When Torvald gave me money for clothes and so on, I never spent more than half of it; I always bought the simplest things and besides that, I made money in other ways. Last winter I got a heap of copying to do. I shut myself up every evening and wrote far into the night [I]t was splendid to work in that way and earn money. I almost felt as if I was a man.
Later, while discussing his illness with her, Dr. Rank actually comments that Nora is "deeper than [he] thought." He too looked at her as like a child. The climax of the story comes when Torvald learns of Nora's forgery and yells angrily at her. He then finds the promissory note, returned by Krogstad, and realizes that no one has anything over his head any longer. During this episode, Nora realizes what has been going on: that she has become Torvald's "doll" which plays around his "doll" house. She points out to him:
You have never understood me. I have had great injustice done me, Torvald; first by father, and then by you He used to tell me all his opinions, and I held the same opinions He used to call me his doll-child, and played with me as I played with my dolls Then I passed from father's hands into yours. You settled everything according to your taste; and I got the same tastes as you I lived by performing tricks for you, Torvald. But you would have it so. You and father have done me a great wrong. It's your fault that my life has been wasted [O]ur house has been nothing but a play-room. Here I have been your doll-wife, just as at home I used to be papa's doll-child I thought it fun when you played with me
Here, Nora pulls together the tragic circumstances. She sees that she was never truly happy in the house, just content. Her father kept her as a child would a doll, and Torvald continued this when they were married. They formed her opinions for her, set expectations to which she was supposed to adhere, and wrote a vague script of how she was supposed to act. She was like a puppet, with no thoughts or actions of her own. When she finally realizes the injustice being done to her, she decides to free herself. The different versions of A Doll's House studied offer different points of view. The stage version presents a third person-limited point of view. The audience knows everything going on the scene being played out before them, but cannot see beyond the set. They see the movements and hear the dialogue between all the characters within the limitations of the stage. The video offers a different point of view. We see only what the camera wants us to see. It shows us close-up shots of the actors and actresses while they are talking and many different rooms instead of just the one seen in the live production. This can both an advantage and a disadvantage. While it allows for more focus to be put on the person speaking, it does not allow the audience to see how the other characters are reacting to this, as in the case of a live performance. The genre of A Doll's House is modern tragedy. Nora seeks to secure a sense of personal dignity when she decides to leave Torvald and accepts responsibility for her actions. Her husband had been treating her like a child and she wanted to break free. She reveals the tragic circumstances of the situation in the aforementioned passage at the end of the play where she explains to Torvald how both he and her father have kept her as a doll. There are also many examples of tragic irretrievability within the plot as well. These include the letter locked in the box, to which Nora cannot get; Nora's secret loan to pay for the trip to Italy; the forged signature on the promissory note; and Torvald's explosive scene in which he calls her a "wretched woman." A final characteristic of modern tragedy displayed in the play is the use of everyday language instead of poetic verse or prose. The style of the play is the way in which it is presented. A Doll's House takes the form of realism. The story is a "slice of life" that seems to be taken out of reality and placed on stage before us. It consists of real time and real places, and puts real people at the center of our attention. It appears to be true to life: the actors and actresses use everyday language, dress in everyday dress for the time period, and are found in everyday common rooms. The characters encountered could very possibly be real people existing during its particular time period. This realism is used to express the purpose by setting up a real life situation in which to illustrate the injustice done to Nora. It allows the audience to relate more easily and get the full meaning of the playwright's message. Nora's motivation is her want for personal freedom. She realizes how she has been unfairly kept by her father and her husband and decides she needs to be free. Initially, she tries to fulfill this need by doing things on her own, such as taking the loan from Krogstad to take her husband away on a life-saving trip. Her final stand is leaving Torvald in the final scene. She tells him, "I must try to educate myself. You are not the man to help me in that. I must set about it alone. And that's why I am now leaving you!" With this, Nora is stating her need to go out and encounter the world on her own. She feels that being with Torvald hinders her, and she must leave him to enjoy true personal freedom. A Doll's House is an example of climactic structure. The plot begins later than in those in episodic structure, such as MacBeth. The beginning of the play merely sets the stage for the actions to come. It shows how Nora is content being Torvald's little "lark." She spends her days shopping and playing with the children. Also, the characters, locales, and scenes are limited. The characters in this play number only eleven: Nora, Torvald, the three Helmer children, Dr. Rank, Christina, Anna, Krogstad, Ellen, and a porter. The live stage production did not even include the children, as they were not essential to the action of the play. There was but one set in the stage production, and few more in the video, and the play has only three acts. Finally, the construction is tight. There are few, if any, loose ends at the conclusion of the play. Nora reveals her true feelings to Torvald in an exciting scene, Christina deals with unresolved situations with Krogstad, and Dr. Rank tells the Helmers good-bye. These all neatly tie together the previous conflicts. It is interesting to see how these elements---purpose, point of view, genre, style, motivation, and structure---make up the underlying pieces of the play. Without them, the play becomes little more than a pointless story with which the audience cannot identify. Even with these common pieces, different versions show us different twists on the same play.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Nora counts the remaining hours of her life after the rehearsal because she thinks she is going to sacrifice herself, before her husband would sacrifice himself for her. Both sacrifices never occur and the theme of the play is a twisted irony to the separation and uncertainty of life. Torvald’s “helpless little thing”, Nora, ironically becomes stronger, confident, independent and serious in life. Torvald’s so imagined possession, his little doll, his beautiful treasure becomes ironically a complete stranger to…
- 886 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
At the beginning of the play, Nora seems completely at ease and demonstrates many childlike aspects. Her relationship with Torvaldis comparable with a father and daughter as Torvald addresses Nora with a range of childish nicknames, such as “skylark” and “featherhead”. However, we are given the impression that Nora does not seem to find this patronizing, as she responds affectionately to her husband’s teasing, for example, “Yes!” when Torvald calls “Is it my little squirrel bustling about?”. Ibsen’s use of stage directions also portray Nora’s obedience towards Torvald, as they present Nora as quiet and timid when in the presence of her husband, “playing with his coat buttons” and “without raising her eyes to his” as though she is a shy pet, waiting for orders. Due to Victorian standards of marriage, Nora is expected to serve her husband’s every need whilst keeping quiet about her own, much like a loyal pet.This means that sheneeds his permission for everythingas a woman in the Victorian era is not trusted to make decisions by herself as she is expected to make mistakes. Women were looked down upon and treated as accessories while men were treated like kings.…
- 1174 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Ibsen uses the symbolism of nicknames to represent how Nora’s façade influences how Torvald treats her because her true personality is…
- 607 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
At the start of the play, Nora is seen as a caring mother and wife; however, this is an affectation of joy and contentment. In reality, her true character is held enslaved by her tyrannical husband. Her demeaning nicknames, “skylark” and “little song bird” truly are a metaphor for her mental and physical imprisonment to the societal roles of being a mother and wife. Nora accepts this captivity, however, evident through her own use of her nicknames throughout the story in order to pry money from her husband and follow all of his commands. At this point, the audience begins to sense superficiality and materialistic behavior from Nora, but this view soon changes as Ibsen reveals his realistic writing style. Deceit is first seen as she consumes macaroons secretively, in spite of her husband’s disapproval. She begins to reassure to Torvald that she, “should not think of going against (his) wishes’,”(Ibsen,1.4) and is dishonest once again when telling him Chritine Linde and Dr. Rank brought her the desserts. This fraudulence continues as she searches for a way to hastily pay a debt which her financially independent husband is unaware of. She hides the truth from her husband in the same manner she participates in a game of “hide-and-seek” with her…
- 2454 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
Henrik Ibsen uses connecting themes such as the uncovering of Torvald’s true nature, his real characterization of Nora and the inevitable hampering of Nora’s rightful individualistic growth in order to show this moral justification. In the beginning, Nora’s fondness for Torvald knew no limits and she sought to do whatever was possible without due regard for herself to please him. She believes being the source of entertainment, indulgence, and appeasement for Torvald allows for her own source of contentment. Although Torvald commands a certain sentimental affection towards Nora, the source for most of these feelings however come solely from the appreciation of her alluring outwardly complexion. Nora’s intricate emotions and intelligence take a back seat in Torvalds mind to the more important plastic image that she is mandated to portray. Perfect examples of this dynamic throughout the whole story…
- 1095 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In A Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen, Nora, a frivolous, lying wife, makes a major decision in which she borrows a loan meant to be used for a trip to better her husband’s health, behind his back. The play develops through constant struggles Nora takes to keep in secret her actions. In the end, her husband Torvald learns of her loan and is extremely infuriated to the point where he says he no longer loves her. Shocked by her husband’s reaction, Nora looks back on her motives for making her decision and decides she had been living a fake life which had come to be by a lack of communication in their marriage. After struggling so much to keep her husband from finding a painful truth and being critized when it was known, Nora realizes all she had ever been was a doll to her loved ones which pushes her to make the right decision of leaving everything behind and finding herself.…
- 678 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The play also shows how Mrs. Linde has matured and Nora has not. Nora initially appears flighty and excitable, her main concern seems to be charming her husband and being the perfect wife. It is Christmas eve and she is excited about showing Torvald what she has bought for gifts and decorating the Christmas tree. Mrs. Linde, on the other hand, has arrived in town looking for a job (and Mr. Krogstad)and makes no mention of Christmas. She and Nora reminisce about their days as school girls and she is very interested when she hears the news that Torvald is going to be manager of a bank, hoping that he will give her a position there.…
- 874 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In this very popular drama from the playwright Henrik Ibsen, Mrs. Linde and Krogstad make an important contribution to the drama as the subplot of the play “ A doll’s house “. The playwright’s intent of this play was to dramatize Victorian society and it is clear that without these characters help, the main characters would have probably remained stagnant. Nora would have most likely, never would have come to a self-realization of her own lost identity without these subplot characters. Krogstad and Mrs.L. clearly help the main characters in their evolution throughout the drama with the benefit of their own past experiences being similar to Nora’s.…
- 1001 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
A Doll’s House, by Henrik Ibsen, was first performed in 1879 in Denmark at the Royal Theatre. It is a play that goes against the social norms of the 19th century and exemplifies women in a questionable way. The play would not be what it is today without the unique theatrical components that made it a provocative and realistic drama. A few of these realistic components include its feminism point of view, Christmas setting, New Years, the living room environment and the rebellious attitude of one the main characters, Nora.…
- 405 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In A Doll's House, Ibsen uses debt as a symbol to expose the superficiality of Nora and Torvald's marriage. Ibsen uses Nora's secret debt as a tool for making social comment. It is significant for Nora's realisation of the shallowness of their marriage and it also gives her a sense of pride and control in her daily life. Ultimately, the debt gives her freedom for self-discovery but simultaneously restrains her because she must deprive herself and lie to Helmer in order to repay it. When Helmer discovers Nora's secret debt and forgery, he is so caught up in her crime and his appearances' that he overlooks her ignorance and good intentions. When confronted with the fact that Torvald will discover her secret debt, she believes that if he…
- 1620 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
At the start of the play, Nora seems humble and responds positively to her husband’s humor and lightheartedness. “[smiling quietly and happily] ‘You haven’t any idea how many expenses we skylarks and squirrels have, Torvald.’ ‘You are an odd little soul. Very like your father. You always find some new way of wheedling money out of me,”… (Ibsen, pg.8). Ibsen’s view of human life was much tilted toward men in this play and he did a good job making the wife very doll-like in her husband’s eye. “She is to live for his sake only, to have no other thought than of him, no feelings, no opinions, save those which are his” (Jaeger, Henrik Bernhard. Henrik Ibsen: A Critical Biography. Benjamin Blom, inc., New York 1972, pg 240). She is excited about all the money that Torvald’s new job will…
- 3445 Words
- 14 Pages
Good Essays -
She is treated as a child would be treated. She has continued on the path from her early childhood, being treated as a doll or a play toy to her father and now the same with her husband. Nora battles with finding her voice as she hides a secret debt from her husband. In a way, holding this secret gives Nora a sense of power and equilibrium as she works hard to try and pay off the debt herself “But still it was wonderful fun, sitting and working like that, earning money. It was almost like being a man.” (Ibsen 1. 207) However, Nora also does something at the end that is very irresponsible, yet gives her the voice that she has been seeking throughout her marriage. She gains this unremarkable voice when she walks out of the house never to turn back. Janie Crawford has a similar effect yet it is without children being…
- 795 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
“Finally, research on Ibsen’s life proves that, all claims to the contrary, his intentions in A Doll House were thoroughly feminist” (Templeton).…
- 7391 Words
- 30 Pages
Better Essays -
A Doll’s House is a play written by Henrik Ibsen. The play was set in the 1800s. This essay will convey the significant role of Dr. Rank in A Doll’s House.. Dr. Rank is a secondary character who is overshadowed by the main characters Torvald and Nora Helmer. Dr. Rank gets easily overshadowed in A Doll’s House because his few actions in the play do not affect the outcome.…
- 1066 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Ibsen avail Nora to take the perspective of character around her and draw her own individual view of morality. Nora believes that moral that moral disease is being mentally sick. She proves this when she tells Torvald “You nor think nor act like a man Could bind me self to” (Ibsen 70). Describing the her perception on what it means to morality sick, which is conflicting to the view of Torvald and Dr. Rank. Nora is there for Dr.Rank in time of his physical sickness and tells. Nora tell Dr.Rak “Sleep well” (Ibsen 60). Ibsen uses Nora who more reflect of his ideas during the Victorian…
- 562 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays