Preview

A Satyre On Charles II

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
932 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Satyre On Charles II
A Satyre on Charles II
This poem is one of the most difficult to establish a definitive version for. Here, I present the poem as Vieth published it in his 1968 edition of the Earl's poetry, along with Vieth's notes.
According to a letter dated 20 January 1673/4, whose testimony is corroborated by the headings in several early texts of the following poem, "my Lord Rochester fled from Court some time since for delivering (by mistake) into the King's hands a terrible lampoon of ihs own making against the King, instead of another the King asked him for." ... The opening lines of the poem, contrasting the peaceful interests of Charles II with the belligerent ambitions of Louis XIV, apparently refer to the approaching end of the Third Dutch War. By the Treaty of Westminster, signed on 9 February 1673/4, Charles withdrew from this confluct which the English and French had waged jointly against the Dutch since Early 1672, leaving Louis to pursue his military conquests on the continent for another four years.
I' th' isle of Britain, long since famous grown
For breeding the best cunts in Christendom,
There reigns, and oh! long may he reign and thrive,
The easiest King and best-bred man alive.
Him no ambition moves to get renown
5

Like the French fool, that wanders up and down
Starving his people, hazarding his crown.
Peace is his aim, his gentleness is such,
And love he loves, for he loves fucking much.
---Nor are his high desires above his strength:
10

His scepter and his prick are of a length;
And she may sway the one who plays with th' other,
And make him little wiser than his brother.
Poor prince! thy prick, like thy buffoons at Court,
Will govern thee because it makes thee sport.
15

'Tis sure the sauciest prick that e'er did swive,
The proudest, peremptoriest prick alive.
Though safety, law, religion, life lay on 't,
'Twould break through all to make its way to cunt.
Restless he rolls about from whore to whore,
20

A merry monarch, scandalous and poor.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Were the difficulties faced by Charles II due more to financial concerns than foreign policy in the years 1667-1678?…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1670, France and England signed a secret treaty called the Treaty of Dover. It required England to assist France in its war of conquest against the Dutch; the third Anglo-Dutch War, a military war between England and the Netherlands, was a direct consequence of this treaty. The treaty proclaimed that “The king of France promises to pay to the king of England two million livers. Each of the allied sovereigns will then jointly declare war on the Dutch Republic” (Doc. 6). This secret treaty not only started a war between France, England, and the Dutch but it also imposed a threat to the security of the Dutch Republic and its inhabitants. England had not only become a spectator but also an advocate to the ongoing war. In 1672 Konrad Van Beuningen, Dutch ambassador to England, sent a letter to the government of the Dutch Republic stating that England’s interest is to encourage the wars between the Dutch and French (Doc. 8). Despite England’s instigations the period from 1650 to the peace of Utrecht (1713) was a time of shifting alliances. In the eighteenth century, during the time of the War of the Spanish Succession, England had sided with The Dutch in opposition against France. An Englishman resident in the Dutch Republic wrote a letter about the Dutch reaction to losses suffered in the War of the Spanish Succession wrote “Dutch armies, allied with the English in…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first factor that led to Charles I losing the First Bishops War was the lack of funding. This was because Parliament had taken control of taxes before the civil war and enjoyed a substantial financial advantage, which also leads to the next factor of the lack of support and discipline from the Parliamentarian forces. Following the outbreak of the Scottish Revolution and Hampden’s case, the ship money yield fell dramatically from 90% collection to 20%. Charles tried to deal with the Scots, without recourse to Parliament. Facing financial problems and not wanting to recall Parliament, Charles negotiated the Truce of Berwick in 1639 agreeing to a meeting of a Scottish assembly as Edinburgh and Parliament as well as disbandment of both armies. On his return, Wentworth tried to advise Charles to call an English Parliament as the only means of raising money to fight the scots. However, Charles refused to compromise when he met with the Parliament and he dissolved it determined to face the Scots in the field. Alongside the attempt to collect the ship money, Charles had called for a coat and conduct money which was a tax to support the county-trained bands when they had to serve outside their country. It was supposed to provide for food and other expenses such as transport however there was widespread opposition to this.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis XIV was the epitome of an absolute monarch. Through his endless wars, extreme extravagance, and absolute control over taxes and the economy, he set the example for other European powers. His absolute rule brought about both positives and negatives. By building a large army to defend and expand his borders, he alienated other empires and created enemies. Placing political power and faith in the nobility helped him rule a vast kingdom but displaced him from the common man. His obsession with being a great conqueror expanded France to its largest in history, but nearly bankrupted the country and resulted in losing more territory than he gained. Although Louis XIV brought many improvements to France, as well as western society, his insatiable lust for war and extravagance caused more harm than good to the French Empire.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Royalty is a term we like to associate with elegance, sophistication, and luxury. They’re the envy of all as they seem to live an extravagant lifestyle filled with exotic trips, an unlimited supply of money, and a stress-free life. But what is often overlooked, is the overwhelming responsibility they have to be the face of a country. Sir George Savile, a member of England’s King Charles II’s Privy Council, attempts to persuade his audience to think of King Charles II as a beloved individual who has suffered greatly, but refused to show it for the sake of his people. Savile succeeds in this by using metaphors, imagery, and allusion.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Enlightenment is touted by modern historians as a time of intellectual and social advancement, an era of optimism and freedom unheard of in earlier times. The era of absolutism is seen as a time of mounting liberty that contributed to the rise of democracy in the Americas and elsewhere. In reality, the "Enlightened Despotism" of the absolutist leaders was more in keeping with the tyrannical rulers of the pre-reformation Holy Roman Empire than with the democratic republic of modern America. Three of the most prominent absolutist leaders were Catherine the Great of Russia, Frederick the Great of Prussia and Louis XIV of France - these three leaders are perfect examples of the avarice, tyranny and lust for power that characterizes the Enlightened Despots.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who rules the Country? The King The rules the King? The Duke (Buckingham) The Rules the Duke? The Devil.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VI and the Nobility

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The power of the Nobility was the most important cause of unrest in the period of 1450 to 1470. ‘How far…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    poetry

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This Victorian poem is about the narrator (a fallen woman), the Lord and Kate. It is a ballad which tells the story from the narrator’s perspective about being shunned by society after her ‘experiences’ with the lord. The poem’s female speaker recalls her contentment in her humble surroundings until the local ‘Lord of the Manor’ took her to be his lover. He discarded her when she became pregnant and his affections turned to another village girl, Kate, whom he then married. Although the speaker’s community condemned the speaker as a ‘fallen’ woman, she reflects that her love for the lord was more faithful than Kate’s. She is proud of the son she bore him and is sure that the man is unhappy that he and Kate remain childless. Some readers think that she feels more betrayed by her cousin than the lord. This poem is a dramatic monologue written in the Victorian era.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    ‘A failure of Charles II’s opponents rather than his own actions defeated the Exclusion movement’. How far do you accept this judgement of the years 1678-85?…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through my studies of this poem, I was unable to find any documentation of the poet, Jim Stevens; therefore I was unable to assess his life and his reasoning behind writing this poem. Because of this I have had to make my own assumption that Jim Stevens might be writing this poem about himself. His lack of publication leaves a rather eerie air to the poem. All I found was purely speculations, of what the poem could mean or why it was written, no assurance.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the middle ages the power of the monarchs was a lot greater than the power of today. For example the monarch would create the laws and taxes the country would obey by there rules and there rules only. The monarch would decide when the country went to war and when Parliament was needed (many problems were caused by the monarchs and Parliament disagreeing). However nowadays our monarchs tend to hand over there power to parliament. Parliament creates the laws, taxes and decides what the country needs. The power of the monarch in 1625 – 49 decreased as Charles I did not consult parliament in what he did. His actions eventually lead the country to a civil war. He believed he could do whatever he wanted as he believed his power came from god. In this essay I will include why Charles ignores the will of parliament, why he started the civil war and if he was responsible for all the murders, rapings, burnings, damage and desolation.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Poetry Essay Prompt

    • 2536 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Prompt: Write a unified essay in which you relate the imagery of the last stanza to the speaker’s view of himself earlier in the poem and to his view of how others see poets.…

    • 2536 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason why war broke out between Charles I Parliament, in 1642 and was due to many reasons which will be discussed. However Charles, belief in the divine right of kings was one of the factors that caused misunderstandings with the Parliament.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    8. How does the poem apply to contemporary life? What passages could serve as satirical commentaries on people’s behavior today?…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays