Preview

Biology Lab

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
933 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Biology Lab
Shannon Yeh October 28, 2013

Animal Dentition Laboratory Assignment

(Figure 1.) Tooth Sharpness (degrees)

(Figure 2.) Relative Tooth Width (mm.)

Results:
The dental formula is a convention used by mammalogists to determine the tooth number and tooth arrangements. The dental formula is calculated by counting the number of incisors, canines, premolars, and molars present in the upper jaw (one side) and counting the number of incisors, canines, premolars, and molars in the lower jaw (one side). The total number of incisors, canines, premolars, and molars (upper +lower jaw) multiplied by 2 would equal to the total number of teeth present in the mammal. The dental formulas for these three species: coyote (Canis latrans), deer (Odocoileus virginanus), and human (Homo sapien) are all different. The coyote had the dental formula of 3-1-4-2/3-1-4-2 (x2), which produced the total of 40 teeth. The deer had the dental formula of 0-0-3-3/3-1-3-3 (x2), which equaled to 32 teeth. The human species had a smaller number of teeth with the dental formula being 2-1-2-2/2-1-2-2 (x2), which produced a total of 28 teeth. The numbers of molars in the coyote upper and lower jaws were the same as the number of molars in the human (upper + lower jaws). According to the dental formula data, not all skulls have the same numbers of different tooth types in the maxilla and mandible because each skull could have varied number of tooth types.
The coyote (Canis latrans) had the largest skull and the human (Homo sapiens) had the smallest skull. The coyote and deer both had largest teeth while the human species had the smallest teeth. Since the coyote has more teeth in its skull, it would have more occlusal surfaces. The species with the most flat teeth would be human species. Coyotes have the most complex topography on the biting surface because there were a lot of different types of teeth such as sharp incisors and their jaws are larger than humans. The coyote

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Bio Lab

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    subdivision, textile plant, an organic farm, and a mountain lake. We had to find the…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bio Lab 1

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages

    We would automatically assume that the longer the thumb is the higher the chances of it winning and because it has much more strength and mass. On the other hand, reflex, flexibility and strength is other factors also. A man with massive gaming experience or ball game experience may have higher winning possibilities than a man with less experience. Eventually, my hypothesis is the longer the thumb is the better chance he or she will win the thumb wresting game.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Chapter 11

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Premolars: There are four maxillary and mandibular premolars. Premolars are a mix between canines and molars.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lab Write Up

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The tooth formula is a shorthand technique that biologist use to keep track of the teeth on a particular jaw. The formula consisted of two lines, top jaw and bottom jaw, which were used to count how many incisors, canines, premolars, and molar teeth a species had. Species A, Odocoileus virginiaus (white-tailed deer), had a tooth formula of 0033/3133. On the top jaw, the deer had zero incisor and canine teeth but have three of both the premolars and molars. On the bottom jaw, the deer had three incisors, one canine, three premolars, and three molars. Species B, Canis latrans (coyote), had a tooth formula of 3142/3143. On the top jaw, the coyote had three incisors, one canine, four premolars, and two molars. On the bottom jaw, the coyote has three incisors, one canine, four premolars, and three molars. Both the deer and coyote skull were long and skinny towards the nose and mouth. The coyote skull had a much rounder nose than the deer. Species C, Homo sapiens (human), had a tooth formula of 2122/2122. On both the top and bottom jaws, there were two incisors, one canine, two premolars, and two molars. In comparison to the deer and coyote skull, the human was an outcast. The human skull was a short distance from the back of the skull to the front. The human skull was very different in bone structure and longer in height than the deer and coyote skulls.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Diprotodon Research Paper

    • 2995 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The skull contained four molars in each jaw, three pairs of upper incisors, and one pair of lower incisors. From this dentition, we can deduce that the diprotodons were herbivorous like wombats. The Diprotodons were probably browsers, rather than grazers, as their incisors enabled them to strip vegetation from branches. The molars, with their flat surfaces, ground the food before it was…

    • 2995 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Becoming Human Worksheet

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages

    larger Brains short heavy set Body hunters Food Source Why are the teeth of children particularly helpful in providing information about extinct hominids?…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Biology Lab One

    • 352 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dissolved oxygen is oxygen that is trapped in a fluid, such as water. Since virtually every living organism requires oxygen to survive, it is a necessary component of water systems such as streams, lakes and rivers in order to support aquatic life. The dissolved oxygen is measure in units of ppm—or parts per million. Examine the data in Table 2 showing the amount of dissolved oxygen present and the number of fish observed in the body of water the sample was taken from; finally, answer the questions below.…

    • 352 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hominaide

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Like other members of the Paranthropus genus, P. boisei is characterized by a specialized skull with adaptations for heavy chewing. A strong sagittal crest on the midline of the top of the skull anchored the large chewing muscles (temporalis muscles) from the top and side of the braincase to the lower jaw, and thus moved the massive jaw up and down. The force was focused on the large back teeth (molars and premolars). Flaring cheekbones gave P. boisei a very wide and dish-shaped face, creating a larger opening for bigger jaw muscles to pass through and support massive cheek teeth four times the size of a modern human’s. This species had even larger cheek teeth than P. robustus, a flatter, bigger-brained skull than P. aethiopicus, and the thickest dental enamel of any known early human. Cranial capacity in this species suggests a slight rise in brain size (about 100 cc in 1 million years) independent of brain enlargement in the genus Homo.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Your Inner Fish

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Your Inner Fish: A Review of Chapter 4 In Your Inner Fish, a book about the study of evolution in mammals, chapter four is dedicated to the study of teeth. Neil Shubin is explicit in his insistence that teeth are extremely important when studying evolution of the human body. He uses three main points to explain this to the reader. First, through the function of teeth. Then by revealing the anatomy of teeth. And finally by discussing tooth-to-tooth occlusion. Teeth are used to manipulate larger objects so that they may fit into a smaller mouth. Shubin writes ”Mouths are only so big, and teeth enable creatures to eat things that are bigger than their mouths” (Shubin 60). Without teeth creatures would have a smaller variety of options when it came to food choices. Bigger fish could only eat smaller fish and so on. As explained by Shubin “… teeth can be the great equalizer: smaller fish can munch on bigger fish if they have good teeth” (Shubin 60). So we derive from this that teeth can play an important role in the food chain and thus in evolution. However, teeth play a more important part than this. By studying the anatomy of teeth many secrets can be revealed about ancient reptiles and mammals. For instance, Shubin relates that “The bumps, pits and ridges on teeth often reflect the diet” (Shubin 60). By knowing the diet of an ancient creature, it is reasonable to see how a paleontologist and evolutionist can follow the emergence of the omnivore over the carnivore and herbivore. And the hardness of teeth make it the “best-preserved animal we find in the fossil record for many time periods” (Shubin 61). This clue to these ancient animal’s diets can “give us a good window on how different ways of feeding came about” (Shubin 61). So, the shape of the teeth and the general mineral make-up both contribute to the usefulness of teeth to the scientist.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Biology Lab

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages

    8. 10 sympatric and 8 allopatric in North and South Carolina. 14 sympatric and 10 allopatric in Arizona.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Inca Bone Report

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The inter-parietal human skull vault, also known as the cranial vault, is formed by the paired parietal and temporal bones and unpaired frontal, occipital, sphenoid and ethmoid bones.5 The occipital bone is formed from cartilage and membrane.6 The portion may remain separated from the-supra-occipital part by a suture and is called the inter-parietal or inca bone. The supra occipital part ossify by both cartilaginous and inter membranous ossification but inter parietal part by inter membranous ossification only. The segment of supra occipital bone between the highest and superior nuchal lines form the intermediate segment. It ossifies inter membranously and probably never separates from the cartilaginous supraoccipital part. True inter parietal bones or Inca bones are bounded by lambdoid suture or suture mendosa. They were previously known as os incae. Os inter parietal Goethe's ossicles. Inca bone resembles triangular architecture monument designs of Inca tribals of South America (1200-1597 AD). The members of Royal family of Inca tribe had crown like configurations on their head, hence this ossicle has been known as…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    bio 101 lab report

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The object of this experiment is to determine how changing the size of the beak of a finch will affect the population as well as the growth rate of the finch’s beak. The reason for the experiment is to evaluate evolution and how it affects the finch’s population, and how natural selection is always present in life. In this experiment I will show that the finch will continue to evolve until its beak has reached the optimal size for sustaining life, when changing the beak size to a much larger size we will see that the finch will have no need for further evolution of its beak and that its population will become much more stable and consistent throughout the years.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The return of lower jaw (mandible) teeth in G. guentheri after more than 200 million years could make evolutionary biologists reconsider this law.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    teeth. This is because bones are continuously being rebuilt with new bone being formed and also…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    mand tooth# + max tooth # = 33 (to deduce which teeth are in occlusion)…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics