I think the way Zack presented his argument was set up very well and followed the Dewey and Toulmin argument models we learned in class. He first framed the problem, then gave his claim and grounds to support it. His grounds pertaining to how parents should not be stigmatized due to pushing sports on their kids because of the growing obesity issue was very logical in the technological based nation we all currently live in. However, I think he should have further addressed at which point parents should stop pushing sports on their kids or what the line is for pushing too hard for their children to play sports. Additionally, I believe his argument would have been stronger if he would have elaborated more on his response to objection. However, his argument made logical sense and I was convinced to be on his side of the argument. In my opinion, his argument was a success with only a few improvements needing to be
I think the way Zack presented his argument was set up very well and followed the Dewey and Toulmin argument models we learned in class. He first framed the problem, then gave his claim and grounds to support it. His grounds pertaining to how parents should not be stigmatized due to pushing sports on their kids because of the growing obesity issue was very logical in the technological based nation we all currently live in. However, I think he should have further addressed at which point parents should stop pushing sports on their kids or what the line is for pushing too hard for their children to play sports. Additionally, I believe his argument would have been stronger if he would have elaborated more on his response to objection. However, his argument made logical sense and I was convinced to be on his side of the argument. In my opinion, his argument was a success with only a few improvements needing to be