Preview

business law tutorial

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
338 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
business law tutorial
Note: Please produce a written answer for each of the following problem questions using the ILAC approach and bring your answers in print form to your tutorial class on Teaching week 3.
Topics

Topics 1 and 2 – Introducing Law and Exercising Legal Skills
Your preparation

Read Chapters 1-3 of Business Law and attend the Lectures on the first two topics.
Problem 1:
There are a number of websites devoted to the republic issue. Sites such as that of the Australian Republican Movement (www.republic.org.au) support Australia becoming a republic, and sites such as that of Australians for a Constitutional Monarchy (www.norepublic.com.au) oppose such a move. Read these and other such websites and prepare a balanced answer to the question: Should Australia become a republic?
Problem 2:
In 1998 the Federal Parliament appointed a special committee to look into the magpie problem. After months of serious investigation, the committee presented its report to Parliament. The following is an extract from the report: ‘We have heard a great deal of evidence and we are satisfied that there is a need for strong legislation to protect the Australian public from magpies during the breeding season ... None of the provisions of the proposed new Act will apply to magpies kept by members of the public as pets ...’. In August 1998 Parliament passes the Magpie (Protection of Public) Act. The Act receives Royal assent on 15 August 1998. Section 3 of the Act provides that ‘Any householder, flat occupier or other person who permits a magpie to remain on his property at any time during the months of August, September or October without reporting the matter to the Department of Environment and Conservation shall be guilty of an offence.’ There is no reference in the Act to magpies kept as pets. During October 1998 Jerry owned a pet magpie which he kept in a cage at his Brisbane home. He has not notified the Department of Environment and Conservation that he owns a magpie. Has Jerry

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law Ch11-15

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Dorris Reed, the plaintiff, purchased a home from Robert King. Robert King and his real estate agent did not tell Dorris Reed that a woman and her four children were murdered 10 years ago, because the murder would affect the value of the home. Dorris Reed, however, did find out about the murder from a neighbor and sued Robert King and his real estate agent for rescission and damages. Dorris Reed paid $76,000 for the home but the value of the house, once the murder was taken into consideration, was only worth $65,000. Due to Dorris Reed failing to state a cause of action, the trial court sided with Robert King and his real estate agent. Dorris Reed appealed. Fraud is being looked at in the case of Reed vs. King. There are five elements to proving fraud, 1) material misrepresentation, 2) facts/knowledge, 3) intent, 4) reliance, and 5) damage (quoted from text book). Robert King and his real estate agent hid the first and second element of fraud. They knew about the murders and did not present Dorris Reed with this information, which would have affected Dorris Reed decision to buy the house. However, when dealing with the selling of real property, the question of materially is the main issue. Materiality is based on three conditions, 1) the gravity of the harm inflicted by nondisclosure, 2) the fairness of imposing a duty of discovery on the buyer as an alternative to compelling disclosure, and 3) the impact on the stability of contracts if rescission is permitted (citation from text book). Even though murder is horrible and it would affect a person’s judgment on buying that particulate house, there is no evidence to support Dorris Reed claim that the murder would in fact affect the market value of the house. The judgment was later reversed because Dorris Reed was able to present enough evidence to show that history can affect the value of property.…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business law

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Scott entered into a unilateral contract with Hume. Scott used the large signboard to offer $1000 to the ballplayer who hit a homerun over the sign. This is a promise for an act. Hume completed the performance of the act by hitting the homerun over the sign and therefore the unilateral contract between them was formed.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    case brief---Gregory, a comedy writer, entered into a contract with Wessel, a comedian. The contract provided that Gregory would provide Wessel with a 15 minute monologue for his upcoming appearance on the comedy hour and Wessel will pay $250 to Gregory. All performers could make $500 per appearance on the comedy hour. and when Wessel was scheduled to aper on the comedy hour, Gregory informed him that he was unable to provide the monologue, because last time Wessel was asked to make special guest appearances at three local comedy clubs performance during the comedy hour. and Wessel bought lawsuit to Gregory for beach of contract and request damages of $1250.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What methods of ADR are available to pursue? Which of these ADR methods do you think is the most appropriate? Explain your answer.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australia is a monarchy because it was colonized by the British in 1778. With them, they brought their lifestyles, culture and system of government. This type of government has remained up to this day. The reason why some Australians say that we should become a republic is because they believe that we have become independent as a country and own our own name, instead of being another part of Brittan. They believe that we need a change, considering that Australia has changed greatly since 1778.…

    • 809 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law Quiz

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    2. A long arm statute permits a court to obtain jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Business Law

    • 2364 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Walker, W. (1910). American Law of Real Estate Agency. New York: W.H. Anderson Co Publishers…

    • 2364 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    BUSINESS LAW QUESTIONS

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. A state's constitution can't conflict with the U.S. Constitution or a federal law.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A republic will eliminate a constitutional monarchy that has worked incredibly well for Australia. A constitutional monarchy system of government has brought great stability, cohesion and positive outcomes to Australia and its entire population for over 100 years. In this time, Australia has grown from an undeveloped land mass to one of the world’s fastest-growing, strongest and wealthiest countries in the world. Australia has a higher GDP per capita than the United States today because of its constitutional monarchy (eNotes, 2011). Also, since 1945, hundreds of thousands of immigrants have left unstable republics for Australia and loved the social and political stability they found in it under a constitutional monarchy. A republic would only restrain Australia from reaching its full potential and ruin previous and current substantial growth as a country. Australia’s constitutional monarchy system of government is the only way for Australia if it is to continue in its success.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that Australia should not become a republic. I think that there would be no point in becoming a republic, because we live without the intervention of the Queen at the moment, so becoming a republic would achieve nothing. If we were to become a republic, we would lose the support of England in times of war, famine or other disaster. I think that becoming a republic would achieve nothing, lose our links with England and waste the parliament's time when they should be concerned with more important issues.<br><br>If we were to become a republic, the governor general would be replaced by a president who would have the same powers and responsibilities as our Governor General, so only the name and the person holding the position would change, wasting important parliament time and achieving absolutely nothing. At the present time, there is nothing wrong with the constitution, and if there was anything wrong with it, it could be changed by referendum, once again proving that becoming a republic is pointless. Currently, we are not tied down at all by the monarchy, and although the Queen does have the power to intervene in the running of our country, she doesn't out of tradition, and therefore, probably never will, bound by the tradition. <br><br>If we become a republic, we would lose valuable ties with England and perhaps part of our heritage that goes with it. England can support us through many unfortunate events that we may face and England, being on the other side of the world may not, putting them in a position to offer us financial, military or other support. If we were to become a republic would we forget that the English were the first people to colonise our country, and instead of learning about the colonisation of our country, learn about the way in which we broke free from England and the monarchy? We owe our existence in Australia to the English and we are treated very well by them - they let us manage our own affairs and don't interrupt in the running…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    business law

    • 343 Words
    • 1 Page

    Nancy Johnston, appellant, brought suit against her employer, Del mar Distributing Co., Inc., appellee, alleging that her employment had been wrongfully terminated. Del Mar filed a motion for summary judgment in the trial court alleging that appellant’s pleadings failed to state a cause of action. After a hearing on the motion, the trial agreed with Del Mar and granted its motion for summary judgment.…

    • 343 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law Final

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ruth carelessly parks her car on a steep hill, leaving the car in neutral and failing to engage the parking brake. The car rolls down the hill, knocking down an electric line. The sparks from the broken line ignite a grass fire. The fire spreads until it reaches a barn one mile away. The barn houses dynamite, and the burning barn explodes, causing part of the roof to fall on and injure a passing motorist, Jim. Can Jim recover in negligence from Ruth? Why or why not?…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law

    • 5650 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning, Inc. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part.…

    • 5650 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In order to determine whether Y and Z are subject to the proposed law, the…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

    d: The following is the reason. The advertisement and website created an express warranty that the trip would include all expenses, three meals a day, and a room with a queen bed.Jones entered into the contract based on a mistake of material fact which the hotel knew to be untrue and under the UCC written disclaimers must be conspicuously displayed to be valid.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays