Zap Fat Argumentative Essay

Nice post Kelly, in spite of your refutation centering from the testimonies of other witnesses who used Zap Fat, that their testimonies were prejudicial and has no probative value to the case. Still, the trial court must still make separate determination that probative value of evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect.
Furthermore, you have not produced any facts of how the jury can be prejudiced or confused after hearing the testimonies of others who used Zap Fat in comparison to the jury if they did not hear the testimonies.

The question is will the testimonies of others who used Zap change the court’s decision?

In my opinion, “No” even if you take away the testimony of others who took Zap Fat the decision will still stand. In support