Preview

Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals Summary

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
262 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals Summary
Dear Editor, After reading the article A Change of Heart about Animals by Jeremy Rifkin . I conclude that Rifkin is really interested in the way animals feel and the research that proves animals are just like humans . He is persuading us to think that animals are just like us by giving lots of examples of animals having emotions just like humans do. There is also lots of science that leads me to believe animals are just like us. Like the studies researchers have done on pigs, they need attention to stay happy because keeping them isolated or alone will make the pig feel depressed.I feel like animals should have their own rights because they are very intelligent and some, like Koko the gorilla, can communicate with humans. Betty and Abel the
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary Of Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals
    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summary Of Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals

    A Trunk Full of Empathy Throughout the years the generation among us has become less selfless. We worry less about those around us and worry more about what we’re going to consume for dinner or how many likes a picture of yourself will get.. In Jeremy Rifkin’s article, (published by Los angeles Times) “A Change of Heart about Animals”, he describes that animals are more like us humans than we think and that our empathy needs to constantly become stronger towards animals. Rifkin gives us a plethora of rhetorical ways to persuade readers to feel more towards animals. One strategy Rifkin utilizes is to note how other countries, universities and groups have already begun to discuss the right to animals.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals Summary
    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals Summary

    “A Change of Heart about Animals” by Jeremy Rifkin. This article talks about how animals are so much like us. Jeremy Rifkin asserted in his September fifth letter announcing that creatures were equipped for each feeling an individual was, and requesting that all individuals augment a feeling of balance and compassion to living creatures equivalent to that they would give an alternate person. This is clearly preposterous and, in the event that you truly make a stride back and take a gander at the procedure behind the thought, unexpected.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals Summary
    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals Summary

    Jeremy Rifkin expresses his knowledge on how animals are compared to humans in his article “A change of heart about animals.” Rifkin argues that science has shown that the differences between animals and humans are less than we think. I agree that animals are very similar if not close to being on the same level as humans. Most people would assume that animals are very different from us; this could be due to the inabilities we think we have to communicate with animals.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A Change Of Heart About Animals Jeremy Rifkins Analysis
    • 190 Words
    • 1 Page

    A Change Of Heart About Animals Jeremy Rifkins Analysis

    After reading “A Change of Heart about Animals”, Jeremy Rifkins argues that animals should be treated in a more humane way. I agree with Rifkins argument because I have seen animals get abuse and it should not be like that. People may say that they do not feel anything but THEY DO! It’s similar to when a humane it getting abused. Many researchers are finding that the animals are similar to us in many ways: they feel pain, suffer, and experience stress, affection, excitement, and even love. Rifkins give scientific evidence to support his argument from credible source and make his stronger.…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analyzing Jeremy Rifkin's Article 'A Change Of Heart About Animals'
    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analyzing Jeremy Rifkin's Article 'A Change Of Heart About Animals'

    Did you know that more than 50% of the fur in the United States comes from China, where there are no penalties for abusing animals, which are raised in unbearably cramped and run-down cages on fur farms? Animals should have a Bill of Rights because they have emotions, feel pain, and are being forced into painful experiments.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jeremy Rifkin Letters To The Editor Analysis
    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jeremy Rifkin Letters To The Editor Analysis

    In an article on September 1st of the Los Angeles Times, Jeremy Rifkin claims animals have the same understanding and concept of emotions we humans have, and that we should treat them as our equals. This idea of his is absurd, and if you really look at it you can see, he is just another animal rights activist trying to get his voice heard.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals Analysis
    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page

    Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals Analysis

    In “A Change of Heart about Animals,” Jeremy Rifkin alludes to scientific research to argue that animals have many more human characteristics than previously believed and that they should be treated like humans. He even goes as far to argue that animals should be given toys to comfort them. I disagree with the majority of Rifkin’s beliefs. While I do believe animal abuse like dog fighting is wrong, I disagree with the idea that pigs, who are about to be killed, should be given toys. Spending money on toys for animals meant for slaughter is a waste of resources.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A Change Of Heart About Animals Summary
    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A Change Of Heart About Animals Summary

    A Change of Heart About Animals Summary In “A Change of Heart About Animals”, Jeremy Rifkin states that animals have many similarities with humans; and people should change their old views about animals and treat them more respectfully. Rifkin proves this by giving scientific experiment results to show that animals can live like humans. The experiments focus on animal emotions, abilities to use tools or learn, and living habits.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of A Change Of Heart About Animals
    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summary Of A Change Of Heart About Animals

    “Animals deserve to be treated with love and care just like any other species.” True. However, to what extent are we willing to be compared to animals? In the article “A Change of Heart About Animals” Jeremy Rifkin sells the idea that science proves everyday that we aren’t much different from any other animal therefore he believes that, just like humans, animals should have a bill of rights. I say this is too extreme and completely unnecessary.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals
    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals

    Your newspaper published an editorial “A Change of Heart about Animals” September 1, 2003 by Jeremy Rifkin, author and president of the Foundation on Economic Trends, in which Rifkin suggests that the center of the human experience is about extending concern to wider and wider realms to the species we share the world with (34). He implies throughout the article that animals like us, feel pain, experience stress, affection, excitement, and even love (33) . He claims that animals should be treated better because they experience similar emotions we do. By focusing on the ideal of extending the amount of empathy we give to animals, Jeremy Rifkin overlooks the deeper issue of how these creatures of the world feel about us because he does not consider that like them, we…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rifkin, Change of Heart About Animals
    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rifkin, Change of Heart About Animals

    Unfortunately Rifkin seems to be drawn to believe that animals are just for the benefit of humans. I agree to an extent, but mostly disagree. Rifkin begins to question what humans can do to prevent killing and promoting inhumane acts upon human’s fellow creatures. Rifkin backs up his argument by using strong words like “millions of domestic animals raised under the most inhumane conditions and destined for slaughter and human consumption” (15). When Rifkin…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer's Argumentative Essay: The Rights Of Animals
    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Peter Singer's Argumentative Essay: The Rights Of Animals

    Animals deserve rights because just like humans, they feel excruciating pain, suffer and have feelings. One would argue that animals don’t experience emotions? But the answer is of course they do. It is emotions that allow animals to display various behavior patterns. According to the theory of utilitarianism, all sentient beings should be given consideration in the society and this includes both animals and humans. Also, animals cannot speak for themselves and for this reason they should be treated equally, protected and given the same respect as human beings. Peter singer’s approach also supports the argument on equal consideration in that animals deserve the same respect as human beings but just in a different view. In today’s society humans exploit animals for milk, meat, fur, scientific experimentation etc. and animals are constantly injured or killed. Their pain and sufferings should be taken into consideration, as this unjust treatment is morally unacceptable. Similarly speciesism is an…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rifkin Animals
    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rifkin Animals

    Jeremy Rifkin exposes in his writing of “A Change of Heart About Animals” that our…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A Change Of Heart About Animals
    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A Change Of Heart About Animals

    Visualize having someone mistreat you because they don’t feel the pain they’re making you go through. As humans we are capable of letting others know when we are in pain and we are also capable of standing up for ourselves. Animals aren’t able to do that so they are treated unfairly, like if they didn’t feel any pain at all. Although many believe that animals shouldn’t be treated like humans, my goal is to convince my classmates that we should improve the way we treat animals.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tom Regan Animal Rights Summary
    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Tom Regan Animal Rights Summary

    Determining the rights of non-human animals and deciding how to treat them may not be a choice available to our human society. As an advocate for the rights of animals, Tom Reganʻs three main goals are to abandon the use of animals in any scientific research, discontinue all commercial animal agriculture, and to completely terminate both commercial and sport animal hunting. To support these intentions, Regan argues that every human and non-human animal possesses inherent value, which makes them all more than a physical object or vessel. He then states that possessing inherent value allows every human and non-human to have rights of their own. To further his argument, Regan claims that the any human and non-human retaining rights requires equal treatment and respect from others. To conclude his argument, Regan states that due to these reasons, non-human animals cannot be treated as resources and must be treated by humans as equals. In this paper, I object to Reganʻs third premise, which states that non-human and human animals must be treated as equals and with respect, because our communication barrier with non-human animals restricts us from determining their notion of equal treatment or respect, and that attempting to do so could…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics