love--and these findings are changing how we view animals.” These characteristics are just like any human being they feel pain just as we feel pain, they suffer just like we do too therefore i agree that they should have the same rights as us humans. Although many other people might say they're just animals but they realize they are species just like us humans.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    When the topic of Canadian rights and freedoms is discussed it is quite facile to state that we are well protected by legislation. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms secures our democratic rights, equality rights, legal rights as well as freedom of religion, and freedom of expression. Although, it is quite unfortunate that Animals are not given a legislation to protect them as well. It is true that they do not have a voice but even without saying a word it is visible that they are being stripped of the rights that they are entitled to. Animals do not exist for the purpose of clothing us, entertaining us and for testing out dangerous products before we get the final result.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Rights - Paper 3

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many people feel that animals have no rights and are here solely for our use.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals are also capable of feeling pain, even though they may not be able to express it. In the article, “Hooked on a Myth” by Victoria Braithwaite, she explains that a study conducted on fish has revealed they have “nerve endings called nociceptors [that alert them] to the damage” when they are hooked by their mouth or have irritating substances in their systems. The same nerve endings are found in humans and serve the same function. Yet, we ignore their sense of pain when they are fished out of their environments. This concept may also be relevant to organisms that are victims of sport hunting. The article “Why Sport Hunting is Cruel and Unnecessary”, published by the PETA organization, stated that animals who become victims of this sport “endure prolonged, painful deaths when they are injured but not killed by hunters”. The most common form of death of these animals is…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Though it has been criticized for its standard, universal means of measuring moral predicaments, utilitarianism still remains one of the most persuasive means of assessing normative ethics. With that said, any and every ethical conundrum should be first looked at through a utilitarian lens. If a satisfying conclusion is reached using the utilitarian approach, then no other approach is needed. If not, the utilitarian approach can be used along with other ethical assessment methods to gain additional insight or a clearer answer to moral conundrums. However, in looking at the ethics of animal experimentation, it is evident that only a utilitarian approach—one that gauges the greatest good for the greatest number based on the consequences of the actions performed within a situation—is needed to reach a satisfying conclusion. This research will prove that undertaking a utilitarian approach to animal experimentation reveals that animal experimentation is indeed moral, given that through the suffering of a few animals, more human lives are improved and saved.…

    • 2921 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To start off, animals are living creatures and deserve to be treated as such, with rights, just like humans. For instance, "Physiological reactions to drugs vary…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Welfare 1

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animals should not be exploited by people and they should have the same rights as humans.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays