Preview

CCJS 370 Study Guide

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1387 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
CCJS 370 Study Guide
Batson v. Kentucky (1986)
-1986: not okay to remove someone from a jury based on race, reversed Swain vs. Alabama
What is the “one drop rule”?
- people make a statement based off of biological differences, meaning any person with "one drop of Negro blood" was considered black
Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
- justice is colorblind, unlawful to separate people on the color of the skin
Swain v. Alabama (1965)
- if you are a juror that is black we can remove from the jury
Hernandez v. New York (1991)
- okay to remove bilingual jurors from courtroom, no bias from interpreter
Loving v. Virginia (1967)
- invalidated laws prohibiting interracial marriage
U.S. v. DeBerry (1996)
-carrying a gun
Delaware v. Prouse (1979)
- Court held that police may not stop motorists without any reasonable suspicion to suspect crime or illegal activity, to check their driver's license and auto registration
Brown v. Texas (1979)
- the Court determined that the defendant's arrest in El Paso County, Texas for a refusal to identify himself, after being seen and questioned in a high crime area, was not based on a reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing and thus violated the Fourth Amendment.
Deontological v. Teleological theory
- judge each action in itself and not on consequences, never okay to profile even if it leads to more arrests, Emmanuel kant
Immanuel Kant v. John S. Mill
- consequential, what are the consequences, judging on consequences and not action, utilitarianism, John stewart Mill
Burgess “Zones”
-one of the earliest theoretical models to explain urban social structures,
Commuter zone Residential zone Working class zone Zone of transition Factory zone Central business district

Collective Efficacy
- defined as social cohesion among neighbors combined with their willingness to intervene on behalf of the common good, is linked to reduced violence.
Meaning of “Majesty, Justice, Mercy”, Douglas Hay
-social control, covert, crack/cocaine

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    e. Court of Appeals found the search to be unconstitutional, concluding that after the occupants were arrested the vehicle and its contents were "safely within the exclusive custody and control of the police."…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although an arrest warrant was procured against the petitioner, he claims that the evidence seized from his home was done so without a search warrant, violating his 4th Amendment rights.…

    • 4749 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John W. Terry (the “Petitioner”), was stopped and searched after seemingly casing a store for robbery. Terry was approached by the officer who decided to search him verses questioning. Synopsis of rule of law says that an officer may search for weapons without a warrant, without probable cause, especially if the individual is believed to be armed and dangerous. From the officers observation he believed that they were casing the store for a potential robbery, due to the nature of the situation the officer decided to quick search before questioning which led to a concealed weapon being found.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Include contemporary examples ( within the last 10 years ) of ethnicity-based jury nullification. Note: you can use news articles ]…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The appellant was in violation of Texas Penal Code 38.02(a) “which makes it a criminal act for a person to refuse to give his name and address to an officer who has lawfully stopped him and requested the information”. The appellant claimed that the officers were in violation of his first, fourth, fifth, and fourteenth amendment of the Constitution. His right to peacefully assemble, his search and seizure rights, his rights in criminal cases, and his civil rights. The application of the Texas Penal Code to detain the appellant and require him to identify himself did violate the Fourth Amendment because Officer Venegas and Officer Sotelo lacked any reasonable suspicion that the appellant was engaging or had engaged in criminal acts. The appellant can’t be punished for refusing to identify himself so the conviction was…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue brought into question in the Terry vs. Ohio case in 1968 involved a police officer, McFadden, who was patrolling the area in normal clothes. He came across two men pacing the area suspiciously and glancing into a store. He the watched them meet at a street corner frequently where they were joined by another man. After watching them do this approximately twenty-four times he approached the group and asked them their names. He patted down the overcoat that the man was wearing and felt a revolver, which he then removed. The defense argued the issue to be admissibility of evidence uncovered by an improper search and seizure. They argued that the Fourth Amendment protects the people despite where they are; at home or on the streets. It…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lago Vista Case

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Atwater v City of Lago Vista (2001) was a case concerning the fourth amendment. This case was where the defendant Atwater was arrested for a seat belt violation. O’Connor wrote the dissent that the arrest was unreasonable. O’Connor stated “…pointless indignity’ that served no discernible state interest and yet holds that her arrest was constitutionally permissible (Electronic Privacy Information Center, 2005).” She implies that if an officer believes someone committed a crime in their presence they can arrest the accused person. This in O’Connor’s opinion presents an issue with the precedence it sets. To her it seems that police officers can use this to explore options that would be otherwise not permitted without an arrest.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: In 1896 Henry Williams, a black man was indicted for murder by a grand jury composed entirely of white men in Washington County, Mississippi. An all-white petit jury subsequently convicted him and imposed a death sentence. The defendant argued that both the indictment and trial violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because the laws of the state Mississippi were discriminatory and thus, disqualified blacks from serving on a jury.…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    case study

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Case Signifance: The 4th amendment prohibits the unlawful search and seizure of resident belonging to citizens of the United States of America.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Supreme Court heard the case and overturned the decision citing the precedent set in the Terry vs. Ohio case. It stated that Detaining appellant to require him to identify himself constituted a seizure of his person subject to the requirement of the Fourth Amendment that the seizure be "reasonable."(Cf. Terry v. Ohio). The Supreme Court also stated that the officer’s actions were not justified on the ground that they had a reasonable suspicion, based on objective facts, that he was involved in criminal activity. The Supreme Court overturned the conviction.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4th Amendment Case Study

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ohio, in Criminal Procedures states although he agrees with the seizing and the frisk of the petitioner that lead to guns found was a valid search, understanding how the seizure and search came about is mysterious. According to Justice Douglas, for the search and seizure to be constitutional, the police officer had to have “probable cause” to “believe that (a) a crime was committed or (b) a crime was in the process of being committed or (c) a crime was about to be committed” (331). However, the opinion of the court denies the existence of probable cause, knowingly that the officer did not have probable cause to search the petitioners. If a warrant was to be filed to allow the search, the magistrate would not issue it simply because the officer cannot act if there is no probable cause (331-332). I do disagree with Justice Douglas’ Dissenting Opinion on the case, simply based off the reasons that the officer witnessed the perpetrators passing by the same store repeatedly and looking inside through the…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (11). That quote is from “Utilitarianism” written by John Stuart Mill. Mill is noted in history as a man who pushed for radical change of social and legal principles using Utilitarianism as his guide. That quote sums up his belief in that theory. In this essay I will be discussing Mill, the theory of Utilitarianism and how that theory relates to contemporary ethical issues.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Since the 1990’s, Major League Baseball has been tainted by the “steroid era,” with over 127 players admitting to or being charged for performance-enhancing drug usage. As records have been shattered, books have been published, and players have confessed to their exploits, these drugs have made society question the legitimacy of America’s favorite pastime. One of the game’s greatest, Hank Aaron, set the all time homerun record in 1974. Thirty-three years later, Barry Bonds tied this record, and shortly after was indicted for lying under oath about his alleged use of steroids in the BALCO scandal. An example of two monumental milestones, both affected by the use of illegal drugs, raises concerns about ethics and morality in the world of baseball. Though controversy often surrounds the world of athletics, no other topic threatens health, careers, and achievements more than steroid usage.…

    • 2376 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case involves a patrolman stopping a suspected drunk driver who refused to take a blood or breath test. The patrolman that stopped the suspected drunk driver drove him to a hospital and ordered technicians to draw blood from the suspect who was handcuffed without a warrant. This case resulted in a 5-4 ruling that determined immediate blood alcohol testing for determining drunk driving did not excuse the need for a warrant. ” (T)his Court has never retreated from its recognition that any compelled intrusion into the human body implicates significant, constitutionally protected privacy interests.” said Justice Sottomayor. We can take from this case of how the Fourth Amendment is still needed today by seeing how the patrolman abused his power and forced the hospital technicians to draw blood when the man…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fourth Amendment

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Arizona (1978), the police collected evidence for four days after the suspect’s apprehension and the death of a police officer at the time of the arrest. He was convicted for murder, assault and narcotics offences. However, because they collected the evidence without a warrant, the suspect’s conviction on the murder of the police officer and assault charges was reversed by the Arizona Supreme Court, but upheld the narcotics conviction. This is a prime example of where the Fourth Amendment protects against unlawful searches. Even though the evidence was overwhelming proof that the suspect murdered the police officer, it was the responsibility of the police to do their due diligence to conduct the search legally. Had they obtained the proper warrants, the conviction would have still been upheld and the suspect would have been punished for the crime he…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays