Script Analysis
3/24/08
A Doll’s House Midterm In the play, A Doll’s House, by Henrik Ibsen, you will find numerous incidents, comprised of numerous beats. Inside each and every beat you will find exponential amounts of subtext, exposition, and character development. Nora Helmer, the main character, makes the most significant changes in her disposition, based on various discoveries throughout the play. It is through the discoveries that Nora eventually finds her true self. Some of Nora’s discoveries are involved in complications; some are even climax points. In the end, everything comes to a resolution, whether they are good or not. Nora’s very first discovery takes place during the second incident of the first act. Nora finds out that Christine has come to visit in hopes of finding a job (p. 401). Nora takes it upon herself to make sure that Christine is secured with a job. There is a resolution to this complication on p. 404, when Nora does indeed convince Torvald to give her a job. This, however, eventually leads to a complication. Nora knows that she will be able to convince her husband to hire Christine. However, this also means that someone will be out of a job. Eventually, this discovery (and the decision she has made about the discovery) lead to Krogstad losing his job, and he blackmails her because of it. The second discovery Nora makes takes place, again, in the first act (p. 402) when Christine informs Nora that she used to know Krogstad. This doesn’t have much effect on Nora when she first learns about it. However, later in the play, we find out that the two were once lovers and that Christine left Krogstad for another man with money. This works to Nora’s advantage, and she doesn’t even know it when she first learns about it. Christine, a widow, eventually has the power to solve all of Nora’s problems, and Nora doesn’t know it until the last scene of the play. Christine takes Krogstad back, and Krogstad takes back all of the problems he put on Nora. Unfortunately, this comes too late to save her marriage. Nora’s third discovery takes place in the second incident of the first act. Nora is talking with Krogstad (p. 403) after he sneaks into the house. Her discovery is that Krogstad is not there to inform Torvald of the money she borrowed. Instead, Krogstad is at their home to discuss business with Torvald about the bank and his new position of authority. This is an important discovery because it shows just how much guilt Nora feels about the loan. It not only builds character in Nora, but it also puts more pressure on her. As more and more pressure is put on her, her character slowly changes. Eventually, this pressure builds so much that Nora can’t take it anymore. Nora’s fourth discovery takes place not long after the last. On p. 403, Nora makes another discovery that Krogstad has something to do with the bank. She learns from Dr. Rank that he was speaking with Torvald about business with the bank, and that he has some sort of job there. Torvald has recently taken on a position at this same bank. Therefore, Torvald has authority over Krogstad’s position. This discovery also plays a part in Krogstad’s blackmail later in the play. Nora makes a fifth discovery when she learns from Krogstad that she has committed a crime. On p. 406, Krogstad explains to Nora that forgery is a serious crime and if she is found out, it could ruin her life like it ruined his. Krogstad once committed forgery and it ruined his reputation forever. If Nora were turned in, she could lose not only her reputation, but also her husband and children. Nora has a strong desperation to keep everything the way it is. Krogstad blackmails her to keep his job secure at the bank, and this complication is dragged out throughout the rest of the play. There are major discoveries on p. 408, where Nora finds out that Krogstad was right to be worried for his job at the bank. This means that Nora does have to worry very seriously about being blackmailed. It is becoming very obvious to her that Torvald does not trust Krogstad, and wants to get rid of him at the bank. Nora is feeling more and more nervous and pressured. Nora also finds out that Torvald hates liars like Krogstad. Torvald explains to her that liars are corruptive and they ruin everything they touch. This convinces Nora that she will corrupt her children. This drives a wedge in the relationship Nora had with her children, since we never see Nora with her children again throughout the rest of the play. In the second act, Nora makes the discovery that her children would have someone to take care of them if she were to leave. On p. 409, Nora and the nurse are talking about how she used to take care of Nora when Nora was growing up. Nora comes to the realization that if she were to leave, the nurse would go on taking care of her children just as she took care of Nora when she was young. Nora dismisses her brief idea of escaping, but the discovery is still there. This is part of a later resolution- when Nora leaves at the end of the play, the children will be left to the care of Torvald and the nurse. When Nora and Christine are discussing Nora’s problem in the second incident of the second act, Christine believes that Nora had borrowed money from Dr. Rank. On p. 410, Christine expresses that Nora shouldn’t involve herself with a man like Dr. Rank, because it is obvious that he is in love with Nora. Christine assumes that his feelings for Nora have something to do with the money that Nora borrowed. This puts the idea in Nora’s head that she could borrow the money from Dr. Rank to pay off Krogstad. Then she would no longer need to worry about working so hard to pay off Krogstad herself. Nora’s major complication comes to a climax on p. 411, when she finds out that Christine will be replacing Krogstad at the bank. Nora’s hope is quickly dwindling, and she is running out of ideas to stall Krogstad from telling her husband about her loan and her crime. Torvald mails the dismissal letter to Krogstad. Krogstad then receives the letter which determines that he has no hope of keeping his job, and comes back to harass Nora even more. However, Krogstad is still unaware of who is replacing him. Once he learns that it is Christine, he doesn’t feel as badly because he is still in love with her. If he had found out that Christine sooner, Krogstad’s letter may have never been written, and Nora may have never confronted Torvald about their problems. Nora finds out a tiny bit more about the history between Christine and Krogstad on p. 415, when Christine exclaims “Once upon a time he’d have done anything for my sake.” Christine asks her where Krogstad lives, giving Nora some small ray of hope in preventing Torvald from receiving the letter. Christine’s help is key to Nora’s continuation in her endeavor to save her marriage. Without her help, Nora may have given up on trying to cover her mistakes a lot sooner. At the end of the second act, Nora finds out that Krogstad has left town. Her final statement to herself is “31 hours to live.” This adds another complication to the plot. Nora has been considering suicide for a while. It seems with this statement that she has come to the realization that she doesn’t have any other choice but to end her life. Nora is finally beginning to change her outlook on this situation. At the beginning, she was intent on keeping things “normal.” But now, she is giving up little by little. She is now choosing what she believes is going to be the easier way out. On p. 420, Dr. Rank and Nora are talking, and he confirms to her that he is going to die soon. This disturbs Nora deeply, and she doesn’t want to hear about it. This could indicate that Nora doesn’t seriously want to think about death, specifically her own. Nora (p. 421) has a moment to herself, after Torvald goes to get the mail, where she realizes that she must leave her husband and children. This is her final maturing point. In the final argument of the play, after Torvald has shouted and threatened her, Nora has completely changed in character. She discovers that the “miracle of miracles” has failed to happen, and Torvald isn’t who she thought he was. Then (p. 422), Krogstad’s second letter arrives, and Torvald forgives her completely, since his reputation is no longer on the line. Nora decides that they must have a talk. She makes the discovery that she never really knew Torvald, and he never really knew her. She finds that they have been married for eight years, and have never once had a serious conversation. Nora feels wronged by both her father and Torvald; they both never really knew her. She blames Torvald that she hasn’t ever done anything with her life. Nora discovers that she’s never been happy. In the end, Nora finds her true self because of all of the things she has been put through over a matter of days. Most of her problems were surrounding her issues with Krogstad, and going behind her husband’s back. She had good intentions, but unfortunately they were not justifiable to her husband. Most of the discoveries she makes have future complications, but are resolved by the end of the play. The major resolution to all of Nora’s problems is her leaving Torvald at the end of the play. His controlling and dominating nature was forcing her into the role of a “doll.” She was his “doll,” and her children were her “dolls,” as well. It isn’t until she is faced with these major complications to fix that she realizes how unhappy she is. It isn’t until the end of the play that she discovers the most important thing of all- that she is a human being, and not just a doll in a doll’s house.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
A woman sheltered by an awful man, turning into a woman breaking free from a helpless man. Ibsen’s A Doll’s House shows evidence that it is written with a feminist agenda. Nora is treated like border line trash the whole play in comparison to her husband. She is called weak, unintelligent, and needy. She is called terrible names the whole time, demeaning her role as a woman. Even the title of the play supports it being themed on feminism. A Doll’s House may have reason to be seen as a play about humanism, but the main theme is indeed…
- 582 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Nora's epiphany occurs when the truth is finally revealed. As Torvald unleashes his revulsion against Nora and her crime of forgery, the protagonist realizes that her husband is not who she thought he was at all. Torvald has no intention of taking the blame for Nora's crime. She thought for certain that he would selflessly give up everything for her, like she given up so much for him. When he fails to do this, she accepts the fact that their marriage has been an illusion. In this moment Nora’s eyes and mind finally become clear of any delusions she once possessed. Nora was dominated and controlled by her father before marriage and afterwards it was her husband dominating her. Torvald never treated her as an equal. She had existed for her husband and she had always expected that her husband would come to her aid when she was in trouble. She had been waiting for miracles to happen. Nora feared that Krogstad would expose everything and that their family would come undone. Contrary to her expectation, Torvald behaved like a hypocrite concerned more with societies idea of morality and a notion of social prestige, not with his wife's welfare and care. He came out in his true colors. Nora realized that her husband didn't see her as an individual. She wanted to dissolve her ties with him by abandoning him and the children. She thought her duty toward herself was above her duty as a…
- 886 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
She works while she is still friends with Nora and her unwealthiness doesn’t seem like it’s having an effect on their friendship. Which it shouldn’t. Yet Christine is still content with her lifestyle, she works hard and gets a paycheck. While Nora is like a child in a House of Mirrors at a carnival. She is so scared of herself and doesn't know what to do with herself. It’s like the pair should just completely switch lives and things would be perfect. But a story wouldn’t be a story without a little bit of conflict. Which is why Ibsen adds the character of Christine to compare and contrast Christine and Nora. Creating one of the foils in the novel.…
- 651 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
An ideal marriage consists of communication and honesty, but in A Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen the Helmer marriage is quite the opposite. At the beginning of the play, Nora conformed to obeying her husband and she was naïve in hoping that her husband would sacrifice his reputation for her. She even forged a check to borrow money from the bank to help Helmer with his illness. She thought that this would be a good way to show her love and ability. Their weak marriage later revealed that Helmer never really understood her and he was ashamed that she had concealed this secret. This event awakened Nora’s true personality and she finally realized that their marriage was fake and weak. In the play A Doll’s House, Henrik Ibsen uses symbolism to portray how Nora is forced by societal norms to mask her true personality through her lies and secrecy, which shows her transition into an independent woman, further emphasising that self knowledge is needed for an authentic life.…
- 607 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
At the start of the play, Nora is seen as a caring mother and wife; however, this is an affectation of joy and contentment. In reality, her true character is held enslaved by her tyrannical husband. Her demeaning nicknames, “skylark” and “little song bird” truly are a metaphor for her mental and physical imprisonment to the societal roles of being a mother and wife. Nora accepts this captivity, however, evident through her own use of her nicknames throughout the story in order to pry money from her husband and follow all of his commands. At this point, the audience begins to sense superficiality and materialistic behavior from Nora, but this view soon changes as Ibsen reveals his realistic writing style. Deceit is first seen as she consumes macaroons secretively, in spite of her husband’s disapproval. She begins to reassure to Torvald that she, “should not think of going against (his) wishes’,”(Ibsen,1.4) and is dishonest once again when telling him Chritine Linde and Dr. Rank brought her the desserts. This fraudulence continues as she searches for a way to hastily pay a debt which her financially independent husband is unaware of. She hides the truth from her husband in the same manner she participates in a game of “hide-and-seek” with her…
- 2454 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
Henrik Ibsen’s play A Doll’s House, is an examination of human nature and personality. Each of the five main characters displays personality traits that can be considered a character flaw. Nora Helmer is an example of a person who has the flaw of being childish. That flaw is made evident in several ways.…
- 284 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
A Doll’s House has several high points that lead up to what I’ve considered the most defining moment. When Torvald finally reads the letter Krogstad (a fellow schoolmate and an employee at the bank) wrote revealing that it was not from Nora’s father that she borrowed money, but from him, what follows was totally unexpected by me. It seems that the situation of her husband falling ill and the decisions she had to make in regards to that, forced her to grow. In the end, Nora makes a decision that she doesn’t want to be married to her husband Torvald any longer, and she tells him so. The line, “We’ve been married for eight years. Doesn’t it occur to you that this is the first time the two of us, you and I, husband and wife, have had a serious conversation?” (Isben 1879 p. 590) says Nora, licks at where she is going with this conversation between the two of them.…
- 815 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
A women was not capable of taking on serious issues especially without a higher education. Women were only seen as the caretaker of the household and not the moneymaker. Nora’s decision at the end of the play, played a big role, Nora realizes that she needs to find herself, and not her husband Helmer. The play does not tell us where Nora goes at the end of a play, it leaves us in awe. Maybe Nora left because she wanted a higher education, and in Norway that wasn’t permitted at that time. Nora wants to start a new life without her husband Helmer, she has no money because Helmer was taking care of her. Nora just wants to have her own life, and maybe that means for her to get a higher education and get a job where she doesn’t have to depend on Helmer. I never thought about it in that way until I researched, the question about women’s role in Norway in the 19th century. Many women were dependent on their husbands, or a male figure in there life. Nora was always dependent on Helmer and her father, “I mean that I was simply transferred from Papa’s hand to yours . You arranged everything according to your own taste, and so I got the same tastes as you or else I pretended to. I am really not quite sure which I think sometimes the one and sometimes the other” (Ibsen, 66). Ibsen created the character Nora as woman who wasn’t following the social marriage norms. When Nora leaves the house, she becomes a symbol for all women, and the article by Largueche shows us how women fought for their education and social norm rights. Some questions still remain, where did Nora go? And did she leave because she wanted a higher education or did she just want to find her true identity? If I were to explore the topic further, I would want their to be a second part to the play “A Doll’s House”. I want to know where Nora went and if she ever got back with Helmer.…
- 1030 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Her life was ruled and controlled by her husband Torvald. Her husband especially did not respect or treat Nora with equality. Nora spent eight years of her life with Torvald, and that is where she had made a huge mistake. Nora found out her husband’s true colours when it was too late, if she had found out who her husband really was and how the love he was showing to Nora was nothing but false she could have left her husband before the eight years and lived her life with freedom. Nora can find someone that actually treats her with respects, equality, and with…
- 449 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Nora Helmer, the main protagonist of Scandinavian playwright Henrik Ibsen’s A Doll’s House (1879), has always been depicted, as an exuberant novelty item, whose only purpose is to serve the important male figures in her life. This especially pertains to her father and her husband. These male figures move around Nora’s realm with indirect disregard to Nora’s true nature, desires, and abilities. Although this facade seems to be built on solid ground in the beginning, we see the consequential subtle, but progressive, crumbling of a falsified foundation. In the end, Nora, the once veiled unseasoned girl becomes a woman waiting to grasp the horizons of experience…
- 1095 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In the beginning of a Doll House Nora is perceived as a happy, full-hearted character. She responds to her husband teasing lightly and is excited about his new adventures. Nora doesn’t seem to mind her doll-like existence, in which she is coddled, pampered and patronized. But as the play progresses you begin to see her true colors. She demonstrates that she’s not just a “silly girl,” as Torvalds call her that she understands the details of business. When she takes out a loan to preserve Torvalds health. Indicates that she is intelligent and possesses abilities beyond wifehood. Nora’s character becomes questionable when she starts breaking away from all the standards and expectations her husband and society had set up for her, this making her a morally ambiguous character.…
- 588 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The play also shows how Mrs. Linde has matured and Nora has not. Nora initially appears flighty and excitable, her main concern seems to be charming her husband and being the perfect wife. It is Christmas eve and she is excited about showing Torvald what she has bought for gifts and decorating the Christmas tree. Mrs. Linde, on the other hand, has arrived in town looking for a job (and Mr. Krogstad)and makes no mention of Christmas. She and Nora reminisce about their days as school girls and she is very interested when she hears the news that Torvald is going to be manager of a bank, hoping that he will give her a position there.…
- 874 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
A Doll’s House, by Henrik Ibsen, portrays a young married woman, Nora, who plays a dramatic role of deception and self-indulgence. The author creates a good understanding of a woman’s role by assuming Nora is an average housewife who does not work; her only job is to maintain the house and raise the children like a stereotypical woman that cannot work or help society. In reality, she is not an average housewife in that she has a hired maid who deals with the house and children. Although Ibsen focuses on these “housewife” attributes, Nora’s character is ambitious, naive, and somewhat cunning. She hides a dark secret from her husband that not only includes borrowing money, but also forgery. Nora’s choices were irrational; she handled the situations very poorly in this play by keeping everything a secret. The way that women were viewed in this time period created a barrier that she could not overcome. The decisions that had the potential to be good were otherwise molded into appalling ones. Women should have just as many rights as men and should not be discriminated by gender; but they should also accept consequences in the same way without a lesser or harsher punishment.…
- 3445 Words
- 14 Pages
Good Essays -
Also in A Doll’s House, you will find that things are not always what they seem. One of the main examples of this, is the various sides of Nora that she uncovers throughout the course of the play. She goes from being told, “Nora, you’re just a child” [pg.951 Ibsen] by Mrs. Linde, to an untypical Victorian woman. She appears to be a spendthrift to Torvald, when really she is paying off a debt she owes to…
- 605 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
As long as people can remember the day know as Christmas and New years has both been seen as see days of new life and renewal. Christmas usually been viewed as a Christian holiday with the birth of Jesus Christ and New Year’s a symbol of a beginning of another new year. Henrik Ibsen play A Doll House setting goes on during this festive season in which most of the main characters work through some sort of realization and come to a new understanding about their lifetimes as the time proceeds.…
- 611 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays