Compare Aristotle’s Claim That Man Is a ‘Political Animal’ with Hobbe’s Claim That the State of Nature Is a State of War. Essay Example
Compare Aristotle’s Claim that Man is a ‘Political Animal’ with Hobbe’s Claim that the State of Nature is a State of War.
Noah Park Ever since the existence of a civilization, the fundamental question of how and why; to identify and explain the human’s nature and how man is ought to live, has been the key element in philosophical world. Many philosophers provided and made public of how they viewed this world as, and the human in it, and experimented themselves with their approaches, however, no philosophers could possibly bring forth the same views as other philosophers nor yield an answer which do not leave a sense of doubt in our mind. None of the theories were incorrect, but none of them were right in the sense that even two theories which seem contrary, had relevant point to prove. Aristotle and Thomas Hobbes’ also had two contrasting views towards this world. Aristotle and Hobbes both had the same uncertainty to deal with, ‘What is in humans’ nature and what is political?’ although they have managed to reach to the answer entirely in different manners. Aristotle (322-384), considered one of the greatest intellectual figures of Western history was born in Macedonia (Biography, 2010). In 367, Aristotle moves to Athens and joined the Academy of Plato (428-348) and became a pupil of Plato (ibid.). Aristotle’s view on politics tended to focus on the relationship between the ‘polis’ and the happiness which he refers as ‘Eudemonia’ of individuals. To achieve ‘eudemonia,’ the good life, it takes more than simply attaining your desire but involvement of reason and rationality (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (SEP), 2010). He claims in addition that no other thing than eudemonia can be the ultimate goal of human and to achieve it, man needs to engage in activities of rational part of its soul. Then how does this concept of eudemonia relate to Aristotle’s view of politics? The modern word we use as ‘political’ originates from Ancient Greek-same
Noah Park Ever since the existence of a civilization, the fundamental question of how and why; to identify and explain the human’s nature and how man is ought to live, has been the key element in philosophical world. Many philosophers provided and made public of how they viewed this world as, and the human in it, and experimented themselves with their approaches, however, no philosophers could possibly bring forth the same views as other philosophers nor yield an answer which do not leave a sense of doubt in our mind. None of the theories were incorrect, but none of them were right in the sense that even two theories which seem contrary, had relevant point to prove. Aristotle and Thomas Hobbes’ also had two contrasting views towards this world. Aristotle and Hobbes both had the same uncertainty to deal with, ‘What is in humans’ nature and what is political?’ although they have managed to reach to the answer entirely in different manners. Aristotle (322-384), considered one of the greatest intellectual figures of Western history was born in Macedonia (Biography, 2010). In 367, Aristotle moves to Athens and joined the Academy of Plato (428-348) and became a pupil of Plato (ibid.). Aristotle’s view on politics tended to focus on the relationship between the ‘polis’ and the happiness which he refers as ‘Eudemonia’ of individuals. To achieve ‘eudemonia,’ the good life, it takes more than simply attaining your desire but involvement of reason and rationality (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (SEP), 2010). He claims in addition that no other thing than eudemonia can be the ultimate goal of human and to achieve it, man needs to engage in activities of rational part of its soul. Then how does this concept of eudemonia relate to Aristotle’s view of politics? The modern word we use as ‘political’ originates from Ancient Greek-same