Preview

Zeran V. Compuserve Case

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
151 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Zeran V. Compuserve Case
The court ruled in CompuServe’s favor with the understanding that CompuServe served as no more than an electronic library and therefore is considered a distributor, which is protected under the First Amendment from libel. “Because CompuServe, as a news distributor, may not be held liable if it neither knew nor had reason to know of the allegedly defamatory Rumorville statements, summary judgment in favor of CompuServe on the libel claim is granted” (Cubby, Inc. v. CompuServe Inc., 1991).
The CompuServe case was major in establishing whether online computer service providers can be held liable for defamatory statements made by third party contributors on their sites. Especially in the case Zeran v. America Online, Inc. Kenneth Zeran sued AOL

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    WIRETIME has committed an intentional business related tort known as Defamation. In this case all four elements of defamation are present. A defamatory statement was made, it was spread to a third party, the statement was very definite to one company, and it caused damages to BUGusa business.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Class Make up Case Brie1

    • 818 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Issues: Did Ms. Akre’s claims meet the whistle-blower statue? Was the “news distortion policy” adopted as rule by the FCC? Should a plaintiff be awarded attorney’s fees from the defendant in an appeals case?…

    • 818 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Korb v. Raytheon, 707 F. Supp. 63 (D. Mass) case involves an employee, Lawrence J. Korb and Raytheon Corporation the company. “Korb was terminated from his position as vice president for Washington operation of Raytheon Corporation because he publicly expressed opinions, which was a conflict of interest with the corporation’s economic concern” (http://www.loislaw.com.libdatab.strayer.edu/pns/index.htp). The case involves freedom of speech, information and challenges with the employment law. The case of Korb v. Raytheon allowed the public to view the relationship between Raytheon and the influence regarding the Department…

    • 2070 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first rule applied in this case was the rule of libel and slander, which states that the cause of defamation must include four elements: “1) a false and defamatory statement concerning the plaintiff; 2) an unprivileged communication to a third party; 3) fault by the defendant amounting at least to negligence; and 4) special harm of the actionability of the statement irrespective of special harm.” (822) Libel is the defamation of one’s character in written form, and slander is the…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1950 case of P. Lorillard Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, P. Lorillard Co., the makers of Old Gold cigarettes, were ordered to “cease and desist from making certain representations found to be false in the advertising of its tobacco products (Warner, et al., 2012, p. 950) From a practical perspective in the 1950’s caveat emptor, or “let the buyer beware” is not a fair or reasonable expectation. While the careful consumer could have looked at the article, the culture of the time was not anti-smoking as it is today. The careful consumer at the time was not savvy to the wealth of scientific data regarding smoking and health. The actual ad, see Figure 1: 1942 WW2 Era Old Gold Santa Cigarette Ad, states that the impartial tests were not done to boost sales or claim superiority of brand. The ad misleads the consumer to believe that it was impartially discovered that Old Gold had the stated attributes.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. What is the most “jealously” protected kind of speech, according to the court in this case? (3 points)…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bugusa, Inc., Worksheet

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages

    WIRETIME, Inc. (WIRETIME) has committed trade libel. WIRETIME’s advertisement satisfies the three conditions of trade libel as defined by our text (Melvin, 2011, p.212):…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It seems WIRETIME, Inc. (a relatively new competitor) committed intentional tort advertising negative information in a well-known industry magazine in regard to BUGusa, Inc.’s devices being low quality and stating the devices works for one month only. An intentional tort occurs when a party intentionally caused another party to suffer injury or damage (Larson, 2005). In this particular scenario, WIRETIME, Inc. posting an advertisement as such participated in a libel act. A libel act involves making defamatory statements in a fixed medium, such as a magazine or newspaper (Larson, 2005). Defamation is considered as an act of harming the reputation of a person or company by making false statements to another person or company (Larson, 2005).…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plaintiffs sued, Netscape, a software internet company who distributed the free software SmartDownload, for electronic eavesdropping. The Plaintiffs alleged Defendant violated two federal statutes, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, by capturing private information about files downloaded from the Internet . Plaintiffs filed suit against Defendant in District Court and Defendant moved to dismiss the case and compel arbitration. Defendant alleged that Plaintiffs had agreed to arbitrate any and all claims through their acknowledgment of the terms and conditions in the license agreement on the Web page. However,…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bugusa, Inc.

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages

    WIRETIME, Inc. committed a defamatory tort which is “a civil wrong where one party has acted, or in some cases failed to act, and that action or inaction causes a loss to be suffered by another party” (Melvin, 2011, p. 208). A tort was committed because WIRETIME, Inc. made a statement that will hurt the reputation of BUGusa, Inc. The statement made is “a false and defamatory statement concerning a party’s reputation, honesty, or a statement that subjected a party to hate, contempt, or ridicule. In order to qualify as defamatory, the statement must have a tendency to harm the reputation of the plaintiff” (Melvin, 2011, p. 209). Next WIRETIME, Inc. placed a defamatory advertisement in a well-known industry magazine that contained a statement that is accusing BUGusa, Inc. for having a bad product. By doing this, the dissemination of the advertisement to a third party is an element that requires the statement must somehow reach the ears or eyes of someone other than the tortfeasor and the victim, (Melvin, 2011, p. 209). Finally, the advertisement has the third element, specificity. Specificity means the WIRETIME, Inc. advertisement specified a particular party, BUGusa, Inc. and their product and services, (Melvin 2011). Because of this defamatory advertisement, BUGusa, Inc. will probably suffer damages or loss of clients because of the negative implications stated in the WIRETIME, Inc. advertisement.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kizza chapter 6

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The article “The Yin and Yang of Copyright and Technology” discusses copyright laws and the Rojadirecta Case in which Congress made it possible for the federal government to seize domain names associated with Websites where allegedly infringing behavior was taking place or being facilitated.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Esposito v. SFX

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    4. According to the case, why was this not defamation, and what tort did the court approve a filing for? (5 points)…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    law assignment USA

    • 1767 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1.[13] The oral arguments before the Supreme Court concerning the Communications Decency Act (CDA) focused extensively on determining the most appropriate analogy for cyberspace. Arguments were presented that compared the Internet to a library, to television, and to a public place such as a street corner or park.…

    • 1767 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. What company was sued because its Web site 's advertisement placed cookies on the computers of…

    • 3371 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tort Reform

    • 3026 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The Chung family immigrated to the United States in 1992 and opened various dry cleaning businesses, including Custom Cleaners in 2000. From October 1999 until May 2005, Mr. Pearson patronized Custom Cleaners on numerous occasions. In July 2002, Mr. Pearson brought in a pair of pants for cleaning or alterations, which went missing. The Chungs agreed to compensate Mr. Pearson for the loss of the pants at a value of $150. Mr. Pearson continued to patronize Custom Cleaners, even after the Chungs requested that he not, until May 3, 2005, when Mr. Pearson brought in numerous suits for alterations. The last items to be brought in for alterations was a Hickey Freeman suit, which was blue and burgundy pinstripe, and a…

    • 3026 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays