Preview

A Change Of Heart About Animals

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
319 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Change Of Heart About Animals
Visualize having someone mistreat you because they don’t feel the pain they’re making you go through. As humans we are capable of letting others know when we are in pain and we are also capable of standing up for ourselves. Animals aren’t able to do that so they are treated unfairly, like if they didn’t feel any pain at all. Although many believe that animals shouldn’t be treated like humans, my goal is to convince my classmates that we should improve the way we treat animals. To begin with, why should we make animals suffer before killing them? In the article “A Change of Heart about Animals” Jeremy Rifkin states “And for the thousands of animals subjected each year to painful laboratory experiments? Or the millions of domestic animals

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I am writing to you regarding Mr. Jeremy Rifkin’s article.”A Change Of Heart About Animals” I personally didnt agree with much of what Rifkin said.To me he is a man who just talks and doesnt really go in to depth or think what hes trying to say through.He reccomended we give pigs toys so that they would be more happier and less agressive.Mr. Bob Stevens on the other hand had an amazing argument to what Mr.Rifkin was saying it was outstanding.Rifkin makes an argument saying that we should be more sympathetic on how we treat our animals.Logically there is million of kids in the world who do not have toys but have familes and can not afford them.So there is a dirty pig who is destin for slaughter that is given the oppurtunity to have toys,they…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A Change of Heart about Animals” by Jeremy Rifkin. This article talks about how animals are so much like us. Jeremy Rifkin asserted in his September fifth letter announcing that creatures were equipped for each feeling an individual was, and requesting that all individuals augment a feeling of balance and compassion to living creatures equivalent to that they would give an alternate person. This is clearly preposterous and, in the event that you truly make a stride back and take a gander at the procedure behind the thought, unexpected.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeremy Rifkin expresses his knowledge on how animals are compared to humans in his article “A change of heart about animals.” Rifkin argues that science has shown that the differences between animals and humans are less than we think. I agree that animals are very similar if not close to being on the same level as humans. Most people would assume that animals are very different from us; this could be due to the inabilities we think we have to communicate with animals.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did you know that more than 50% of the fur in the United States comes from China, where there are no penalties for abusing animals, which are raised in unbearably cramped and run-down cages on fur farms? Animals should have a Bill of Rights because they have emotions, feel pain, and are being forced into painful experiments.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In “A Change of Heart about Animals,” Jeremy Rifkin alludes to scientific research to argue that animals have many more human characteristics than previously believed and that they should be treated like humans. He even goes as far to argue that animals should be given toys to comfort them. I disagree with the majority of Rifkin’s beliefs. While I do believe animal abuse like dog fighting is wrong, I disagree with the idea that pigs, who are about to be killed, should be given toys. Spending money on toys for animals meant for slaughter is a waste of resources.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A Change of Heart About Animals Summary In “A Change of Heart About Animals”, Jeremy Rifkin states that animals have many similarities with humans; and people should change their old views about animals and treat them more respectfully. Rifkin proves this by giving scientific experiment results to show that animals can live like humans. The experiments focus on animal emotions, abilities to use tools or learn, and living habits.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Animals deserve to be treated with love and care just like any other species.” True. However, to what extent are we willing to be compared to animals? In the article “A Change of Heart About Animals” Jeremy Rifkin sells the idea that science proves everyday that we aren’t much different from any other animal therefore he believes that, just like humans, animals should have a bill of rights. I say this is too extreme and completely unnecessary.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How does making animals suffer during the process of animal testing, benefit humans? Animal testing is a controversial issue that many still ask if it’s still right or wrong. Although medical resources help people, scientists should be opposing medical testing on animals since the outcome doesn't always work on humans just like tested animals, and it’s cruel. The outcome of succeeding on animal testing doesn't work all the time on humans.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the article “ A change of Heart about Animals” by Rifkin, he states “ They feel pain, suffer, and experiences stress, affection, excitement and even love--and these findings are changing how we view animals.” These characteristics are just like any human being they feel pain just as we feel pain, they suffer just like we do too therefore i agree that they should have the same rights as us humans. Although many other people might say they're just animals but they realize they are species just like us humans.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal cruelty is wrong I don’t know how or why people do it, there innocent animals, they are a life they have feelings like us they feel pain, it’s cruel on so many levels. They cannot scream out in pain or talk to anyone to help them. Just because animals can't talk that doesn't mean that they don't have things to say, and it surely doesn't mean that they don’t have feelings. I also believe that animals deserve to live according to their own natures, without harm, abuse. Animal Neglect and abandonment are the most common forms of animal cruelty found in the United States. If you have…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing

    • 554 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Most of this research is not humane whatsoever: over six million animals in Australia and New Zealand are subject to this cruel testing each year. Most of these animals are also subject to extreme amounts of pain or stress during these experimental procedures. What I struggle to understand, is why animals are able to be treated and tortured in this cruel way without anyone blinking an eye, but these experiments are considered too risky to test on humans. While researching this topic, I found a quote that I think sums up animal testing perfectly.…

    • 554 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Everyone knows that animals feel pain so why do we continue their suffering. If we know this to be true why do we continue this, because it’s cheaper? This shouldn’t affect the way we make decisions for the fact that the livestock are giving up…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    animal testing

    • 1320 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The acts of animal testing are extremely cruel and unethical and no living creature should have to endure the variety of pain that test subjects go through without their own consent. Millions of animals suffer from experimentation each year, but that number is not even precise since there are several countries that do not publish their data. Animals can receive something as little as an injection, or something as extreme as an organ transplant. Experiments classify the pain as being mild, moderate, severe, or unclassified. 61% of experiments fall into the category of severe suffering. Many of these severe tests predict from the start that an animal will die. Sometimes scientists try to mimic symptoms of diseases in animals to treat them, but that does not necessarily cure the disease. Animals are maternally deprived and suffer in isolation. Right now, there are millions of animals imprisoned in laboratories, wishing to roam free. They do not know which of them is next in line to be a part of a trial that will most likely cause them, pain, suffering, and death. Animals often become very stressed during the process and develop neurotic behaviors. It is common for animals to become out of control and to starting biting away at their fur, hair, or skin. Some trials involve chemically burning their flesh or eyes. Others test entail being force fed, or even…

    • 1320 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Should animals be harmed to benefit mankind? This pressing question has been around for at least the past two centuries. During the early nineteenth century, animal experiments emerged as an important method of science and, in fact, marked the birth of experimental physiology and neuroscience as we currently know it. There were, however, guidelines that existed even back then which restricted the conditions of experimentation. These early rules protected the animals, in the sense that all procedures performed were done so with as little pain as possible and solely to investigate new truths. Adopting the animals' perspectives, they would probably not agree that these types of regulations were much protection, considering the unwanted pain that they felt first followed by what would ultimately be their death. But, this is exactly the ethical issue at hand. For the most part, animal rights are debated in regards to two issues: 1) whether animals have the ability to rationalize or go through a logical thought process and 2) whether or not animals are able to experience pain. However, "it will not do simply to cite differences between humans and animals in order to provide a rational basis for excluding animals from the scope of our moral deliberations" (Rollin 7). This, Bernard Rollin claims, would be silly. He says that to do this is comparable to a person with a full head of hair excluding all bald men from his moral deliberations simply because they are bald. The true ethical question involved is, "do these differences serve to justify a moral difference?" (Rollin 7). Also, which differences between humans and non-humans are significant enough to be considered in determining the non-human's fate?…

    • 4016 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Research

    • 700 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although the animal rights activists claim that people and animals are equal and so they should be treated equally, I think that people and animals cannot be seen equal, and therefore the death of an animal cannot be the same thing as the death of a person. Animal tests are the only way to study the behavior of a lethal pathogen (like HIV). For that reason, causing animals to die (Use a less harsh term like, to be tested on) for science, for the sake of saving human lives, may be considered right, to some extent if it will contribute to the advancement of science and will be to the benefit of people in general. Give a few examples of unnecessary reasons to harm animals ex: For cosmetics and such.…

    • 700 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays