Preview

A Response to Descartes' Meditations and Spinoza's Ethics

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3108 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Response to Descartes' Meditations and Spinoza's Ethics
John Green (SIU85*******)
Philosophy 305A-001, Paper #1
September 29, 2014
In his meditations, Descartes often references a “deceiver” that possess both supreme power and malicious intent. This deceiver uses its powers to deceive Descartes with a false reality, forcing him to question everything and take no sensory information as accurate unless said information can be logically proven correct. Of course, the malicious deceiver is not real, and Descartes does not actually believe it is. In his meditations, Descartes is seeking to develop a new philosophy from scratch that does not contain a single piece of falsifiable information. He wants to create an intellectual foundation that is absolute so that anything built upon it can cannot be questioned because of its foundations. In this sense, the malicious deceiver is a rhetorical tool used to introduce and illustrate the skepticism he is using in building his arguments. Since an all-powerful, malicious deceiver cannot be proven to not exist, the only information that he considers to be completely reliable is that which can be proven when working under the assumption that it does exist.
Working under his new paradigm where there is an all-powerful force seeking to trick him in every way, the first thing he seeks to prove is that he definitely exists. To this end, he says “Then without doubt I exist also if he deceives me, and let him deceive me as much as he will, he can never cause me to be nothing so long as I think that I am something. So that after having reflected well and carefully examined all things, we must come to the definite conclusion that this proposition: I am, I exist, is necessarily true each time that I pronounce it, or that I mentally conceive it” (Meditations, p. 9). These lines can be boiled down to the much more memorable declaration that “I think, therefore I am.” What Descartes is saying here is that, he must consider the possibility that there is nothing aside from the malicious

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The story “Let the Circle be unbroken” starts with the Logan children, and Mr. Logan or Papa riding in a wagon to go to Mrs. Lee Annie Lees to go check on a sick mule. On their way there Cassie thinks she sees Wordell go into the woods. When they got to Mrs. Lee Annie Lees Mr. Logan left Logan kids in front of her place, as he go attends to the sick Mule. While Mr. Logan was gone the Logan kids talked to Son-Boy, Lee Ellis, and Waynard, and Little Willie, who were waiting for Clarice. The children started talking about TJ Avery who was their friend, that got caught up into some trouble with the Simm’s kids. They said that TJ killed Mr. Barnett, but in all actuality The Simm’s kids did. TJ is currently In Jail. While they were in the conversation, Dube Cross a 16 year old came and asked if they had any jobs open for him to earn some milk. Stacey offered him to milk the cow, and Dube said that he’d do it tomorrow morning, and left. When Clarice finally came, Waynard, and Little Willie left with Clarice. After they left Mr.Logan and Mrs. Lee Annie Lees came out and she ushered the Logan kids to come in her place. In the house there was Mr. Tom Bee, and they sat down and ate peanuts, after a while Mr. Page Ellis, Son-Boy, and Javan came in with Russel who was Mrs. Lee Annie Lees grand son that joined the army. When they came in they were happy to see him, since they haven’t seen him for a long time. They talked to Russel about how he needs to be careful going into the Delta with the Army uniform on because there was some White Bigots, and red necks out there. The conversation soon turned to TJ’s situation, and explained to Russel what was happening, and how Mr. Jamison their Lawyer is trying to get him a trial. This was when Son-Boy told the other kids to come with him outside. Outside Son-Boy presented them his marbles, and his prized possession which was the emerald-green marble, which he let no body touch. The other children were amazed, and when they started…

    • 2717 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Cogito ergo Sum”( ….) . This conditional statement translates to “ I think, therefore, I am” and he presents that his ability to have consciences confirms his existence. After doubting God Descartes proves his existence in his Meditations on First Philosophy, he affirms the existence of God with an ontological view. This view suggests that the ability of one to think…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believes that there is a chance that he is imagining life. When a person envisions, he or she basically designs thoughts that exist to be judged by the brain. The method in which thoughts are created should not always be valid, and due to this they cannot be right all the time. One can have the possibility of some substance that does not exist, for example, an alarm, and this does not represent any issue. Descartes looks at the observations people have in our sleep to those people have when they are alert, these two scenarios are closely identical. He reasons that there is no complete approach to recognize being conscious from being asleep. Nonetheless, he keeps up that there are sure things that would be ignorant to question. He considers a few of his earlier opinions as having a chance of containing doubtfulness. Descartes believes since he thinks therefore he must exist meaning his own being in reality is…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fact that Descartes is even considering the mere question of his own existence just proves that he indeed exists and that is certain. Further, he argues that we are essentially thinking things (res cogitans) that can know our minds clearly and distinctly. Descartes pitches a tent for himself firmly in the rationalist camp, as opposed to the empiricist camp. He constantly emphasizes that the clear and distinct perceptions of the intellect are the only sure means of securing knowledge, and ultimately concludes that the senses are not designed to give us knowledge at all, but are rather meant to help us move through the world in a very practical…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes proves that God exists in his third meditation. He proves that God exists because he wants to be certain about things outside of himself. But, he cannot be certain of these things if he is ignorant about the existence of God. This is because if a supreme God exists, he could cause Descartes to be mistaken in the one avenue to certainty that he has. This avenue is known as clear and distinct perception, and, according to Descartes, it is what is necessary to be certain about a thing. However, a supreme God could easily be deceiving him even when he thinks he is correct as a result of this clear and distinct perception. This is known as the metaphysical doubt. Therefore, to remove this basis for doubt, it is important to Descartes to establish whether this supreme God is capable of deceiving him. But first, he must establish whether this God exists.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes vs Locke

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Descartes and Locke both agreed that there were things in life that exist that we can be certain of. For Descartes, human experiences did not provide sufficient proof of existence. He indicated that through his Dream Conjecture and his Evil-Demon Theory (Paquette 205). Descartes stated that we cannot be certain if reality is a dream or not, thus questioning our existence (Paquette 205). In his Evil-Demon Theory, Descartes claimed that for all he knew, an evil demon could be putting thoughts into his head, making him think that reality was true when it was in fact false (Paquette 205). Ultimately, all this thinking resulted in Descartes coming to the conclusion that the one thing we could be sure of existing is the mind (Newman 2010). This can be seen through his most famous quote, “I think therefore I am (Kaplan 2008).” Descartes claimed that since he was able to doubt and think using his mind, his mind must exist (Paquette 205).…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes conclusion on premise 6 about God’s existence argues that the clear and distinct perceptions provide the foundation or basis for the truth of our beliefs and that is so because God, who is not a deceiver would not allow Descartes to be mistaken about that which he clearlyl and distinctly perceives. His notion of clear and distinct perceptions and their truth requires God’s existence.…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first doubt that Descartes highlights is that of his senses. He says that all of the information he has received has been through his senses and that sometimes his senses mislead him. Descartes is sure in his existence. To him, this is impossible to doubt and he justifies this…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes Meditation Iii

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In earlier meditations Descartes proved that he existed through the Cogito argument. Descartes must now move on to examine and explore questions about the world around him, but instead of doing this he first stop to examine the question of whether or not God exists. Descartes wants to know that he was created by an all knowing, perfect creator that is good and wants to make sure that he was not created by an evil spirit or demon. If Descartes can prove that he was created by a perfect all knowing creator then his ideas must carry some semblance of truth, because God is not a deceiver and he must of placed these ideas in Descartes. Descartes has good reasons for searching for the answer to the question of God's existence, now he has to come up with a good sound argument to prove it.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    How can Descartes confidently believe anything if he can't believe his thoughts are his own or exist. This creates a paradox of refuting…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Firstly, Descartes in the third meditation sets out to prove that God does indeed exist. To begin with, he considered that the source of an idea must be as real as the idea itself. He thought that since his idea of God had overwhelmingly unlimited content, then the one who caused the idea must be infinite and that it must be god, and thus asserted that what is more perfect cannot arise from what is imperfect. In his conclusion, Descartes says that God is a substance that is omnipotent, omniscient, independent and infinite. He argued that if the objective reality of an idea could not come from him, then it could have come from something else. The basis for the arguments he put forward lies in the…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes also states that this argument isn’t strong enough to prove that God exists. Because he has been constantly revising his believes he says that at this point he can easily tell the difference between essence and existence. After he points that out he explains that he believes that God could be separated from the existence but not from his essence. Then he contradicts himself saying that not existing would be prove of him not being perfect thus he had to exist. After that Descartes starts lacking of confidence that God exists. He thinks that he is giving some attributions, being perfect; to a creature that he doesn’t even know if exists. He thinks that he is just matching two things that he knows to make something new, something that…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He starts with the idea of a God who is eternal, infinite, and perfect. In the beginning of Meditations on First Philosophy, He explains that “we must believe that there is a God, because we are so taught in the Holy Scriptures, and, on the other hand, that we must believe the Holy Scriptures because they come from God “(Descartes 1). He then doubts himself if god does really exist. Through examining his thoughts, he ends up believing that the idea of God exists because of his innate idea of God which has to be God who “is the cause of this idea”(Descartes 25). Descartes then explains more in depth saying, “I have no choice but to conclude that the mere fact of my existing is and of there being in me an idea of a most perfect being, that is God, demonstrates most evidently that God too exists” (34). Another reason is how in his further mediations, he explains how if God does not exist, then he is not a supremely perfect being. Saying that God does not exist, we can imagine a being that is more perfect than God. But this is a contradiction because since the idea of God is the idea of the most perfect being of all. Therefore, God must exist because you cannot image a more perfect being than god, who he is the almighty and perfect of…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rene Descartes concludes that sometimes our own senses can be deceptive and misleading, however there are some experiences so simple and tangible that they cannot be denied as real or true. For this essay I will defend Descartes’ beliefs from the objection that even simple experiences can be deceiving and that no experiences should be trusted completely. The problem with this objection is that a person needs to be able to trust what they are experiencing, and without that everyone might as well be crazy. Descartes starts by saying that “senses are sometimes deceptive” ( p.14)1 and then goes on to say “never to place our complete trust in those who have deceived us” (p.14) and finally “there are many other matters concerning which one simply…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Furthermore, as Descartes said “I think, therefore I am” to prove the indubitable truth of self-existence. He suggested that every time when we doubt that “I” exist or not, we can absolute certain that “I” am existing by this act. Then he said that the evil genius could not deceive us “I exist” because before the evil genius’s deception, “I” must exist first, then I can be deceived in some way by the evil genius. So “I exist”…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays