Preview

America: A Narrative History notes Ch. 1

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2969 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
America: A Narrative History notes Ch. 1
From Empire to Independence



Colonies became more important for the British mainland economy
Colonies experienced agricultural and commercial growth but remained diverse in composition and outlook o Generally adverse to cooperative efforts

The Heritage of War




Most Americans submitted willingly to the English government due to their alliance in French and Indian War o However, American nationalism was building
 Brutalities of English soldiers heightened sense of separate identity
 English soldiers were inept at frontier fighting; initial respect for them was lost
 English disrupted the colonies’ illegal but necessary molasses trade with the French West Indies
 Writs of assistance (unspecific search warrants) and naval patrols
 Boston merchants hired James Otis to fight writs of assistance; he lost but revealed that writs of assistance were like slavery
Why was revenue needed? o Management and defense of new global possessions o Payment of war debt o Expansion of colonial administration and defense

British Politics




Nearly every politician was a Whig: a name given to those who had opposed James II, led the Glorious
Revolution of 1688, and secured Protestant succession o Champions of individual liberty and parliamentary supremacy o Whiggism drifted into complacency: dominant group of landowners became concerned with personal wealth George III wanted to limit Whigs so ousted William Pitt as prime minister and established “king’s friends” o Government became unstable. Ministries rose and fell usually because someone offended the king, etc. o Colonial policy remained marginal to the chief concerns of British politics. The result was inconsistency and vacillation followed by stubborn inflexibility.

Western Lands


Royal Proclamation of 1763: issued by king, drew an imaginary line along the crest of the Appalachians, beyond which settlers were forbidden to go, in response to Pontiac’s Rebellion o also

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    APUSH Essay Qs 1980 07

    • 8795 Words
    • 56 Pages

    colonies. Assess this change with regard to TWO of the following in the period between 1763 and 1775…

    • 8795 Words
    • 56 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    French and Indian War DBQ

    • 661 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The French defeat in the war paved way to the expansion of British territory throughout the eastern coastline (Document A). The colonists began to settle on the land beyond the Appalachian Mountains, which resulted in tensions with the Natives who primarily resided there. Canassatego, chief of the Onondaga Nation of the Iroquois Confederacy, delivered a speech to the representatives of Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Virginia. In the speech, he speaks with an accusatory tone as he is angered by the unrightfully settling of the American colonists (Document B). He sees the white settlers as people who spoil his hunting and addresses to the representatives that they know the colonists have no right to settle in the Natives' land. Because of this speech and Pontiac's Rebellion, Britain was forced to implement the Proclamation Line of 1763, which prevented American…

    • 661 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Boston tea party the British passed what was called the intolerable acts. This acts punished the colonist and made them pay for the tea they destroyed (doc 4). The British thought that this was the final straw and the colonist would finally listen. This drove the British to keep putting pressure on the colonist and made them eventually just explode. When the British kept on with these acts they pushed the colonist to their breaking point and since the British were already making so much money it was clear King George just got greedy. (doc…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sugar and molasses were important commodities for Britain since they were its source of revenue from the colonies. The British West Indies were originally the colonists’ main molasses provider; however the colonists bought molasses from foreign markets where the commodity was cheaper. Because the colonists depended on other countries, the British government passed the Molasses Act in 1733, which implemented a tax of six pence per gallon on molasses bought from non-British colonies. The British hoped that the high tax would persuade the colonists to buy molasses from the British West Indies. In addition, the Molasses Act was supposed to help the West Indies gain profits and raise revenue to pay off the debt from the French and Indian War in 1763. Nonetheless, it was never seriously enforced because the colonists found ways to avoid paying the tax such as smuggling molasses and bribing custom officials.…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although American colonists always tried to negotiate the contentious policies which contradicted their principles with the British Parliament, the crown did not leave much room for the discussion fueling the Anglo-American debate with a stubborn constitutional position; with a ridiculous notion as virtual representation; with a large British army that limited the economic development of the country; with the unjust acts that forced to shell out revenues from the colonies;…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the introduction in William Pitts speech on the Stamp Act, although Pitt firmly believed that Parliament had the right to legislate for the colonies, they did not have the right to tax them.3 In his speech, Pitt fought that it was not reasonable for Parliament to levy taxes on the colonies without representation for the colonies within Parliament while making decisions that would affect the colonies. He argued that the “greater must rule the less; but so rule it, as not to contradict the fundamental principles that are common to both”4, meaning that Britain should rule the colonies, but they had the obligation to treat them fairly. Pitt goes on to make the point that the British could force the Americans to accept the Stamp Act, but it would still be unfair and unreasonable. Pitt does not come in front of the House with multiple examples of cases or laws that prove how and why the Stamp Act is unjust; he only comes with one example, Chester and Durham. Pitt uses the Chester and Durham case to show that “even under arbitrary reign, parliaments were ashamed of taxing people without their consent and allowed them representatives”5. He believes that the Americans are right for revolting against the Stamp Act because it takes away from the…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Meant to limit naval construction and prevent an arms race of the powers following World War I…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introduction In the book America, by E.R. Frank, presents a personal narrative of a man’s journey through the foster care system, and how it affected his mental health. The author’s major premise is to highlight the disparities in the foster care system and how those disparities affect the children’s mental health and future outcomes. The author’s point of view is to offer sympathy and empathy to the families involved and offer opportunities for advocacy and awareness. The author’s point of view is transferred into the content of the book to contribute to further learning and advocacy for change.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But it wasn’t only the British militia placed in the American colonies that treated the colonists unfair, but the King of Great Britain was a tyrant, or an unjust ruler who has absolute power in the parliament. Document 7 states, “ The history of the present king of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations [unlawful seizures]... a prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.” This quote thoroughly explains how the King of Great Britain was a tyrant and unfit for this role in the parliament. Another major incident of unfair treatment of the British to the colonists was the Olive Branch Petition. The Olive Branch Petition was a written document that asked the British to cause peace with the colonists, but the British were stubborn and refused to accept the petition. Document 6 exclaims,” No man was a warmer wisher for a peaceful settlement than myself before the fatal nineteenth of April, 1775 (Battle at Lexington and Concord), but the moment the event of that day was made known, I rejected the hardened, sullen tempered [King of England] forever.” This quote shows how the colonists want to create peace with the British, but since they killed many of their family and friends and shed blood on the colonies, they are slowly losing their…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1650, the Navigation Acts effectuated mercantilism, but the colonists were permitted to have their own public legislature among other policies as long as goods were shipped and trade was limited to Britain to encourage its prosperity. In George Washington’s 1755 letter (document C), he expresses his want to serve in the French and Indian War, hoping to contribute to the desired victory. Following the 1763 victory, a reverend’s sermon (document E), very jubilantly thankful about the French and Indian War outcome proclaims the greatness of Britain, and how Britain will make colonies greater than before, when the French occupied the continent. However, the disdain for Britain also grew. A Massachusetts soldier in 1759 (document D), documents the social superiority held by English soldiers, and is upset by the inferior and poor treatment he is receiving in contrast to his English counterparts, and looks forward to returning home. The discussion of the British Order in Council shortly after the end of the French and Indians War (document F) emphasizes keeping the colonies in order, by issuing the Proclamation Line of 1763 to prevent colonists from moving further, for it would be more difficult to source money from dispersion, and that extreme measures including military enforcement to source as much finances as possible to profit Britain, and alleviate its…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    French and Indian War Dbq

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The political aspect would change when the British would start taxing the colonies to pay of debt accumulated by the war. Just like James Ottis said, “No taxation without representation,” The colonies agree with the statement and believed they had the right to be represented. If they had representation, it would have been virtual, instead of direct. With direct representation the colonies would be able to overpower the government and vote for someone with their interests. The colonists though during this time were not use to the British paying so much attention, because Salutary Neglect happened before the war. This was when they loosely enforced the laws on the colonists. Other then the British now enforcing laws, the colonists also did not appreciate when they declared the Proclamation of 1763. Canassatego, chief said, “We must insist on your removing them…” They set the proclamation to keep the Indians happy. This helped prevent another uproar like Pontiacs Rebellion, and also did not allow colonists to move westward. Also, during the war to keep the Iroquois Indians pleased, Franklin called the Albany Congress into plan.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Foreshadowing the Revolution

    • 3254 Words
    • 14 Pages

    By the 1760’s the colonies were becoming more and more discontented with the influence of Great Britain. The Seven Years War left Britain in a difficult situation. With an army in the new world and debt to be paid, Britain was forced to impose a number of taxes and policies on the new world colonists. These policies would help Britain maintain a military in the new world and pay off debt, but ultimately spelled the doom of their hold on the North American colonies. The policies infuriated the colonists. It was only a matter of time before the colonists did something about it.…

    • 3254 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    American heroism is a term that started to show itself in the early years of the creation of America as a nation and before hand when America was first founded and explored as a frontier. Heroism defined by the Oxford English Dictionary is simply, Great Bravery (Oxford, 2013). Heroism only consists of someone doing something brave, being courageous in the face of danger being someone who other people want to follow and emulate. Heroism in itself is the basis for American heroism but with the addition of American in the beginning of the term it also adds something to the definition as well. American heroism demands civilization or becoming civilized in itself to be the proper form of American heroism. It can not be American heroism unless civilization is already present or is there for the development of civilization. In both D. W. Griffith’s 1915 film, The Birth of a Nation and James Fenimore Cooper’s 1826 novel, The Last of the Mohicans, American heroism is at the forefront of the plot but only due to the rising development of civilization of the characters, settings, and plot. The definition of civilization by the Oxford English Dictionary is, the process by which a society or place reaches an advanced stage of social development and organization (Oxford, 2013). Civilization is not the sole part of American heroism but it is a major point for it’s creation and continued use in the development of American culture. America was developing itself as a nation, while gaining both populace and industry. It began to model itself after many European countries and using their influence on development, implemented civilization as a critical factor for their own form of heroism, American heroism.…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    independence from britain

    • 2136 Words
    • 7 Pages

    colonies. James Otis Jr., a Harvard-educated lawyer, argued that Parliament had no right to tax…

    • 2136 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Dryden

    • 2309 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Buckingham took an active part in prosecuting those implicated in the Popish Plot, and accused the lord chief justice of favouring the Roman Catholics. A writ was issued for Buckingham’s arrest, but it was never served. He promoted the return of Whig candidates to Parliament and constituted himself the champion of the dissenters. Buckingham, however, separated himself from the Whigs on the exclusion question, probably on account of his dislike of the Duke of Monmouth (Absalom) and the Earl of Shaftesbury. He was, however, later restored to the king’s favour.…

    • 2309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics