The remedies for breach a general law duty include an injunction, compensation or damages, an account of profits, rescission of a contract, and a constructive trust. Firstly, the company can seek an injunction, which is an order of the court requiring the director to stop doing something or to undertake a particular action, in this case, EY can terminate the contract. Secondly, in this case, even though EY has not yet suffered any loss or damage, the court can still order the director to pay any profit the director made because of the breach of duty to the company. The director will have to account for the profit of commission to the company.(Regal(Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver) Thirdly, a director can breach their duty to the company if the director enters into a contract with the company and the director's interest in the contract is not disclosed. If the court finds that there has been a breach of duty, the court can order the contract to be rescinded. In this case, Roberta did not disclose her interest gained from WHS in the contract properly, there should be a rescission of the contract. However, EY makes large profits from the contract, they may not want to rescide it.
What statutory penalties (if any) can be imposed against her? Who can impose them? consequences of contravention of the following statutory provisions in this case and its related penalties imposed against Roberta: 1. Disclosure of interest. If a director contravenes the requirement in s 191 to disclose a material personal interest in a matter that relates to the affairs of the company, the court can order the director to pay a fine of up to $1100, or be sent to prison for up to three months, or both: see Schedule 3 to the Corporations Act. court can impose these penalties. 2. Improper use of position or information
Section 182 and Section 183 prohibit improper use of position and information by directors, other officers and employees. Where a court finds that a person has breached s 182 or 183, the court can make the following order: 1). an order disqualifying the person from managing company for a specified period of time. 2). an order to pay a penalty of up to $ 200,000, and/or an order to pay compensation to the company for any loss or damage it has incurred because of the breach of the section. The two sections are civil penalty provisions and are imposed by court and enforced by ASIC.
Conclusion
EY can sue Roberta and get follows remedies:
1. terminate the contract. 2. The director will have to account for the profit of commission to the company.
3. rescission of the contract statutory penalties can be imposed against Roberta: 1. order the director to pay a fine of up to $1100, or be sent to prison for up to three months, or both, 2. disqualifying the person from managing company for a specified period of time. 3. pay a penalty of up to $ 200,000
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The primary legal issue was the claim of negligent misinterpretation and the secondary issue was the third party breach of contract. The Bank claimed that it suffered losses as a third-party beneficiary of the engagement contract to conduct the audit between Brandon and GKCO. The Bank also claimed that GKCO committed the tort of negligent misrepresentation. According to the definition, when the parties enter into a contact, they can agree that the performance of one of the parties should be rendered to or directly benefit a third party, which then becomes an intended third-party beneficiary (Cheeseman, 2012, p. 266). An intended third-party beneficiary has the right to enforce the contract against the breaching party. As described in Section 552 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, an accountant is liable for his or her negligence to any member of a limited class of intended users for whose benefit the accountant has been employed to prepare the client’s financial statements or to whom the accountant knows the client will supply copies of the financial statements (Cheeseman, 2012, p. 896). An accountant can be found liable to a third-party beneficiary if the following conditions are met: (1) the client intended the accountant’s work to benefit or influence the third party; and (2) the accountant knew of that intent (Johnson Bank v. Korbakes, 2005). Both the U.S.…
- 2258 Words
- 10 Pages
Good Essays -
b. What defense should Lauren Yost and Co. use in the suit by First City National Bank?…
- 1346 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Ms. Granbury can claim illegal discharge through citing breach of an implied contract. The handbook lists a number of grounds on which an employees’ employment may be terminated. It…
- 1906 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
12) Which of the following is likely to be a breach of a corporate officerТs or directorТs duty of care?…
- 707 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
2. Section 180 requires that an Officer must exercise their powers and discharge their duties with the degree of care and diligence that a reasonable person would. (slides) Patricia and Dan did not act in a way that a reasonable person would because they failed to make good decisions that deal with the financial and business affairs of SEPL, therefore it is likely they have breached section 180. Daniels v AWA Ltd (1995) 37 NSWLR 438: The CEO breached his duty of care and diligence because he did not exercise due care and skill to cover decisions dealing with the financial status and business affairs…
- 987 Words
- 3 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Corporate officers and directors may be held criminally liable for the actions of employees under their supervision.…
- 2373 Words
- 13 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
It depend upon the approach of the legal duties of the administrators which were framework in the Corporation Act. The court has noticed that the appellant provide the legal duties approaching the suer and the duties which were performed was not for the benefit of himself although it was not for the benefit of other partner too. It was only for the benefit of the company. It was noticed by the court that there has been contravention of legal duties performed by the offender discarding the prosecutor out of the building for profit and loss account and also regarding the goodwill of the company.The court held that the offender has to paid a premium for the losses which has been incurred. Although the court told them that in order for compensation they can buy shares from offender for their losses incurred.…
- 504 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
C) If the corporation failed to start an action through its authorized agents (e.g., its directors), no action could be taken because a corporation is merely a legal concept and must act through its authorized agents.…
- 499 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
violated a Civil Law by engaging in insider trading. Being the one to organize the…
- 674 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Elliot, Chloe and Raj have breach their duties of care, diligence and skill as directors of De-Caffeine Delights because of not reading carefully financial report under section 180(1). They have also taken responsible for not preparing and maintaining financial statements under section (286). In addition, they have breached section 187 about director’s duties on wholly-owned subsidiary.…
- 1628 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Page 50 1b. If there is no violation of law or regulation, the manager could have put herself in a position that caused her to be terminated from AutoCorp as well as losing her reputation. Autocorp could have face charges based upon the unethical decision that the manager made and if she used the confidential documents, Autocorp would have been faced with stealing the documents and using the unauthorized information to increase their budget.…
- 905 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Jane has recently been hired as a Payroll Manager for R&S Electronic Service Company, a small business that employs 75 people and is owned by Brad. After a few months of relatively uneventful work, she discovers activities involving Greg, a Service Technician and brother to the General Manager, receiving preferential treatment that she feels is in violation of general business standards and practices. She has been instructed by her General Manager, Eddie, to ignore these potential violations or it will cost her the job. Jane is still in a probationary status with the company and is not sure what the correct course of action should be. The stakeholders in this particular situation are Jane, Brad, Eddie, Greg, the other R&S technicians and employees as well as R&S customers. The potential impact of Jane’s decision could mean loss of jobs, lost revenue, negative brand image, performance issues, decrease in trust with management, negative work environment, poor productivity, and apathy. The purpose of this paper is to examine both the legal and ethical implications of what Jane has witnessed and the recommendation for the corporation on a course of action based on what we have learned to this point.…
- 1352 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Given the unsafe work environment she was put in the remedies that she would be seeking include: Salary (reasonable notice), bonuses, benefits, aggravated damages for mental distress…
- 787 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The former controller, Kline and former director of financial services, Wilkinson, both consented to final judgments permanently enjoining them from future violations of Exchange Act, and for aiding and abetting violations of Sections 13(a) and also agreed to pay a civil penalty of $25,000 each. Both of them further consented to suspending each of them from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant with the right to apply for reinstatement after one year.…
- 688 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Far East Hospitality Holdings Pte Ltd (Far East Hospitality), a premier hospitality assets owner and operator, is a 70-30 joint venture formed in 2013 between Far East Orchard Limited (a listed company under Far East Organization ) and The Straits Trading Company Limited. Far East Hospitalitys two key markets are Singapore and Australia. n Singapore, the holding companys hospitality management arm, Far East Hospitality Management, operates the city-states largest hospitality portfolio comprising 18 hotels and serviced residences. Far East Hospitality owns and operates the largest hospitality portfolio in Singapore. The sustainable development of Far East Hospitality is related tothe whole hospitality industry in Singapore. This report analysis the social, environmental and economic issues of Far East Hospitality will be faced, and the challenges of implementing sustainable development practices in Far East Hospitality. 2.0 Key issues 2.1 human resources issues Far East Hospitality face recruitment challenges due to the countrys tight labour market. This problem is exacerbated with the newly implemented government regulations on foreign labour which includes an additional 700-800 levy per worker. As the industry relies greatly on low-cost foreign labour, the alternative would be to hire Singaporeans. However, Far East Hospitality are met with difficulties in attracting Singaporeans due to negative perceptions of the industry, and undesirability of roles like room attendants, porters etc. This makes the hotel can not hire good employees, resulting in lack of hotel personnel. Because there are not many good people, so that quality of service can not keep up. This directly make that customers do not enjoy good service. Without a good staff also led the development of the hotel could not be better. 2.2 Technology issue Oasia Hotel Singapore is one hotel under the Far East Hospitality. In May 2014, there are two customers give the feedback about their Debit card. The…
- 2335 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays