In general I found the novel to be interesting and well detailed. Women were considered to be housewives that could not think for themselves. Furthermore they went even lower into being considered possessions and decorations of the house. However Ibsen contradicts this idea in this novel by exploring every aspect of life that Nora lives. Ibsen strongly believes women should be considered on equal grounding as men despite their physical strength. By the end of the novel Nora shows her resolve by reaching her breaking point and within the novel she experiences a struggle which triggers it. Everything starts out with her borrowing money from a man named Krogstad. Things progress when Nora forges her father’s signature in order for her family to survive. Time passes, they manage to pull through and on top of that Torvald gets promoted to manager status. Conflict occurs when Krogstad learns that he is about to lose his job so he blackmails Nora saying if he loses his job he will unmask her and bring her down with him. Without furthermore address he says that he wants a higher position and that he will crush Torvald and become the manager himself. By putting her in such a situation, she doesn’t know what to do, which stimulates her mind. However Christine says that if he truly loves her he would most likely be willing to change his mind. She tries convincing Torvald but, he doesn’t even think about it and just send the letter to Krogstad. This is where Nora is starting to understand and start thinking for herself that maybe he doesn’t love her.
I understood the overall theme and message of the novel, however I did not get this quote. I assure you… “(Ibsen 78 Act 3). Ibsen puts Torvald in a situation to prove himself as a man that Nora wanted. Sadly I was disappointed to see Torvald overwhelmed with fear from the mail. Ibsen sets up a perfect setting where Torvald had to sacrifice his honor or his wife. Without hesitation he flips out and blames everything that happened on her despite the sacrifices she made for him. I strongly disliked how Torvald completely ignores the fact that his life was saved because Nora had done that. Nora then gets a grasp of reality and discovers she never really loved Torvald for a man. While unfolding her flaws she also realizes she doesn’t know who she is herself, that she has just been merely a doll for Torvald to play with. I mean that I was simply transferred… “(Ibsen 76 Act 3).
What got me the most was the fact that she was going to leave her children so she could find out more about herself. Ibsen uses Christine as a foil character to Nora to display the difference in intelligence. Christine was an old friend of hers that she hadn’t seen in 10 years but, one day decided to show at the doorsteps. Christine was kind of a role model towards Nora because she knew more about life and she knew what happiness was. She was the spark for Nora in order for her to open her eyes and truly ask herself if she was happy with what she had. Personally I think if it wasn’t for Christine I don’t think Nora would have been able to strengthen her resolve into action.
Ibsen illustrates perfectly the social status of a woman in the 1900s but, I feel like it would be harder to understand today why women would do such things because throughout the whole novel I disliked Nora’s action any lies. I didn’t understand why she couldn’t even eat sweets because her husband said so. Overall Ibsen did a really good job comparing the male superior social status compared to a female.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
A woman sheltered by an awful man, turning into a woman breaking free from a helpless man. Ibsen’s A Doll’s House shows evidence that it is written with a feminist agenda. Nora is treated like border line trash the whole play in comparison to her husband. She is called weak, unintelligent, and needy. She is called terrible names the whole time, demeaning her role as a woman. Even the title of the play supports it being themed on feminism. A Doll’s House may have reason to be seen as a play about humanism, but the main theme is indeed…
- 582 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Author Henrik Ibsen was a very brave man during his time period. He dared to be different and wrote about what people did not want to or desired to discuss because it was not the cultural norm. He mainly focused on women’s rights and their roles due to his startling upbringing and wanted the world to know that, in reality, everything was not always hunky-dory, especially when it came to women. This led to and fueled him to write in the Realism format which discussed real life issues. In his work, A Doll’s House, Ibsen metaphorically spoke of one of the main characters, Nora, as he used symbolism to expose the reality of women’s roles, along with a possible outcome of how women would end up if they challenged society’s view of them.…
- 1251 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Henrik Ibsen uses connecting themes such as the uncovering of Torvald’s true nature, his real characterization of Nora and the inevitable hampering of Nora’s rightful individualistic growth in order to show this moral justification. In the beginning, Nora’s fondness for Torvald knew no limits and she sought to do whatever was possible without due regard for herself to please him. She believes being the source of entertainment, indulgence, and appeasement for Torvald allows for her own source of contentment. Although Torvald commands a certain sentimental affection towards Nora, the source for most of these feelings however come solely from the appreciation of her alluring outwardly complexion. Nora’s intricate emotions and intelligence take a back seat in Torvalds mind to the more important plastic image that she is mandated to portray. Perfect examples of this dynamic throughout the whole story…
- 1095 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Feminism today is very different from what it was in 1879. Throughout the play, the female characters exemplify feministic characteristics that made the play controversial for its time. The first example of feminism is when Nora’s husband, Tovald, treats her as if she isn’t human. He calls her pet names and dehumanizes her. Torvald says, “Come, come; my little lark mustn’t droop her wings like that. What? Is my squirrel in the sulks?” (Ibsen 2358). There is no excuse for the way Torvald treats Nora. This phrase sets up the character and his relationship with his wife. While some suggest it is the structure of the home itself that plays into the doll house effect, most critics will argue that Torvald's demeaning nature taken with Nora is the reason she leaves her family at the end of the play. Another feministic characteristic seen in the play is when Torvald tells Nora that her only duty is to take care of her husband and children… “Nora: "What do you consider my most sacred duties?" Torvald: “your duties to your husband and your children.” Nora: "I have other duties just as sacred. […] Duties to myself” Torvald: “Before all else you are a wife and mother” (Ibsen 2402). During Ibsen’s time, the idea that a woman may have more worth other than homemaking and being a mother was outrageous and looked down upon. Men did not see women as anything more than a maid and caretaker of men and children and therefore Torvald…
- 405 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
At the start of the play, Nora seems humble and responds positively to her husband’s humor and lightheartedness. “[smiling quietly and happily] ‘You haven’t any idea how many expenses we skylarks and squirrels have, Torvald.’ ‘You are an odd little soul. Very like your father. You always find some new way of wheedling money out of me,”… (Ibsen, pg.8). Ibsen’s view of human life was much tilted toward men in this play and he did a good job making the wife very doll-like in her husband’s eye. “She is to live for his sake only, to have no other thought than of him, no feelings, no opinions, save those which are his” (Jaeger, Henrik Bernhard. Henrik Ibsen: A Critical Biography. Benjamin Blom, inc., New York 1972, pg 240). She is excited about all the money that Torvald’s new job will…
- 3445 Words
- 14 Pages
Good Essays -
In the play A Doll House written by Henrick Isben several social issues were revealed. Considering the time period, women had little to no rights at all. They were basically expected to have no voice, and to just keep a happy home. The main social issues that are portrayed in the play mostly stem from a high level of disrespect for women that are presented in several different ways.…
- 817 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In the 21st or present century, the idea of a woman abandoning her children and husband to discover who she truly is would be viewed as a triumphant action. However, in the Victorian era, where the play “A Doll’s House” takes place, this event was unheard of and completely outrageous. Women mostly served the same purpose in every relationship and every household so the idea of being an individual and finding their interests was entirely unimportant. Many times in literature, a deeper meaning can be found within the text. The drama “A Doll’s House” by Henrik Ibsen, conveys a scenario that represents Victorian views and women’s place in society at that time. With the use of symbolism throughout the play, a message is created about ideals during this era. While Ibsen claims to not share any feminist views, much of his creation speaks otherwise. As many believe Ibsen’s intent “is to expose the patriarchy and it’s exploitation of women(Baseer)”. Many aspects in the play are intriguing as well, that could lead one to believe Ibsen really is a secret feminist. With careful analysis, the reader can locate several places in “A Doll’s House” where Ibsen acknowledges the imbalance of a patriarchal society and covertly establishes himself as an advocate for Women’s Rights.…
- 1725 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
A symbol is an object, action, or event that represents something or that creates a range of associations beyond itself. In literary works a symbol can express an idea, clarify meaning, or enlarge literal meaning. In A Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen, Ibsen uses the title as a somewhat symbol to portray to the reader that the household within the story could be compared to a doll house which is pretty and well kept together on the outside but could possibly be in disarray on the inside.…
- 368 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Henrik Ibsen, the author of the controversial play “A Doll’s House” said, “There are two kinds of moral laws, two kinds of conscience, one for men and one, quite different, for women. They don’t understand each other; but in practical life, woman is judged by masculine law, as though she weren’t a woman but a man…A woman cannot be herself in modern society.” Isben created the plot of “A Doll’s House” from those ideas. Ibsen was viewed by his contemporaries as a moral and social revolutionary who advocated female emancipation and intellectual freedom. He believed that freedom must come from within individuals rather than from the efforts of social and political organizations (141). His play displays many sexist issues from the nineteenth century that are displayed through Nora’s treatment in the play.…
- 939 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Early on it is made very evident through the conversation with husband that she is meant to be the face of their marriage. Ibsen introduces the fact that Nora is not allowed sweets; something that seems strange in this day and age, but in the 19th century was not uncommon. It shows the power a husband had over his wife in that time as well as the submissive behavior women adopted in order to have a proper marriage.…
- 1507 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
What is the “spiritual reassessment or moral reconciliation” evident in the ending of The Doll’s House?…
- 796 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Chopin and Ibsen’s work both criticize a women’s place and role in society by using an antagonist to challenge the reader to question morality and a women’s responsibility in marriage. The conflict within their writings is the traditional expectations society had placed on women in the 19th century along with the search for self-identity under such circumstances. In Ibsen’s A Doll’s House the underlying antagonist is Torvald, husband of protagonist Nora. Although not a direct conflict, it is revealed later in the play that Torvald is ultimately in the way of Nora’s happiness, independence and equality.…
- 421 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Hearing the word “family” we should not only picture a husband and a wife raising their children, but also a mutual behavior within the couple. Henrik Ibsen 's play, written in 1879, called “A Doll House” is written particularly about a couple, a banker, Torvald, and a housewife, Nora. The story takes place during a period of time, when the status of women is not equal and suppressed comparing to men within the marriage. As the play progresses, it seems that Nora loves her husband, nevertheless being treated as a child. Torvald does not trust anything to Nora, especially his money. He thinks that Nora is too foolish to handle neither money nor any business. Obviously Nora does not like the fact that her…
- 2159 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays -
The play "A Doll 's House" was written ahead of its time, addressing issue related to women 's rights. Although Ibsen does attempt to tackle women 's rights as a matter of importance, he fails to do so. By portraying Nora as an unintelligent, selfish person, Ibsen directly contradicts his own belief that women have rights. Throughout the 1800 and early 1900 hundreds women rights where completely ignored. "A Doll 's House" was written during the movement of Naturalism, which commonly reflected society. Ibsen acknowledges the fact that in the 19th century the role of a woman was to stay at home, raise the children and attend to her husband, again showing his own ideals and nature. Nora Helmer in "A Doll House" is portrayed as a victim, instead of a strong independent woman. Nora is oppressed by a variety of totalitarian social conventions. Ibsen depicts the role of women as subordinate in order to emphasize their role in society for that era. Nora is oppressed by the manipulation from Torvald, and Krogstad.…
- 1780 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In the play “A DOLL’S HOUSE”, we are presented with a very idealistic version of life in the late 1800’s, and along with that, the very confined roles both men and women were placed into. “A DOLL’S HOUSE” lends proof to the fact that women do not always enjoy the freedom to say, do and choose a lifestyle that they find fulfilling. The story that the play presents sheds a very domineering light on males as heads of households, and in society in general, and portrays women as dependent and subservient.…
- 707 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays