Preview

Act and Utilitarianism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
677 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Act and Utilitarianism
Assess the view that a religious concept of love is the most difficult to put into practice. (20 Marks)
It can be considered that loving an individual in all circumstances can be a difficult thing to do. Most religions would say that love should be the central theme behind all of our actions. This may be an ideal standard for the world to have. However, would this be applicable in the world of politics, business and jury systems? For example, if love was to be the ruling norm of a jury system, would it be practical for the jury to not send a rapist to prison for his actions? This would be impractical and would put society in danger with such individuals having freedom. This shows that love can be impractical as it may not take into account justice alongside love. However, Joseph Fletcher who devised situation ethics used a working principle which stated ‘Love and Justice are the same, for justice is love distributed nothing else. In this case of the rapist being punished, there would still be justice. However, it would be served with love. Therefore, the conclusion may be to retribute the criminal, but alongside the retribution there would have to be reformation to show the person that their actions were wrong, but at the same time show them that they can change. Therefore, it may be argued that love is practical as it can be flexible in all situations.
On the other hand, Christianity teaches that humans are flawed and as a result of our condition we cannot truly love without spiritual inspiration. This means that in order for an individual to put love into practice this would require help from a super natural power. Jesus illustrates “I am the vine; you are the branches. If you remain in me and I in you, you will bear much fruit; apart from me you can do nothing.” This illustration shows that the same way the branches of a plant are hopeless without the vine (root),

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The essential part of utilitarianism, whether it is Act or Rule, is to promote the greatest overall utility for the given situation. If we look in terms of Utilitarianism, one would be in favor of killing Tom to save the other four children. Even though, Tom would be killed, he would promote overall utility by saving four people through his one body. This reminds me a lot of the Trolley problem we studied in Unit five. They killed one man to save multiple. This may be considered immoral in a way, but according to Act Utilitarianism, the correct choice and the one that promotes overall utility would be to kill Tom and use his body to save the four siblings. In an Act Utilitarian’s mind, they would first think “In what way could I promote the greatest utility for every single person in the situation?” They must then think about the situation. The mother and father could either lose Tom, or they could lose their other four children. The Doctor could either kill Tom and save the four children or let Tom live and watch the others die…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Four Loves, authored by British novelist C.S. Lewis, is often viewed as one of the best books written on the subject of love as it pertains to religion. In the book, Lewis covers many ideas including the four types of love which include: storgé (empathetic love/affection), philia love (the love between friends), Eros (erotic/romantic love), and Agapé (the unconditional ‘God’ love). In this book, Lewis also covers the differences between need and gift love; however, one of the most astounding statements that Lewis makes is in the storgé passage, specifically in the section about affection where he states, “Affection is responsible for nine-tenths of whatever solid and durable happiness there is in our natural lives.” (pg. 53). Lewis also states, "The highest does not stand without the lowest. (pg.9) If affection is part of storgé, which is considered the lowest love, then to obtain the higher loves one must have affection. Furthermore, storgé (commonly referred to as affection) creates stamina in natural relations between people due precisely to that low-level nature it…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I. The primary meaning of the word "love" in Scripture is a "purposeful commitment to sacrificial action for another."…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anthony Flew Belief

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages

    is an inscrutable love." What started as a simple statement "God loves us as a…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Freud and Lewis’s perspectives on love differ because Lewis focuses on God while Freud focuses on self. One on hand, Lewis’s explains that Gods love in man enables him to love unconditionally. For an example, Lewis believed the divine gift love in a man enables him to love what is not naturally lovable – lepers, criminals, enemies and morons. On the other hand, Freud believes on the gratification of self because a man’s beliefs and behavior stem from his own childhood fears and desires. Moreover, Freud and Lewis perspectives on love are tied together because they focus on the affection for family, friends and sexual love; however, Lewis added a fourth category – love of God. Lewis’s response to Freud’s critique on religion is that love does not have an ulterior motive. In my opinion, the viewpoints within “Religion: Why Bother” are self- centered rather than selfless because there has to more than Freud’s type of love; therefore, most circumstances do not revolve around oneself. Because God Is love. Lewis’s perspective on love is more convincing than Freud’s for the reason that Lewis acknowledged that…

    • 362 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are obvious problems with both Act and Rule Utilitarianism. Both theories share the common goal of achieving the greatest happiness for the greatest amount of people. However, it is impossible to measure or compare happiness, as one persons happiness may not necessarily be another’s. And how do we measure intangible gain, such as happiness against material gain, such as money? The root principle is a good concept, but it’s the means to which we arrive at the end that cause the problems. In my opinion, there is a greater problem with Act Utilitarianism versus Rule, because it justifies not only ethical but also unethical actions in order to achieve the desired results. It allows for the abuse of people’s rights, demoralizes and devalues the welfare of individuals if it brings enough happiness to the group. The group is nothing more than many individuals coming together to form a whole, and this group would eventually become just a group of demoralized and devalued people who would resort to any means necessary to get what they want because this is what they would be taught to do under the Act theory. This group would raise their children with these same principles, or lack of them, and the cycle would continue, producing a society that was almost egocentric in nature.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theo 104 Research Paper

