Preview

Zoom Car Company

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
987 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Zoom Car Company
Case Example D

The main legal issues that have come about from this case are very important for many reasons. Zoom Car Company is being sued on part of Daniel Boone for them to pay for his medical expenses resulting from being dragged from his car and being beaten. The reason behind this is his compass that was installed in his car by Zoom Car Company was faulty which lead him in the wrong direction where he got lost and ended up in a horrible situation. Daniel Boone is suing for his medical bills to be paid by the company of the faulty feature the car offered when it was bought. Who should be responsible for Daniel Boone’s medical bills? As the plaintiff he argues that Zoom Car Company should be responsible for his medical bills that were a result from Zoom Car Companies faulty features. Daniel Boone believes that they should be held responsible because if he had a properly working compass installed in his car he wouldn’t have been lead to this bad part of town where he was beaten. Daniel believes he can win this case by the laws under product liability. Product liability entails that “the liability of manufacturers, sellers, and others for the injuries caused by defective products (119).” Zoom Car Company showed negligence by not properly assembling the item, testing the product, and product design. Which makes both companies at risk for strict liability under the doctrine of strict liability in tort, Zoom Car Company and Corrigan Rulers, responsible for the negligence in a product liability lawsuit. “A seller can be found strictly liable even though he or she has exercised all possible care in the preparation and sale of his or her product (121).” The manufacturer and company that sells the product knows at some point the product is going to be sold to a customer and they need to make sure that everything was checked twice and in working condition so they aren’t held responsible for incidents like Daniel Boone’s. You can’t put blame on just the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Culpepper V. Weihrauch KG

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On August 12, 1996, Plaintiff, Ann Culpepper, filled action against defendant, Hermann Weihrauch KG, ETC., seeking damages for injuries she sustained after an accidental shooting from the gun she owned that was manufactured by Weihrauch. Ann Culpepper imposed liability on Weihrauch under the Alabama Extended Manufacturer’s Liability Doctrine of 1979. This doctrine provides liability “if a company manufactured, designed or sold a defective product, which by unreasonably unsafe conditions, injured someone or damaged their property when such product, unaltered, was put to its intended use.”…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Description: Terry Fedrick appeals from a take nothing judgment following a bench trial. In one issue, Fedrick argues that he was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law in light of factual findings made by the trial court. We affirm. * * * Fedrick is a truck driver, and he owns a commercial truck manufactured in 1994. The truck apparently developed a short circuit in the wiring and caught fire while it was parked outside Fedrick's home. Fedrick was able to extinguish the fire, and had the truck towed to Nichols's repair facility. Nichols agreed to attempt to repair the truck. One of his employees began the repair job, but could not complete the repair because a part had not yet arrived. The truck was parked outside Nichols's facility overnight when it caught fire again and was burned beyond…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Citation- Legal Brief

    • 1352 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Facts: The appellant, Michael P. Babine brought suit against Gilley’s Bronco Shop, Inc. damages from injuries sustained at Kevin’s West, Inc. a nightclub, where he was thrown off the mechanical bull “El Toro”. The mechanical bull was sold to Kevin’s from Gilley’s. Gilley’s purchased it from another party. The purpose of the mechanical bull was for training rodeo cowboys.…

    • 1352 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first element is proven by the fact that FF was driving the car that rear-ended DD and caused the accident to occur and the hitchhiker's death. The second element is proven as well due to the fact that under ordinary course of events this type of accident would not occur if the FF had not been negligent by running into DD’s vehicle. Since both of these elements can be proven by the Plaintiff’s evidence, FF is liable of negligence for the…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    "In determining whether liability exists under a duty-risk analysis, a plaintiff must prove that the conduct in question was the cause-in-fact of the resulting harm, that [the] defendant owed a duty to [the] plaintiff which [the] defendant breached and that the risk of harm was within the scope of protection afforded by the duty breached." The court used a different set of principles to determine DOTD’s liability. “The plaintiff bears the burden of showing that: (1) the DOTD had custody of the thing that caused the plaintiff's injuries or damages; (2) the thing was defective because it had a condition that created an unreasonable risk of harm; (3) the DOTD had actual or constructive knowledge of the defect and did not take corrective measures within a reasonable time; and (4) the defect in the thing was a cause-in-fact of the plaintiff's…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    FACTS: Defendant, AAA North Jersey, Inc. (“AAA”), contracted with Five Star Auto Service (“Five Star”) to perform towing and auto repair services for AAA. Defendant Terence Pershad, a tow-truck driver employed by Five Star, received a call through AAA to assist a crashed car. Upon Pershad’s arrival at the crash site, Pershad and Plaintiff Nicholas Coker (a passenger of the crashed car) began fighting, which ended soon after Pershad assaulted Plaintiff with a knife. Plaintiff filed suit in a New Jersey state court against Pershad, Five Star, and AAA. The trial court determined that AAA held no responsibility for the alleged negligence of Five Star in hiring Pershad, and granted AAA summary judgement. Coker appealed the trial court’s ruling to the New Jersey Appellate Court.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Due to this collision, Bradshaw suffered serious injuries including a cervical fracture which caused quadriplegic paralysis. The plaintiffs alleged that Rawlings was negligent in operating his vehicle and that Delaware Valley College was guilty of negligence as it failed to supervise students at the class picnic.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    dynamic business law

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Javier Galindo, the husband of the plaintiff, was sitting in his car in the driveway of Mr. Clark's property waiting to pick up his wife, who worked as a housekeeper for Mr. Clark, when a leaning 80 ft tree on an adjacent property fell on the plaintiff's husband's car and killed him. Ms. Galindo sued Mr. Clark for failing to notify her husband of the danger posed by the leaning tree.…

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr. Class V.: Case Study

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    (#4-7) According to the case, the plaintiff should not be held as semi liable for his injuries while attending the Daytona International Speedway. My client should receive a decision in his favor because NASCAR and the Daytona International Speedway were and are negligent in how races are conducted, the design of the speedway, and the lack of safety barriers to protect spectators, such as my client, from being severely injured during an event. There were several issues that NASCAR and the Daytona International Speedway are responsible for that resulted in the traumatic injury my client sustained. According to my client the numerous problems that resulted in the plaintiff’s injuries are:…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Haugen Vs Ford Summary

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Haugen v. Ford Motor Co., the requirement of Article 2-302(2) that the court required an affording opportunity for the buyer to present evidence to aid the court in making a determination. In this case, Plaintiff buyer challenged the judgment of the District Court of Williams County (North Dakota) that granted summary judg-ment in favor of defendant manufacturer dismissing the buyer's damage claim based on a liability exclusion for damage from fire. The buyer filed a complaint against the man-ufacturer when the car he bought burst into flames while he drove it. The manufacturer was awarded summary judgment dismissing the buyer's claim based on a liability ex-clusion for damage from fire included in the limitation of liability. The court…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The claimant, Morgan, sustained severe physical injuries caused by an accident which occurred as he was driving a two person bobsled during a national championship race. Morgan was an experienced rider who had been bobsledding for over 20 years and had competed in the US Olympics. He also testified that he was familiar with this particular course and had raced on it many times prior to this race. The area where the accident occurred was recently reconstructed and substantially modified but was approved by FIBT, the regulating authority of the sport. Morgan brought a lawsuit in the Court of Claims stating that the design of the exit ramp was the cause of his accident and injuries. The defendant, State of New York, which owns and operates the mountain, stated that the athlete assumed the risks of a dangerous sport and was primarily to blame for the accident.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Setco Automotive

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Setco Automotive is not the type of company that gives out incentives to their employees. The only items is a twenty-five dollar gift card on Thanksgiving and Christmas it is all about work. However, this company the only worry is about was making money no matter what it takes. These new people that have taken new ownership of Haldex Brake System. Furthermore, Setco Automotive management team only care about the company interest and not the employees. We never receive thank you or job well done from anyone, all they say is did you get that order out or how many more parts do you have before the order is complete.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: In 1976, Harry and Kay Robinson purchased a new Audi automobile from Seaway Volkswagen, Inc (Seaway) in Massena, N.Y. The following year the Robinson family, who resided in New York, left that state for a new home in Arizona. As they passed through Oklahoma, another car struck their Audi in the rear, causing a fire which severely burned Kay Robinson and her two children. The Robinsons subsequently brought a products-liability action in the District Court for Creek County, Oklahoma, claiming that their injuries resulted from defective design and placement of the Audi’s gas tank and fuel system. They brought suit against the automobile’s manufacturer (Audi), its importer (Volkswagen of America),…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Critically analyze the following case and say whether or not you think that the plaintiff will succeed under the tort of negligence:…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Truck Accident In Texas

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A family recently reached a settlement for injuries caused by a 2007 tractor trailer accident after seeking representation from a personal injury law firm in Texas. A family of three, injured in a Texas 18 wheeler truck accident near Chappel Hill, in Washington County, recently received a settlement of $435,000 after being represented by The Carlson Law Firm (Cause No 2011-CI-00049). The suit was filed in the 150th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, Texas. According to the Texas personal injury attorneys, the lawsuit stemmed from mounting medical costs endured by the family after their vehicle was struck from behind by a tractor trailer truck in April 2007. Approaching the intersection of U.S. 290 and FM 1155 at a high rate of speed, the driver of the tractor trailer truck, David Lynn House, was unable to come to a stop, smashing into the back of the family’s vehicle and propelling them into a car stopped ahead of them.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays