Preview

Youth Criminal Justice Act

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
867 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Youth Criminal Justice Act
When someone mentions the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA), some would argue that there is no purpose for it. Some believe that the age boundary is inappropriate; some believe that children should not have reduced sentences and special rights; and some may think that a youth’s criminal record should be accessible in the future. If one would look at all of the positive aspects, statistics, and examples that apply to the YCJA, then they would better appreciate the statute that applies to the young adults of Canada.

When one reads into the YCJA, they will find that it applies to children between the ages of twelve to seventeen (Justice Canada, 2003). Some would argue that this age is either too high or too low to make children criminally responsible for their actions. Even dating back to the 1800’s, children were treated a lot like adults (Capelli, 2007). This was often done around the age of twelve. Whenever children disobeyed their parents or the law they were often punished on an adult level. This applies back to present day, where the YCJA applies to children aged twelve to seventeen. To add onto the argument, modern research has proven that children under the age of 18 have not fully established their maturity in the brain yet, and should not be held responsible for their crimes (Beckman, 2004). A lot of the YCJA is based on the fact that it is providing a “second chance” for children, as they do not fully understand the consequences and procedures that they have to go through after committing a crime. This research has also shown that people do not fully develop their brain until the age of nineteen to twenty years old, which is also when the YCJA does not apply to children anymore. The age that the YCJA applies to is appropriate and provides youth a second chance to understand what they did wrong.

It is written in the YCJA that every youth criminal has special rights and more lenient sentences (Justice Canada, 2003). Special rights could be having a



Cited: Beckman, M. (2004, July 30). Crime, culpability and the adolescent brain. Retrieved from http://www.loni.ucla.edu/~thompson/PDF/MBscience.pdf Capelli, S. (2007, December 16). Children and their changing roles throughout history. Retrieved from http://ezinearticles.com/?Children-and-Their-Changing-Roles-Throughout-History&id=1418062 Howard Society, J. (2008, July 17). Youth criminal justice act handbook. Retrieved from http://www.johnhoward.ab.ca/pub/youthcrim/youth.pdf Justice Canada. (2003, April 1). Youth criminal justice act. Retrieved from http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/Y-1.5/page-1.html http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/Y-1.5/page-8.html#h-15 http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/Y-1.5/page-49.html#h-38

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Roper Vs Simmons Case Study

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages

    It was noted that while juveniles are capable of committing truly heinous crimes, they are not fully culpable for three main reasons. The first reason discussed was that juveniles under the age of eighteen lack the maturity and responsibility that adults have attained. This shortcoming causes decisions and subsequent actions to be poorly thought out. Basically, juveniles are not responsible decision makers. This idea was supported by the fact that most states do not allow minors to vote, do jury duty, or get married without consent. The second rationale for why juveniles are less culpable than adults dealt with environment. It was suggested that juveniles lack control over their environment. They do not have the ability to remove themselves from an environment that encourages delinquency. Finally, juveniles are less culpable because they are still developing a sense of self identity. This suggests that behaviors exhibited now may not be part of their character in five or ten years, allowing for recovery. The majority then argued that the same reasoning they used in Stanford v. Kentucky applied to Roper v. Simmons, and that the eighth amendment did not allow for the execution of people under age eighteen due to lesser culpability (Counsel of Record,…

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The YCJA is a federal law that came into force on April 1st, 2003. It applies to all Canadian youths from ages 12 to 17. The YCJA is an ineffective law as, between Young offender rights and Public safety, Public safety is more significant by a huge margin. For instance, let's look at the “Media Ban” policy and how it doesn’t do enough to ensure public safety. The Media Ban policy “protects” young offenders names, preventing it to be released to the public unless one receives an adult sentence or is a “high” risk to the public. The “Stettler” case is a good example why this policy is inadequate. Three teenagers were charged with sexual assault and confinement of two girls, ages 12 and 13. Even the Principal, of the School those teenagers…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Youth Criminal Justice Act is the law that governs Canada's youth justice system. It applies to youth who are at least 12 but under 18 years old, who are alleged to have committed criminal offences. In over a century of youth justice legislation in Canada, there have been three youth justice statutes: the Juvenile Delinquents Act (1908-1984), the Young Offenders Act (YOA) (1984-2003), and the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) (2003-present). A set of amendments to the YCJA was adopted by Parliament in 2012. The purpose of this document is to explain the background of the YCJA, to provide a summary of its main provisions and the rationale behind them, and to highlight the experience under the YCJA.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Justin System Case Study

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Under the YCJA, a person of 14 years of age or older may choose to be tried by a judge and jury for certain serious offences, such as assault or murder.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Youth ages twelve to seventeen are qualified under the Youth Criminal Justice Act, but ages eighteen and older are under the Criminal Code of Canada. The goal of the YCJA is to provide a fair and efficient youth justice system. How do they continue to keep this goal? The YCJA believes that the protection of society is the most important objective that needs to be practiced through prevention, serious consequences, and reconstruction or rehabilitation.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, crime is an almost impossible thing to get rid of in our society. Every week we turn the TV on and see on the news of someone getting murdered, robbed, or hurt. But the way we punish these “criminals” depends on the circumstances of the offender. For example the way we punish adult criminals is not same way we punish youth criminals. Adults will always get punished harshly compared to youth when accused of a crime and the reason why is because of the youth criminal justice act (YCJA). The YCJA are the law that governs Canada 's youth criminals. It applies to youth who are at least 12 but fewer than 18 years old and the objectives of the youth justice system are crime prevention, rehabilitation and reintegration, and meaningful consequences. I think that the YCJA is fair and equitable in addressing youth crime in Canada because they give kids second chances and rehabilitate them so they can get back into society.…

    • 943 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    <br>There is, however, debate over the need for change. Some say the current act is much too easy on youths and that they're getting away with too much. There are reasons situations, such as these misinterpreted ones, have come about. The YOA was designed keeping youth protection in mind, and experts in the area tend to refer to the fact that "…repeated studies have shown that it is not the severity of punishment which deters crime, but the certainty of it" (Daunt 1998 7). Therefore it is not surprising that thousands of good kids have been helped, and not hindered, by the current legislation on their way to a productive life (Good 1998 171). As well, the current YOA does have serious consequences for violent offenders, many of them ending up in adult court (Daunt 1998…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ycja Essay

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Youth Criminal Justice Act is represented in all of the following sources, but only 2 of them agree with and support the YCJA. The other one does support them to a point, but are saying that the punishments are not harsh enough for youth. Going back to the sources, in the first one Graham Long is stating that the law is already hard enough on young people. In his case he has been to many court hearings and almost all the young offenders that he sees are not the first priority to the judge, the victim is. I don’t blame the judge for this, but if you are going to be dealing with a child that’s 12 – 14 or so, I think that you should have some feeling for them. An example that he describes is in Drayton Valley, Alberta where a youth offender was ordered to pay the victim $25,000. This is a bit too much for a teenager to be paying; most of them don’t even make that much in a couple years even if they have a job. The second source that I am looking at has a complete opposite view. They think that a lot of the young offenders that do go to prison get off to easy, with not enough punishment and that they will probably be a repeat offender. The third and last source is a line graph that shows the number of youths charged with crimes. This graph is showing that in the early 1990’s youth that were charged with offences went up from 8000 to 9000 in as little as 2 years. These numbers start to drop after 2003 when the YCJA was first introduced. It is proven by statistics that about 80% of first time youth offenders will not break the law again. These 3 sources of information are just a few of the many examples of the different views and opinions of the Youth Criminal Justice Act. In my opinion I agree with the YCJA, in that youth should get punished for their actions depending on the age of the person. For example going back to source one, Graham Long is saying that kids don’t get off easy and that some punishments are a bit harsh. Giving a teenager a fine of…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) is an act in respect of criminal justice for young persons and to amend and repeal other acts. It is made up of communities, lawyers, business people, families, parents and so many more. Canada is a party to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and recognizes that young persons have rights and freedoms, including those stated in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Canadian Bill of Rights, and have special guarantees of their rights and freedoms. There are certain requirements for an adult sentence that this case upholds. Their motive, planning and age show that these two sisters have a right to be sentenced as a adult, generally having a length of 25 years to life.…

    • 768 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ycja Fair And Equitable

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Many people believe that the YCJA is fair and equitable but that is not the case. Maturity is a factor that does affect the consequence(s) given to the offender but the YCJA…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Young Offenders Act (YCJA)

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1982, the Young Offenders Act [YOA] was established. It replaced the Juvenile Delinquents Act [JDA] of 1908 and its main objective was to guarantee the rights and freedoms of Canadian Youth were being met. Many revisions and opportunities arose with the passing of the YOA. With the passing of the YOA, it provided the young offenders of Canada with extended rights, chances for rehabilitation, and also therapy institutions. The YOA takes into concern such elements of age, maturity, reasonableness, and seriousness of the crimes committed (Barnhorst & Barnhorst, 2004). Barnhorst & Barnhorst (2004) explained that the act was useful to Canadian Youth for an abundant of time however, some weakness become clear since the act was passed. Under the…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Currently, Australia’s primary answer to offending youth, for serious matters, is incarceration. However, across Australia many believe that the incarceration of youth is still the stem of the issue of recidivism, and therefore, the issue cannot be solved until the incarceration of youth is removed. Between 2011-12 approximately $640 million was spent on the youth justice system nationwide, and even with this much there the recidivism rates are anything but favourable. Approximately half of the juveniles appearing before a youth or children’s court will have been convicted previously, and approximately one-third of juveniles appearing…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is tremendously important to have a “just”, justice system that is specifically geared towards the youth; separating the adult and youth system. Using Stephan’s Truscott’s case as a basis, we can easily deduct that a separate justice system for the youth are crucial due to the vulnerability of the youth towards adults in power. Truscott was drilled by officials, insisting that he was guilty, and not respecting him and his right. The youth are in a process of growth and development that requires understanding and consideration. If an adolescent is indeed guilty, we must take many things into consideration: their environment, family, parents, household, lifestyle, etc. In having a justice youth system, we are protecting the youth and helping…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As crime in America seems to be decreasing, reports from law enforcement experts state that: violent crimes are expected to increase (Butterfield 6). Many people feel that the American Judicial System treats the criminal as a victim, therefor, favoring the criminal. The American judicial system, however, has taken an attitude that "Perpetrators not only deserve blame but are worthy of it, in the fullest, most human sense of the word" (Reidinger 98). Despite the popular belief that the American Judicial System favors the criminal, in reality, this system imposes strict penalties in the majority of criminal defense cases in this country.…

    • 2202 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Critical Criminology

    • 2339 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Cunneen, C., and White, R. 1996. Juvenile Justice: An Australian Perspective. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press…

    • 2339 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays

Related Topics