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    God gave us two gifts, life and love. God has given us the ultimate gift of love, by sacrificing his only son to give us eternal life. John 3:16 says, "For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish, but have eternal life." God has endless love for us, even though we are sinners by nature, his love is never ending and never changes. John 4:8 says “God is love,” people have different views on what love means to them, but the true meaning of love is what God gives us.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jeremy Bentham was a philosopher, economist, atheist and social reformer. Being a social reformer means that Bentham worked to make a gradual change to society. Being an economist meant that he had knowledge in the social science and discipline of economics. Bentham was a philosopher because he studied ways of thinking about the world. This all had an impact on the way his ideas were influenced. He developed the theory known as Act Utilitarianism. His version of Utilitarianism is referred to as 'Act' Utilitarianism because it states that the principle of utility should be applied to every act performed in each unique situation. Any act is justifiable if it produces 'the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number'. By the principle of utility Bentham meant the 'usefulness' of a situation. The principle states that we should aim to achieve 'the greatest happiness for the greatest number'. Act Utilitarianism depends on each action or each individual dilemma being calculated. According to Act Utilitarianism it is the value of the consequences of the particular act that counts. In 1789 he wrote the book 'An Introduction to the principle of morals and legislation' He believed our main aim in life was to achieve 'happiness' and to avoid 'pain', he wanted to introduce this to society to maximise the amount of happiness produced in certain situations. His theory was made to drive a human being; pain v pleasure. As people are motivated by pleasure and pain is considered evil. As stated in his book: 'Nature has placed mankind under the governance of to sovereign masters, pain and pleasure'. Jeremy Bentham's theory is considered as relativistic; this means that there are no universal norms or rules and that each situation has to be looked at independently because each situation is different. It is also thought of as a teleological theory. This means that it is concerned with the end purpose or goal of an action in this case it should always be happiness. Bentham's…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some may argue that the greatest love story to date is Romeo and Juliet: the love; the passion; the unlikely pair. Although Romeo and Juliet may be a great tale of two unlikely lovers, it could never compare to Our Christian Story. However, throughout these two renowned stories, elements of love and sacrifice can be demonstrated frequently. Out of love, we are able to make sacrifices for those whom which we hold dear to our hearts; when humanity betrayed God by consuming fruit from the forbidden tree, He displayed an unconditional love by sending His only son, Jesus Christ, to absolve us from sin. This represents a vital bond of love that has, over time, remained between God and humanity, but to experience this bliss we must freely embrace…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cruciform love: conforming to the voluntary self-giving and self-emptying regard for others (Rom 3:25; 4: 25; 5:6-11; 8:3, 17, 32; 15:3).…

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act Utilitarianism

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The theory of Utilitarianism was first developed by Jeremy Bentham who was a philosopher of the 18th century. Bentham developed this theory to create a modern and rational approach to morality which would suit the changing society.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Utilitarianism theory supports individual capability to foresee the costs of an act. A Utilitarian considers the decision of giving the best profit to a large number of people; this is known to be ethically correct.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    God Is Love vs Sonnet 116

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “Love” has been experienced, examined, converted for entertainment, manipulated, shaken, and stirred innumerable times through the ages, as humanity attempts to reign in the profound concept. Mankind was created to participate in a love affair with the Creator, and even those who don’t believe in Him still feel desire for the love only He can provide. With regards to Christianity, the fact that “God so loved the world” seems to be ingrained in the church, but His love can nonetheless feel intangible and semi-present. Therefore, when God’s love feels distant–or is not believed in, people try to fill this ache through other means, namely each other. What is then found is an idealized love--created by people--which mimics the love of God but focuses on the satisfaction of the individual. Shakespeare’s “Sonnet 116” represents this secular vision of ideal love, but as Benedict XVI reveals in “God is Love,” it is ultimately only a shadowy, reflected image of God’s passion that cannot be fully manifested amongst sinful people.…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    9.What is the role of love in the redemption of an individual and/ or of a society?…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism

    • 1278 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In A Critique of Utilitarianism, Bernard Williams argues that when following a Utilitarian approach for moral dilemmas, Utilitarianism might have us sacrifice or modify our moral integrity. Williams explains this argument with a hypothetical execution situation with protagonist Jim. Jim, who is a botanical expeditionary, accidentally wanders in the central square of a small South American town. There, he finds twenty Indians tied up in a row, with several armed soldiers standing in front of them. The captain in charge of the soldiers, Pedro, is ready to execute the Indians for protesting against the government. However, Jim is a foreigner and is honored by the captain. Because of this special occasion, Pedro gives Jim the option to shoot and kill one Indian. If Jim accepts, the other nineteen Indians can go free, if not, Pedro will shoot all twenty like intended. The Indians beg Jim to accept the offer and shoot one of them. Now, Jim is faced with a difficult decision whether to shoot one Indian or let Pedro shoot all of them. What should Jim do? It is not sure what the right course of action is, but four different theories could help him decide. These theories are: the Divine Command theory, Cultural Relativism, Kantianism, and Utilitarianism. In this paper, I will present these four theories and their suggestions for Jim’s right course of action, the faults in these theories, and how Utilitarianism is morally correct in this case.…

    • 1278 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays