Preview

Zaroff Vs Montresor

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
941 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Zaroff Vs Montresor
Even short stories contain evil people. Edgar Allan Poe, the writer of the short story “The Cask of Amontillado,” creates Montresor : a man with intentions of evil revenge. Likewise, the author of “The Most Dangerous Game”, Richard Connell writes of an evil and bloodthirsty man. Poe’s antagonist Montresor is a wine expert who has been insulted one too many times and has sworn his vengeance. Zaroff, Connell’s antagonist, is a big game hunter who got too bored with animal hunts. Rather than giving up hunting due to his boredom, Zaroff hunts and traps sailors instead. Montresor and Zaroff are deceptive and inhumane, and while both hunt, their motives for hunting differ. Montresor and Zaroff are deceiving men. Poe writes in “The Cask of Amontillado”, ‘“As you are …show more content…
Poe’s antagonist cheers his wine with sarcasm, ‘“And I to your long life”’ (Poe 90). Montresor cheers his glass of wine to Fortunato’s “long life” in knowing that he is about to kill him. Montresor’s comment in this instant is very sarcastic and unsympathetic, showing absolutely no regards to the value of the protagonist’s life. In regards to hunting, Connell’s antagonist replies to the protagonist, ‘“I hunt more dangerous game” (Connell 73). Zaroff clarifies to Rainsford that he hunts more precarious prey then the Cape Buffalo. Connell writes, ‘The general smiled the quiet smile of one who has faced an obstacle and surmounted it with success. “I had to invent a new animal to hunt,” he said’ (Connell 74). Zaroff smiles as he thinks back to the time that he thought of hunting humans instead of animals as he explains where his game came about to Rainsford. Zaroff refers to another person as a “new animal to hunt”, showing that it he has no respect for another human or their life. While both Zaroff and Montresor do not respect their prey’s lives, they do have different motives for why they

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    There is a lot of simalaritys and difference between the two characters, M0ntresor in the cask of allmontiallo and General Zaroff in the most dangerous game. Montresor had his murder all planned out includeing every small detail. General Zaroff had never even planned on killing Rainsford because rainsford appeared out of nowhere to him and Zaroff wanted to hunt with Rainsford not hunt him. The reason Zaroff wanted to hunt Rainsford was because Rinsford refused to hunt with him.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This article describes the emotional aspects of Montresor, the protagonist in Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Cask of Amontillado.” While Montresor seems uncaring and without emotion as he is murdering Fortunato for the insults against his family, Montresor is not as ruthless as he seems. He shows care and concern for his victim in that he gives Fortunato numerous chances to escape his fate by suggesting they head back on account of Fortunato’s cough. He also calls Fortunato my friend and good friend six times as the article points out. In the end, Montresor does…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this analysis, I will be comparing Shakespeare’s ‘Macbeth’, Robert Browning’s ‘The Laboratory’ and ‘Porphyria’s Lover’. All of these texts include one or more villainous characters.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In every story, there is one character who gets on the reader's bad side: the antagonist. In Connell's, "The Most Dangerous Game," General Zaroff, a world renowned hunter, kills the smartest prey in the world: humans. On the other hand, Montresor from "The Cask of Amontillado" plays the evil character as he kills Fortunato, a fellow member of a secret organization. But between the two, Zaroff is the more evil character because he kills people for entertainment and feels no remorse for his actions The first way that General Zaroff is a more evil character than Montresor is because of his motives to kill people.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In “The Cask of Amontillado,” Poe engages the reader by using point of view to emphasize the untrustworthiness of Montresor's, the narrator’s, character. For example, when Montresor had described how Fortunato had inflicted him with “[a] thousand injuries” and “ventured upon insult”, “[Montresor] vowed revenge” (1). This is the moment when the reader first experiences his unreliability as a narrator. Montresor had never specified the copious wounds that he had supposedly suffered from Fortunato and the severity of his offense. Furthermore, when Montresor had voiced out that Fortunato had ventured, in order words proceed with knowledge of risks, he had let bias trickle into his words. Us, the readers do not know whether or not Fortunato had intentionally insulted Montresor with malicious intentions, but in Montresor’s phrasing of words, it implies that he did indeed intended to do so. This not only makes the reader question the extent of exaggeration that Montresor inserts into his statements, but the reliability of the narrator as the story progresses. In addition, after Montresor had successfully, albeit reluctantly, finishes burying Fortunato in the alcove, he remarks: “My heart grew sick—on account of the dampness of the catacombs” (9). Here, one can see that Montresor had almost a moment in which he had felt guilt, yet had been quick to disregard it to the scenery. The dash indicated that Montresor added the latter portion onto his thoughts as more of an afterthought, rather than a…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, Sanger Rainsford and General Zaroff are distinct characters who share a passion for hunting big-game, but disagree on the value of human life. This disagreement leads Rainsford to kill Zaroff and end…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Cask of Amontillado,” Poe uses various types of irony to develop his theme of revenge as tool of justice. Poe’s use of irony deals the audience a vast knowledge of the story’s conclusion, and gives the narrative a dark humor that was signature of his work. In this story of an unreliable narrator in the first-person point of view, the dark humor and irony makes this tale of cold-blooded murder interesting and entertaining to the reader.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Edgar Allen Poe is known for using many different artistic elements to create eerie, spooky stories. In “The Cask of Amontillado,” Poe uses first person point of view to let the reader know how proud the narrator, Montresor, is with his past impunitistic murders. “I must not only punish but punish with impunity” (pg.236). The use of setting and imagery makes the mood dark and gloomy.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Cask of the Amontillado” is a short story by Edgar Allen Poe. It is about a most likely deranged man who exacts revenge on his old friend for an unknown insult. The sotry’s tone is very dark and serious and has an equally dismal atmosphere. The plot contains many literary elements such as symbolism and foreshadow.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Edgar Allen Poe’s short story The Cask of Amontillado, the protagonist, Montressor, is driven to murder a former acquaintance by a mysterious and unexplained past event that has irreparably harmed him. Tricking him into believing he is treating Fortunato to a fine wine, Montressor seals him off in his crypt where presumably he dies. By having a character powerfully motivated by an event of the distant past, Poe employs a hallmark of literary fiction.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Only when in the place of the prey does he understand the fear and terror felt when pursued by the reaper. Compounding the mania experienced by Rainsford is the fact that he cannot plead ignorance. He has been the predator countless times, pursuing his living quarry with religious zeal, and he knows how this encounter ends all too often. The antagonist, General Zaroff, has grown bored of traditional hunts and sought out “the only animal with reason” (Connell). Killing men for entertainment, or “sport”, may seem barbaric to most civilized people. But many other deaths occur daily from trivial pursuits from the running of the bulls in Pamplona to the ski slopes in the Alps. Furthermore, if the General seems desensitized to the destruction of human life, this doubtless stems from his service as a Cossack officer, where killing men was compulsory and undoubtedly an adrenaline-fueled adventure. The “legitimate” killing in war very well may have given him the taste for his “barbaric” hunts. To hunt is to kill with the intention of sport. This fictionalized anecdote illustrates that the killing in itself is neither good nor bad, but judged so by the killer. When General Zaroff was hunting enemies of the Russian state in the Caucus Mountains, were those kills more honorable than his forays into his private “game reserve”? Would the General’s killings be more legitimate if he declared himself the monarch of his small island, and wrote out an ultimatum against all who washed up on his shores? Upon closer examination line used to distinguish killings…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    plan is to make the person he is avenging to feel guilt and die in…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roughly 56,600,000 people die every year, making it no surprise that authors everywhere create stories based around the sport of killing. In the horrific and sadistic stories of Edgar Allen Poe’s “The Cask of Amontillado” and Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game,” the authors use literary elements to illistrate nefarious murderers . No matter the motives of these murders, demented people always commit them. In “The Cask of Amontillado,” the guile Montresor seeks vengeance on Fortunato, an imprudent man who has an addiction to alcohol by using Fortunato’s desire of Amontillado against him to lure him to his death. In Connell’s amazing short prose “The Most Dangerous Game,” Rainsford, a skillful hunter, falls off a yacht into the Amazon. There he meets the hunting fanatic General Zaroff, who eventually implies that the only creatures that give him a thrill to hunt are humans. Rainsford thought he was being treated well and that him and Zaroff were to hunt other humans together; however, he soon finds out that he is the one who will be hunted. Authors Poe and Connell use tone, metaphores and suspense to illuminate a foreboding atmosphere in their tales “The Cask of Amontillado” and “The Most Dangerous Game” ultimately creeping readers out…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    troubled thinking

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Although "The Cask of Amontillado" and "A&P" are narrated by two considerably distinct types of narrators in very different situations, both of these stories by Edgar Allan Poe and John Updike take on a comparable meaning through the actions that these characters yield based on their reactions to certain events that lead them to make their fixed decisions. Two characters, Montresor from “The Cask of Amontillado” and Sammy from “A&P,” are the main focus of these plots and each of them is seriously affected in a certain way by their alleged enemies, Fortunato (Montresor’s respected acquaintance) and Lengel (Sammy’s uptight boss).…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Of Monsters and Men

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The word “monster” can mean many things to different people. In general a monster is someone or something that terrifies a person. Some might think of monsters as imaginary or fake but in fact they are real. Monsters can be people who commit heinous crimes and transform themselves from being human into something much darker and sinister. In no place can we find more of this type of monster than in fiction. “The Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allen Poe is the perfect example of a monstrous character masked as a human being. Poe creates his Monster, Montresor, by portraying him as a cold and calculated murderer with an intelligence that makes him both devious and terrifying.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays