Arguing for Drug Testing Policy
Life Support, Inc.
Interoffice Memorandum To: Jane Doe
From: John Smith
Date: April 27th, 2013
Subject: Agreement with Idea to Implement Drug-Testing Policy
This memo is in response to your recent e-mail in regards to random drug testing. I believe that implementing this policy would be extremely beneficial to our company as a whole. This is for the following reasons: financial savings, workplace safety, and to maintain our reputation.
Financial Savings
It is important that we strive to maintain a safe and effective work environment for every single one of our employees. It is estimated that workplace accidents related to drugs have costs employers in the United States $75 to 100 billion dollars per year. Those who abuse are also six times more likely to file worker’s compensation claim and use 16 times the amount of health benefits as their fellow employees who do not use drugs. (http://www.employmentdrugtesting.com/screening.html_) Not ensuring that our employees are drug-free could end up costing our company a great deal of money in the long run if an employee under the influence injures themself or another employee while on the job here at Life Support, Inc.
One might argue that implementing this drug-testing policy would actually cost our company more money due to the cost of the drug tests. However, the cost of a drug test cannot compare to the higher cost of worker’s compensation or lawsuits to this company that could potentially occur due to an employee under the influence while on the job. Spending money on these drug tests is a preventative measure to keep our company from spending more money in the long run.
Workplace Safety
It is absolutely vital that Life Support, Inc. provides an environment in which our employees come to work knowing that we value their safety. The facts and figures mentioned above suggest that employees under the influence of drugs are extremely likely to cause and produce accidents in the workplace.
Interoffice Memorandum To: Jane Doe
From: John Smith
Date: April 27th, 2013
Subject: Agreement with Idea to Implement Drug-Testing Policy
This memo is in response to your recent e-mail in regards to random drug testing. I believe that implementing this policy would be extremely beneficial to our company as a whole. This is for the following reasons: financial savings, workplace safety, and to maintain our reputation.
Financial Savings
It is important that we strive to maintain a safe and effective work environment for every single one of our employees. It is estimated that workplace accidents related to drugs have costs employers in the United States $75 to 100 billion dollars per year. Those who abuse are also six times more likely to file worker’s compensation claim and use 16 times the amount of health benefits as their fellow employees who do not use drugs. (http://www.employmentdrugtesting.com/screening.html_) Not ensuring that our employees are drug-free could end up costing our company a great deal of money in the long run if an employee under the influence injures themself or another employee while on the job here at Life Support, Inc.
One might argue that implementing this drug-testing policy would actually cost our company more money due to the cost of the drug tests. However, the cost of a drug test cannot compare to the higher cost of worker’s compensation or lawsuits to this company that could potentially occur due to an employee under the influence while on the job. Spending money on these drug tests is a preventative measure to keep our company from spending more money in the long run.
Workplace Safety
It is absolutely vital that Life Support, Inc. provides an environment in which our employees come to work knowing that we value their safety. The facts and figures mentioned above suggest that employees under the influence of drugs are extremely likely to cause and produce accidents in the workplace.