A Critical Review of the European Union’s Emissions Trading: An Understanding from Concept to Reality
The way in which Western, developed states have sought to deal with environmental problems, and particularly climate change, can be encapsulated within the ecological modernisation agenda; the notion of which implies that ‘market forces in partnership with an enabling state are seen as the means of achieving both economic and environmental objectives’ (Blowers 2000, p. 1). One could argue how these market based solutions are only natural, given that we live in market based economies. With respect to climate change, this agenda has primarily taken the the form of creating a carbon price, allocating property rights to pollute in a global commons and the idea that markets are more flexible and efficient. A perfect example illustrating such measures is the European Union’s Emissions Trading Scheme (EU-ETS), which is a purely economic strategy in helping member states reduce their C02 emissions in a cost effective way. The concept of the system, does in effect achieve the fundamental goal of reducing overall C02 emissions, yet overlooks a number of political realities or issues including distributional concerns of C02 permits, the lack of an International agreement and the social cost of carbon. These are three significant areas surrounding a number of others (i.e. vulnerability to fraud and import emissions) which I shall unpack in greater depth within this analysis.
The EU-ETS is a ‘cap and trade’ scheme that was established to help the EU meet its GHG emission target of 8% below 1990 levels under the 1997 Kyoto Protocol (DECC, 2012). It came into force in January 2005, launching a three phase period of operation - Phase I ‘Trial Period’: 2005-2007, Phase II ‘Commitment Period’: 2008-2012 and Phase III ‘2nd Commitment Period’: 2013-2020 - and now applies to 27 EU member states (Europa, 2008). The initial emissions cap setting process is decentralized, in that
Bibliography: Blowers, A. (2000) ‘Ecological and Political Modernisation: The Challenge for Planning’, The Town Planning Review, Vol. 71, No. 4, (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press), pp. 371 – 393. Cameron and McKenna. (2009) ‘Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme: your Q&A guide’, Law Now Online, Available at: www.law-now.com/cmck/pdfs/nonsecured/phase3.pdf, [Last Accessed 21/03/12]. Carbon Trust. (2010) ‘Tackling Carbon Leakage; Sector-Specific Solutions for a World of Unequal Carbon Prices’, Carbon Trust Online, Available at: www.carbontrust.co.uk, [Last Accessed 21/03/12]. Cooper, R.N. (2010) ‘Europe’s Emissions Trading System’, The Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements, (Harvard: Harvard University Press), Available at: http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/files/CooperETSfinal.pdf, [Last Accessed 21/03/12]. Department of Energy and Climate Change. (2012) ‘EU Emissions Trading System (EU-ETS)’, DECC Online, Available at: http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/emissions/eu_ets/eu_ets.aspx, [Last Accessed 21/03/12]. Ellerman, A.D. and Joskow, P.L. (2008) ‘The European Union’s Emissions Trading System in Perspective’, Pew Center on Global Climate Change: MIT, Available at: http://www.c2es.org/docUploads/EU-ETS-In-Perspective-Report.pdf, [Last Accessed 22/02/12]. Harvey, F. (2010) ‘MPs urge higher carbon price’, Financial Times Online, Available at: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/4b111a28-1426-11df-8847-00144feab49a.html#axzz1pfV3NUtJ, [Last Accessed 24/03/12]. HM Treasury. (2010) ‘Carbon Price Floor: Support and Certainty for Low Carbon Investment’, HMRC, Available at: http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/consult_carbon_price_support_condoc.pdf, [Last Accessed 21/03/12]. Pierce, F. (2006) ‘Top economist counts future cost of climate change’, New Scientist Online, Available at: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn10405-top-economist-counts-future-cost-of-climate-change.html, [Last Accessed 21/03/12]. Sijm, J.P.M., S.J.A. Bakker, Y. Chen, H.W. Harmsen, and W. Lise. (2005), ‘CO2 price dynamics: The implications of EU emissions trading for the price of electricity’, Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN), Publication ECN-C-005-081. Tietenberg, T. (2003a) ‘Economics of pollution control: An Overview; Chapter 15’ in Environmental and Natural Resources, (Addison Wesley: London). Tietenberg, T. (2003b) ‘The Tradable- Permits Approach to protecting the Commons: Lessons for Climate Change’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, (19)30, (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 400-419. Stern, N. (2007a) ‘Chapter 14: Harnessing Markets for mitigation – The Role of Taxation and Trading’ in The Economics of Climate Change, (Cambridge; Cambridge University Press). Stern, N Webb, T. (2011) ‘Budget 2011: Carbon tax brings higher electricity bills – and nuclear windfalls’, The Guardian Online, Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/mar/24/carbon-tax-electricity-bills-nuclear-windfall, [Last Accessed 21/03/12]. Weitzman, H. (2010) ‘US carbon emissions trading in doubt’, Financial Times Online, Available at: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/55232080-9fe8-11df-8cc5-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1pfV3NUtJ, [Last Accessed 21/03/12]. World Bank. (2010) State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2010, (Washington, D.C: World Bank). World Bank