Preview

A Close Reading of Titus Andronicus

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1742 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Close Reading of Titus Andronicus
Titus – Seeing the Dark Side of the Moon Titus Andronicus is a study of the conflict between personal responsibilities and duty to the state. Shakespeare establishes the character of Titus early in the play. He is a loyal subject of Rome, a commander of legions, and a career soldier who devoted his life to defending and expanding the Roman Empire. Titus serves the state in such blind loyalty that it gets to the point of neglecting his duty to his family as a father and patriarch. Throughout the play, from the triumph parade in act 1 scene 1 to the execution of his sons in act 3 scene 1, Titus maintains blind devotion and steadfast loyalty to Rome. Act 3 Scene1 is a pivotal scene in the play; it is the moment when Titus goes through changes in heart and mind. In this scene, Titus suffers through the agony of all his losses from the revenge acts of Tamora to the corruption of Rome. In this scene, Titus changes from subject to freeman, proud general to grieving father, giving his first priority to Rome to giving his first priority to family, and from a mind full of hopeless despair to a mind full of hope for revenge. In the first 5 lines, Titus is pleading with the powerful leaders of Rome to stay the execution of his two sons as a reward for his service to Rome, “Hear me, grave fathers! Noble tribunes, stay! / For pity of mine age, whose youth was spent / In dangerous wars, whilst you securely slept; / For all my blood in Rome's great quarrel shed; / For all the frosty nights that I have watch'd” (3.1.1-5). Obviously, in these five lines Titus is pleading for his sons' lives. However, looking beyond the words at the whole situation reveals the full impact of this scene. Titus had spent his whole adult life in the army. He was the quintessential career military man; he had literally shed his blood for all the values he believed in and the system of order that made those values possible, the Roman Empire. With this in mind, the scene of Titus, the nobleman,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The Roman's godlike worship of Caesar threatens the prominence of the Senate. To retain his dominance Mark Antony chooses to become a close ally to him. Cassius, Brutus, and the other conspirators however, plot Caesar’s demise. In the end, Mark Antony finds high esteem and the conspirators receive banishment and death. The play is an example, or maybe even a warning, that our actions and reactions have real effects. Brutus, Cassius, Casca, Cinna, Trebonius, and Cimber respond swiftly and without thought to Caesar’s rise and pay a heavy price for it in the end. Mark Antony sees the worth in being Caesar’s friend, and their friendship benefits him when Caesar is dead. In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare the principal characters' initial reactions to Caesar’s rise affect their conclusive outcomes.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clitus said he would not kill Brutus or help him kill himself. Next, Brutus asks Volumnius to kill him. He says that he knows his time has come and does not want to surrender to Antony’ army. Volumnius also tells Caesar he will not do it. Finally, Brutus asks Strato, another one of his men, to hold a sword that Brutus can run into to kill himself. Strato’s only request is that he says goodbye to Brutus properly because he respects and loves Brutus, as a commander, and wants to be say goodbye properly. After Brutus dies, Octavius and Antony enter the scene. Octavius treats the conspirators with respect, which creates a trust and immediate peace between the people. In the play’s final lines, Antony and Octavius honor Brutus through their final orations through complimenting his character. Antony goes as far as calling Brutus “the noblest Roman of them all”. They promise Brutus full funeral rites and thus the play closes. Antony and Octavius final speeches reveal a personal revelation that has occurred among them that Brutus was fighting to preserve Rome. They acknowledge this change of heart through praising Brutus and giving him full burial rites, something they would not have done they still considered him a…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It portrays the 44 BC conspiracy against the Roman dictator Julius Caesar, his assassination and the defeat of the conspirators. Although the title of the play is Julius Caesar, Caesar is not the central character in its action; he appears in only three scenes, and is killed at the beginning of the third act. The protagonist of the play is Marcus Brutus, and the central psychological drama is his struggle between the conflicting demands of honor, patriotism, and friendship.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Titus Andronicus Analysis

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Many of William Shakespeare’s plays are so memorable because of the protagonists presented in them. Shakespeare delicately crafts (his) protagonists as complex characters that (evoke) different responses from the audience, often leaving the audience with a memorable impression of how they initially felt about the protagonist and how over time those feelings changed due to their experiences in life. Even after the play, the protagonist’s reactions to the events that took place in the play stay with us, because they make us question how we would have handled the situations that the protagonist was presented with. This exact feeling happens in two of Shakespeare’s early plays, Titus Andronicus and Hamlet. Both plays present two protagonists of…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patriarchal describes a general structure in which woman are dominated by men who are presented with power. A Patriarchal Society is composed of a male with dominated power structure throughout an organised society and in individual relationships.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The citizens of Rome are also called the plebeians. The plebeians didn’t have many lines as the main characters in the play, but they cause what the outcome of the play will be. Throughout the play, they are manipulated by their leaders, changing their minds quickly, and had an important role in the play. The common people support their leaders throughout the play, and in return the rulers would gain their trust and more power to rule in making decisions for them or against them. In Julius Caesar, the common people are easily manipulated by their leaders, but their rulers need the support of the plebeians, because they could overthrow their leaders.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Feed Discussion Questions

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    f. I would define Titus’ character by his ability to debate because it is really hard to debate with people on controversial subjects and you really need to be courageous to share your point of view or opinion.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marc Antony, Brutus, and Cassius are all critical characters in William Shakespeare’s famous play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Due to their distinctive personalities and values, there is no trait that all of these characters share, although they do share some traits with one another. Firstly, Marc Antony and Cassius are manipulative in nature, while Brutus is not. Secondly, the root of Brutus and Cassius’ failure is their personality flaw, while Marc Antony proves strong in all the ways they prove weak. Lastly, Antony and Cassius, unlike Brutus, do not separate their private affairs from their public actions while acts only with honor and virtue and completely ignores his personal concerns.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Shakespeare’s drama, bias and self-interest, more than anything else, are the key elements of the conflicting perspectives fabricated in the play. Shakepeare unites the epic legedary stories of nationalism in the history of Julius Caesar to the lyrical stage craft of the theatre. The drama provides a visual realism of the fortitude of men; it highlights the self-acting individual and their ability to supersede values of patriotism and nationalism when self-interest becomes apparent. A key example of this is the character Brutus. The characterisation of Brutus changes throughout the play. So the audience is left with the conflicting perspective of who Brutus is; they are only left with the representation of who he is, only to work out for themselves who the true Brutus is. At the beginning of the play, the audience is shown a character who is noble, good, patriotic, honourable but most of all, proud of Rome. He is also depicted to be loyal. “Brutus has rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” This quote from Act 1 scence 2, shows the inital view of Brutus at the start of the play; it portrays him as noble and loyal to Rome. This becomes a motif throughout the play…

    • 2407 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Line act 3 scenes 2 of William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, the character Mark Antony delivers to the Roman people a speech that employs a appeal to pathos and diction to show that Caesar was wrongfully killed, and uses metaphor in order to show how the stab wounds of Caesar spoke in pain and treason.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Individuality is rejected as Titus and his family succumb give in to docile submission to the corporate world of advertising and manufacturing. Titus and his family are totally dependent on the feed, and thus leads to blind acceptance of the physical and moral decline that saturates society. Destruction of the earth is little concern to Titus providing he has unrestrained access to the feed and its delights, which he has no apperception of the immorality of his actions.…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Loft Essay

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Directions: Identify the speaker and the significance of the following quotes from Act 1. Don’t forget to use literary devices such as theme, dramatic irony, etc. Be specific! Use names! You should have a small paragraph for each one.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Titus Andronicus

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Obviously all very good qualities to posses. He stands in contrast to Tamora and Aaron who have both been called ‘ravenous tiger(s)’, the two main figures of barbarianism in Titus Andronicus. Titus, being the model man of piety and honour in Rome, so much so that the people have unanimously agreed to offer him the crown, is so set in his traditions that one may say he is blinded by them. He refuses the crown, and instead of offering it to the more virtuous and noble of the previous emperor’s sons, he passes it to Saturninus based on pure tradition and his adherence to it. Shakespeare has put into play the question of tradition as a true and apt measure of decisions; when does an observance of tradition become the wrong gauge by which one evaluates a situation? Strangely enough it is also the Andronici’s strict following of traditions in I i which inevitably leads to their down-fall. Lucius calls for the proper sacrifice to be made in honour of his fallen brothers, and despite the desperate, touching pleas of Tamora, who argues very logically appealing with reason, that her son not be taken from her, Titus refuses her and sends Alarbus to be sacrificed to appease the spirits and the gods. This action prompts two very interesting concepts dealt with in Titus. Firstly that of revenge, for the revenge of his sons’ deaths by the Goths, he has the…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Brutus Honorable

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this play, Brutus is an honorable man. He is a man who loves the country of Rome and all of the people in it. Brutus would have done anything to protect Rome and its’ people. As said in the play by Brutus, “If it be aught toward the general good, / Set honor in one eye and death i' th' other, / And I will look on both indifferently, / For let the gods so speed me as I love / The name of honor more than I fear death” (1.2. 87-91). In these lines Brutus is saying that he will do anything for the Roman citizens and he would rather die than love honor and power more than Rome. Brutus…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar is a play with many central ideas, but one in particular stands out to its readers. Shakespeare shows in Julius Caesar that following people blindly can end in conflict through the plot.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays